Some level of amnesia for sure. Only a tiny fraction of our past is known. The stone age is called the stone age because the organic matter they used is long gone. Otherwise it would certainly be called the wood age. There is no reason to doubt that people who mastered working stone and bone didn't master working wood as well. The picture of stone age peopel as club swinging bepedal apes certainly is wrong. But one thing is certain too: There was no ancient highly advanced, industrialized, global civilisation. There is no sign of domestic breeding of animals except for the dog, no sight of livestock of any kind and no sign of selective breeding of vegetables before the younger dryas. Genetic data on livestock and vegetables living today and archaeological data get the exact same results in this question. There is not a single introduces species oder disease on a continent where it doesn't belong. Simply nothing. The current knowledge of when and where humans have been spreading over the globe is based on genetic data, there's not too much to doubt about it. What data of living humans of course can't display is failed exploration in the deep past. Lines that got extinct in the past without survivors or interbreeding with a line that survived aren't in the genes of modern humans. There is nothing wrong about humans 115ky ago on North America. They made it there, lived there for some time and vanished. Then there were tens of thousands of years without humans in North America before the next ones made it there.

If you bothered to watch the video you would see they explained very clearly why that can't be the case.

Just say you don't understand the science next time, it'll be a lot quicker.

that doesn't mean much

Always has a limit.

Obviously wrong! We, humans, are ALL of African origin! Having said this... a bit tongue-in-cheek... to modern people, 10'000 years or so feel very much like "always"! We are at another order of magnitude in time at the Cerutti site.

White sands is 23k ish...

There is not one scrap of stone tool. Humans always leave lots of stone chips. These people are desperate to find something new. But it would seem the early history of human colonisation of the Americas is already written. These amateurs should spend a little time on a REAL dig in Europe and Africa to see what human butchery actually looks like and the types of evidence that real sites produce. The "scratch" mark they think are tool marks are consistent with predator teeth marks. Where are the tools??

do you support the bering gay theory or did you just misspell something? all caps and emojis means it could really go either way

@@LolUGotBusted About time someone caught that. 👍🏾

@@thunderbear4254 well played

Did she publish? I'll read it if so. Also did you know Leakey found a site in CA that is 100s of ks? He was also lambasted whatever that means haha. I hope Dr. M had a good career in any case.

Ha ha, I had the same thought. Bigfoot and giants.

You may be right .

I m not going to want to take any pictures of them They re nothing to me I hate em I v e never seen them in the wild all of my 61 years Knock on wood for that I hope there never is a first time

lol yeah then take a picture of your bite to upload to social media..

What about Neanderthals? Just because we haven't found fossils (yet) east of Denisova doesn't mean that a group might not have made it across the Bering Land Bridge. We know both they and homo erectus could sail, so I wouldn't rule Denisovans, homo erectus or neanderthalensis out.

@@harrietharlow9929 you're absolutely right.

@@harrietharlow9929 And Dragon man, if he's not Denisovan, is another candidate! They say the tools are different from contemporaneous Eurasian tools, so maybe it's a NEW Species!?

@@nmarbletoe8210 He could be. Only time wiII teII.