Obviously Baudrillard drives a BMW... 😅😂 But really this is 101 psychology. The girl who buys the VL hand bag wants to be seen as the girl in the ad itself... OK. Problem. Those voting for their futures are more influenced by the narrative than an in depth equation of what is in the best interest of mankind and right now, insanity wins... Nice discussion🤔😵‍💫😊

'If no one would believe the ideology, no one will reproduce the system' p.s we're in accord

THANK YOU 🙏

Awesome

Popper is so relevant these days. But very few people are familiar with him. We need to popularize these teachings in order to help protect the open society. It might even be useful in deprogramming MAGA ‘cultists’. There is another YT video on Popper vs conspiracy theory. It all fits, based on his rock solid epistemology. S’why I like Popper.

Excellent. Explained really well. Thanks. There is quite a bit of overlap with the Athusserian subject here, too...

would this be a choice between being and meaning/having then

Musk is a sinister profiteer, using mans naivety regarding a simple solution to his self-inflicted deadlocks. The Borg collective calling

Brief and extremely easy to understand!

Great.

Thanks for the summary!

Thank you!

3:30 sounds like what dark Brandon is doing

He's always smoking a cigarette. Lol

Hegel was a total fraud of bullshitting. He hid his bullshit circular metaphysical pseudo reasoning behind heavy, eloquent words and lots of rhetoric trickery.

excellent analysis

Should I read this book?

Loved it! Very clear and informal video, great work!

Looks cool! ✨

What has happened to the other chapters? please we want more

Thanks so much for this!

Please keep doing these!

Thank you!

askin hocaya slmlar

thank you so much, what a clear explanation. you are a lifesaver!!!!

Great video! I'm currently writing a research proposal on approaching interaction design in immersive theatre shows from a cybertextual perspective; I'm wondering if you had read or formed any critiques of the concept of cybertext? I'm a theatre major and are quite new to game studies, so any pointers would be great. Cheers!

Thank you so much for this summary. It was really insightful. Could you please make a summary of Fred Inglis' "Theories of Ideology"?

Bullshit

Thank you so much for this because the essay itself is gibberish to me.

Great explanation and summary of the chapter!

Why did you stopped making videos?

Even while creating a strawman of Marxism, Popper openly admits he is an intellectual acting on behalf of the interests of the "free market." The same neoliberal "free market" that has ravaged the world for the past 50 years. Popper is also incorrect in thinking that capitalism has gradually made itself better through state intervention. Those interventions are concessions to the working class and their struggle for reforms. Many of these struggles were and still are led by -- you guessed it -- Marxists! Remember, the 8 hour day only came to the West once it was implemented by the Bolshevik Revolution. The threat of Bolshevism, that is, the "spectre of communism" that Marx spoke of decades earlier, also influenced the West to grant those concessions. Marxism, theoretically could be falsified, but Popper simply fails to falsify it in his works, despite dedicating so much of them to refuting Marxism and dialectical/historical materialism.

Sloterdijk, der buchbare Redner für dekadente Hochzeiten, die perfekte Selbstdemontage eines Philosophen !

people like poper always pop up in capitalism's boom times and they're always shown to be short sighted and wrong when it inevitably collapses again

Beautiful summary. Kinda reframes the underlying role of religion. Also reminds me of John Vervaeke's work: kzfaq.infovideos

Love your videos.

What does Popper mean by "Open" in an "Open Society." Is he referring to transparency, open borders, or just mentally open to new ideas?

p̾r̾o̾m̾o̾s̾m̾

Great summary!

I would have thought Hegels account of dialectics was was in keeping with his own idea on falsifiability as the hallmark of a scientific proposition. 2 things more. Would Popper consider elite universities in the west as good examples of open societies. Aren't all societies to some extent clised- some more than others and that societies open and close according to the strains they are under. Look at Poppers native Austria which has undergone different phases with the same people involved.

This is great, but the video ends at the exact point where it gets very interesting! Great cliffhanger...

8 seconds. That checks out, cause you cant summarize Kant in 7 seconds. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/a5l-aJabtdfLfmQ.html

Great Video! Im a Philosophy Bachelor with interest in pursuing game studies and reading this text made me painfully aware of some holes in my understanding of semiotics and (post)structuralism, so seeing others discuss it helps fill some gaps.

You saved my life ! thank you so much!

Ok, now I see where Soros and many of the other Davos Hegelian/Marxists are getting screwed up. They start with the dialectic, which is an incomplete (and badly flawed) model of progress. Plato takes one extreme, and the Popper takes the other. The idea being the synthesis will be better. And that's only somewhat true. Depending on the elements you take from both you can actually get the worst of both worlds. But the Hegelians wouldn't care, a synthesis is a synthesis. There's no point of measurement for them against reality, the more important aspect is mashing two opposite things together.

As a huge fan of both zizek and dark souls I gotta say I'm so glad someone out there is making videos like this one. You deserve a much larger audience imo. Thanks for the content

Open society - the biggest threat to the world. Edit - I see you now.

on point summary, really

Lenin was worse than Marx in apology of revolutionary violence, a true founder of totalitarianism.Marx's dictature of the proletariat is not a good concept.Lenin was also influenced by anarchistic ideas

Hegel was an admirer of Luther and of the Prussian state, against kant and kantian philosophers, against Judaism.he didn't inspire Hitler and Alfred Rosenberg