This is Aikido not Daito ryu. Anyway thanks a lot.

前面是20杖素振, 最後面是13之杖, 可以很清楚看到半身和重心移動.👍

0:51 Iwama Jo Suburi 5:59 13 Jo Kata

This is impressive. Better than dancing, 😉. It'd be ashamed for such skill and knowledge to end with the Masters passing. We know jujutsu started hundreds of years ago, but from what did it come, Kung Fu?

shibukawa

Goki shibukawa

Esa son vergadas de ese bejuco

Those who believe this demo is representative of fighting don't understand these kata drills are similar when a classical piano or classical guitar student trains drilling the scales. If you see a student practicing music scales you may think impractical noone plays a song like that but it's training neurons y central nervous system. Also what you're seeing isn't a dueling art it's a weapon retention art y counter grappling art against both sitting y standing assassination attempts. It's self defense not mutual unarmed dueling like boxing, muay thai, kick box, bjj, wrestling.:

1:26...Uke on the right is going in to grab Shioda.Shioda evades him and as the uke goes by he does a break fall for no reason whatsoever...Yoshinkan aikido exaggerates their ukemi more than any aikido branch.

the 13 kata Jo is after the 20 suburi.

shotokan karate would work

Daito Ryu is effective. Aikido is effective. Daito Ryu is simply the predecessor to Aikido. I like how this video shows direct ways to get into Sankyo and Gokyo wrist locks. VERY effective.

with all due respect to aikido, these attacks are very predictable and compliant to the opponent, I have doubts

It's just a pure sport that works in a clinch. Forgetting everything that a street scenario could go wrong in that time. It's nothing like Daito ryu which opens the option before a clinch happens. Thus increasing reaction time.

The way my perception goes. Judo has good theory and philosophy but it's application of that sucks. It's only a sport which says it's superior yet is inferior when attempted to execute.

Plus I did mention that in a knife attack, the worst thing you possibly want to do is to turn your back, unless your timing is better than the best martial artist in history. Which strips all judo techniques down to a few sweep and throws. Nothing else works.

Nope. Judo is a sport with rules and rounds. Their way of breaking someone's balance is too long and inefficient. No one will go and grab you as their first line of defense. In my place where knives are common, if they grab you, they want to stab you. Countering using judo is suicide.

its not aikido but its the parenthood of aikido, some of aikijujutsu technique are same to aikido technique

looks very similar to Fudoshin Ryu.

It's mostly an educationnal exercise. While training standing, we can do an excessive number of moves without any need, as well as very wrong moves. We use training on our knees to keep only necessary moves and help simplify, and also to show students where is the center, as they must learn how to keep it theirs. Then, when standing, we can apply a better technique. Also, one standing and one on his knees is a good exercise to show a difference in height implies on the techniques. Exercises only

that i am studiying was created by a Karateka and Judoka who later turned to Aikido.The Judoka was also a sumo wrestler so we study breaking balance prety much in every technique using leverage and our hips and especially leg movement.I heard that there are alot of bad dojos out there in which people don't learn even some basic things they could use in every day life.My opinion is that it all depends on the practitioner.I have seen good Judokas,Karatekas,Kick-Boxers..but also bad ones.

Aiki Jujutsu was definitely not for him.Aiki JuJutsu is a whole other part of JuJutsu the basic philosophy of JuJutsu(now Judo) is pull when pushed and push when pulled while the philosophy of Aiki itself is accept your attacker force by blending with him then redirect it back to him and apply your own force to make the attack more powerful so he can't resist it.Of course there are allot of other things like breaking your opponents balance,using hips etc. but that is the basic of Aiki.JuJutsu.

The first real standardized jujutsu would be Judo or Kano Jujutsu as at was called before he founded the Kodokan(because he used different teachings from different schools and combined them) .Yes there where standard techniques that where used(mostly by the military)but you can't really call that standard jujutsu.For instance there was an institute strictly for newaza or ground techniques at the time that the Kodokan existed but it was shut down for being associated with nationalistic movement's

Oyama never trained in standard jujitsu because there is no such thing.He trained in Judo with Masahiko Kimura.In the time Mas Oyama was growing up most jujitsu schools in Japan where banned or simply unpopular because they where affiliated with old Japanese warfare times when all honor was forgotten.He trained in Chinese Kempo,Shotokan and Goju Ryu before founding Kyokushin.

yes kyokushin in this 2 tradtional karate including aiki jujutsu! check on wikipedia! :)

No , kyokushin bore its roots from shotokan and goju-ryu .

So, mas Oyama did this martial art?? This is where kyokushin karate was influence!!?

I'm no fan of aikido/aikijutsu, but it really does have quite a charm and aesthetic to its simplicity.

What year is this?

daito ryu looks better compared to akido´s very gentle way.

Then you are seeking the true way. Few judo-ka even bother doing this anymore. Beware though, the second you change your techniques from sport, to lethal then your art is no longer a "Do" art, it is considered once again "Jutsu" and therefore combat purposed. The trouble is you may as well call it jujutsu then as its the same as calling kenjutsu, kendo when neither are alike. the Do arts seek to practice technique in a rather none lethal manner from what ive seen, compared to koryu

I have to disagree, judo is very much a sport, from how is executes throws, to how it actually fights upon the ground. If i wanna be picky, id call judo, jujutsu without its dangerous waza. Why would i call it this, well its simple. If i asked a judo practitioner to perform a powerful throw from jujutsu which requires him to manipulate my wrist to do so, he will have no clue how to execute it safetly and thus will not attempt it. its night and day difference in systems.

Want to know what really makes the difference very few will tell you. Jutsu itself literally translates to "Skill" or "technique", so when you place "Jujutsu" together you get "Soft-technique". Now this may seem confusing. Now lets as you said go back to judo "Judo" translates to "The soft way", now this is not comparable to jujutsu on the basis that it is a mindset, and not a technique practice judo aims to master, compared to koryu systems where the jutsu is all that matters

Hip throwing in Daito-ryu is more commonly used to drop a knife attacker through the use of it, and of course the kote-gasehi in the process. Judo again is a sport, so to compare it to jujutsu is rather foolish. The types of throws i see in judo are completely executed differently to those from daito-ryu. Such as the seoi-nage for example, in aiki-jujutsu you would rip his entire should out as you threw him, in judo you hold his gee the entire time. Daito-ryu is to kill.

The trouble is, you cannot transition an art such as Daito-ryu aiki-jujutsu into traditioaal striking arts such as karate, due to the simple fact the art of Daito-ryu contains techniques designed to make karate and its punches completely useless no matter how good the person can aim. The idea to the Kata and then waza of aiki-jujutsu is to manipulate the persons aiki either through your own strength, or slapping them hard to destabilize their balance to allow you to throw them for a kill

well injuries can't be completely avoided, but restraint is necessary so as to decrease such instances. Ukemi has to be done properly or else u might end up bruising your shoulders or worse the cervical joints. Hence, doing it at slow speeds lets u know the dangers w/o seriously hurting urself & others.

If you were samurai and someone grab you like this, it would not be stupid at all. Think a second, we are in the old times, not in the 21st century...

It helps to develop your hip too

my question to DAITORYUDESHI.... yes your very true indeed it's good to show slow movements.... like you explained to show during demo or while your practicing with partners.... to stop injury ?

aikijujtsu ans aikido jujtsu are taught in japan on the battlefield all these can be used to kill harm or injure an attacker you can break bones with either one of these japanese martial arts but having that if you break anyones arm neck or leg its classed as assult,,,,, lol dont ask me why to be honest because i think it's ballocks but its UK law i guess to say they are attacking you....so this is why its used an holding method to apply pressure to there joints if they move apply it more ???

Aikijujutsu aims to harm the attacker and break their bones with the techniques.Aikido looks to not harm the attacker(which is why aikijutsu is more practical and better for self defense).The techniques differ as well.

In the days of the Samurai when much of Japanese culture meant that people spent long periods kneeling. It was very important to be able to defend against an attacker while your in a kneeling position. The attacker could also be in the same position or even standing, which is where the practice of Hanmi Handachi Waza is derived. It is also belived that this type of training help to develop centre & movement.

What's the different betwen aikijujutsu and aikido?, I watched both and aparently are the same.

you shouldn't joke like that, people won't get it :(

*adding to the uploaders response* japanese people still spend some amount of time in that position.

Thanks for uploading. Any idea what year this is?

Well you should also tell them that if done right you are stepping off at an angle and moving in close which makes the punch a lot weaker. I can attest to this as I do tradition based Jujutsu like this video, and I also fight MMA. In my last fight I was entering in while my opponent threw a hook punch and connected with my head. I didn't feel a thing. The only way I knew it hit me was because I saw it.

Uke can grab toris hand out of thin air. In kotegaeshi done against a tsuki, tori can grab ukes hand out of thin air. Why can the hand not also be grabbed in this technique?

I also get lot of questions from karate students when I am showing Tachi Gyaku Kote Gaeshi, saying that their other hand is free to punch me. They fail to see that during a demo or while learning, the techniques are done at slow speed in order to protect our partners. If the wrist is twisted at high speeds just to show the actual thing, it will snap & that would defeat the purpose of a practice session - which is to learn the proper technique, not to maim our fellow brothers. Thanks.

Thanks for the info, been doing Aikido for 4 years know and I finally know the history