My whole pc is inside a container

Funny how 20 years later Solaris Zones and BSD Jails are cool again.

Leaves a lot of questions unanswered and does not well describe how containers work.

Never thought I would get cozy consuming functional programming related content Beautiful, purely beautiful. So purely beautiful it would never need a monad or other filthy thing. Congratulations on the video and the effort put in the animations.

So glad we got the payoff at the end lmao

"You singleton? ❤" -- "No, I observer 👀"

4:36 - nice

Docker, in particular, is buggy, lacks security, and a bankrupt organization. Pass

hi mate this is pretty good looking. what do you use to animate it?

is wine a container?

Pure functions exist in all paradigms. Closures exist in most modern languages. Your code (that means everyone's) code sucks. "Bugs are nearly impossible" is funny clickbait, like a 99.9% guarantee. Having said all that, use the right tool for the job.

I only install locally on vm's. Containers are a security nightmare waiting to happen

FINALLY! A video that gives a quick concise easy to understand explanation of what containers are and how they work. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve watched a video on this subject and the creator is throwing Docker commands around but not explaining a single thing about the hows and whys. Bravo!

I subscribed for the uganda knuckles reference.

You're spreading dangerous misinformation: none of the "issues" you list are actual problems if you would just cleanly and modularly package software AND CONFIGURATION as native OS packages; that is EXACTLY what the OS packaging was invented for. Instead of learning how to, for example, write a .spec file and generate, for example, an RPM package, you now have complicated, external application like "Docker" and convoluted, complex configuration in arbitrary "YAML" format. This is needless complexity - the information technology equivalent of venom. It would have been simpler to just learn how to package and deliver software in the native format of the operating system's software management subsystem, not to mention that the OS would then worry about, and manage your software for you, that you could provision fully configured systems using nothing more than the OS vendor's native provisioning system, that you could formally and consistently express dependencies which the tools like "yum" or "dnf" would then use to install the software in the correct order, that you could encapsulate all automation inside of package(s), that you could query the OS which package a particular file belongs to, ask the OS when the files were installed, or whether they were tampered with - all that just for making a nice, clean OS package. There is a reason why all the mainstream operating systems install via OS packages; it's not done out of someone's fancy or mood.

Dude I love your animations, awesome icon design. Great visualization helps a lot, Thanks <3

Awesome video, thank you!

I'm brainwashed

The entire industry is built on side-effects and the ability to to effectively mange indirections. And for reusable, well, if you have a reusable piece of code and you do not re-use it, then all the effort you put in to make it reusable is a complete waste. If you force yourself to reuse it, you end up with unmaintainable parallel systems. My problem with functional is stateful systems. The functional paradigm breaks down very fast if you need states. Yes, you can delegate state handling to a separate system but that form a coupling is far worse than just going with OOP. That being said, it is an important tool. It is probably the only one in the declarative family that works seamlessly with OOP.

Never install locally, if you have stable internet...

the production quality in this video is outstading.

Superb video. What did you use to create those illustrations?

I don't learn principles 'cause someones ask me to do that. I learned them by myself from my pains, so i know exactly why and when i should follow rules.

I always asked myself: How would i write good tests. Yes, i can test some things, but a lot of code was untested / tested by hand. I didn't know how good SOLID is for this. My code is now 100% tested (without coverage tests)

It goes in the square hole

This video is him admitting they're worse than native platforms but still keeping a clickbait title

Nah serverless is better. And YES I know serverless solutions are just containers, but they are uniform containers so we don't have to worry about the hardware. This lets us focus on the code. Separate the code from the hardware. Write the application you need and then someone else can optimize how it is executed.

alot of books on algorithms are written for imperative programs and for functional we only have the SICP

SOLID 👎👎👎

Technical videos are usually someone typing examples with a screen recorder, I don't hate that but this was really unique learning experience too. Thanks

Tell us the secrets behind animatiom too please!

If only this summary was as accurate as it was charming sounding.

*sighs* “firstly please sit down”

I always try to do things right the first time in my personal projects, I think people tend to be ok with constantly reapplying bandaids Edit: The ending almost touched on what I was saying, very good reaffirming video xD

Reminds me of Haskell and Rust

This is the worst kinda educational vid. It is soo close to being correct that you dont relize that most of it's wrong. This was very clearly made by a dude who knew programming but spent more time on the animation than learning functional programing.

Thank you for the 60K ft view of good programming practices. Please do more videos on software development

you're voice would be better used for bed-side stories :)

Please, i'm willing to pay 100 dollars to get in touch with your animation team for a small gig. Arigato!!!

Brah, talks about good code, and preaches SOLID. With interface classes.

Nice summary of Uncle Bob's "Clean Code"

I remember using a strongly-typed pure functional language… it was a nightmare to get anything past the compiler! But when you did, it never had bugs. Instead of coding quickly then spending ages bug fixing, you would spend ages coding and hardly any time bug fixing. And, as a bonus, it was sometimes possible to mathematically prove your code was correct.

I started off with C++. When I went to Python and then to my now main language of JavaScript, I was so confused that a lot of focus was placed on functions and not classes. Like yeah you can still use classes, but tutorials don't spend much time on it. While my C++ class was literally called C++ and datastructures (which are based on classes). Now I just have my main function that calls a whole bunch of other functions to do things that run forever. 😊 All my variables are fleeting and only things stored in a database matter. The different styles of programming are fascinating.

Functional programming is so powerful that nobody uses it to create full real world programs. Great video by the way

You have 164 k subscribers with only 3 videos!!??? AMAZING😀

Testing. Ugh only in go it’s a pain everywhere else. I’m a bum. I know.

no idea what you just said. maybe i'll come back in a few years and understand something.

Most of these are solid on the whiteboard, but not practical through the keyboard.