Are you still catholic brother? You still have instagram
@MiguelMangada16 күн бұрын
Welcome to the catholic Church-the only CHirstian Church established by Jesus Christ
@elispena1719Ай бұрын
My daughter and husband leafed the Catholic church 15 years ago, and r now Nondenomination . it has been the most paintfull time of our live. we r devorting catholic. it give me hope, i pray the they come back home to our beatibeful catholics faith. thank you for sharing our testimony. Welcome home brother.
@elispena1719Ай бұрын
Welcome to Juses's Church were you have the plenitud of the truth. Love it.Thank you for sharing your beautiful testimony. Thank you.
@hs78123Ай бұрын
❤
@Lar-BearАй бұрын
I love that... Let's fix this, let's not split apart! I agree!
@solafide9533Ай бұрын
.
@solafide9533Ай бұрын
@1373abby ⭐Was Bible a Roman Catholic Book? ⭐ The answer is No. Scriptures was written by Jewish Prophets and Jewish Christian APostles. Not Roman Catholics. By ad100s, all Scriptures of modern day Bibles were already in all churches. Jesus and APostles already called Scriptures "Scriptures" in their days. Believers did not have to wait 300 years for Scriptures to be "made inspired" or "called Scriptures" by Roman religion. ⭐Did Roman Church make Scriptures Scriptures or make Scriptures inspired?⭐ The answer is No. Jesus and Apostles already called Scriptures Scriptures in their days. They were already inspired. By ad100s, all Scriptures of modern day Bibles were already in all churches. Compiling Scriptures into a Book does not make Scriptures inspired like what Roman religion love to claim. ⭐Did Roman Church come up with a Universal Canon?⭐ The answer is No. Roman religion merely compiled what was already there. Council of Rome was merely a local council. Council of Rome merely compiled it's own local canon. Not a Universal Canon. Roman religion’s NT canon was only one of many local canons in those days. Roman Church did not fix any Universal Canon. That requires an Ecumenical Council with bishops of all churches. Nothing of such happened. ⭐Were there other canons after Council of Rome in ad382? ⭐ The answer is yes. Council of Rome claimed to have a Universal Canon by ad382. If Roman religion and Roman pope was all that powerful having authority over all churches, no other churches would need to come up with a canon; like Hippo (397) and Carthage (419). There were still other canons in ad692 and 1442. If a Universal Canon was really fixed in ad382 like what Roman Catholics claimed, why were there still other canons after ad382? Why are there still other canons till this day - 66, 73, 81 books canons?* ⭐Does Christian Bible come from Roman Catholic Bible?⭐ The answer is No. Roman Bibles came from a Greek translation called LXX. Christian Bibles came from Hebrew OT. So why would Christian Bible be from Roman Catholics? ⭐Did Christians remove 7 books or did Roman Catholics added 7 books? ⭐ Bible says Scriptures is of Jewish Origins. Romans 3:1-2. Not Roman Catholic origins. Jews till this day holds OT 39 books. Not Roman religion’s OT 46 books. Scriptures is always correct. So clearly pointing to Roman religionists adding 7 books. Greek LXX was merely a translation of Original Hebrew OT. Original Hebrew OT did not contain Apocrypha 7 books. So why would a translation have Apocrypha 7 books? So clearly pointing to Roman religionists adding 7 books. ⭐Refuting Papacy from canon point of view. ⭐ ad382 canon was merely one of many local canons in those days, from a local council called Council of Rome. It was not a final Universal Canon which RCs love to claim. There were still other local canons before ad382 and after ad382 like in ad692 and 1442. If Roman canon was the one and only final Universal Canon for all churches, why would there be other canons before and after ad382? In fact there was not a single Ecumenical Council with bishops of all churches that fixed any Universal Canon till this day. Not one. If there was really a pope who had "All Authority" from ad33 in early Church like what RCs love to claim, he would have fixed a Universal Canon by ad100. Why would there be so many canons floating around from ad100s -ad1400s?
@solafide9533Ай бұрын
@1373abby *Hilarious false claims. It's 27 books. Not 23. Scriptures of modern day Bible were already there 300 years before any compilation of Scriptures. Jesus and APostles already called them Scriptures. So they were. They did not suddenly become inspired 300 years later.* *Bible and real history did not say Roman religion = the Universal Church or Church Christ founded. You will have to prove this self claim before using it as an argument. So where is your proof?* *Scriptures was not from Roman religion. Jewish Apostles and Prophets wrote them. Not Roman Catholics.* you said Even if we set aside the Old Testament, the only reason you trust that the 23 books of the NT you hold is true and is God-breathed is because a Council of the Catholic Church proclaimed it (Council of Rome 382).
@solafide9533Ай бұрын
@1373abby *Sinner's prayer is just a combination of Scriptures. Of course the doctrine is in Scriptures. Salvation not By Works is in two third of New Testament. Of course it's biblical. Book of James was addressing Juice under Mosaic Law (saved by Works of the Law), James 1:1. Not addressing Gentile Christians. So why do RCs love to misquote Scriptures?* *Jesus did ask APostle to write in a Book. You failed to read the Bible again.* you said The Bible does not say "The sinner's prayer", "faith alone" (it does however say "You see, that a man is justified by works, and not by faith alone" - James 2:24, nor "scripture alone", nor "trinity", nor "Bible"....remember, scripture doesn't tell us that Jesus ever wrote anything down or told anyone to write anything down.
@solafide9533Ай бұрын
@1373abby *Hilarious false claims. Bible recorded so many Churches you claimed there was only One? Lol* you said there is only ONE, because it is HOLY (set apart), because it is APOSTOLIC, and because it is CATHOLIC (universal).
@user-ei7os9li1b4 ай бұрын
Welcome home brother!
@tomcha754 ай бұрын
Welcome home, brother. Pray for other Protestants that they may also find Christ's Church.
@jediv33814 ай бұрын
@Catholiclady3 *You are in a man made religion and you know that. R Catholicism has nothing to do with God and His Words. R Catholic Church contradicts Scriptures in every possible ways!* 1. Catholics say Mary was sinless. But BIBLE says Mary offered a sinner's offering. She was a sinner. Bible says Mary needed a Saviour. Lk 2:23-24, Lev 12:6-8, Rom 3:10. 2. Catholics say clergies must be celibate. Yet BIBLE says Peter (supposed R Church first leader) had mother in law. Bible says celibacy is not a qualification for clergies. Mat 8:14-15, Mar 1:30-31, Luk 4:38-39. 3. Catholics say Mary was forever virgin. Yet BIBLE says Jesus had brothers and sisters. Mary was not perpetually virgin. Mk 6:3, Mat 13:55, Mat 27:56, Mar 6:3, Mar 15:40, Mar 15:47. 4. Catholics say confess to R priests in a box. BIBLE says nothing about confessing to priests in a box. Bible says confess to GOD only. 1 John 1:9, Mat 6, Romans 10:9-10. 5. Catholics say drink of the physical blood of Jesus. Yet OT and NT both say do not drink blood. Acts 15, Lev 7:26. 6. Catholics say pray to passed on Mary and "saints". Yet BIBLE says do not contact the dead. NT Church did not record a single case of NT believers asking passed on saints to pray for them. Deut 18:11, Isaiah 8:19. 7. Catholics make and bow down to statues. BIBLE says do not bow down to graven images (statues). Deut 4, Exo 20:4-5. 8. Catholics sprinkles “holy water”. But NT Church of the Bible mentioned nothing about “holy water”. There was no record of any Apostles sprinkling “holy water” on believers. Catholics claimed “holy water” came from OT. Yet Num 5:17 says “holy water” was water used to test adulterous women in OT temple. Hardly the same. Those were for Old Covenant Jews. Not New Testament Christians. 9. Catholics say Peter was pope - bishop of all bishops. Yet BIBLE says Peter was just a leader of the Jerusalem Church. Bible says nothing of the office of bishop of bishops. Gal 2:9, Mat 16:18. 10. Catholics say there is a seat of Peter. Yet BIBLE says nothing about it. Jesus said “not to lord over others”. 11. Catholics has clergy priesthood. Bible says clergy priesthood was done away with in New Testament. There is no clergy priesthood in NT. Heb 7:27, 9:12, 10:10. 12. Catholics preaches Works Salvation (faith + good works + partake R sacraments + submit to R pontiff + be in R Church + devote to Mary = to be saved). Yet Bible says “believe in Jesus to be saved”. Bible says Works Salvation is cursed. Gal 1:8-9. Acts 16:30-31, John 3:16, Romans 10:9-10. 13. Catholics says they must do Penance to atone for their sins. Yet Bible says repent, confess and sins will be forgiven. Catholic Bible changes the word “repentance” in NT into “penance”. Original Greek NT does not use or mean the word penance. Penance = work to atone for sins. Repentance = change of heart. 1 John 1:9, Mat 6. 14. Catholics say Mary went straight to heaven without dying. Yet Bible says nothing about it. 15. Catholics say Islam and Christianity have the same GOD. Yet Islam doesn't believe in death and resurrection of Jesus and Trinity.
@jediv33815 ай бұрын
@Catholiclady3 *It's exactly the opposite. Church of Rome naming itself the Universal Church does not make it one.* *Western Church and Eastern Church both called itself the Universal CHurch. Eventually in ad1054 schism they decided Western Church being called Roman Catholic Church and Eastern Church being called Orthodox Church.* Quote from real history: The first known occurrence of "Roman Catholic" as a synonym for "Catholic Church" was in communication with the Armenian Apostolic Church in 1208, after the East-West Schism. The last official magisterial document to use "Roman Catholic Church" was issued by Pope Pius XII in 1950. you said I don't know where you come up with the idea that we have Roman anything besides in the name. Does your denomination have a name? Did your church start itself without being sent by the Apostles. I'm sorry you're so confused, but no one person on the internet can untangle your ideas. There are plenty of resources online for you to be able to learn the truth. Your salvation depends on your theology. If your theology is wrong, you are not actually following Christ but a false religion. Keep learning, you'll get there. Don't be prideful and think you already have all the answers. Learn the truth. God bless
@jediv33815 ай бұрын
@Catholiclady3 *Exactly. Doctrines come from infallible Scriptures, Jesus and APostles. 95% of Roman doctrines did not come from Scriptures, Jesus and Apostles. You know where you are going ..* you said Your salvation depends on your theology. If your theology is wrong, you are not actually following Christ but a false religion. Keep learning, you'll get there. Don't be prideful and think you already have all the answers. Learn the truth. God bless
@jediv33815 ай бұрын
@Catholiclady3 *You do have a Roman rite. In history it was called Church of Rome/Latin Church/Western Church. Goodness sake read some real Church history.* In ad 300s it was called Church of Rome or the Latin Church or the Western Church. It was just a local church. It became prominent due to its backing from Rome and later became part of the Pentarchy consisting of 5 prominent local churches - Rome, Jerusalem, Antioch, Constantinople, Alexandria. Pentarchy + all other local churches then formed the Church or the Universal Church. R Church was never the Church or Universal Church. History tells us Roman Church was just one of 5 prominent local churches. Together with other smaller local churches they formed the CHURCH or UNIVERSAL CHURCH. Roman cult was NOT at any point of history the CHURCH or UNIVERSAL CHURCH!* Rome was part of the original Pentarchy and had the honor of first among equals. However, the Catholic Church since the time of Charlemagne has been away from the other 4 Holy Sees. Leaving officially in 1054 and sealing the deal with the sacking of Constantinople during the 4th Crusade in 1204. Pentarchy (from the Greek Πενταρχία, Pentarchía, from πέντε pénte, "five", and ἄρχειν archein, "to rule") is a model of Church organization historically championed in the Eastern Orthodox Church. It found its fullest expression in the laws of Emperor Justinian I of the Roman Empire. In the model, the Christian church is governed by the heads (patriarchs) of the five major episcopal sees of the Roman Empire: Rome, Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch, and Jerusalem.[3] The idea came about because of the political and ecclesiastical prominence of these five sees, but the concept of their universal and exclusive authority was firmly tied to the administrative structure of the Roman Empire. The pentarchy was first legally expressed in the legislation of Emperor Justinian I (527-565), particularly in Novella 131. The Quinisext Council of 692 gave it formal recognition and ranked the sees in order of preeminence. Especially following Quinisext, the pentarchy was at least philosophically accepted in Eastern Orthodoxy, but generally not in the West, which rejected the Council, and the concept of the pentarchy.[4] The greater authority of these sees in relation to others was tied to their political and ecclesiastical prominence; all were located in important cities and regions of the Roman Empire and were important centers of the Christian Church. Rome, Alexandria and Antioch were prominent from the time of early Christianity, while Constantinople came to the fore upon becoming the imperial residence in the 4th century. Thereafter it was consistently ranked just after Rome. you said We have no Roman rites
@jediv33815 ай бұрын
@Catholiclady3 *Yes that was/is merely the self claim of Roman religion. Bible does not say so.* you said We are the Catholic church, the church Jesus started here on earth.
@jediv33815 ай бұрын
@Catholiclady3 *You are the result of not reading the Bible. What you said totally contradict Scriptures. Roman religion teach that to keep RCs in ignorance. Yes RCs love misquoting 2 Pet **1:20** to fit your man made agenda. 2 Pet **1:20** is NOT about private interpretation of Scriptures. It's about private interpretation of Prophecies. 2 Pet **1:20** says DO NOT privately interpret prophecies. Nothing to do with interpretation of Scriptures.* 2 Pet 1:20 knowing this first, that no prophecy of Scripture is of any private interpretation, *On the contrary, Bible encourages believers to interpret Scriptures to hold men in authority accountable.* Jesus interpreted the Scriptures (not wait for the Jewish authorities to interpret for HIM) Apostles interpreted the Scriptures. Paul interpreted the Scriptures. Stephen who preached to a whole crowd interpreted the Scriptures Philip interpreted the Scriptures for the Ethiopian Eunuch Disciples interpreted the Scriptures. Bereans searched and interpreted the Scriptures. Act 17:10 Then the brethren immediately sent Paul and Silas away by night to Berea. When they arrived, they went into the synagogue of the Jews. Act 17:11 These were more fair-minded than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness, and searched the Scriptures daily to find out whether these things were so. you said The bible forbids personal interpretation
@jediv33815 ай бұрын
@Catholiclady3 *Yes Roman religion documented a false history that totally does not corroborate with Scriptures or real history. Nowhere in the Bible ever said Roman religion inherited the authority of Peter or was successor of Peter or Apostles. None.* you said We have a documented line of succession from the apostles.
@jediv33815 ай бұрын
@Catholiclady3 *You are misled by Roman religion to promote all it's self claims. And self claims is Not a Proof for doctrines.* *1. Roman religion was not the Universal Church or Church Christ founded. The First Church was Jerusalem Church, Acts 2. Not Roman Catholic CHurch. The First Believers were Christians, Acts 11:26. Not Roman Catholics.* *2. Scriptures were written by Jewish Prophets and Jewish CHristian Apostles. Not Roman Catholics. Scriptures did not come from Roman religion. Jesus and Apostles already called Scriptures Scriptures in their days. They did not say we need to wait for 300 years for Scriptures to be made Scriptures or to be made inspired. THat's the subtle claim of Roman religion.* you said The bible came out of The Catholic Church. The church didn't come from the bible.
@jediv33815 ай бұрын
@Catholiclady3 *Yes do not lean on your understanding. Then why are you doing that? WHy do you follow a man made religion which contradicts the Scriptures in every possible ways?* 1. Catholics say Mary was sinless. But BIBLE says Mary offered a sinner's offering. She was a sinner. Bible says Mary needed a Saviour. Lk 2:23-24, Lev 12:6-8, Rom 3:10. 2. Catholics say clergies must be celibate. Yet BIBLE says Peter (supposed R Church first leader) had mother in law. Bible says celibacy is not a qualification for clergies. Mat 8:14-15, Mar 1:30-31, Luk 4:38-39. 3. Catholics say Mary was forever virgin. Yet BIBLE says Jesus had brothers and sisters. Mary was not perpetually virgin. Mk 6:3, Mat 13:55, Mat 27:56, Mar 6:3, Mar 15:40, Mar 15:47. 4. Catholics say confess to R priests in a box. BIBLE says nothing about confessing to priests in a box. Bible says confess to GOD only. 1 John 1:9, Mat 6, Romans 10:9-10. 5. Catholics say drink of the physical blood of Jesus. Yet OT and NT both say do not drink blood. Acts 15, Lev 7:26. 6. Catholics say pray to passed on Mary and "saints". Yet BIBLE says do not contact the dead. NT Church did not record a single case of NT believers asking passed on saints to pray for them. Deut 18:11, Isaiah 8:19. 7. Catholics make and bow down to statues. BIBLE says do not bow down to graven images (statues). Deut 4, Exo 20:4-5. 8. Catholics sprinkles “holy water”. But NT Church of the Bible mentioned nothing about “holy water”. There was no record of any Apostles sprinkling “holy water” on believers. Catholics claimed “holy water” came from OT. Yet Num 5:17 says “holy water” was water used to test adulterous women in OT temple. Hardly the same. Those were for Old Covenant Jews. Not New Testament Christians. 9. Catholics say Peter was pope - bishop of all bishops. Yet BIBLE says Peter was just a leader of the Jerusalem Church. Bible says nothing of the office of bishop of bishops. Gal 2:9, Mat 16:18. 10. Catholics say there is a seat of Peter. Yet BIBLE says nothing about it. Jesus said “not to lord over others”. 11. Catholics has clergy priesthood. Bible says clergy priesthood was done away with in New Testament. There is no clergy priesthood in NT. Heb 7:27, 9:12, 10:10. 12. Catholics preaches Works Salvation (faith + good works + partake R sacraments + submit to R pontiff + be in R Church + devote to Mary = to be saved). Yet Bible says “believe in Jesus to be saved”. Bible says Works Salvation is cursed. Gal 1:8-9. Acts 16:30-31, John 3:16, Romans 10:9-10. 13. Catholics says they must do Penance to atone for their sins. Yet Bible says repent, confess and sins will be forgiven. Catholic Bible changes the word “repentance” in NT into “penance”. Original Greek NT does not use or mean the word penance. Penance = work to atone for sins. Repentance = change of heart. 1 John 1:9, Mat 6. 14. Catholics say Mary went straight to heaven without dying. Yet Bible says nothing about it. 15. Catholics say Islam and Christianity have the same GOD. Yet Islam doesn't believe in death and resurrection of Jesus and Trinity. you said Keep learning and asking God to show you the truth. Do not lean on your own understanding. That is forbidden by the bible.
@jediv33815 ай бұрын
@Catholiclady3 *Wake up RC. You are in a man made religion. R Catholicism has nothing to do with God and His Words. R Catholic Church contradicts Scriptures in every possible ways!* 1. Catholics say Mary was sinless. But BIBLE says Mary offered a sinner's offering. She was a sinner. Bible says Mary needed a Saviour. Lk 2:23-24, Lev 12:6-8, Rom 3:10. 2. Catholics say clergies must be celibate. Yet BIBLE says Peter (supposed R Church first leader) had mother in law. Bible says celibacy is not a qualification for clergies. Mat 8:14-15, Mar 1:30-31, Luk 4:38-39. 3. Catholics say Mary was forever virgin. Yet BIBLE says Jesus had brothers and sisters. Mary was not perpetually virgin. Mk 6:3, Mat 13:55, Mat 27:56, Mar 6:3, Mar 15:40, Mar 15:47. 4. Catholics say confess to R priests in a box. BIBLE says nothing about confessing to priests in a box. Bible says confess to GOD only. 1 John 1:9, Mat 6, Romans 10:9-10. 5. Catholics say drink of the physical blood of Jesus. Yet OT and NT both say do not drink blood. Acts 15, Lev 7:26. 6. Catholics say pray to passed on Mary and "saints". Yet BIBLE says do not contact the dead. NT Church did not record a single case of NT believers asking passed on saints to pray for them. Deut 18:11, Isaiah 8:19. 7. Catholics make and bow down to statues. BIBLE says do not bow down to graven images (statues). Deut 4, Exo 20:4-5. 8. Catholics sprinkles “holy water”. But NT Church of the Bible mentioned nothing about “holy water”. There was no record of any Apostles sprinkling “holy water” on believers. Catholics claimed “holy water” came from OT. Yet Num 5:17 says “holy water” was water used to test adulterous women in OT temple. Hardly the same. Those were for Old Covenant Jews. Not New Testament Christians. 9. Catholics say Peter was pope - bishop of all bishops. Yet BIBLE says Peter was just a leader of the Jerusalem Church. Bible says nothing of the office of bishop of bishops. Gal 2:9, Mat 16:18. 10. Catholics say there is a seat of Peter. Yet BIBLE says nothing about it. Jesus said “not to lord over others”. 11. Catholics has clergy priesthood. Bible says clergy priesthood was done away with in New Testament. There is no clergy priesthood in NT. Heb 7:27, 9:12, 10:10. 12. Catholics preaches Works Salvation (faith + good works + partake R sacraments + submit to R pontiff + be in R Church + devote to Mary = to be saved). Yet Bible says “believe in Jesus to be saved”. Bible says Works Salvation is cursed. Gal 1:8-9. Acts 16:30-31, John 3:16, Romans 10:9-10. 13. Catholics says they must do Penance to atone for their sins. Yet Bible says repent, confess and sins will be forgiven. Catholic Bible changes the word “repentance” in NT into “penance”. Original Greek NT does not use or mean the word penance. Penance = work to atone for sins. Repentance = change of heart. 1 John 1:9, Mat 6. 14. Catholics say Mary went straight to heaven without dying. Yet Bible says nothing about it. 15. Catholics say Islam and Christianity have the same GOD. Yet Islam doesn't believe in death and resurrection of Jesus and Trinity.
@jediv33815 ай бұрын
@Catholiclady3 *That totally dishonest to real history. Roman Catholic Church came from Church of Rome in history. It was also called Latin Church or the Western Church. They are one and the same.* *Christians did not name Roman religion "Roman". Roman came by virtue of ad1054 schism where Eastern Church called themselves Orthodox Church and Western Church called itself Roman Catholic Church (since it was Church of Rome in history).* Quote: "The first known occurrence of "Roman Catholic" as a synonym for "Catholic Church" was in communication with the Armenian Apostolic Church in 1208, after the East-West Schism. The last official magisterial document to use "Roman Catholic Church" was issued by Pope Pius XII in 1950." you said We never called ourselves the Roman Catholic Church. We are the Catholic church under the Holy Father in Rome. Prodestants coined the phrase "Roman Catholic," and it stuck. We are a Catholic period. Latin Catholic would be more accurate.
@jediv33815 ай бұрын
@Catholiclady3 *You are ns. THat's why you answered in a nonsensical way. Book of Romans Church was not Roman pagan religion or Roman Catholic Church. Roman religion does not teach the doctrines of Book of Romans:* 1. Salvation not by Works. Romans 4-5 2. Imputation of righteousness. Romans 4-5. 3. Predestination. Romans 8. 4. Roman religion teaches Roman religion replaces Israel and Israel is abandoned by God. But Romans 11:26 says Israel will be saved.* you said It's a nonsensical question that shows you need to do some more research, that's why I'm not answering it. Look at the letter written to the church in Rome by Paul. It is, and was a universal Church, spreading all over the world. It has a structure to disseminate the gospel in its true form. The head of it is in Rome. I know you think you have a gotcha question here, but you don't. You either haven't looked at history, or you have a bias here. To all God’s beloved in Rome, who are called to be saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. - Romans 1:7
@jediv33815 ай бұрын
@Catholiclady3 *You failed to answer once again. If Roman Catholicism is true religion or Church of the Bible, why was there not a single New Covenant believer saved in a Roman Catholic way in the whole Bible? Why is that so? Please explain coherently intelligently.* - submit to Roman pope to be saved - devote to Roman Mary to be saved - be in Roman Church to be saved - partake Roman sacraments to be saved - baptise in Roman baptism to be saved - do lots of works to be saved
@iqgustavo5 ай бұрын
🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:00 *🕊️ Early Religious Background* - Raised Lutheran, actively involved in church activities and sports. - Inspired by figures like Tim Tebow, maintaining a spiritual connection despite wavering commitment. - College experience marked by involvement in Christian fellowship and a profound conversion to Christ. 02:18 *🙏 Exploring Catholicism* - Introduced to Catholicism through encounters with Catholic individuals. - Questioning Protestant Reformation and contemplating historical perspectives. - Growing interest in Catholic teachings, particularly the Eucharist, sparking further inquiry. 06:10 *📚 Deepening Knowledge and Engagement* - Delving into Catholic literature, videos, and podcasts to understand beliefs. - Attending Catholic-focused events and engaging with missionaries from the Fellowship of Catholic University Students (FOCUS). - Contemplating the significance of Catholic teachings, particularly the Eucharist, amidst personal uncertainties. 09:59 *🌟 Providential Encounters* - Serendipitous encounters with Catholic individuals, including missionaries, igniting further interest. - Navigating uncertainties and hesitations while discerning the path towards Catholicism. - Recognition of divine providence in guiding the journey towards Catholicism. 13:29 *🛤️ Embracing Catholic Community and Practice* - Integration into Catholic community through participation in RCIA (Rite of Christian Initiation of Adults). - Initial experiences of Mass, grappling with its differences from Protestant worship. - Challenges in maintaining spiritual connection amidst transitions and uncertainties. 17:54 *✝️ Deepening Faith and Understanding* - Growing appreciation for the early Church's teachings and the continuity of Catholic beliefs. - Joyful engagement with learning about Christ and His Church through RCIA. - Wrestling with theological concepts like confession while approaching the Easter sacraments. 19:26 *💡 Transition from Knowledge to Heart* - Wrestling with understanding church teachings during RCIA. - Struggle of transferring knowledge to heartfelt understanding. - Encountering transformative experiences that deeply connect with Catholicism. 20:09 *📚 Influence of External Sources* - Recommendation of a book by a nurse leads to a profound video that helps in internalizing Catholic beliefs. - Experiencing a shift from head knowledge to heartfelt connection through external resources. - Reflecting on the journey of falling in love with the Catholic Church. 22:08 *⛪️ Preparation for Easter Vigil* - Selection of a confirmation sponsor and saint. - Emotional preparation for first confession. - Anticipation and nervousness leading up to the Easter Vigil ceremony. 23:56 *🕯️ Experience of Easter Vigil* - Description of the Easter Vigil atmosphere. - Significance of confirmation and receiving the Eucharist for the first time. - Reflection on the community support and the beauty of the Easter celebration.
@psbb4him5 ай бұрын
Could you please lust the title of the books mentioned in your testimony.
@sopad46295 ай бұрын
I discovered that there’s a lot of Providence in the Catholic faith. In Catholicism, the Truth is always searched. There’s always an explanation for everything that we do and why we do them.
@jediv33815 ай бұрын
⭐⭐⭐ *Roman Catholics always fail to answer* ⭐⭐⭐⭐ *If Roman Catholicism is true religion or Church of the Bible, why was there not a single New Covenant believer saved in a Roman Catholic way in the whole Bible? Why is that so? Please explain coherently intelligently.* - submit to Roman pope to be saved - devote to Roman Mary to be saved - be in Roman Church to be saved - partake Roman sacraments to be saved - baptise in Roman baptism to be saved - do lots of works to be saved
@Catholiclady35 ай бұрын
One more thing! We do call things Roman sometimes within the church but we use it as an identifier between churches. There is the Roman catholic church, the Byzantine Catholic Chruch, the Eastern Catholic church and a couple of others. We are all under the Pope but things are slightly different with each. Like our liturgical schedule and wording etc. We all hold the same belief system but aren't exactly the same. Sorry, it can be confusing to outsiders. I'm not super familiar with the other catholic churches because there aren't any of them near me. We don't usually refer to ourselves as Roman catholics, we just refer to ourselves as Catholic unless we need to differentiate for some reason
@jediv33815 ай бұрын
@@Catholiclady3 *Bible does not teach the Universal Church is centred in Rome. So where did Roman pagans get all your ns?*
@Catholiclady35 ай бұрын
@jediv3381 You're just looking for an argument. If you really care, do your research. It doesn't teach personal interpretation. It saysndo so at your own destruction so there's that
@Catholiclady35 ай бұрын
@@jediv3381 You are fixated on something that doesn't matter. Pray to be led to the truth that does matter
@jediv33815 ай бұрын
@Catholiclady3 *You failed to answer once again. If Roman Catholicism is true religion or Church of the Bible, why was there not a single New Covenant believer saved in a Roman Catholic way in the whole Bible? Why is that so? Please explain coherently intelligently.* - submit to Roman pope to be saved - devote to Roman Mary to be saved - be in Roman Church to be saved - partake Roman sacraments to be saved - baptise in Roman baptism to be saved - do lots of works to be saved
@jnesofficial5 ай бұрын
This is a beautiful conversion story man! The Catholic church is the ONE TRUE CHURCH!
@jflow56016 ай бұрын
When I heard that you converted to Catholicism and were studying to be a nurse, I had so much respect for you. I saw how nurses took care of my mom in her last days and thought that these folks were saints. May God bless you in your journey and help you in your service to the sick. Angels walk among us.
@solafide95335 ай бұрын
*RCs always resort to Ad Hominems when they cannot prove their Romance doctrines. Nothing new.*
@peaceandlove5446 ай бұрын
What is the speach that changed your life?
@peaceandlove5446 ай бұрын
When we go to mass is justvHim is not about the music or the congregation, if You find one that the congregation is Nice, that's great, You can always volunteer
@peaceandlove5446 ай бұрын
1, You would be a great traditional priest working with youth. God said He would revealed Himself to the young in the End of Times. And to the old. 2, During covid I would go to this little peace of heaven, a tiny church close by that God led me to, and one day while the priest was consecrating I saw a pair of angels above the Holly Eucharist adoring Him there!!! 3, Soon, as prophecied the evil people infiltrated in our Church hierarchy changes our Holly Liturgy as they plan Our Lord wont be there, but in the masses celebrated in hiding like in Roman times. He also will send His angels to administered Holly communion. God already gave me that previleged on dayvat night after I was denied holly communion in the mouths in the afternoon at another church and I refuse to receive in the hand, in front of a full church. Be prepare.
@peaceandlove5446 ай бұрын
Same now with Bergoglio as Pope we true catholics are suffering but we will not leave The Church because of him or anyother woke, progressive, ignorant or perverted priest. Specially now during The End of Times, with the persecution and tribulation starting. Please never take holly Eucharist on the hand. Take it spiritually if you see it given on the hand and look for another priest or church, God will herecyou. Ask.
@stevenlee56736 ай бұрын
Bergoglio? Excuse me but it's Pope Francis to you! As someone who is taking RCIA in the Catholic Church, please have some respect for our Holy Father!
@peaceandlove5446 ай бұрын
God bless you. You don't know how important converts are tonour Church, you bring beautiful energy of the new born in the holly faith to The Church.
@faithalone21717 ай бұрын
@srich7503 *You failed to answer once again. If Roman Catholicism is true religion or Church of the Bible, why was there not a single New Covenant believer saved in a Roman Catholic way in the whole Bible? Why is that so? Please explain coherently intelligently.* - submit to Roman pope to be saved - devote to Roman Mary to be saved - be in Roman Church to be saved - partake Roman sacraments to be saved - baptise in Roman baptism to be saved - do lots of works to be saved
@nicoleyoshihara40118 ай бұрын
Welcome home!
@tasiaflynn35499 ай бұрын
God bless you your testimony help many people 🕊✝️🤍🕊✝️🤍🕊✝️🤍
@cbooth1519 ай бұрын
All you did was go from one garbage can to another garbage can.
@lynfebabailan16129 ай бұрын
Wow what a nice conversion story,. I want to know you more...
@dawnnichols77429 ай бұрын
. Only Jesus is our priest. Mary is not a way to Christ.. Giving that glory to a person other than God? No way to heaven but by works? Pergutory? None of these things are scriptural. Do u read the Bible? Hope you pray about this.
@srich75037 ай бұрын
If Mary is not a way to Christ then would it really matter if she abandoned Him at birth or not nursed Him as an infant, took care of Him until He was on His own?????
@pamscarr86969 ай бұрын
I Have a "from Baptist to Biblicist". Walking away from the church and studying the Scriptures deeply.
@SgtPiper10 ай бұрын
Now lets hear about your Catholic to Orthodox converson story
@Nihit_Arora_Eagle10 ай бұрын
My name is brother Nihit Arora, I was born & brought up in a hindu family till 2012 then surrendered my life to JESUS my Lord & saviour, a pentecostal spirit filled praying in tongues protestant But headed to join catholic church after got answers to all of my questions which I never ever got from my protestant church(s) since 11 years of my faithful walk in pentecostal denomination(s). Now I'm convinced there is only ONE HOLY CATHOLIC APOSTOLIC CHURCH which catholic church only, whom Jesus gave the keys to st. Peter.
@awuriefnejqwjmnwn496010 ай бұрын
Amen
@richardlau244710 ай бұрын
I went to RCIA taught by a lay person at a Catholic Church and became baptized as an adult. I had a choice to attend RCIA taught by a sister in a different community and a culture of people. I wish I had gone to RCIA taught by the sister.
@bethanyrose202310 ай бұрын
Protestant converts to Catholicism are gifts to the Church. God bless you. Praying for our Protestant brothers and sisters to take the next step to Full conversion. Thank you for sharing your conversion story. I am a cradle Catholic but I had a full conversion this year. I cry because I now realise the treasure that we have in the Catholic Church. Salvation is in the Catholic Church. ❤
@faithalone217111 ай бұрын
@supreme87878 *Nonsensical claim. Where in the Bible ever taught "be intimate with a piece of wafer"? Lol. Where in the Bible says wafer = the host JEsus? And worship the wafer? WHere?* you said Once you know and believe in the Eucharist, you can never ever not love the Holy Blessed Sacrament of the altar! Protestant was all about the personal relationship with Christ but how can one not be more intimate personal relationship with Christ in the Eucharist? We have that intimate relationship where no other can have.