Thank you so much for make this material in this form. Is there a script available? Thank you for your answer 🙏

Brazil here 🇧🇷

Wow, so delusional to think this is rational.

Toki, Loki, kamu

Thank so much for making this brief but very enticing introduction to your book!!!

One of the most trusted academic voices on theology

🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼

Great teacher❤

I would rather believe there is a GOD, then die not believing in Jesus Christ and find out there is a GOD.

Professor McGrafth, thank you for your lectures. I have been taking courses in faith, and is in the program attributes of GOD. Through Blue Bible Institute. Your lectures has greatly deepened my belief in being able to evangelize.

Also called Propagandanists, right?

😴💀

6:20

Who engineered the basic process that allows for thought and that allows for instinct. And decision making

I am also inquiring about the difference between Christian history and Christian theology because they were both written by you. Please 🙏

Hello sir, I am your online student, and I am inquiring about your Christian history book, not Christian theology, but I have failed to find any video of you speaking about it.

Gloria in Excelsis Deo. Have your way Ruach Hakodesh o Holy Spirit to the glory of God the Father El Shadai. In the Name of Jesus, Yeshua Hamashiach. Prayers and best wishes from Fiji, dear brother in Christ.

Thank you!❤

Great playlist, God bless.

Excellent video, really ejoying the series.

You live by faith

Everything you wrote is hogwash. True. You love your sin so much. Can you give me good evidence that you evolved from a monkey? Is this verifiable?

Thank you.

Thank you

Thank you.

Thank you

Thank you

Love your talks, Mr. McGrath. You're one of the people I always go back to listening to. Been doing this for years, just never got round to mentioning it. Sound words become more and more precious as the world becomes more and more deranged. I can't believe what I'm seeing when I step out my door these days. I live an ocean away from Oxford, but I imagine taking one of your classes would be a pleasure.

Limitações do Cientificismo e do Exagero Científico 🧪 A ideia do cientificismo consiste em considerar a ciência como o padrão final e árbitro de todas as questões interessantes, expandindo o escopo da ciência para abranger todos os aspectos do conhecimento e compreensão humanos. 🌍 A própria existência de um ponto de vista extracientífico falsificaria a afirmação de que a ciência por si só nos dá um meio racional de investigar a realidade objetiva. 🧠 O problema de justificar a autoridade da ciência vai além do uso da própria ciência, levando a implicações de algo além da ciência. 🤔 Precisamos de mais do que ciência para responder às grandes questões da vida, e confiar apenas na ciência para determinar o que é certo ou errado é altamente contestável. 🧠 Albert Einstein alertou que as Ciências Naturais se destacam em sua esfera de competência, mas e a ética e as questões de sentido? 🌌 A ciência é maravilhosa em levantar questões, mas algumas dessas questões, como o significado da vida, estão além da capacidade de resposta da ciência. 🧠 O uso de critérios racionais e evidenciais para criticar a religião por Richard Dawkins destaca a importância de aplicar a mesma atitude crítica às próprias ideias. 🌍 "O perigo do exagero científico é muito óbvio quando você lê os escritos de Richard Dawkins, e leva ao empobrecimento intelectual ao limitar nosso conhecimento e compreensão do mundo a uma única abordagem disciplinar." Reconciliação entre Ciência e Religião 🤔 McGrath compartilha sua jornada pessoal desde um ateu comprometido até abraçar a importância da apologética em relação às Ciências Naturais. 🌍 Os estudos modernos aumentaram a nossa compreensão da história intelectual, afastando-nos da ideia de que a ciência e a religião estão permanentemente em guerra. 🌍 A ideia de que ciência e religião estão necessariamente trancadas em Mortal Kombat está desatualizada e não é mais relevante nos estudos recentes. 🧐 O conflito fundamental não é entre a ciência e o cristianismo, mas entre o naturalismo metafísico dogmático e a crença em Deus. --- Limitations of Scientism and Scientific Overreach 🧪 The idea of scientism is about regarding science as the ultimate standard and arbiter of all interesting questions, expanding the scope of science to encompass all aspects of human knowledge and understanding. 🌍 The very existence of an extra scientific vantage point would falsify the claim that science alone gives us a rational means of investigating objective reality. 🧠 The problem of justifying the authority of science goes beyond using science itself, leading to implications of something beyond science. 🤔 We need more than science to answer life's big questions, and relying solely on science to determine what is right or wrong is highly contestable. 🧠 Albert Einstein cautioned that the Natural Sciences are outstanding in their sphere of competence, but what about ethics and questions of meaning? 🌌 Science is wonderful at raising questions, but some of those questions, like the meaning of life, lie beyond the capacity of science to answer. 🧠 The use of rational and evidential criteria to criticize religion by Richard Dawkins highlights the importance of applying the same critical attitude to one's own ideas. 🌍 "The danger of scientific overreach is very obvious when you read the writings of Richard Dawkins, and it leads to intellectual impoverishment by limiting our knowledge and understanding of the world to a single disciplinary approach." Reconciliation of Science and Religion 🤔 McGrath shares his personal journey from being a committed atheist to embracing the importance of apologetics in relation to the Natural Sciences. 🌍 Modern scholarship has increased our understanding of intellectual history, moving away from the idea that science and religion are permanently at war. 🌍 The idea that science and religion are necessarily locked in Mortal Kombat is outdated and no longer relevant in recent scholarship. 🧐 The fundamental conflict is not between science and Christianity, but between dogmatic metaphysical naturalism and belief in God.

Dr. McGrath, have you ever read anything by Henri DeLubac? If you did can you please comment on his work? And if you haven't I would recommend you to start with "The Discovery of God", short but probably the most powerfull theological work I have ever read.

I'm already looking forward to the next episode! Thanks Dr. McGrath. From Brazil!

thank you

Interesting! Convid was always only real inside the cave ( TV). Outside it was normal life. We are born with a Babylon TV in our homes (cave). We don’t k ow any other reality. Secular humanism Prussian schools cement the illusions. We add Christ inside the cave instead of breaking free from the secular humanism cave setting up our own institutions. We love the seats of power and credibility, respect of the cave dwellers.

5.33 receiving what is promised. Hopefully

I am reading this now. Not so easy to follow. But the chapter on Spirit and Trinity are well done. I couldn't put the book down. I will definitely buy and read the companion book on Christian Theology. I find this the primer and having a more detailed book of 500pages is no bad thing.

Can this series be published as a book? It is very well put together as a series of topics and slides. Please publish because it gives us many new insights and is different from the two other major textbooks. It seems more personal

Thank you for your instruction. Shaffer (sp?) "non-inclusive language"? Was not he quoted as saying "he or she"? Not "inclusive"? Fiddlesticks!!

Thank you so much Professor for providing these lectures free online. I’ve been experiencing doubt in my recent conversion to Christianity. I had the time to listen and they’ve really helped me.

Circa 36 minutes. What do you mean professor that Schaeffer hadn’t used ‘inclusive’ language ? Sheer nonsense! Have you been indoctrinated with the worldview of wokeism?

Delusional and English.

Thank you so much for teaching and sharing. It was very detailed and apt.

Thank you, I’m so grateful for these resources as I’m just starting what will hopefully be a deep dive into apologetics.

Came here from, "Daily Dose of Wisdom". I love the lectures, wish i would have found this channel sooner. Thank you and God bless you, professor McGrath.

Here via Daily Dose of Wisdom.

Thank you for these, Alister. They are thought-provoking, challenging as well as illuminating. God bless you.

Outstanding! Thank you for sharing this series, and I look forward to the next sessions.

It is somewhat perplexing that one of the most eminent proponents of Christian theology in our era does not receive the audience he rightly merits, whereas average populists maintain sway over the multitudes.

These videos on reflection are waay to good to only have as many view as they do. Hopefully the algorith will soon figure out how profound of a thinker this man truly is, and how many people would enjoy these if they only knew they were here.

Happy to find your channel !

Sir, could you please do a series on Christian philosophy? Thank you.