Пікірлер
@asianlover101
@asianlover101 4 күн бұрын
Still have mine from 2005, bought it brand new. I wish we could still purchase tape for it
@dan_rad
@dan_rad 6 күн бұрын
Random Dan has the personality to match his photos. What a cool dude.
@yee8558
@yee8558 12 күн бұрын
Thank you for sharing the comparison😭😭 was going to get one of them but didn’t know which one❤
@cryptobyt2403
@cryptobyt2403 17 күн бұрын
Yes.
@user-sl2eo6iz6c
@user-sl2eo6iz6c 25 күн бұрын
It’s not turning on
@23davidian96
@23davidian96 29 күн бұрын
This is a good video, you should keep uploading.
@UnorthodoxMiscellaneousVideos
@UnorthodoxMiscellaneousVideos 29 күн бұрын
*Are these tapes reusable? Or once you have used it, it's permanent??*
@Maartenols
@Maartenols 29 күн бұрын
Thanks for the upload. But why making these super boring pictures with this expensive film? Trees and a bridge and then more trees, then more trees, and then a bridge... I don't get it. What's wrong with some variety? This film deserves that. Deserves beter.
@DaniloAllen
@DaniloAllen 29 күн бұрын
Guess I just live in a place with a lot of trees 😂
@starling1360
@starling1360 Ай бұрын
Can you use Hi8 analogue tapes in this camcorder?
@maudfaugere5267
@maudfaugere5267 Ай бұрын
Please I need help from the community 😁 On the KODAK, for the flash, we have to press the button all along the shooting ??
@Maartenols
@Maartenols Ай бұрын
Wonderful grain, from 01:48 ;) Ps. Did you shot this a box speed? Pps. Thanks for the upload.
@Bird-0
@Bird-0 Ай бұрын
Making astrophotography specific instant film cameras with massive film sizes would probably sell amazingly as a niche photography device. It'd be bulky, for certain, but the overall size would make it simple to design and thus fairly inexpensive overall, especially compared to digital cameras with large enough sensors to be useful at 25+ second exposures without star trailing. How the lens system would work would be a question. It might make sense to make it a fixed lens device like traditional instant cams. The device would male a lot of money off the film, since it'd be a new format (I'm thinking it would be designed for ~a12 paper sized pictures since you could always use a set of adapters or a telescopic film framing system to make smaller photos). Maybe it's stupid
@sesa2984
@sesa2984 Ай бұрын
Thanks for doin this.
@VariTimo
@VariTimo Ай бұрын
The big difference between Gold and Color Plus is that when you correct the Kodak warmth out during scanning, Gold will retain good saturation. That makes Gold more like Portra 400 and 800, where when you don’t want the warmth you can just tell the lab to scan them slightly cool and have a neutral and well saturation, balanced image. With Ultramax, it starts getting a tint in certain regions and Color Plus just becomes pretty muted, pretty fast.
@Maartenols
@Maartenols Ай бұрын
Portra 400 is known for low saturation, and a more natural/realistic/muted look. That makes it very different from Kodak Gold and Ultramax (and more like Color Plus).
@VariTimo
@VariTimo 29 күн бұрын
@@Maartenols In the end a lot of that depends on how you scant it but Portra 400 has marginally lower saturation at box speed compared to Gold. At notmal magnification it’s hard to tell the difference between Portra 400 and Gold in daylight.
@Maartenols
@Maartenols 29 күн бұрын
@@VariTimo No, it's not. :)
@VariTimo
@VariTimo 29 күн бұрын
@@Maartenols Have you tested all these stocks with a color chart and a lab scanner?
@Maartenols
@Maartenols 29 күн бұрын
@@VariTimo Yes
@turboseize
@turboseize Ай бұрын
Ektar is the Velvia 50 of colour negative film. And just like Velvia, it is great if your subject profits from saturated colours. Landscape, architecture (some styles)... and drinks/food. And just like Velvia, you would rather not use it for portraits. At least not for "beauty" shots. (Could maybe work for sun-burnt endurance athletes like cyclists or rowers...)
@wontbuybiscuits
@wontbuybiscuits Ай бұрын
Watched this video a few years ago and thought it was awesome that you can do astrophotography using a Polaroid camera. Finally bought a OneStep+ this weekend and can't wait to give this a try, all thanks to this video! :)
@ToyStoryNBarneyFan
@ToyStoryNBarneyFan Ай бұрын
From my experience with Ultramax, I really enjoy the film, it’s definitely more versatile in terms of the speed of the film, it’s not too high speed and it’s not too low speed, it’s perfect for a lot of situations. I do respect your opinion on Ultramax and it’s not the film for everyone, I’m just speaking from my experience with it and it passes as a great option for consumer film
@ChesAdams_
@ChesAdams_ Ай бұрын
I just got one in mint condition in 2024 and having a blast using it more than my mirrorless Sony haha😅
@michaelpoczynek
@michaelpoczynek Ай бұрын
Very well-done video. I feel better now as I just bough the MKE2 kit and I am looking forward to using it. Cheers!
@JordysRailVideos
@JordysRailVideos 2 ай бұрын
4:52 looks familiar but I can't exactly pinpoint the location
@romanfedorowycz4090
@romanfedorowycz4090 2 ай бұрын
Goes to the effort to Shoot film, complains how you can't edit ektar heavily lol. The point seems to have been missed. Pick the stock, and show what the analog stock gets. Use different scanners sure but leave the heavy editing for digital photography
@bluecheha8763
@bluecheha8763 2 ай бұрын
I’m trying to take photos on it but it dosnt work, we have the battery and film in it so idk why it’s not working
@sirnoname6943
@sirnoname6943 2 ай бұрын
The actual instagram camera 😂
@mkshffr4936
@mkshffr4936 2 ай бұрын
Perfect for great grandma's box camera.
@renanparedes6403
@renanparedes6403 3 ай бұрын
Wao
@mebel_PRO_Kiev
@mebel_PRO_Kiev 3 ай бұрын
its my favorite film. A lil bit sad because of finish its production.
@Danieltakacsvfx
@Danieltakacsvfx 3 ай бұрын
Bro it's just about the scanning/editing process. I've shot ultramax and It had a very nice latitude, even better when overexposed. Your highlights being gone is simply an editing issue. not trying to criticise, just help for the next time
@wintrymix
@wintrymix 3 ай бұрын
I made an observation about fingers, based on my own experiences. Notice it's only vertical photos that have it, so it has nothing to do with your grip creeping up into the lens. If your finger was actually touching or overlapping the tiny lens, it would block most of the image and wouldn't look like a finger. Look at the footage of you holding the camera vertically. Your hand that's gripping the camera from above has your pinky hanging in the view. This also happens with sleeves if you're wearing something wide like a coat.
@reshmaajayakumar7939
@reshmaajayakumar7939 4 ай бұрын
Hii , please give a suggestion about instax mini 90 or instax evo which one is better ?
@longchampion
@longchampion 4 ай бұрын
super helpful bro
@lalnunpuii38
@lalnunpuii38 4 ай бұрын
Hello Kodak mini shot 2 retro or Fuji mini 90 ?..
@ftlbaby
@ftlbaby 4 ай бұрын
Canon Autoboy Mini T aka Sure Shot Tele Max aka Prima Twin S also has dual lens switch for 38mm f3.5 and 70mm f6. It is much less bulky.
@vintagevantics
@vintagevantics 4 ай бұрын
About to try some Ilford Pan F on my Pentax Spotmatic F. Can’t wait to see and share the results.
@benny2skips
@benny2skips 4 ай бұрын
Just picked one up! Does your battery and date display stay on when the lens cover is shut? Is that normal?
@thorstenjaspert9394
@thorstenjaspert9394 5 ай бұрын
The UltraMax400 is contrasty. If you scan it yourself you should do it with a flat, linear "curve". With it you can optimize the shadow contrast an pull out better details. In the second step you process the pictures in a program of your choice.
@fredib8638
@fredib8638 5 ай бұрын
Great review. I’m totally the same though. Can’t get past the fact it’s a Polaroid camera. Wanted to get the go for size and style but seeing that the photo quality is tripe. :(
@NunThree
@NunThree 5 ай бұрын
Hi, are new Hi8 cassettes still being produced or is there only remaining stock to buy?
@josefatay1957
@josefatay1957 5 ай бұрын
I was thinking about getting the Kodak Ektar half frame camera. But after seeing your video, I realized I can use my finger to block half of the frame😂😂
@just_in_key
@just_in_key 5 ай бұрын
Is this camera have auto exposure?
@cedarandsound
@cedarandsound 5 ай бұрын
It's quite amazing, you set the video camera up so we can watch you snap a photo, but the video camera angle that you set up is much more interesting than the film photos you are taking. You're missing the compositions here bud.
@user-dz7tx2ig4p
@user-dz7tx2ig4p 5 ай бұрын
I just discovered your page. I love it ❤ keep up the cool content
@timotimoson7584
@timotimoson7584 6 ай бұрын
I like your video. It really brings the ProImage 100 to the point. ProImage 100 is between Ektar 100 and Portra 160/400. However, I can provide another information. The ProImage 100 is according to Wikipedia an ISO160 film! I can provide with the link, if you like. And it is for sure, a consumer film, not at all a professional one.
@user-py7wy2oy9c
@user-py7wy2oy9c 6 ай бұрын
Dude please do an fstops video !
@coralcraig4530
@coralcraig4530 6 ай бұрын
Where do you put the batteries??
@DaniloAllen
@DaniloAllen 6 ай бұрын
On the side, you have to undo a screw to get at it!
@stm22
@stm22 6 ай бұрын
the fake shutter sound is distracting😅
@DaniloAllen
@DaniloAllen 6 ай бұрын
For all the on location stuff, that’s just the sound of my shutter 😂 as for the stuff shot inside it’s the sound from the same camera that the images were shot
@stm22
@stm22 6 ай бұрын
​@@DaniloAllen Uhm the real shutter sound without the rolling film sound then :P I'm shooting with the same camera right now and I find the rolling film motor sound on EOS EF really distracting compared to older camera with mechanical roller (click vs click+high pitch sound of rolling motor) Nice videos, keep it up :)
@RaduGheorghe23
@RaduGheorghe23 6 ай бұрын
“Pictures of a friend” 😁
@maxarmitagee
@maxarmitagee 6 ай бұрын
How do you convert it to digital?
@Halbmond
@Halbmond 7 ай бұрын
You sure it was 480p and not 480i?