when a gentlemen in a fedora hat and a cool speaking voice is giving a lecture, you grab your popcorn and tea!
@jordanearth112 күн бұрын
I have never used your lights, but I can say after watching this I am a fan.
@plixplop3 күн бұрын
So the lamp lens causes the light source to be effectively far away behind it.
@feelingwonder86986 күн бұрын
I understood nothing this old man said. But the visuals were cool
@mikeliszemitis89466 күн бұрын
super video - i loved every second of it
@KarmaDama6 күн бұрын
You've avoided explaining so many core concepts that the video ends being more confusing than informative. Please write down, revise and edit your scripts before going on camera (you know, like they would on a movie set). The internet doesn't need more confusion. (Or straight up misinformation regarding the reflector loss of light intensity)
@zelalemfikre12036 күн бұрын
Thank you very much. ❤🙏
@michaelbailey41647 күн бұрын
Just use pie plates.. Buster Keaton it. No frills.
@Millie-um2bi8 күн бұрын
The inverse square law is a "law" to describe the spread of photons, not that individual photons get weaker over time. You're not escaping physics or making a light source further away, you're just focusing the light well 🤦
@JoATTech13 күн бұрын
Nice concept. And PB70 is just about 20k EUR. Just ordered 4 😅😅😅
@clct940614 күн бұрын
Christian Berger has done exactly this already 20 years ago.. google cine reflect lighting system..
@suckersklub8218 күн бұрын
very comprehensive explanation, but i must say this: the reason you're not getting exactly half between 10m and 20m (at 04:43 min) is not because you're shooting some light past the reflector. that portion of the light wouldn't be hitting your meter if you were measuring an actually straight path either. the reason is that the reflector is not a perfect mirror, and diverts some of the light away from its straight path to the meter (as we can see from the fact that the reflection in it is slightly blurry). you would get the same reading at 20m with a much larger or a much smaller mirror, too.🤓
@user-ge3xu4fv7m18 күн бұрын
A lot of bullshit verbiage to just say "Collimated"
@madelinehoyle10595 күн бұрын
I'm enjoying this man speaking
@mrfelinsky18 күн бұрын
Legendär! Danke Dedo!
@kingmuhu18 күн бұрын
Its also kinda lame as a lighting compagny uses terrible lighting in their video.😅
@julianreverse7 күн бұрын
They are a manufacturer ... not a lighting company ...
@kingmuhu18 күн бұрын
So, its a beam of light right? Doesnt godox also has a thing like this?
@cagf201316 күн бұрын
Dedolight has had these available for years… Godox copied the concept
@kingmuhu15 күн бұрын
@@cagf2013 aight.
@MrNoipe3 күн бұрын
@@cagf2013 collimated lights existed long before dedolight. used in stage production for like 100 years.
@KyleBartReidFilm18 күн бұрын
Always insightful!
@Dstonephoto18 күн бұрын
These guys are the flat earthers of lighting.
@julianreverse7 күн бұрын
🤦♂🤦♂🤦♂🤦♂
@tomspiers20877 күн бұрын
He got a techincal achievement Oscar in 1991
@MrNoipe3 күн бұрын
@@tomspiers2087 he should give it back
@tomspiers20873 күн бұрын
@@MrNoipe....... says a guy on KZfaq
@MrNoipe3 күн бұрын
@@tomspiers2087 science is real, these optics have been around for 200+ years. sorry bud.
@niknam.19 күн бұрын
"Square Law" works ONLY for POINT light sources! It's a why it does't works for a laser sources, because in that all quantum of ligths moving parallel!
@dishoanimaciones13083 күн бұрын
Actually the inverse square law is a law of physics that applies to any light, but the rule of 1/4 of the intensity at twice the distance begins to be achieved, once the distance is larger than five times the diagonal or radius of the light source, but beyond that distance, no matter if the light source is a 12x12 diffusion frame, the law is met.
@teambroforce19 күн бұрын
the audio has a very annoying noise floor.....
@tafilms2219 күн бұрын
YEIIIII
@jhonore2420 күн бұрын
Isn't this the same thing as a Mole Richardson Molebeam?
@richardsisk177020 күн бұрын
Brilliant. Thank you!
@Yoliver130121 күн бұрын
i love this video... you know what, i'm gonna try this idea using blender 3D =)
@manfrombkk20 күн бұрын
I was thinking the same thing. Let us know your results and how you achieved it. Assuming it’s possible
@ina0020321 күн бұрын
Stunned by this new innovation! Great job dedlolight
@bluerockcomputingllc414322 күн бұрын
Genius technology
@brianii580923 күн бұрын
It's basically a collimated light source
@La4o2121 күн бұрын
Thank you for explaining it in 3 simple words.
@Ajidam20 күн бұрын
WOW U R SOOOOOO SMART
@MrNoipe3 күн бұрын
they try to make it sound like a scientific breakthrough but its just a simple collimated light.
@flaviopresutti23 күн бұрын
Great video Dedo team! I love how natural it look with this mirrors!
@wakingstate9Ай бұрын
Such great products. Sadly so expensive.
@mamumonkan2 ай бұрын
Kinskilicht
@gordonsmith332 ай бұрын
excited to see these at CineGear!
@brittacurkovic2 ай бұрын
Beautiful! Can't wait to try out the tropicals :)
@eddingtonmcclane69632 ай бұрын
Geniuses, both.
@michelediniz93793 ай бұрын
genius. i love dedo light.
@carlwarrenphoto3 ай бұрын
How are they packed for travel/storage ?
@DedoweigertfilmDe2 ай бұрын
There are optional bags/cases designed for transport of the Eflect reflectors in different sizes. Information is below: DEFPB is for the 20x20 reflectors DEFPL for 45x45 reflectors DEFPXL for 80x80 reflectors For more details contact: [email protected]
@AdliberateVideoProduction3 ай бұрын
Struggling to find the money for these. Please let me have some. I have your excellent classic DLH4. This set up would be great though. Please include some of your new Neo Light fixtures. I'll send my address.
@PenFriends4 ай бұрын
It’s a wonderfully compact setup, but I still feel giant scrims give you much nicer quality of soft diffused light. But I could see this working in tighter working conditions
@navidkhayam90674 ай бұрын
with your coco head wear :)))
@navidkhayam90674 ай бұрын
haa?!
@navidkhayam90674 ай бұрын
what's wrong with post office?! you coco!!!
@adliberate4 ай бұрын
I have Lowell and Dedo like a team
@adliberate4 ай бұрын
WOW. Wish I had a house to remorgage
@danielasanchez46744 ай бұрын
2:40-2:54
@sharifsircar5 ай бұрын
Surprised this has zero comments, thank you.
@mamumonkan5 ай бұрын
ich glaub das hat jeder schon mal gespielt war mein Lieblingsstück als Kind :) such grad nach einer IR möglchkeit für mirrorless wie früher SCA Metz für Nikon ( kann auch DSLR sein ) leider gibt es ja keinen unsichtbaren AF beam mehr wie früher Konica Hexar oder Fuji 645 ... es ischo a Kreitz mir dera technik .... lebt eigentlich der Robert Elgas noch - Grüße aus Miami
@ArminHirmer6 ай бұрын
fascinating
@carlporter22396 ай бұрын
Where to buy in Europe ?
@boschulte6 ай бұрын
I’m confused how the inverse square law relates to the constant exposure? I would think that he would lose a stop of light every time your distance doubles.
@ottawamountainman5 ай бұрын
The presenter “misspoke”. The exposure remains contant not because of the inverse square law but because the inverse square law does NOT apply here; it only applies to light that radiates freely away from a point source. It does not apply to “parallel” or collimated light, focused light or light that is otherwise modified with intensifying reflectors or blocked by grids (occlusion effect). That’s the entire premise of this system= inverse square law does not apply to this light source. To be clear… the magic here has to do with that amazing light source with the special lens on it - and not the reflectors used. If you don’t have that or similar light then this trick with these reflectors will not work.
@ottawamountainman5 ай бұрын
@@VectorClassics the light from a "normal" source like a light bulb, or a strobe, or a COB will radiate away from the source as an ever expanding sphere. The further you are from this source the less light density there will be from your perspective. If you double your distance from this source then you will perceive 1/4 the intensity of light from where you stand. That's the inverse square law. It is because the light is an expanding sphere as you move away from its source. But with tools like a PERFECT mirrored parabola and with a light source placed in the "focusing position", or with "special" lenses (like in this video) you can *collimate* the light rays to project PARALLEL to each other as the rays move away from the source; and not in an expanding radial way.... This is what is being used in this video. Again, it should be emphasized, that the magic in this video is because of the fancy light they are using and NOT the $$$$ reflectors (the tittle is a little ... deceiving). Note: with "normal light" if you cast a shadow on the wall with your hand; the shadow will be crisp close to the wall and become larger and fuzzy as you move your hand away from the wall and towards the light source. This does not occur with perfectly collimated light; shadows are crisp irrespective of distance...there is NO fall off .... the rays are parallel. You can APPROXIMATE this effect by using a normal radial light source placed VERY far away. From your perspective those rays will seem parallel; that's the case for the sun. So, you can reproduce this video by using sunlight and reflectors. You can try this with the aluminized side of insulation foam boards you get from Home Depot; you can easily cut them to the size you want. As for using GRIDS over your lights or strobes... well that's a more complicated discussion and has to do with a principal called OCCLUSION; and this principle can also help you prevent the light fall off you would expect from the inverse square law....