Travel

Not goal tending.

Landing foul

No

Does not look like an illegal screen to - he takes a firm standing position and is more than 2 steps away from the defender.

Yes, that's a foul

Seems like defensive foul

the ref seems like a boxing ref . There must be someone of his family is or was a boxer

LEGAL?

YES TRAV

YES

WRONG CALL BY THE REF

LEGAL DRIBBLE

Fumble the ball not consider as a dribble, not illegal.

1.-Mala decisión arbitral En primera instancia falta del jugador #24 amarillo posterior fata técnica a jugador #26 negro por uso excesivo de los codos. Se debió realizar un tiro para cualquier jugador amarillo sin rebote y posición para el equipo negro. 2.-Desacuerdo a lo marcado fue doble falta antideportiva para jugadores #24 amarillo y #26 negro más técnico. Solo se debió tirar el técnico sin rebote y los tiros de las faltas antideportivas se anulan entre si por ser penalizaciones iguales y la posición de balón favor del equipo negro uesto que al momento de la marcación ellos tenían control de balón 🏀🏀🏀🏀

Roll while having the ball in his hands . Traveling violation .

Jugada Legal, no hay balón devuelto atrás.

If it's called, has to be defensive!

Good call.. ofence foul

This is intension foul?

Yes...while on screen she moving with the opponent it's a illegal screen

Yes...Good call ref...❤

Yes...

Yes...

It's called carrying the ball. Not legal.

Of course...easy to see.

Judging by where he called the foul, this isn't an unsportsmanlike foul since she had begun the act of shooting, and the contact with her swiping at the ball would not be enough to justify a U foul. However, if he would have called the illegal contact in the back before the shot, then it would have been a clear path U foul.

Defensive player must give landing space to the shooter after shoot released , if not , contact occurred , he or she should take responsible for the contact .

Consecutively touches the floor with her same foot after dribble ended , traveling violation.

After ending her dribble , Blue 15 may make a legal stop with two steps ( in this case : right 1 , left 2 ) . Right after legal stop , her both feet had left the floor , so neither foot may touch the floor before the ball leaves her hands for a pass or shoot . In this case , traveling violation , red possession .

Not a normal basketball play , potentially causing injury to her opponent . Unsportsmanlike foul , criteria 1 in my opinion .

Since the ball isn’t within the basket when the tap occurred , good tap , no violation . Misunderstanding of the rules by referees in this case maybe .

YES

TRAVEL

first one was the fumble ball thats why it was a LEGAL DRIBBLE

bad call

Legal

Of

Yes, She makes a two legs more

No, it was perfectly legal play. She accidently dropped the ball, gained cotrol after. There was no double dribble here.

Using elbows to ‘ clear his path ’ , excessive swinging of elbows , technical foul should be given in my opinion . If contact happens on defender’s head , unsportsmanlike foul .

Excesive swing of elbows

Foul first. Loose ball doesn’t considered as dribble, legal move, no violation committed.

Travel

Travel

Legal..!!!

Players fake fouls because it works. Refs see something happen and invent the reason.

Absolutely! It's not even close!

loving your videos very educational

Yes