Thank you for the view and I am happy you liked it.

I am puzzling over Rebel Fury. I like the concepts in the game for movement and simplified combat. But there is some specifics that needs some help.

Very nice map.

Love Revolution games

Thanks Charles. Yes this is a brother game to Longstreet

Thank WARdROBE. Lot's of action in the Valley at this time. After Kernstown, it slows for a bit as Grant reconsiders the command structure of the Washington, Maryland and the Shenandoah. But will be back with more before too long.

2024 is the 160 years since 1864 so lots of battles to show case

@Hex2Hex Thanks Hexy. Few more to come for the next big skedaddle.

Thanks for the view. I got them from Stone Moutian Miniatures here is the link www.wargamingminiatures.com/

@@campsawyer Thanks, I will check them out.

Thanks for the view. I will have to double check this when I am in front of the rules.

@@campsawyerIt is in the notes to the Union setup. Many thanks.

Thanks for the view and I am glad it was inspiring to get the game out. Rutherford's Farm is a great on to restart with.

Thanks for the view and I am glad it was inspiring to get the game out. Rutherford's Farm is a great on to restart with.

That sounds like a plan. Will you be able to use combat values and weapons ratings?

@@campsawyer I think I will need to use the 1st ed combat charts because they have weapon types that are not in the modern rules. I do have corps display boards that I printed out a year ago. At most I will play the first day and Longstreet's attack July 2nd.

@@nordicmaelstrom4714 Smaller stuff is fun, the lessor played Culps Hill fight is fun too.

@@campsawyer Id have to check the playbook from 1st ed but I don't think I saw a scenario for Culps Hill which is a shame. That was one of the few times the fighting in the Civil War was hand to hand and at night to boot! Smaller fights are fun. That is why I am grateful for having Death Valley and hopefully Stiglrs game soon.

Thanks for the view.

GMT Great Battles of the American Civil War

Thanks Wardrobe. I usually have table cloth clips to hold the plexi, but did not on this one.

​@@campsawyerI guess I need to get some of these clips...

@@charleslatora5750 Here is the link for Amazon, www.amazon.com/T-Antrix-Tablecloth-Flexible-Stainless-Graduation/dp/B07P7GCSZT

Yes, it is very good little scenario, I find this reminds me of the the British 1st Para's stand at Arnhem in WWII. But these units have a way out.

Ah, I have a solo tutorial on my channel, if you have not see it yet. Here is the link to the playlist. kzfaq.info/sun/PL0R2fH2rRUntFrpulQrv60fdw-qVFfMhw As for how it plays, there is a lot and you need to like it really crunchy, but it is a step up from ASL tanks. Flow and play is better once comfortable with it.

More ACW is coming, big week in the Shenandoah with Early's retreat from Washington. Mulitple Union armies looking for him stumble upon him. Video's very shortly.

@@campsawyer Thanks for the link! I will give it a watch and see if this is the game for me. I am looking for a tactical squad level game to break up my usual larger level actions.

@@campsawyer Speaking of the ACW. I am finally sorting out the counters for Three Days of Gettysburg instead of tossing them in as corps size elements. Going to make it easier to set up and all that. I am going to try to play some TDOG this month I think.

@@nordicmaelstrom4714 One more point about Panzer, it is focused on tactical tanks so infantry is secondary. More like speed bumps for the tanks to run over :-) So there is bare bones infantry rules. Firepower is geared toward tanks, no leaders, but good support weapons. If I want an infantry focused game, I go to ASL starter kit.

Thanks for the view and comment. This one is a lot of fun and quick play with detail. I agree I would like to see more new ones on ACW naval action.

Thanks for the view and comment. More to come soon.

Thanks for the view. Yup, explained in other post, everyone has some sort of dropping letter is pronunciation.

Thanks for the view, Stiglr. I have played the full engagement and it is fun, but it can get long with cavalry skirmishing and it did not even come close the historical action when the infantry was engaged. I really wanted to see how Hunter was able to break Jones lines. As for Staunton, you must forgive me as I am from Massachusetts and we have Taunton, which has a long U in its pronunciation and the only let we don't pronounce is R :-)

@@campsawyer I can see how a Massachusetts accent wouldn't work down in ol' Virginia!! Actually, everyone NOT from the Shenandoah would likely make the same mistake with Staunton. It's part of the rite of passage as one gets immersed in Civil War history!! I'm *still* learning about the odd pronunciations of some waterways (Mattaponi, Ni, etc.) and some of the commanders are routinely mispronounced (the two Taliaferro's, pronounced "Tolliver", Huger (pronounced more like YOU-zhee) and even Heth (pronounced more like "Heath"!! I also find many people seem to trip over Sigel, which you did not, to your credit. I don't know WHERE someone would get "SY-jel" out of that, but some do!!! 😉

Thanks for the view. I will say it has been very interesting learning more details of the Valley campaign of 1864

Thanks for the view and good comments. With regard to the discussing on game play I have limited aspect as there are plenty of learn to play videos. I would also reference Hex to Hex channel for some great into videos. That said, I so sometime add in a full play turn so you can see the moves and combat. But I am slow and deliberate with the moves so it can make a longer and some time duller video.

@@campsawyer Fair enough. Anything that provides insight to how to make the best use of the system wouldn't be boring to me. 👍

Thanks for the view. It really highlights how Sigel really mismanaged the battle. Breckenridge's force is limited and needs to attack a fractured force to win. Keeping the Union together is the key. For another time I am thinking of seeing what the variant with Imboden's cavalry attacking with Breckenridge rather than flanking.

Thanks for the view.

Thanks Wardrobe. So far so good but I have some big ones coming up with 3rd Winchester and Cedar Creek.

Thanks for the view. Nordic you will need four hands for the clipping and painting at the same time.

@@campsawyer You're welcome! More like a time machine to go back in time to be able to do both.

Thanks for the view.

Thanks for watching them all. Yes, I need to play through them for the narrative that develops from the play. Sometimes they are very exciting and I cannot stop until the end.

Thanks for the question. This is a "it depends" answer. The standard solitaire rules state that all enemy units roll for commands, both hidden and activated, in 10.4.2 referenced in PNA playbook. This can be overridden by SSR's with a specific command for some timeframe. I also take this further and don't roll for enemy unit commands until they will be needed instead of the Command Phase.

Thanks for the view. It is a good scenario and really liked it. You are correct, before each video, I would recite the name, but still get it wrong when on camera.

Thanks for the view. Will keep this in mind.

Thanks for the post. If you are firing GP, you still use the GP attack factors versus GP defense and for most trucks it is 1. Follow the damage results for S type vehicle on the GP Damage chart. With AP, you use the AP attack and most trucks have a 0 armor. This means that you will most likely penetrate and just use the AP damage for the gun firing.

Thanks for the view. Maybe that is why they could not shoot straight, my pronunciation.

Thanks for watching. Bit of a break and some other videos, but there will be more. Thank you for the work on this Fernando.

Thanks for the view. The close NC's were my bad, if friendly units enter the Point Blank Range, they roll for commands. I corrected it late in the series.

Thanks for the view Stiglr. Good suggestion for Rob to correct on the next update. He just dropped one yesterday, but a email should put it on the next list. Hope you enjoy the game too.

Thanks for the view. There is a lot rules you can add, it is all up to you.

An early (the first?) version of this game many moons ago was a miniatures game.

Thanks for the view. I have not heard of conversion of ASL scenarios.