Can someone make a chat for nclex test to pass

My prompt idea was this: "Form a medical consultation team composed of a …* for educational purposes. Demonstrate the methodology of differential diagnosis using the following case study. The objective is to narrow down the causes of the symptoms and resolve the case." *The … part is the list of relevant medical specialties. (ChatGPT can help with them, too.) Then Patient data, symptoms, medical findings, if an examination has already been carried out.

Update Even if you are using academic extensions that come with chatgpt 4 now make sure you cross check them for authenticity of data.

At best, with the state of the technology as it is now, LLMs are most appropriately used to outline the background and provide a start or a structure for a systematic review. As shown in the video, you can't actually do a systematic review in an hour and you can't actually do one with WebChatGPT.

total BS...also he has 0 knowledge on how to conduct a systematic review..

Before making this tutorial, you should watch a tutorial on what is a systematic review! Think about prisma guidelines, reproducibility, comprehensiveness, and validity. I believe all are missing when you are using ChatGPT.

Completely not advocate to this writing manner. As a medical specialist as well as a researcher, most of the time I profit the advantages of ChatGPT and increasing my productivity, but not in generating text content, especially in writing a systematic review - a high-quality scientific paper. It exists 2 major problems: Firstly, this AI-based writing manner lacks of quality evaluation and bias assessment during the process of article selection. Secondly, nearly half of the papers listed in the references (2m11-2m33) are basic random links on the Internet (not scientific papers at all).

Thanks, we need part 2 and 3 please :)

I might try one as an experiment. But the idea of using AI to "write" my case reports leaves a bad taste in the mouth. Writing case reports are actually quite easy once you've done a few. The key is to identify your "take home message", plan your structure and not deviate from the message, then find an efficient way to keep track of your references, of which I'll use about 15-30 for a 1200-1500 case report.

If you don't know the answer to the first question you shouldn't be a doctor in the first place, especially an ER doc! If you don't know the answer to the second question you can look it up instead of wasting time asking and then checking the answer to verify. If you are prescribing a medication to a patient and don't know how to explain the directions, you should be prescribing it in the first place and you shouldn't be practicing anyway.

How is this ethical ?

Why do you keep on mentioning systematic review? That is a narrative review

Thank you for this tutorial. It saves a lot of time and efforts giving me more time to jump into what is more crucial for my research.

i cant find this plug in can anyone send me this?

Interesting content. Really helpful for a new researcher like myself. Like any other newcomer, my biggest challenge in writing up is case report or any other write up is "HOW TO START?!" and "where to start?!". Hope this helps me in writing and publishing more scientific papers. I do have a question though. I'm following all the prompts as your videos, however i could not get the Bing AI to fill in the references as your video. Any tips on that? if it can do that, i guess that this Bing AI tool really help resolve the problem we face in chatGPT. Thanks again for the great videos.

Hi Ben, I wanna do my thesis in systematic review. what are the differences between these? I mean thesis and article in a systematic review. Also is it possible to publish it in good journals?

Thank you so much man ❤️❤️❤️❤️

Are these prompts in chat gpt 3.5 or 4? I think it's important to use the paid gpt 4 version with more learnt knowledge for these types of prompts. Great video.

Your audio is poor.....fluctuates....sometimes inaudio.

voice not proper glitches

Great video!!! Thanks a lot! Could you please avoid mumbling words sometimes, I had to watch it multiple times to understand it.

wow if the MD use chatgpt to write their paper then all the product must be in hallucinogen.

That is not a systematic review. Sorry.

Hello, Dr. Tran. I admire your desire to help people conduct systematic reviews. They are difficult, tedious, and time-consuming. But there are commonly-accepted guidelines on how to conduct SRs - for example, PRISMA, which most high-impact journals now require authors to follow. The methodology you propose here does not follow these guidelines at all and would not even be accepted by established peer-reviewed journals. I see that you have only ever published one systematic review. "Topical Scar Treatment Products for Wounds" in 2020. In it, you searched PubMed and didn't use ChatGPT. I think it would be fantastic if you learned more about the peer review process and then created more videos. You are a great teacher but the information in this particular video is not correct.

I feel like getting the outline done must be enough for an academic researcher to be able to organize the writing only. Using these AI tools that generates mostly fake citations can generate fake assessments too. However, its insights are valuable though. Therefore, it is a smart tool that needs to be used efficiently, and ethically. Afterall, you need to own your work and research with honor. By the way, that what academics call a systematic literature review.

This is a great demonstration of how to get ChatGPT to write essays but please don't watch this video and think you can do an actual systematic review this way. The process shown is nothing like what's required for a real systematic review (and pretending it is just confuses people who might be undertaking a real one)

Please keep in mind how ChatGPT works. It just predicts the next word. The references generated at 08:00min don't actually exist. Every time you dont use plugin, (since I do not know how the plugin works I would say that even if you use it) you must check the references.

chatGPT for primary physicians: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Z9iff8hqttDRqWg.html

thanks, but the problem is that many of the papers and references do not exist. I tried to find them, and unfortunately, they look correct, but do not exist.

Great 🙏🙏

I don't have direct access to the internet or databases such as the Web of Science. I can't perform real-time searches or provide up-to-date information on specific publications.

could you try doing this using Bard and see if it's better? Or a video comparing Chat GPT, Bing AI and Bard

This is going to revolutionize healthcare!

ChatGPT generate all fake citation and source, cannot be trusted.

when I install the plugin mentioned by dr Tran, supposedly reducing chatGPT's tendency to cite non-existing papers, I get "An error occurred blah blah" in response to any prompt. btw, the review paper that dr Tran wrote with Chat GPT does not exist either (not on google scholar anyway)

TOP NOTCH CONTENT!!!! Thank you Sir!!

Amazing - thank you for sharing!

Me: Doc I'm having a heartattack Doc: Just 1 min let me quickly ask ChatGPT.

I think that your video might be too soon in regard to writing a systematic review, which ranks at the top of research evidence hierarchies. There are many comments here from people who appear to be professional researchers, which are mostly not in favour of this video. You might be discrediting yourself as a researcher.

I WISH I had seen this before! I've got 2 weeks to write an 8000 word lit review. I've got a messy collection of citations and I was trying to find videos on how to synthesise the info, but came across this video which SAVED me! I knew about ChatGPT but hadn't known how to use it. Thank you so much for this tutorial! Can't wait to put it into practice :)

Fake Reference! You Must Retire This False Information!

Comment from: @sinnedciti try using this seed prompt: Please act as an expert researcher assisting in the creation of a systematic review. Your role is to generate and provide credible, peer-reviewed citations to support the assertions and conclusions made in the review. When generating citations, it is important to only include studies that have been published in recognized, peer-reviewed journals and to ensure that all information is accurate and up-to-date. Additionally, please ensure that the sources you provide are relevant and directly related to the topic being reviewed. The goal of this systematic review is to present a comprehensive and accurate summary of current knowledge on the topic, and the use of high-quality, credible citations is essential to achieving this objective.

This is a review, NOT a systematic review. Please change the title to reflect that.

I tried this and find most content not aligned with tru ctations. Information is correct by citation is wrong. Please be careful and double check the title of article with its real article.

For any doctors reading this working on any research and in need of a helping hand , I’d love to offer my time to help with writing. Thank you.

Interesting video, and definitely the WebChatGPT plugin helps a lot. I dug in just a bit and found if you prompt with "!pm" it will use PubMed as the search engine. It still had difficulty analyzing studies beyond what was provided in the abstract, but possibly a way to sift through PubMed searches faster than a manual read of them... I'm still experimenting. Thanks again for posting, and I look forward to how we will improve the use of this incredible tool.

ChatGPT had been blocked in some countries. And it can detect VPN so there is no way to use it lately. How can we solve this issue?

This video is so undervalued... I mean, for real, it is soo soo powerful for data gathering and generating articles. It is such a great tool. Thank you for introducing the way of using it

Poor audio quality makes it difficult to continue watching the video. Please improve your audio quality.

I'm asking this on several channels, brand new to ChatGPT and have been trying to sign up since Monday (this is Wednesday, so 2 days now). I always receive the same error message saying sign-up is not available. Any suggestions?