Divine infinity is problematic

Greetings from Brazil! We´re reading here too!

Thank you for this comparison with the 1689 LBCF and your review of Dispy Theology and PC. You are gifted teacher and preacher. Blessings

What ever happened to Lyrical Theology? Shai Linne from Rap battles on the streets of Philly to moving his ministry to Portland, OR. He is still reformed, just not restless and none of us are young anymore. Flash in the pan.

Aquinas discusses the five ways much more in his Summa Contra Gentiles.

The church needs a 200 pg. summary of Horton's new book with theological conclusions applied to those insights.

How many purposes of the conjugal act are essential to it?

And the open theists shudder

Thank you for that thoughtful discussion. Two things were especially memorable: 1) the "image of Caesar on the coin vs. image of God in us" point and 2) imagining the angels in the break room of heaven watching the big screen TVs showing the big news of what's happening in the churches while the ticker tape of political news scrolls across the bottom.

Love this series, and looking forward to future installments!!!!

Translating 1800 Latin words/hr 👀

July 7, 2024: Very nice talk about an important issue (i.e., slavery) with Witherspoon.

You guys were nothing but political. Political, political, political. An anti-gay juggernaut that produced an army of smug, arrogant, tribal, men that pushed all voices within the local church aside or completely out of the church if they differed in any way from your black and white edicts.

I learned a lot more about Mr. Cousins from the QB documentary on Netflix and have been following him since. Seems like such a good dude

Editor is there any way we can get some sort of video of Kevin teaching this class?

Always a good day when clearly reformed posts these videos

Wow, very good! This needs to reach more people.

Pastor Kevin! Thankful for you! Thankful for your ministry! Thankful for you starting Clearly Reformed! Excited for your systematic theology devotion! Brother Justin, excited about your writing on John Piper! Brother Collin, thankful for your faithfulness! Love you guys! Christ is all!

excellent conversation.

Dr. Swain is making very, very important distinctions with respect to what secularism takes for granted of natural theology, especially in how he applies his explanation of the doctrine in relation to other doctrines. Because Evangelicalism is mentioned I think there is another comment also very necessary. First that the bible speaks about changes of status in relations eternally with respect to a limit in our understanding, being so subjected to time, that we are intended to believe with respect to eternity past and eternity future. As he acknowledges no one has ever said this equates to changes in God. I do not need to quote these Scriptural passages, but it is obvious in the text they are not speaking to relations of origins but of destiny by fulfillment eschatologically (not that the economic relations and result of their operations are unrelated to the relations of origins/ministry, or require any less of God's oneness, but that the economic Trinity is not an expectation of his oneness is against the three persons, or a thereness as implied in some logic of our own abstraction as against the one). The Latin tradition has much it can teach about the integrated relations of origins/missions, and manifestation of one God in the three persons, neither should we neglect how integrated the Evangelical tradition is in a robust application of knowledge of the Trinity to theology in submission to the bible's language. Not to imply a division from the relations of origins in the results from the divine missions or in their fulfillment, as to imply a broken Trinity, and what Packer calls a commercialism in our doctrine of God with respect to God's attainment of salvation. And yet, I'm also concerned about when subjecting our theology to criticism as if in response first to the Latin tradition than the bible, something of our doctrine of Scripture is lost as Evangelicals to this sense of antithesis our doctrine has not earned. This is where a distinction between gross biblicism the reading things carnal into the text/use of the text to affirm our notions, and biblical biblicism the acknowledgment the bible and not our analysis as if it is of common authority becomes important. The first type of theological method (Latin analytical) uses negation greater than the first (Evangelical) because God is lost as the conversation stopper to religious discourse. It might appear more antithesis is left to the evangelical doctrinal method, but there is less to negate when our analysis is not held in common esteem with the text. Especially in understanding theology analytically applied with a primacy of what the Trinity is actually doing, namely inviting us into a real relationship defined in biblical terms yes, and only in biblical terms, but not first the subject of our inquiry before those terms, but divinely stated. We cannot understand status changes in eternity past to eternity future, but the biblical text expects that we won't try to. Unless looking through the mystery only the bible could have shown as being revealed, looking then exclusively through the person of Jesus Christ to find anything of eternity our carnal minds can never achieve, and ordinary Christians throughout church history until now have appreciated this. In talking about Christ's humanity, the bible also speaks about him more divisibly from the Father than many of these discussions allow for (though never less than one in being and will with respect to his divinity). Sometimes the biblical text talks about God as the God of Jesus in a way that I think these convos make very difficult to consider, along the way to of course bringing more depth theologically sure. The way the Latin tradition has expressed the missions and relations of origins being integrated is important because it is the integration from beyond that we often miss by gross biblicism. However, the use of the integration that makes God one by some extension of our analysis is a real abuse of the biblical text to church history also, it is exactly what is assumed by the assumption social trinitarians are around every corner with respect to needed to get the Trinity exact as it pertains to an authority within our own analysis. Again, the distinction I am making is not with a requirement of an ontological difference in God's being upon accomplishment of their missions, rather that each one of us as Christians rely upon authoritative changes in status economically within the Trinity that we shouldn't feel like we have to explain completely by relating backwards to enjoy. As if by necessity of our own application of knowledge we must do what Christ really is for us as the display of entry into knowledge of the Trinity and fellowship with God's Triune person. As if this relies upon making his being proper explicable in a way it never will be to enjoy completely fellowship with the divine Triune life. I know that no one is saying merit is necessary but am concerned that if we place the accent upon our analytical ability as of such an authority with respect to the Trinity that something is lost dogmatically in how we are supposed to listen and be amazed, not gained, especially with our application of the Trinity by way of our doctrine of Scripture. That the emphasis is taken away from the ease of access only Jesus Christ could have accomplished into the Triune relations of God. This is not to belittle doctrine, but the use of tradition to pretend some naming of God's being proper by acumen and scholarly resources most Christians will never have with the understanding and relationship with knowing God as Trinity that they do. When the bible's explanation is more than enough, more than sufficient for entrance into this wonderfully mystery. Something would be lost of simple faith in the doctrine of the Trinity by faith in the bible and could then take the humanity of Christ for granted, which the bible otherwise makes real more easily through the simple Gospel's introduction to the Trinity in the economy of salvation. It would be our insistence to make God's being proper so explicable that would create a sense of antithesis whereby Christians feel like their explanation is in competition with simple trust in what the bible says in its definition of our place in knowing God as Trinity. That everyday Christians, every Christian is meant by God to enjoy the Trinity in the beauty of the simplicity it is presented in the biblical text, not because they fully understand, but all the more enjoyed because they trust what the bible says. That it is no surprise to most Christians all eternity will be required to be brought into any more of a full consideration of the doctrine. And yet, now they know no less of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit for saying so as to pray, but expect him to be doing in his revelation of those persons in the very priority of the biblical text a statement of himself our minds can never fully attain, and yet have been no less made certain as reveled and made known to be believed/instructed in Evangelical doctrine. There is something really good in the commitment to hold out for the best understanding of the Trinity we can have, there is something better to not belittling grace by missing the freedom every Christian has in enjoying it in doing so. No one is saying a distinction between the result of the relations of the economic Trinity by their missions means an ontological difference in God from the being of origins. It is taking the origins of being in some tension with the economic Trinity, that is putting in tension what the biblical text in whole is inspired to resolve. The disclosure of God as Trinity explicitly as the relational basis for our knowing god in the New covenant. Many believers know this by faith more than in principle as a hermeneutic, it is the Evangelical faith that in the name of tradition we cannot lose.

🤍🙏🏻.

🤍🙏🏻.

someone abusive mom probably sent this to their kid and that kid probably committed suicide

Collin Hansen is a Leftist clown. Can't believe he laments the creation of Mt. Rushmore. Everyone take note of where he's coming from, a true disciple of Keller.

Joy to listen..when a fairly seasoned n tested minds come together...thank you guys..

Great to listen to you guys esp. when you guys come together to share thoughts....there should be more trios, seasoned Men like you guys...Blessings.

Respectfully, Mr. DeYoung, speak to the men in Moscow face to face. They have invited you to meet privately and or publicly, whichever you prefer. I think they would agree with you on everything you've said here. It's odd to me that a godly man would be so adamant against the idea of privately meeting men with whom they disagree face to face. Things like this only deepen the divide, whereas we should be seeking unity. Blessings to you sir.

Good

What is the role of Pastoral Counseling in preaching. Only one who does it successfully knows well the saint in the pew.

Read Willie Jennings Ph.D , he is also from Grand Rapids, Michigan.

Name tge OPC church. Gaffen. . .worshiped where Calvary Presbyterian of Glenside? Westminster is not in Philadelphia it is in Glenside, Pa.

Bring on David Currie from Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary South Hamilton, Massachusetts campus.

Don't fear the Moscow Mood. Dialogue with Doug Wilson in a debate.

Eleazor is the Holy Spirit in Genesis 24 and you see by the servants genuine care and effection for the father cuase that his will is in agreement with the father and son

I pray that God will use your book to bless his children with depth of knowledge and strengthen those who read it daily.

Mr. Kevin and Mr. Guelzo Good morning. Thank you so much. Excellent interview. Yes, Humility, wisdom and hope, complement my early prayers today.

What about critical theory that is benefiting women to thrive in the career world and men being disapproved?

A response regarding comments made in this video pertaining to Federal Vision. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mcWkm9iIutevgqs.htmlfeature=shared

Kevin should really sit down with Doug and talk in person (proverbs 18:17) i think it would clear up any accidental or intentional confusion.

I've been shepherded by Doug Wilson since the late 90's. Our family has been greatly blessed by his ministry. I'd say i support FV and when many PCA ministers talk about the sacraments they sound like Baptists.

I love football as much as anyone. I love Kevin too, but I was hoping there would be some discussion of the Lord's Day, particularly given the all-encompassing commercial aspects of the NFL.

For anyone going around looking for the truth, you will come across many Christians who are trained in the art of wiping out verses from their bibles to support their ideas. Don't be fooled. We aren't dealing with A truth, its THE truth. The real law of God is written on the hearts of those good people, and it is also written in the wind, so that anyone can see it and know it. Anyone wonder where all the true Christians went? Well they aren't spending their time searching for the minute details within the written texts, but out in the real world trying to glorify God. Truth always was and always will be for the people of heart, and only so. With 100% certainty, there is one humanity entirely chosen, but will you and your actions chose God? We hope.

Eat to see the effects of effective discipleship for College students. Building the Kingdom to reach the nation's for Christ.

Thats my QB

God's definition of "true Israel" ALWAYS centered on Christ (see Ephesians 1). That never changed, though awareness of this truth varied. I like the revision you made (21:06) to Acts 1:7. What Luke wrote was pretty good, but what you changed it to is obviously better.

So what do you guys think of Harrison Butker's recent commencement address which seems to have much of secular culture and left-wing media outlets up at arms?

"6th choice"... I had no idea. Well Kirk Cousins was no doubt the best 6th choice the Spartans ever made! Kirk, Scottie Scheffler, Clayton Kershaw, Paul Goldschmidt, (and now given recent events, Harrison Butker) are notable Christian athletes I definitely root for on the playing field.👍

Amen 🙏🏼✝️♥️🕊️

Thanks for having my QB on the show! Kirk is destined for greatness.