John B The Holographic Universe is a Walter Russell 2.0 Check him out on here!

The Gravitative vortex always travels in the EAST direction as it heads from the cone base towards the NORTH cone apex (sharp tip). The body of matter that is at the cone apex (tip) like a sun or a planet only turns in one direction, and that direction is WEST. (It is WEST even if the planet's axis has tilted 180 degrees and appears to spin in the opposite east direction) So, EAST would be the direction that is opposite the direction that the body of matter is turning. And the Radiative spiral turns WEST as it heads from the cone apex toward the SOUTH cone base. If you like these kind of answers please consider subscribing to my KZfaq channel --3Dfrequency

Just found him too he is amazing.. my son is a sun moon mercury Taurus ♉️ with Venus as his star of destiny ❤️❤️❤️

Can you comment on brain Keating’s rubbdtle to Russell’s work (on his KZfaq channel). He says that Russell’s work predicts things that hey haven’t been able to find. Unfortunately the details of the experiment I haven’t been able to find.

I'm from Russia, how to find Richard Orlee email?

Amazing video!

I love the film showing the visual representation of important mathematical concepts: I don't understand the maths but it at least lays it out so people can get a idea of how things relate.

Where can I get a copy of the General Radiative Concept?

So, if an action occurs somewhere else in the universe, we see it immediately? So, is the concept of light-years false?

GREAT PRESENTATION...GOD BLESS

Wonderful as always Matt I haven't counted how many 'oneness' or 'merging with Source' experiences, but, a lot. My 1st one was during meditation, I had a continuous oneness experience during a 14 day juice fast where i could see what everyone has attached & it wasnt a guardian angel. I went to a locam Market & stood watcing a guy playing guitar - the sounds came out as a rainbow & a singer had rainbows of colours coming out of her mouth. I felt amazing but could not relate to anyone. Eventually i had to start eating grain to bring my frequency down to where I could interact with humans again. Another time i did an exercise of 'looking' at Light & Dark & then standing in the 'middle path' of Oneness. After that, I could simply 'Be' in Oneness at will. That was 20 years ago. If i close my eyes now I can still feel the oneness... When i moved to Australia in 1999 I quickly realized/was told that I'm different to humans in this place, the 'side effect being that I have no friends here. I will just add, I know that I'm not human, but rather Spirit having a human experience & I'm guessing the Australian humans around me sense a difference & feel uncomfortable...

Love this presentation! Excellent job Buddy! Thank you for sharing. 😀

Hi, Many thanks for this presentation.. I have a question. If I do remember , electricity has created life in the third octave in which inert gases and elements of the third octave formed atoms which formed our bodies and all life around us. Everything was formed throughtout the transformation of gases by the compression and expansion of electricity. If one element can tranform into another one on the next octave, then when a body has heavy metals like cadmium, mercure etc which belong to a superior octave, how to make these metals transform back to the octave suitable for the human body ? many thanks

I'm a bit lost on the Chemistry. But it was great to hear someone well-versed in Russellian Science! (Even if most went over my head!) Thanks for uploading USP!

I really liked this presentation. I study alone and I have difficulty understanding some topics, including the periodic table. In this presentation, a lot of things became clearer to me and I hope to be able to study from here. I will try to make these drawings, and access the references indicated. I don't speak the language very well, so the fact that I can watch it with subtitles, even in English, makes it much easier to understand. I thank you immensely! Thanks Tim Gillespie!

Can you make a video on the newest podcast with Joe Rogan, Terrance Howard and Eric Weinstein taking about in essence Walter Russel’s work. Would like to hear your take on Weinsteins comments.

Thanks for the video. This chart and all of Walter Russels work digitized by Ken Lee Wheeler so thank you Ken aka Theoria Apophasis on youtube.

Absolutely captivating; I listened late one night in one sitting, and could not tear myself away. Although I take the story of this particular future with a grain of salt. the most fascinating part of Darren’s talk is connection of solar flares to Walter Russell and others’ illumination. I think we had some recent solar flares causing Arora borealis to be seen far southward than is normal - I personally experienced no illumination, but I hope others did on our planet. The more the better. The future scenario which involves a disastrous colonization of mars, tells me that in this future people did not learn of Walter Russell, who would have cautioned against inhabiting a dead planet. Doesn’t sound like the future is good to Walter Russell although I hope for the complete opposite due to the dedication of USP, Matt Presti, Darren and so many others. BTW I knew of an illuminated sage from Kashmir who made predictions of nuclear war exchanges changing our world before the end of the 20th century, and it did not happen. So I hold lightly this strange story of the future where a tipping point for illumination in the human race doesn’t happen for almost 2000 years give or take. Rather discouraging. The Greek professor who brought this to publication just happens to be a Mason if that is important to anybody. Masons always have an agenda. Thank you Darren for this amazing presentation and the research you did to make it happen. I will make the most of the Now.

Terrance its time to do another appering 🪷💮🌸💮🪷 Here with your team And visual Wave conjugtions. lynchpins And so much more... Ive watched so many times this one Do the new one 🙏♦️ Something is telling me That u r preparing Huge wave ,love it

Im still comfused.

So, I understand "frequency" making "tones" or musical notes... and when waves "align" at points they synchronize which then becomes "harmony"... I understand that the higher the frequency then becomes "light"... What I am still missing is how do you determine the "frequency" the element makes? What determines, or how do you calculate the wavelength of the element?

Ooooo Lao talks about the germ theory fraud!? I need to put that book on my list 📝 V iru s Mania is another great book that explains their fraud. Love ya'll!!!❤❤❤

This is psuedo science

I miss Tim. So glad this was posted. Now I can see him anytime and be reminded how much of an asset he was...and now still is!

Alexandre-Émile Béguyer de Chancourtois

Scot is a very good teacher

Great video, but it is important to point out a major fundamental error! You say that Mind is substance. Dr. Russell repeatedly stated that Mind is NOT a material substance. Mind is the equilibrium stillness from which all polarized motion (substance) emerges as as wave vibration. Waves are divided polarized halves of Zero.

This was a great compressed presentation. Thank you Tim and R.I.P.

Thank you! Why did Dr Russel amend the table from 10 to 9 octaves? What reason did Lao tell him?

Thank you for the presentation. The popsci version of this has been raked over but I see something here and feel better to hear this (and others) discuss the idea at length. Recently I tried the thought experiment of what matter is if the proton is an error, what it would mean, and I believe I see a way through understanding this.

I love being exposed to alternative scientific theories! But this one comes off not a little woo-ish. I'm sure Russell's theory is complex and difficult to summarize, but I've been assaulted by lots of passing references to concepts that don't get explained. oblates? Inertial plane? Solar system is iron? Elements with new names? Trinities? Lightwave format? Has this table been used to make predictions? Is it falsifiable? Is this "table" considered by its adherents to be a replacement to the Mendelev table? ''cos I can't imagine a world where we teach this image to children over the standard table.Anyway, not hating, just confused upon fist listen. Thanks for the vid!

The moment I saw the spiral, I got goosebumps. That was the pattern I was looking for ages ago.

Loved the video. What made you say it was golden ratio?? I've been obsessed with this golden ratio for a couple of years now and have found some amazing things along with square root 3d spherical geometric and cubic rotations.

walters octave diagram is directly lifted from the stele of ptah in egyptian myth ptah becomes atum, in the stele of ptah atum is centered by two mirrored ma'at figures, ma<>at is >at>am is ma<ta< in the 9 octaves 1H is between 3rd and 4th octave to read 314PIE, adam in the sistine chapel is created by god sitting in a slice open brain, russells first and last elements are tom<>ion (>mot>ion) walter loved his pendulums, also if you line up the heavy elements with the elements in the 1st 3 octaves of russells 9 octaves you'll notice alberton is einsteinium, erneston is rutherfordium, jameson is lawrencium and so on, this is completely insane considering walter drew the 9 octaves decades before the heavy elements were synthesized and named, walter railed against subatomic particles so if we cant accept that his work is somewhat cryptic, what the hell is with those 1st 3 octaves

Tim, are you available for a interview. Would love you to introduce and teach my ppl about this topic on my platform.

JOIN THE CONVERSATION --> philosophy-org.myshopify.com/products/russell-cosmogony-conversation

Thank you for what you do really🫶

This show sound created everything and everything create sounds

46:10 BUBBLES!!!! YAYYYYYYYY!!!! WE NEED MORE OF MRS. JACOBSON! Its a bubbleverse! Redefine the bubble and realize that we don't only have to have Liquid-Gas bubbles! We can have solid-solid bubbles and even sparse gas-gas bubbles!

AWSOME CLARITY! THANKS SCOT🥇✅

Water has an unusual ice phase (ice 6) that acts as an electret. It is solid and cold. It is formed usually in the upper atmospheres, and does not like to form at atmospheric pressure. Upper atmosphere has an antenna float voltage potential difference between the earth's ground. I note this to draw attention to the electric condition that is its origin enviroment. Browns gas is simultaenously reducing and oxidative. It makes magnetite jump away from the flame. Magnetite's inner structure is balanced, and is used in magnetic cores which, when alligned with an external magnetic fields, posses little to no histerisis currents on fast switching. Magnetite is noted to illustrate its utilization as a balanced magnetic state. Using silica, aluminum oxide, and HHO, you can fuse dissimilar materials to them with the HHO flame. Minerals, metals, and other glasses fuse alike. With a high enough output of water gas -- You can form a small sealed spherical crucible. Upon heating the external surface with the flame, you draw the impurities towards the flames inner blue electric cobustion surface. Its burning radius is a vacuum. Said another way -- the 1800:1 implosion volume of the electrically separated gas applies a vacuum of water, or water vapor. On formation of the water on the ceramic surface, Because it is simultaenously oxidative and reductive, the substrate which is becomming heated experiences high generation, and radiation. It is as though an electric current were drawn through the body of the ceramic at the spot heat of the flame. I am unsure if the ceramic is charging and storing, or upon heating, discharge inwardly and compressing the inner core. As the flame burns, the outser surface is simultaenously continuing to be externally evacuated -- and in a vacuum with little abillity to discharge the heat -- it freezes. Carbon heats to a greater intensity under vacuum when an electric current is applied. In its vacuity, it can discharge its inner heat less than when surrounded by a denser volume of atmospheric air. It is possible that carbothermal reductions ocurr within cooling magmatic rocks, and when water mixes and cools -- new minerals are reassabled into formafter cooling. Note that the old prospectors always looked for quartz and magnetite before finding the load bearing ores. If carbon to carbon reduction is needed under high pressure in order to convert graphite and graphene from its amorphous state to its true form -- the diamond, and high temperature. We currently use hydraulic presses and weeks of direct current to form diamonds. Using the shrinkage of a borosilicate glass, such as when used in a prince ruperts drop -- when applied to the spherical crucible -- would provide the compressive tonnage without hydraulics. Its inner core material, of carbon with aluminum oxide or sand with magnetite in a fixed magnetic orientation -- might provide the body (alumimum or silica), and magnetic polar guidance (magnetite, or hematite / iron to conduct the angular countercancelling of magnetic fields). It is possible, that the true cube is of carbon's diamond is carbon's highest expression, and natural state. Graphite is not amorphous, it is the allotrope of diamond; for it was not forced to allign in the same axis of rotation on its poles. This is noteable in graphene formation from wood and cotton fibers, as they are reduced. HHO also lends itself to a myriad of other effects that are unusual. Upon burning adjacent to a copper wire, a great current is induced before the metal becomes molten. Its heat, fusing capacity is harsh to conductors and ceramics; and yet somehow gentle to any living organism that contains liquid water. It is the center of cavitation; it bears high heat of the sun upon its implosion, and after rapid heating -- also quickly quenches whatever material is unfourtunate enough to be surrounded by it. If Russell used supercritical water to form his "gas samples" with westinghouse; and the supercritical point of water likely resembles a soft plasma -- it is very likely that water gas behaves like a plasma is a low, non incandescent termperature. Many ways to induce plasma. This can change drastically change how we view our bodies and organic chemistry, if the electric qualities of water are better understood; and the magnetic axis which russell. There is a problem when you try to merge all four fields of the quadropole into one axial plane though. If I'm being perfectly honest, I havent solved that part yet. I am delighted to know that Margaret knew Lao, and also bedini -- Bedini was greatly influenced by russell's work -- but Bedini's field intersections are drawn differently than russell's. Bedini also experiemented with pulse discharges, which work pretty good in water gas circuits. Much to think about.

On the off chance this is marked as spam, I hope whomever runs this channel can convey my interest to speak with Matt, Darren, and Scott. I've left a comment on matt's channel, and I'll leave the same comment here, and on Scott's video too. I hope it reaches one of them, at least.

Hi Scott, I'd like to get in touch with the USP. Specifically, you, Matt, and Darren. I've read russell's works since I was eighteen, and made my own audiobooks of his works (in 2008-2009) when there were none available on the internet. Of notabe relevance to this video -- I have comments and recommendations about a bifilar quadropole if you are trying to re-create the "gas discharge experiments", not a mono-filament conic section. You need more interwinding capacitance (dielectric capacity) to interweave the blotch walls in a more forgiving fashion. Also of note, I'm not sure if any of you have seen a document -- I'm not sure ever made it to russell's archive -- that was a private exchange with lao russell after the optical-dynamo fried itself, and the project was abandoned after the second construction (the one you likely have at the museum) for a reason disclosed therein. The feild intersections you're trying to make between the blotch wall (dielectric) took me a decade to see -- they do not 1:1 map with just a static bar magnet -- and our science is missing the hidden inner magnetic vectors. I foolishly discussed russell on the internet before I understood what mis-concepts I had misunderstood. As a teenager, I've re-drawn his drawings and tables with some nuance to understand the angular relationships -- In the last year, I also have assembled the periodic table to examine common spectral lines, to try to understand how russell read their history and qualities. Also of note, is that some commonly made simple cubic combinations of opposite mates do show. And they always turn to å ceramic. I unfortunately have the opinion that in order to decipher russell's work, you have to understand the whole concept first -- and until the wholistic view is understood, most of his work seems difficult to apply. I think he tried to keep it that way as he was developing his own language to express the concepts he saw. The periodic table has a recursive element within it -- that appears to be an inert gas. You would not see it in the melendeev arrangement, because they are arranged. I am but one programmer, and I haven't been able to dedicate as much time as I would like to be able to over the last three years. As a student, Usually, you have to have an experience that makes you at least "try on" his concepts for size in order to examine something outside science's well catalouged domain. I think the ultimate proof that this will be, is being able to map scientific observations of crystallography and semiconductors -- to russell's periodic table, and predictively idenitfy where other effects are constructed. Alas, I have not been able to inter-relate the spectra to the orbital positions of the elements yet, but I have some ideas of how to do it. Also, I haven't figured out how to predictively use the crystallography table yet with metals. But I hope, that perhaps if I am able to speak with other students who have dedicated decades to the calling -- that we might together be able to offer each other our understanding of his work. Some low hanging fruit that should be acheiveable, is gas transmutation from the atmosphere (NCOU). Carbon to gold (Atomic suicide), or new conductive alloys divided from the carbon body (U1). There is a type of nanocrystalline lead sulphide and magnetite that occasionally appear in granite rock with an extraction technique dating back to the 1600's that changes copper to gold, or magnesium to tin or silver upon melting in a reducing atmosphere. Anyways, I have some experiments I've tried over the years, including buying a spectrometer and experimeting with sealed gas discharge tubes, that you would likely be interested in; and after some explaination of how I got here -- what I see as next steps to do next with water, carbon, and air, and rocks. I don't want to make a public presence again until I've been able to discuss the ideas privately, I've gone offline for the last 16 years without a trace -- after I first mis-represented russell; and I deeply regret speaking from a half understanding. Science and its apprentices will need more handholding to arrive at the same conclusion, and in its conclusion must be dynamic proof which they could not acheive with their understanding. But I am looking for a group to share with, and people to talk to who have lived russell's work. I will divulge my collection of his archived works which I posess. I'm 34 years old now, it's been 16 years I've been chewing this over, since I last tried. I think it's time to show myself and engage in discussion, at least to other students. I think I have run out of time to walk this path alone. I'm not finished with my work yet, but I hope you will understand my effort to be transparent. It is not only my work to withold, if I am to map currently observed effects, to the previously unforseen cause of an interwoven quadropole -- of which the blotch wall intersections are the outer cubic wave mirrors, the inner mirrors are countercancelling magnetic zeros which are only registered/stored in its dielectric capacitance. There are so many fields this touches, and each of the niches have developed their own specific languages and techniques, and relative scale of time to observe the effects within. I have to imagine that a better understanding of superconductivity (or dielectric reflectivity) would be sought out under high pressures for room temperature conductance. But because of the depth of this, I find myself needed to refer to someone who is already well versed in the domain in order to translate how the effects are constructed. I don't think I'm alone in this pursuit of translating russell. But I did think that I would finish this walk alone. I'm not sure why that feeling changed recently. So, What is a good way to contact you?

Hi Darren, I'd like to get in touch with the USP. Specifically, you, Matt, and scott. I've read russell's works since I was eighteen, and made my own audiobooks of his works (in 2008-2009) when there were none available on the internet. Of notabe relevance to this video -- I have comments and recommendations about a bifilar quadropole if you are trying to re-create the "gas discharge experiments", not a mono-filament conic section. You need more interwinding capacitance (dielectric capacity) to interweave the blotch walls in a more forgiving fashion. Also of note, I'm not sure if any of you have seen a document -- I'm not sure ever made it to russell's archive -- that was a private exchange with lao russell after the optical-dynamo fried itself, and the project was abandoned after the second construction (the one you likely have at the museum) for a reason disclosed therein. The feild intersections you're trying to make between the blotch wall (dielectric) took me a decade to see -- they do not 1:1 map with just a static bar magnet -- and our science is missing the hidden inner magnetic vectors. I foolishly discussed russell on the internet before I understood what mis-concepts I had misunderstood. As a teenager, I've re-drawn his drawings and tables with some nuance to understand the angular relationships -- In the last year, I also have assembled the periodic table to examine common spectral lines, to try to understand how russell read their history and qualities. Also of note, is that some commonly made simple cubic combinations of opposite mates do show. And they always turn to å ceramic. I unfortunately have the opinion that in order to decipher russell's work, you have to understand the whole concept first -- and until the wholistic view is understood, most of his work seems difficult to apply. I think he tried to keep it that way as he was developing his own language to express the concepts he saw. The periodic table has a recursive element within it -- that appears to be an inert gas. You would not see it in the melendeev arrangement, because they are arranged. I am but one programmer, and I haven't been able to dedicate as much time as I would like to be able to over the last three years. As a student, Usually, you have to have an experience that makes you at least "try on" his concepts for size in order to examine something outside science's well catalouged domain. I think the ultimate proof that this will be, is being able to map scientific observations of crystallography and semiconductors -- to russell's periodic table, and predictively idenitfy where other effects are constructed. Alas, I have not been able to inter-relate the spectra to the orbital positions of the elements yet, but I have some ideas of how to do it. Also, I haven't figured out how to predictively use the crystallography table yet with metals. But I hope, that perhaps if I am able to speak with other students who have dedicated decades to the calling -- that we might together be able to offer each other our understanding of his work. Some low hanging fruit that should be acheiveable, is gas transmutation from the atmosphere (NCOU). Carbon to gold (Atomic suicide), or new conductive alloys divided from the carbon body (U1). There is a type of nanocrystalline lead sulphide and magnetite that occasionally appear in granite rock with an extraction technique dating back to the 1600's that changes copper to gold, or magnesium to tin or silver upon melting in a reducing atmosphere. Anyways, I have some experiments I've tried over the years, including buying a spectrometer and experimeting with sealed gas discharge tubes, that you would likely be interested in; and after some explaination of how I got here -- what I see as next steps to do next with water, carbon, and air, and rocks. I don't want to make a public presence again until I've been able to discuss the ideas privately, I've gone offline for the last 16 years without a trace -- after I first mis-represented russell; and I deeply regret speaking from a half understanding. Science and its apprentices will need more handholding to arrive at the same conclusion, and in its conclusion must be dynamic proof which they could not acheive with their understanding. But I am looking for a group to share with, and people to talk to who have lived russell's work. I will divulge my collection of his archived works which I posess. I'm 34 years old now, it's been 16 years I've been chewing this over, since I last tried. I think it's time to show myself and engage in discussion, at least to other students. I think I have run out of time to walk this path alone. I'm not finished with my work yet, but I hope you will understand my effort to be transparent. It is not only my work to withold, if I am to map currently observed effects, to the previously unforseen cause of an interwoven quadropole -- of which the blotch wall intersections are the outer cubic wave mirrors, the inner mirrors are countercancelling magnetic zeros which are only registered/stored in its dielectric capacitance. There are so many fields this touches, and each of the niches have developed their own specific languages and techniques, and relative scale of time to observe the effects within. I have to imagine that a better understanding of superconductivity (or dielectric reflectivity) would be sought out under high pressures for room temperature conductance. But because of the depth of this, I find myself needed to refer to someone who is already well versed in the domain in order to translate how the effects are constructed. I don't think I'm alone in this pursuit of translating russell. But I did think that I would finish this walk alone. I'm not sure why that feeling changed recently. So, What is a good way to contact you?

On the off chance this is marked as spam, I hope whomever runs this channel can convey my interest to speak with Matt, Darren, and Scott. I've left a comment on matt's channel, and I'll leave the same comment here, and on Scott's video too. I hope it reaches one of them, at least.

😎 cool

Throwing up an awful lot of hand symbols for someone who isn't still "connected" with the occult.

Unfortunately he was wrong about gravitation being a force.

Thank you Margaret 😊 💓

I'm so glad you have posted this.