Waterflow
1:28
3 ай бұрын
Пікірлер
@zayacz123
@zayacz123 11 сағат бұрын
Great review! I have both lenses and love them both.
@supergeodotca
@supergeodotca 2 күн бұрын
Hello Stephen Did you use the focus limiter switch during your lense tests? Thanks
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham 2 күн бұрын
I experimented with it…especially for birds in flight. It helped some in that situation.
@supergeodotca
@supergeodotca 2 күн бұрын
@@StephenIngraham the reason I asked is because the focus limiter is supposed to speed up focusing, especially for the close photo tests like you did. All the best TS
@Tucano08
@Tucano08 4 күн бұрын
Great video Stephen! Thanks for writing the eBook, I have already downloaded it. I have the A6700 and have been using it with the Sony 70-350 lens which is the lightest of the supertelephoto zooms available for the A6700. I have been using some of the settings you recommend: I use it in P-mode based on your recommendation for Point and Shoot Nature Photography (for bridge cameras, I used those recommendations with a Sony HX$00V) and when i got the A6700 I tried the P-mode. I got the focus setting recommendations from a tutorial found in Sony's website. It worked well. Will refine it with your recommendations. Thanks again.
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham 4 күн бұрын
THANK YOU.
@dr.alanmarcus4741
@dr.alanmarcus4741 5 күн бұрын
Thank you very much for your detailed explanation of your settings for bird, wildlife and nature photography. This video certainly is a great companion to your PDF. I plan to make a separate CAMSET for my A6700 that I can load whenever I need it. I have developed a series of separate CAMSET files for different activities and needs such as Dance, Landscapes, Travel, and Birds. These have different sets of custom memories and buttons preprogrammed depending upon the situation. Most are based on Mark Galer’s excellent recommended PAL CAMSET for Sony A6700.
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham 4 күн бұрын
Thank you.
@joostvanbruggen
@joostvanbruggen 8 күн бұрын
Could you answer a question please? I hear people being very enthusiastic about the "bright monitoring" pption on the RX10-IV. What is the difference with the night options under SCENE and why does the camera zoom in so much whilst trying to manual focus?
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham 2 күн бұрын
I am not familiar with “bright monitoring” ?? The night Scene Modes. The first one is for with a tripod and the second one is for without a tripod. The second one takes more than one image and stacks them in-camera…similar to what anti-motion blur does…or what Multi-frame-noise-reduction does under the ISO settings. You can turn off “focus assist” to stop the camera from magnifying the center of the frame during manual focus. :)
@sabinek.7357
@sabinek.7357 9 күн бұрын
Thats great😊
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham 8 күн бұрын
Works well.
@greyhoundsweetsoul.5788
@greyhoundsweetsoul.5788 11 күн бұрын
Are these settings using auto focus as tried it and doesn't seem to. How do you add auto focus to it?
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham 8 күн бұрын
Yes, Auto focus should be turned on, but you do that with the focus control dial on the front to the camera. I keep mine set to DMF, but C works well too.
@greyhoundsweetsoul.5788
@greyhoundsweetsoul.5788 8 күн бұрын
@@StephenIngraham Thanks. I am getting their but finding out how important good light is when taking shots of birds.
@joostvanbruggen
@joostvanbruggen 12 күн бұрын
I did everything you've suggested.. hope to make beautifull picture of birds in Malaysia!
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham 8 күн бұрын
Wonderful!
@GillHammond-c1g
@GillHammond-c1g 13 күн бұрын
Thanks so much for all your hints and tips….I have used them to progress from the RX10 V4 to the OM-1 Mk11 and have similarly set up my custom options.. have you produced a list of the custom settings that you’d advise for Landscapes?
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham 13 күн бұрын
I have not used the OM-1 as much for landscapes. I generally use Program mode and HDR 1 and let the camera take care of it. :)
@GillHammond-c1g
@GillHammond-c1g 13 күн бұрын
@@StephenIngraham thanks so much for getting back to me
@gregm6894
@gregm6894 24 күн бұрын
Two points I would make are: 1. Even though the OM 150-600mm is a heavy lens by m4/3's standards, it is still 'small and light' compared to any FF lens that gives you a 1200mm field of view. The Canon 1200mm f/8 prime weighs 3 lbs more and costs $20,000 -- no hand holding that puppy! 2. While the Synch-IS of the 150-600mm is not doubt an advantage over the 100-400mm, it is a mistake in my opinion to use the Lens IS on the 100-400mm. I have mine turned off, and use only the IBIS in my OM-1 for bird shooting because the Lens IS takes a second to stabilize, whereas the IBIS is instant upon half shutter press.
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham 24 күн бұрын
Good points. I will have to try turning off the lens IS. The weight issue though is real to me.
@scumctv
@scumctv 25 күн бұрын
Thank you for these instructional videos! I bought the Sony RX 10 vi about 6 months ago for my travels. Heading to Tanzania in 2 months so trying to get comfortable with it. This helps.
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham 24 күн бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@lasticonoclast
@lasticonoclast 28 күн бұрын
I appreciate this very insightful and well reasoned review. Having owned and used the 100-400 for a few years with the 1.4x tc, primarily for motorsport and wildlife, I was very curious about this new lens. The single greatest advantage is that 1200mm effective reach. To offset the inherent IQ and noise disadvantage that the m43 sensor has against FF cameras, I try to achieve perfect composition in-camera every time. Even when shooting fast subjects, the relatively long reach of m43 lenses enables me to keep cropping to a minimum in post-processing. So this new lens is right in line with that thinking. However, as you correctly noted, the size and weight of the 150-600 goes against the whole point of using a smaller size sensor camera in the first place. It is simply too great for all day carry and international travel, and that 150mm on the short end is too limiting. In fact, my favorite telephoto zoom is the diminutive 40-150 f/4, which pairs up nicely with the 8-25 f/4 for when I'm not using the 12-100 f/4. I will continue saving up for that 150-400 f/4.5, as I prefer to have a faster lens over greater reach for my nature and wildlife photography.
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham 27 күн бұрын
Thanks for the well reasoned response.
@wisdomtoothfairy
@wisdomtoothfairy 28 күн бұрын
Beautiful pictures . Thank you so much. ^^*
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham 27 күн бұрын
Thank you too
@ml.2770
@ml.2770 29 күн бұрын
I'll stick with my more moderately priced 150-400mm F/4.5
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham 29 күн бұрын
I am sure it is a better lens but not moderately priced by any means :)
@ml.2770
@ml.2770 29 күн бұрын
@@StephenIngraham Why needs two kidneys anyway?
@FrancoisMcinnes
@FrancoisMcinnes 29 күн бұрын
U can skip the first 27min. Nobody buys a $5000 setup without knowing how to get to the menu. Subject detection, back button focus, saf caf, that's all u need to know.
@user-tf6tm4ut9s
@user-tf6tm4ut9s Ай бұрын
Thanks
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham Ай бұрын
Welcome
@CheikosChannel
@CheikosChannel Ай бұрын
Very detailed comparison. Thanks for sharing. A big LIKE from me.
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham Ай бұрын
Thanks a lot!
@user-tf6tm4ut9s
@user-tf6tm4ut9s Ай бұрын
The 950 does not appear to have an ISO setting of AUTO.
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham Ай бұрын
Correct. The 900 did. Just put it on a reasonable setting. 100-1600 is a good place to start.
@cjk1943
@cjk1943 Ай бұрын
❤ great video
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham Ай бұрын
Glad you liked it!!
@michaelhall2709
@michaelhall2709 Ай бұрын
Hummingbirds built a nest on my front porch several months ago. I was able to snap some pictures of the chicks with my OM-1. They’re long gone now, though the nest remains.
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham Ай бұрын
:)
@Mulberry2000
@Mulberry2000 Ай бұрын
not good
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham Ай бұрын
??
@marekp2845
@marekp2845 Ай бұрын
Great comparison. Thanks!
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham Ай бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@g.franch4097
@g.franch4097 Ай бұрын
Than you very much for your insights… Just a question: Which kind of “camuflage” cover are your using with your 100-400?
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham Ай бұрын
Chasing Birds
@marklaurendet1861
@marklaurendet1861 Ай бұрын
Thanks for the interesting comparison, I have the 100-400. I hope they one day make a 100-400 MkII with sync IS as the 150-600 is too big and heavy for me. Even more expensive in Australia.
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham Ай бұрын
Even a pro series zoom to reach 600mm equivalent would be welcome. 🤗
@stratgirl62
@stratgirl62 Ай бұрын
Thanks for creating this video. Just a few minor comments. The lenses are F5-6.3, (not f4.5). I only shoot in RAW to get the best processing power for my images. Using the focus limiter helps a lot to snap onto your subject. The 150-600 is coming on safari with me later in the year. I will also bring 300mm pro, 40-150 pro, and teleconverters. Hubby will likely have one of our 100-400mm as back up. (Other one will be for sale). Suggest that you hold the 150-600 further out and push/pull the lens in and out on the smoothest setting. I had no problem with camera movement when using this technique.
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham Ай бұрын
Thank yoy
@michaelhall2709
@michaelhall2709 Ай бұрын
That was one exhaustive breakdown and comparison, thanks.
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham Ай бұрын
thank you
@bobf711
@bobf711 Ай бұрын
Thanks for the comparison Stephen - very helpful as I have neither lens at the moment but do use the 300mm F4. Towards the end of your review you mention that if you want the reach, the "150 - 600 is the only game in town" I wonder how the 300mm F4 would compare with the 2x converter, from an image quality standpoint. Appreciating of course there is no option to zoom out with that setup?
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham Ай бұрын
That would be an interesting comparison.
@HokKan
@HokKan Ай бұрын
The 300/4 + 2x is much sharper.
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham Ай бұрын
:)
@RaulSuarez-re9sg
@RaulSuarez-re9sg Ай бұрын
Most useful comparison I've seen. Thanks so much!
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham Ай бұрын
thank you.
@brucegraner5901
@brucegraner5901 Ай бұрын
I really enjoyed this review and have wondered about the real differences between the three lenses you mentioned. I own a Lumix G9 and the Lumix 100-400mm lens. Recently I had the opportunity to photograph nesting eagles and their chicks. Keeping a very respectful distance with other photographers I found my 800mm = reach and 20-meg sensor not really up to getting closeup shots of the chicks and decided to employ the 2x converter in the menu of the G9. To my surprise, given good light and low ISO use, the 1,600mm = closeups of the eaglets came out far better than expected, much better than enlarging into my 800mm images. Like you, I shoot JPEGS and, perhaps the 800mm reach, would have given me more cropable images had I been shooting RAW. However, I do value the light weight of my MFT gear and wonder if you've ever tried the 2x digital converter in the menu of your OM-1? I came to Lumix through the Leica V-Lux 114 (based on the Lumix FZ1000) and found its I-Zoom feature very usable, doubling the 400mm reach of that 25-400mm equivalent lens with processor enhanced images. I think this would be a big selling feature for both Lumix and Olympus if they could enhance the performance of this feature in their menus.
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham Ай бұрын
I agree on the digital tel converter. I used it occasionally on my Sony RX10iv and have used it on the OM-1 and OM-1 Mkii. It works well, but could be better with some more processing power and AI put behind it. However 100-400 plus digital tel converter does not come close the the 150-600 at 1200mm equivalent. :)
@brucegraner5901
@brucegraner5901 Ай бұрын
@@StephenIngraham Good to know. Thanks again for the review.
@jvnature
@jvnature Ай бұрын
Do you mean Om-System 150-600mm?
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham Ай бұрын
As opposed to what? I left out the M.Zuiko?
@sjdown100
@sjdown100 Ай бұрын
Your title of the video has 150-400 instead of 150-600. Thanks for your video
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham Ай бұрын
Thanks for that…totally missed it and I was trying so hard to get the name right…the one thing OM asked me to do. :)
@BrentAdams
@BrentAdams Ай бұрын
Cool
@zarkano1
@zarkano1 Ай бұрын
Thank goodness I found this video! I was deep in the throes of buyers remorse until I found this tutorial. I think you just saved my African safari vacation from becoming a major let down. With your help, I was able to set it up quickly and correctly. The 300 page manual from Nikon's website is overwhelming for someone like me with limited photography knowledge. Many thanks for being generous with your time and knowledge.
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham Ай бұрын
You are so welcome!
@papa.alfredo
@papa.alfredo Ай бұрын
I forgot to ask you, you put the ISO to fast without saying, what that means! The rest of the ISOs I understand, but, I do not understand what FAST, SLOW or MEDIUM means, please, can you comments on this? Greetings from Germany! Alfredo
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham Ай бұрын
The ISO fast, slow, and medium set how quickly the camera increases ISO as the light level changes. Fast means that the camera will favor higher shutter speeds over keeping the ISO low…so in low light situations the ISO will increase rather than the shutter speed going down…which is what I want when shooting active birds. Slow would keep the ISO as low as possible while decreasing the shutter speed to compensate. Medium…well somewhere in the middle.
@wenlu5046
@wenlu5046 Ай бұрын
Thanks a lot for sharing your setting, exactly what I have been looking for a long while!
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham Ай бұрын
Glad I could help!
@Jan__J
@Jan__J Ай бұрын
Nicely done, Stephen. 😊 @1:10!
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham Ай бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@albutt7132
@albutt7132 Ай бұрын
Thanks for this but what about birds in flight where higher speeds required for smaller birds.
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham Ай бұрын
You can set your minimum shutter speed to whatever you think is needed. For most birds 1/2000th will freeze both body and wings. For hummingbirds 1/4000th might be needed. 1/1250th will freeze the body of even the fastest bird if you have good panning technique.
@Sunset13118
@Sunset13118 Ай бұрын
Done subscribe
@gamosl.5579
@gamosl.5579 Ай бұрын
Thank you for the best video ever made that really explains what to do. I have a P950 but use my P1000 most of the time. With the settings above and my bird is a Raptor (I specifically take photos of my Raptors/Hawks, etc in flight) will the shutter speed be fast enough to get the perfect 'frozen' shot of a Hawk in Flight? I've read that the shutter speed should be near 1/1000 but more often than not, it is 1/2000. So, do I need to change something else so that I get that super fast shutter speed or will those settings you used automatically detect what the shutter speed should be? I hope my question makes sense.
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham Ай бұрын
The settings in the video are for birds on a stick, as they say. For Birds in Flight, you will need to use Shutter mode on the main dial. Set your shutter to 1/2000th. Use Auto ISO. You can try Subject Finding auto focus, but you can also try Tracking. Subject finding might pick up the bird against the sky better. With tracking you have to get the focus area right on the bird to begin, but then it will track. I should say that the neither the P950 or the P1000 are the best cameras for Birds in Flight…but with practice and patience they do work. For Hawks you can also try Sports mode…but often it will give you too slow a shutter speed. Have fun!
@gamosl.5579
@gamosl.5579 Ай бұрын
@@StephenIngraham I'll try those settings out. Sports mode rarely captures the bird correctly as the shutter speed is far too slow. I'll report back!
@EyeInTheSkypaulmcmenamin
@EyeInTheSkypaulmcmenamin Ай бұрын
How would the OM1 II with the 100-400 cope with aviation photography. With airliners on an easily predictable approach I think it would be no problem, but not sure about an airshow scenario where the jets perform aerobatics and can you need to be quick to get the shot. I ask you because you used the setup for bird photography which is not exactly the same but somewhat similar. Both require good autofocus and tracking to track both birds and jets.
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham Ай бұрын
Since the camera has aircraft recognition it should work as well as it does with birds. I have been shooting Least Terns in flight over our local beach, and that should be very similar to shooting air shows…perhaps even harder as the flight patterns are harder to predict. :)
@Swaggerlot
@Swaggerlot Ай бұрын
Tried your suggested settings and its producing some very nice jpegs from my OM-1 with the f2.8 40-150
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham Ай бұрын
Great to hear!
@tranquochung9498
@tranquochung9498 Ай бұрын
Hello Sir, thank you very much for your review. I am currently evaluating several options, including the Kiwi Ears Quintet, LETSHUOER x GIZAUDIO GALILEO, ThieAudio Legacy 4, and Sennheiser IE 200. My primary interest lies in the clarity and detail of the music and instruments. Could you please provide your recommendation? Thank you in advance!
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham Ай бұрын
I have not heard the Legacy 4 or the IE 200. Between the Quintet and the Gallieo, the Quintet for detail and clarity wins by a large margin. :)
@tranquochung9498
@tranquochung9498 Ай бұрын
@@StephenIngraham oh thank you for the recommendation sir <3
@user-tu3xj5ii2c
@user-tu3xj5ii2c Ай бұрын
My question: if I use regular headphones 3.5mm jack via connector 4.4 mm connected to original balance cable add on. Will I get higher output power?
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham Ай бұрын
How would you do that? Use a 3.5 to 4.4 converter? Do they make those? But yes, I think you would get some extra power.
@wahid-lg1kk
@wahid-lg1kk 2 ай бұрын
You said it has Bluetooth. Or did I mis hear you. It doesn't.. I use this, with the alternate firmware installed, it's very nice. Good note weight, rich mids..I don't like the Ess stuff I have, I only use this now..
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham Ай бұрын
You are correct
@socialengineer1441
@socialengineer1441 2 ай бұрын
How the hell do you get these shots.. i can hardley keep my camera still
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham 2 ай бұрын
Ha! These are selected from maybe over 4000 frames I shot over 2 days. :)
@socialengineer1441
@socialengineer1441 2 ай бұрын
@@StephenIngraham ah so continual shooting?
@socialengineer1441
@socialengineer1441 2 ай бұрын
@CheikoSairin
@CheikoSairin 2 ай бұрын
Beautiful tern in-flight footage. That is big like me. I'm a new friend here. A birder from Singapore. 👍🔔
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham 2 ай бұрын
Thank you.
@Thesummerof2024.
@Thesummerof2024. 2 ай бұрын
Hi i have the P950 and dont have auto auto option on iso settings any ideas please what i would leave it on
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham 2 ай бұрын
100-1600 is the safe choice. 100-3200 if you are shooting in really dim light…like under the tropical canopy.
@Thesummerof2024.
@Thesummerof2024. 2 ай бұрын
@@StephenIngraham Thank you so much 👌
@laurasullivan3027
@laurasullivan3027 2 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for this video! I'm going to Africa and bought this camera but was so overwhelmed until I watched this. Many thanks!
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham 2 ай бұрын
You are welcome.Enjoy Africa. Which country?
@laurasullivan3027
@laurasullivan3027 2 ай бұрын
@@StephenIngraham Tanzania!
@CheikoSairin
@CheikoSairin 2 ай бұрын
Excellent bird photography footage. Thanks for sharing the video. 1 LIKE from me. Greetings from Singapore.
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham 2 ай бұрын
Many thanks!
@HansPetterOsvold
@HansPetterOsvold 2 ай бұрын
nice video mate👍, atb Hans Petter
@StephenIngraham
@StephenIngraham 2 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it