Lovely, I’d watched a video from elsewhere and didn’t quiiiiiite get it, but the sea breeze example was just what my brain needed! Thanks 🙌🏾
@sanatsrivastava28144 күн бұрын
thank you. this was great.
@KarthikStudies-tx1sl5 күн бұрын
mass da super ra sonna
@johnweir12176 күн бұрын
Takes you back to a time when women knew their place.
@Kylepittendreigh6 күн бұрын
Thanks for the upload
@Kylepittendreigh6 күн бұрын
Did you cover this on a deep dive before
@MetOfficeLearnAboutWeather6 күн бұрын
Yes, probably! We'll also be looking at the seasonal forecast for the upcoming autumn in next week's Deep Dive
@Kylepittendreigh6 күн бұрын
@@MetOfficeLearnAboutWeather we still need a deep dive premier with alex deakon
@MichalShalaev8 күн бұрын
Cool video😊 My grandma's brother was Prof. George Zaslavsky- he dedicated his entire career to the chaos theory. May he rest in peace 🙏
@midnightsilver942812 күн бұрын
Just commenting to say I have marked this for later and I’m looking forward to watching it👍🏻😄. (Don’t want the algorithm to think I’m not interested. 😂 wanna encourage more videos like these. Love getting the extra info.)
@chasemarangu13 күн бұрын
love the visualization at 2:25, it helps me visualize chaos theory
@Kylepittendreigh13 күн бұрын
They help to understand if high pressure or Low pressure dominates if the data and the models agree is this true alex or aiden
@FictionVent13 күн бұрын
Video has good graphics, but the music is oddly distracting. The text on screen has no narration, forcing you to either read or watch the visuals. This video has done the opposite of what it set out to do.
@observer95015 күн бұрын
Get to the point
@Sjmmckee166819 күн бұрын
No wonder the met office hasn't done cartoon videos for 8 years. They only get a few hundred of veiws compared to their forecasts that get thousands and thousands. To be honest, I do like the new shorts you have all been doing, but with the lack of veiws I would just stop. 178 compared with thousands is a huge difference.
@ladyflibblesworth728220 күн бұрын
if this is more weird preparations to normalize more weird weather that's likely to happen soon....
@Kylepittendreigh20 күн бұрын
Aiden when we had the beast from east it was from a cold direction as well as the big freeze like the beast from the east
@Kylepittendreigh20 күн бұрын
Thanks for this
@EthioClimateAnalyticsNet21 күн бұрын
thanks synoptic weather chart important parts of weather
@ColbsterzSnowboarder21 күн бұрын
Pilot here. Working on my instrument rating. Weather is my weak spot but I'd love to learn more! So here I am! There is so much to know and it seems like even meteorologists don't know how to interpret what they're seeing lol.
@kartramasamy24 күн бұрын
Best explanation ever..❤
@tanyapandey-bj1vj27 күн бұрын
Your video is very useful for students please post video regularly thanks
@Sjmmckee166827 күн бұрын
I have had no clouds in sight for days! Yet every single year when you all say thunderstorms are hitting the most common place in the UK(the SE) I don't get any and I live in Suffolk. I only get a few flashes of lightning or rumbles of thunder or the odd thunderstorm. I'm sorry, but I have to say that this current forecast is one of the most inaccurate, nice video though.
@midnightsilver942827 күн бұрын
Very informative! 👍🏻😄 and cool animation to help explain. Also enjoyed learning about the way high impact and high likelihood can have different effects in a yellow warnings. Didn’t know that before! Awesome video 👍🏻😄 cheers.
@MetOfficeLearnAboutWeather10 сағат бұрын
Thanks for your feedback :) as we start posting again on this account weekly, any thoughts are really useful!
@tranporter50027 күн бұрын
Nice video Aiden! Have you seen the CAPE over France? It going up to 2000j/kg! I even think tornado activity has been occurring has some suspicious hook like shapes have appeared on radar.
@Kylepittendreigh27 күн бұрын
How come u dont see my comments on the deep dives
@Kylepittendreigh27 күн бұрын
Thanks for making this
@MetOfficeLearnAboutWeather10 сағат бұрын
Anything else you'd like to see Kyle?
@nniicckk122327 күн бұрын
calling it "cahos" is not a very good name. In reality the universe is qualifiable, it's just a complete overwhelming of data to the point that it's incalculable.
@MarkConnolly28 күн бұрын
A probability factor should be added to every forecast. When models converge there is a low degree of chaos, when they diverge there is a high degree. This would allow the public to start to understand chaos theory.
@user-yk3gh4pq4nАй бұрын
This hapoend to me last night guys
@Miss_autumn_FpeАй бұрын
I searched it up for u guys. DONT SEARCH UP GOATSE ITS DISGUSTING
@Alana_fox-vd3qeАй бұрын
I saw a smiling cloud when I was outside with my little brother it scared me little bit
@idfitterАй бұрын
This is interesting as the explanation I was given was that for other days where the measured conditions were the same, it rained on 20% of those days.
@HolahkuTaigiTWFormosanDiplomatАй бұрын
This doesn't make any sense :00
@KylepittendreighАй бұрын
Aiden you forgot about thunderstorms can thunderstorms impacts the chances of rain
@MetOfficeLearnAboutWeatherАй бұрын
Thunderstorms will be covered in next week’s animation!
@wellnessgirl2806Ай бұрын
Great explainer thanks ✨😊
@KylepittendreighАй бұрын
Thanks for this aiden
@adrianharding4769Ай бұрын
So according to the example given at 3:00, if for a 10 hour period the chance of rain is 5% in each hour (in other words it's a sunny day with very low chance of rain), I should expect to get wet during 40 out of every 100 similar 10 hour periods. That feels wrong. Basically, I'm almost as likely to get wet as not. And that's on a day with no hour having a greater than 5% probability of rain 🤯
@MetOfficeLearnAboutWeatherАй бұрын
Technically, yes, that is how probability works. Although, admittedly, the video simplifies the complex and often very messy situations that are showery days in the UK. On some days, the formation of showers will lead to the formation of other showers. On other days, showers that form in one location will prevent the formation of showers in another location due because the overhanging cloud or the downdrafts will discourage updrafts. So, of course, it's not as simple as rolling dice. Also, a 5% chance of rain doesn't necessarily translate to a 5% chance you will 'get wet'. It might be two drops of rain from a fleeting and very light shower. Or it might be a very low chance of a torrential thunderstorm. This additional information (chance of a very light shower or torrential thunderstorm) will be reflected in the symbol and / or in the presented forecast.
@user-xi6by2we2iАй бұрын
If these probabilities were independent, you would be correct. In practice, these probabilities are unlikely to be independent, so it would depend on the specific forecast.
@adityakshirsagar5383Ай бұрын
Amazing explanation👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
@AjmalhussnainAjmalhussnainАй бұрын
Ok
@navabkazemibookie2198Ай бұрын
More videos please helping me with ATPL😊
@k.gomathy496Ай бұрын
Best video 🎉of the decade
@EternalFootman-kr6yxАй бұрын
Easterly winds in the mid latitudes?
@willybloch3974Ай бұрын
Granddad had a Reaumur meter on his winter set of double glass windows.
@nivekv1958Ай бұрын
ITS KAOS
@surferxbloodАй бұрын
We are in a dome
@tekubusАй бұрын
The most important statement made in this video is "Coriolis is not a real force"
@rakeshboin3914Ай бұрын
why dont IMD do these kind of videos .A small doubt from my side it will help needy aspirants to strengthen their conceptual clarities