Wow. Love the Neve. It’s so full and honest. Focusrite still sounds good, but lacks the class and depth.

Great - many thanks!

это не дешёвая система, просто у западных производителей цены завышены на свою продукцию

Question. We have the xr 18 and 1 splitter this one we have. But we loss a lot of db in our in ears what do we do wrong😢

Have you had any issues with interference, having 3 iem transmitters and aerials in the same rack?

Hi, nice video, it gave me quite a few ideas for my own rack case. Just one question how did you attach wireless router to the top of the IEM transmitter?

PSA tip here-when using a single screw to hold your rack component in place, use the lower hole. Less likely to damage the ear.

Talent matters the most. No one care for your gear.

Thank you for making this video. I appreciate you using music and a performance that is uncompressed, dynamic, and lyrical. Both preamps sound very good, but I found Neve had the best overall performance for this segment. It sounded a bit smoother and had the most complementary color.

We need more channels like this, I am listening on some monitors, m-audio bx5 in a non treated room. I don't hear much of a difference. They both sound good and usable, which is the main goal in recording either way.

I have a question, I want to know the name of the illuminator and the name of the dmx and MacBook and the connection device.

I just remembered why i sold the opx 😂

link case?

Did you know you can test your IEM´s ... see Finnur Ragnarsson, mon tech for Björk talka bout the MiEMi - kzfaq.info/get/bejne/aLF2iLde067Vmn0.html

Helpful, thank you!

SSL FTW! Notice the smoothness of the sibilance with SSL as compared to the others ... and the "jumps out the the speakers vibes"....

But … listening to your recordings - there is a HUGE difference. From daw it is stereo, and from iem100 it is mono. This Maker a huge difference. Why did you not computer stereo to stereo? I am curious

Thanks for sharing this - your vid, and this comment section have given me all sorts of ideas!

Good test. I was surprised there was such a huge difference in sound quality tbh. Still, better than no IEM. Still thinking... Thanks

I'd ditch the splitters and get a Midas DN4816-O box. It would mirror channels 1-16 (or whatever) on Ultranet for FoH.

On the Behringer splitter (MS8000) which output goes to XR18 and which output goes to FOH?

If $ wasnt option i prefer the neve sounds full… midas i dont like for same price i say ssl

Have you had any issue with double size modules in your midas L10?

Some people may be confused that they are hearing a Neve 1073 in this comparison because it's not clearly labeled. You're not hearing a Neve 1073, you're hearing an OPX. The OPX uses surface mount components and the board inside is like a PC motherboard. The OPX circuit is very different from a 1073, OPX uses transformerless output stages and modern power buffering stages, it's radically different from a 1073. OPX is a good unit. They are actually more detailed than a 1073, but they do not have 1073 saturation.

What about phantom power, is there an issue with it? the splitter passes the current?

Thank you ! Very useful! I'm just building my own mount rack.

Greetings, I stumbled across KZfaq searching for information on Dante and your video is very helpful as it is similar to the application I have in mind for my setup. The question I have is; How well can your external hardware be used similar to a plug-in? Also is it more advantageous to route each hardware device individually to the network? For example I have a 1073 routed into a distressor in my vocal chain. If I route them individually to the network and utilize the virtual mixer to route them can I expect the same results? Thanks

Don't know why, but something is happening with the SSL. Damn that thing is great :O and so inexpensive

An excellent video. Thanks so much for posting. Really helpful. Put more songs from your set list on here.

What is that rack with wheels and where do we find it!

Switchcraft makes some loe profile xlr connectors if i remember correctly. I think they would look neater

How much U did this take up?

That intro song is amazing!

I did not understand the purpose of the splitters...sorry. Can't we go from the mixer AUX directly into each IEM device? What am I missing?

Neve & ssl is for rock and rap music not so much for singers singers needs to sound smooth & less harsh & annoying so the Midas wins for me when it comes to singing vocal.

The Midas DN4816-O makes the splitter unnecessary. Use the ultranet out from the mixer to the DN4816, which requires one shielded CAT cable and provides 16 XLR outs.

Hi, I had a look on ebay at the power strip that you're using. Is it possible to flip the rack ears so that the power outlets are facing the interior of the rack?

Just curious about the latency and if it is low enough to monitor and track via the DAW output? Thanks.

Hi, great video thanks, How did you make the lights flash though? Surely you didn't do up and down fade cues for all of the chorus?

Hi! Awesome video! But I would advice using splitters with input and direct output in front and second output in the back. Like ART S8 3way. Yes its more expensive but makes your kit cleaner and wont require keeping all wires for FOH hanging out of the rack. Cutting the hole in the XR18s rack mount will make it easier for cable management especially for those racks where you will have to leave one unit empty for cables and you wont need to take out behringer from the rack to change cables. OR just put xr18 with its inputs inside the rack. XR18 does not have any faders/buttons/triggers on it that are crucial on the stage

Thanks! great video

Which router do you use? is it has a good range? great video!

Would be better if you turn xr around. Less messy looking.

Hey ! Thanks for the video ! Very nice since I am looking into building a similar system. Quick question: can you plug all these standard XLR and stille close the rack flawlessly? We would like to have kind of a set and forget approach.

Thanks for sharing this rig! On paper, I reached a similar thought. Glad to see it’s working for you.

Remember it's a monitor, not hifi. How good is the sound you get from your floor wedges with everything else going on. It's doesn't have to be perfect to be much better than floor monitors. We have a couple of the even cheaper Thomann T-Bone 75s sets, and four wired sets of iems, running from a Behringer XR18 digital mixer into a six channel headphone amplifier. If we were to run more than two of these wireless sets we would risk problems with frequencies and interference. A more expensive set would be required if all six of us went wireless. It works for us, and it works well. The choice of earbuds is important. We have tried Shure 215s, but most of us opted for CCA10s, fitted with the correct sized memory foam tips. The supplied silicone tips are okay for home use, but fail to properly isolate in a band setting. The digital mixer gave us six monitor channels, rather than the 2/3 available on the old set-up. It makes so much difference for everyone to have their own monitor mix, which they can control themselves. Since changing to iems our monitoring is much improved, we sing better in tune, don't damage our voices straining to hear ourselves, we have reduced on stage volumes, and front of house sound is so much cleaner as there is no need to fight against the output of the monitors.

I think Neve sounds fuller because of transformers

Not sure how any conclusions can be drawn from this. These have to be carefully level matched using the RMS of the entire take and the takes need to be multed out from a single take or it's not a fair comparison. If those precautions are taken the results will be hard differentiate, especially if shared as a blind test. Another way to do it is to use three of the exact same mics simultaneously.

Nice video! Just a question? How are you plugging the Dante into your computer? Via the switch or do you have a Dante device? Sorry if this is a dumb question lol

Just what i needed , cheers ... Any idea the case model please? .. cheers