I never knew Josh was in Twilight

+Crizpy +Mixey I never knew Twilight was saved.

Julio Cesar Calixto Moreno lol

also he was in 24.

+Julio Cesar Calixto Moreno lol!!

watch Dead Silence! He's right, the ending is fantastic! Lol, but I guess now you already know it....

Plot twist it's a dude

Late on this, but if you haven't seen it, watch it. That last scene is god damn bone chilling.

Good Bad Flicks did a whole thing on Sleepaway Camp. There's a reason that last shot is so weird.

Dude, so glad I'm not the only one. Hella. fucking. unsettling.

Gerard Newell that actually sounds really good

Judas didn’t miss the last supper, he was very much present: Matthew 26:21-25 21 and as they were eating, he said, Verily I say unto you, that one of you shall betray me. 22 And they were exceeding sorrowful, and began to say unto him every one, Is it I, Lord? 23 And he answered and said, He that dipped his hand with me in the dish, the same shall betray me. 24 The Son of man goeth, even as it is written of him: but woe unto that man through whom the Son of man is betrayed! good were it for that man if he had not been born. 25 And Judas, who betrayed him, answered and said, Is it I, Rabbi? He saith unto him, Thou hast said.

Yeah that twist made the movie worth it.

Yeah I thought that twist made it stand out from all the other Dracula flicks.

Clever you

When you realize that the saw franchise is more a revenge genre/anti hero than horror franchise (Exception saw 7! Only good thing was the end twist. The killer was a mindless blood lust idiot and did not give his victims any chance to survive! He made a mockery of jigsaw name and deserves what they got!)

I like Saw 2 as well. It’s one of my favorites from the series! The traps are cool and bringing Amanda back as the apprentice was a surprise to me. I also like Saw 3. Saw V was terrible though lol

@@bonafiedangeredpenguin5387 There is no way Jigsaw is an anti-hero. The worst part about the Saw franchise was 1) That the kept acting like he wasn't just a psychotic murderer and 2) That Jigsaw was somehow omniscient.

Everyone who is a fan of the saw movies likes Saw II. I don’t know why it’s on this list.

JSmellerM Depends on what you mean with twist. I mean, they considered something that was is all the ads and built up through the whole movie (Twilight) a twist.

william timonen you lost me halfway through your comment because it becomes unreadable to me

JSmellerM I have no idea what that was either... I was just angry that they considered the battle built up through the whole movie a twist.

william timonen if you are talking about twilight the real twist was probably that it was just in that one dude's head but they explained why they thought the battle was a twist

JSmellerM That wasnt a good twist. Or did anyone want them to live?

Fucking yes!!

+uMovie97 That was not a bad movie tho.

+Eric Carter That wasn't a bad movie, you morron !

Yea! Except for the part where it was a bad movie.

+Jonathan Yurek Yeah, the Last seconds after the credits...

I agree. I can rewatch that movie over and over and still enjoy it.

Freaked me out WAY TOO MUCH!!!!! I HATE PUPPETS!!!!! NIGHTMARE FUEL!!!!

I saw this movie years ago on the TV in a physical therapy room, and I was still spooked with ten people around me stretching....

Jello what are you doing here?

And why is he only getting a commen ton this now

i agree

Yes

i know Im asking randomly but does any of you know of a method to log back into an instagram account?? I somehow forgot the password. I appreciate any tricks you can offer me

+Pat Somers For a long time I thought it was the worst of the terminator movies, then I watched it again recently and though I get where dude is coming from with the cheesy humor and the underwhelming action I think a part of that is because both of those things are done so well in T2, and also because they earmarked a lot of the budget for that whole blowing up the world thing since CGI was still relatively expensive at the time and it had been long enough since T2 that the studio weren't quite sure what they were going to be able to make back.

+Korvas989 Yeah, that's a pretty impossible task. Nothing short of watching Justin Beiber get executed could properly follow that act...

+Pat Somers >> I agree. T3 is better than people say.

agreed

+Pat Somers It's better than Salvation.

lee mceachern it was,this guy is a idiot how was densel Washington blind 😂he was reading books in the film and clearly wasn't blind. great film

Only idiots think that Eli was blind. My god...

dorukkose ye like I said the guy who made the video is stupid and hasn't watched the film.he was clearly reading the bible at 1 point

Um He's saying that the character of Eli is blind which he is it clearly says so in the synopsis of the film on IMDB: www.imdb.com/title/tt1037705/synopsis?ref_=ttpl_sa_2 and the films Wikipedia page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Book_of_Eli#Plot

Jonathan Kent don't believe everything you read on the Internet - Abraham Lincoln

Gooch359 That wasn't a plot twist (as any DC fan worth his shit would have already known) it was a cop out by a clueless director and writers.

Gooch359 it's funny cause it's true😂

That part made me think of step brothers. Superman: Save Martha Batman: why did you say that name?!?! Lois: it's his mother's name! Super man: did we just become best friends? Batman: Yep! Super man: Do you want to go do karate in the garage? Batman: Yep! Lol when I watch BVS that was exactly what came to mind at that part. 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂

WHY DID YOU SAY THAT NAME?!

Unless they were the SAME MARTHA. That twist would have made it all worth it.

Kristen Stewart is only CGI.

I refuse to believe that she is human. She is an android trying to pass herself as a human woman, but lacking the ability to emote.

@@tafua_a 😂😂😂 Damn A.I. 😂😂😂

+Andy Valenzuela - I know, right? She was pretty much a wax doll in the whole damn series! Then I saw her in Clouds of Sils Maria and my jaw hit the floor!

+Cabochon1360 Liked the movie, but hated the twist. Up till then it really was a head trip. What happens when a child starts wanting the things an adult does, but can't have them? Little ways it happens all the time, but this case. Way down the rabbit hole as she went psycho. Just to toss the ideal and make it a dwarf in disguise? Totally ruined the head trip. Back to our safe place where everything is always what we think it is. :P

+Justicar333 Honestly if she had been an actual orphan the Orphan Activists would have boycotted the movie. I thought the movie was great.

+ControvT ^^ What is an orphan activist? Do you mean just people who support the ideal of adopting orphans? Is that an activist category now? I don't think supporting doing something makes one an activist. We would have to stat labeling people coffee activist, tea activists, or myself an energy drink activist. : D

+Cabochon1360 Orphan was piece of shit

Cabochon1360 My biggest problem with Orphan wasn't the pacing, but the ' evil kid' movie cliche's: inept counselors, and naively stupid husbands- those two were the worst in this film. I liked the more adult back story about the couple and the girl. The sexual dialogue and content, kinda shocked me in theaters, but the twist at the end was jaw - dropping for me and it worked pretty well.)

Also, John Connors drifting existence without the war (or inner hate of machines), and Claire Danes spirit. Best parts of terminator 3 didn't had anything to do with any terminators at all, lol.

Yeah, it's the reason they should've skipped 3, and put that at the beginning of Salvation instead.

Argumemnon i don't know man...salvation is garbage anyways.

videogiocatore3 It's not very good, but I wouldn't go so far as to call it garbage. It was mildly entertaining, even if the ending was crap.

I still like t3 more than terminator salvation de gustibus non disputandum est!

Shamir George Just watched that and yeah, did not see that coming. Normally I get pissed at the Scooby Doo "man in s mask" twist, but this time was an exception.

I know, maybe it's just me, but the non-supernatural twists seem to be the creepiest.

i thought the boy was alright anyway

BardicLiving ~ I agree. when it's something supernatural it's not as bad bc it's isn't real, depending on what sorta supernatural things you believe in. But when it turns out that something is real, like a real human being all along, it's totes creepier bc that means it's in the real realm of possibility. spooky shit yo

i think i saw somenting like that on an episode of Supernatural

In the end, that imaginary fight scene averts all the real fighting and saves the lives of everyone involved. It was incredibly well done even though it didn't save the film or the franchise from being shit.

But technically the guy getting the vision could have used that to change the outcome in the battle I guess? Or delay the battle anyway and just say they'll withdraw to strike at a later date.

Marcus Well How it should already kinda made a video on that situation

+The Wanderer Not just the army coming but this mist starts to fade and we see the mother who everyone assumes was long dead, alive and well (with her kids i believe). i fucking love the movie ending because its so sad and horrible its the sort of things that often people are afraid to do in film even in horror . I do agree that the ending makes it memorable but wouldn't call it a twist(unless you read the book) or the movie a "bland horror movie with no real plot." The movies plot is simplistic(or rather minimal) but it is there and works.Lets go to the store,Oh shit inter dimensional mist what should we do? It builds from there with characters building up to be as big of threats as the creatures(and ultimate being bigger) . Whether someone finds it bland i guess is more of an opinion. i like horror movies where people are isolated and the threat isnt just the monster or killer but the other people as well. Over all like the book its not overly amazing but i feel Frank like he often does nailed the adaption with the lil Stephen king things like the Dark tower poster ,"My life for you" and most of all that great ending that were we realize if they had just stayed calm and waited everything would have been fine(not the wife but still). On slightly related note it suppose to be getting a show adaption so lets hope its better than the under the dome one also Dark tower is getting a movie.

+The Wanderer and the funny thing was Stephen King couldn't even write that ending in his story.

+NagualElias That ending was horrible & unnecessary. I'm amazed Stephen King agreed to it, especially since he wrote in his introduction to the Bachman books that he was still callow enough to believe in unhappy endings with his first novels.

there's also the fact that during the film the crazed woman says that God requires a sacrifice, meaning his child but then is subsequently killed. Then, at the end of the movie as soon as the child is shot the mist starts to clear...

Along with Final Destination 5 and Friday the 13th.

+MrTomservo85 An excellent comment.

But the movie was good.

tru

Heck yea

Sir Michael J Nope. It was terrible. I'll bet you liked The Road, also. That was terrible as well.

FrennisDaemon Fuck off both you and your negativety, it ain't needed here. Go watch some teletubbies while your at it, bet you'll like that.

lol trolls on trolls on trolls

Nothing will ever come close to T2, that's for sure, but I actually really dug Genisys (despite the stupid name). Lots of cool, T2-esque throwbacks and moments. Plus Emilia Clarke.

Ok, I absolutely love Terminator 2, but I personally feel like the first Terminator is better.

Charles Bentley I mean w/out that one we wouldn't have had such a great sequel.

T2 is the perfect action movie.

Cool

That wasn't a twist. I saw that coming from the trailer.

Insane Ian The same to me in Usual Suspects but the critics love this, maybe the question not is the twist but the details of plot

Everyone pans it, but you have to think of the bar that had been set by the two movies that came before it. Not great, sure, but still a decently competent action movie. Did not see that end coming, that's for sure.

I know. Seems that people forget how bleak it was. I think it saves the movie in general.

Yeah, I thought T3 is not a bad movie either. It's a decent one to end the trilogy with a good twist ;)

In a lot of ways, I prefer it over T2. Yeah, classic action flick, but it had Edward Furlong, and he is a blight on the screen. No charisma, a shrieking voice, and just generally annoying.

Yeah, it had its "moment" - the ending of which the dude with the British accent in the video pointed out.

One of my favorite twists of all time. I remember being confused by the older phones and fashion. Then it all made sense.

I disagree. Although T2 is a great action movie, it's plot made no sense. I hate temporal-causality, and I hate the idea that the machines only existed because people found their remains from the future which only existed in the past because they were built by the people that found their remains which came from the future but wouldn't have existed otherwise, wut?. Also, how would John Conner have been born with Judgment Day and time travel? T3 had every right to exist. When the Terminator says, "you did not stop Judgment Day, you only postponed it," that made sense. It dealt with the massive, _massive_ plot-holes dealt in T2, and it makes the entire saga come full-circle. I think it's underrated for that reason alone. I also think Salvation is underrated. Yeah, it's got plot-holes too, but it's still pretty good in a lot of way. Genysis I didn't even bother watching.

It makes sense if you accept the theory that Skynet more than likely inadvertently sent its machines to the past in one or more alternate realities, and not to the past timeline of its own current reality, which explains Skynet's lack of understanding of why it kept failing to complete its mission to destroy John Connor. In fact, one has to take into account a couple of things. One, if not for the machines' intervention, Sarah would have gone on that planned date of hers with John's original birth father, and would have eventually ended up becoming pregnant with John anyway. Two, in regards to certain deleted/extended scenes from "T2", some events (e.g., John Connor's birth) were apparently always fated to happen, regardless of what reality they occurred in or how they happened, while others would not necessarily have happened at all.

Corinth Maxwell That had occurred to me as well, but multi-verse theory is never established in the Terminator series. I guess I just like Nick Stahl as John Conner. I don't know why they couldn't get him to reprise the role in Salvation.

T1 and T2 are the real Teriminator movies

Terminator 3 is R-rated moron!!!

omg i just saw this the other day! Yeah definitely didnt suck....

This was one of the first movies I had watched on Netflix when I first got it and I was like YOOOOO THIS MOVIE JUST BLEW MY MIND!!

Is that the film with Malcolm Mcdowell where there person has to shoot somebody in order to get the job?

henkman00 chill bro. you r right but chill

Dimidia Luce. okay, but promise you will never let me go...HOLD ME!!!

Terminator 3 had to end with an apocalypse otherwise the first two movies make no sense. In order for the terminators to be sent back in the first two movies there has to be an apocalypse and a war between the machines and humans. I was angry at the ending of Terminator 2 because I knew there had to be a judgement day for it to make sense to even send back the terminators in the first place. I knew they couldn't stop judgements day.

+Kingdxm / Exactly why time travel movies are kinda bullshit. Unless you specifically set up Multiverse theory as how shit works, going back in the past would solve nothing because if you prevented the thing that made you want to go back into the past, you would have never gone back into the past in the first place thus ensuring that it happens which ensures that you go back into the past and once again fail to prevent it. Hell, SKYNET should have been intelligent enough to figure that out and never bothered sending a Terminator back to deal with Sarah in the first place.

RaithSienar. but Skynet did send a Terminator back in time and so it must have known that in the universe the story takes place in history can be altered. many people seem to think that time travel stories can only work in one way: you go back kill your grandfather and you don't exist anymore, so your grandfather was never killed. aka the grandfather paradox. people expect cause and effect to work no matter what happens. but that sucks out all the drama out of allot of time travel fiction. however, storytelling isn't limited to just one way to tell a story. Terminator 1 and 2 (and not T3 or T5. they broke the series time travel rules) use the bootstrap paradox. this is a far more flexible and more interesting way of story telling. this paradox allows the time traveler to go back in time, kill their grandfather and still survive. the bootstrap paradox allows for time anomalies to exist. this allows John Connor to live even when he never send his dad back in time when Skynet's creation was prevented. let me give an example: say time travel exist in say the 26th century. and a time traveler uses it to travel all over time. meets famous people. was there for allot of historical events. then the traveler comes up with an idea: he wants to meet the person who invented time travel. so he goes back to say, the 23rd century. and he takes the blueprints of the original time machine with him for the inventor to sign. he rings the doorbell and explains to the inventor how much the inventor is admired for time travel in his future. however, the inventor has no idea what the traveler is talking about. but looks over the blueprints. the inventor then asks ''can I keep these? you know. just as a reminder of our meeting'' the traveler thinks nothing of it, after all, this was the person who invented the thing in the first place. how's that going to mess up time? the inventor signs something else and the traveler leaves. the inventor will now build the time machine. and history records everything as the traveler saw it. it's this concept that James Cameron used for Terminator 1 and 2. if Skynet didn't send the first Terminator back then Skynet wouldn't have been invented in the first place. that act alone shows how flexible time is in the Terminator universe (well, the first two films)

Does that mean you found the rest of the film pretty terrible? Cause I thought it was at least half-way decent. This list is about movies which are otherwise near god-awful.

Oh yeh, you're right. Missed the part about it saving terrible movies (despite it being right there in the title lol. oops)

Well, some of this movies are not really terrible. Just normal, 5/10 movies. Although without that ending Mist is 6.5, in my humble opinion

I found the ending as a kick to the balls and I loved it for it

I will never watch it again because like any normal father, I'm not killing my child till I see fricking teeth!

Way too articulate for youtube. Get out.

And NEVER COME BACK!!!! LOL jk man

You have to consider the point of an ending, which is to provide catharsis for the build-up set by the previous scenes. A shitty ending invalidates the purpose of everything that comes before it. I don't think a movie can be _saved_ by a surprisingly smart ending, but it can certainly be ruined by a particularly bad one.

Obviously you've never seen one of my "short" comments...

+19stalkern I'm not even a big thriller fan and I thought that movie was amazing. ^.^

Ariana W...Right?!?

+19stalkern I absolutely love this movie, but it's one of those mind blowing films that are good to watch only once.

Blergh. I'm gonna have to totally disagree. The movie was okay, but since it gave everyone arbitrary powers to commit impossible acts of deception, there turned out to be no reason to play detective and figure out whether , or what, was real and what was a game. And then it ends with the silliest deus ex machina I've ever seen. That ending is five kinds of impossible, and any chance I had to suspend my disbelief up until that time was dumped in the bin and pissed all over. But since you didn't have the same reaction, perhaps I'm the asshole skeptic who can't simply go with a movie premise and enjoy himself. Any KZfaqrs on my side...?

Eric Goldlust Onoes! Spoilers! It's all ruined! But seriously. XD There's more than a few holes that can be poked into the movie so it wasn't brilliant or anything. I think most of David Fincher's movies are like that. But for back in the day when not every other movie was trying to make plot twists, it was definitely different. It's aged well for something made almost 20 years ago. It's not gonna win any best movie awards, but compared to most of the stuff that comes out these days, it can compete. Or maybe that's just nostalgia goggles for one of my first suspense movies when I was itty bitty.

they had to do something to keep thje boyfriends from killing their girlfriends for dragging them through 5 movies, building up to a ending that is just talking....least give them a glimpse of awesomeness heh.

Xaoran Chronicles I Just realize that how my friend reacted at the part was similar similar to how we reacted to endgame big fight

If I even started to watch this movies, 15-20 minutes in I'd be asleep.

Eric McIntyre yeah I really loved the movie

It's really just all about opinions.

same here

+Mish Mash Mush hahahaa

Theres still hope but its dying every week lol

Lol😂

+Mish Mash Mush What if he turns heel because though everyone expects it, no one believes it will happen.

what has he done? i haven't watched wwe for like a year

+XCyclonusX That was one messed up ending.

+XCyclonusX The Mist is not a terrible movie. It's a great one. That ending makes it even greater.

+XCyclonusX While in the book (actually a short story), it ends with the main characters still going around with the car, and he is writing a diary in which he says something like "I don't know how this will end"... And that's it

***** Good thing we're talking about the movie and not the book.

Kajed8963 I wouldn't really say its a bad movie either. Its a typical Stephen King movie. And I usually find Stephen King movies very predictable and a little boring. His stuff is more suited to television IMO. But the Mists ending is one of the bravest endings I've ever seen in a movie. It literally leaves you sitting on the edge of your seat with your mouth wide open.

+Mike Morini That's what I was thinking.

I watch it most Hallowe'ens :)

+GanonTEK hell yeah :D

I watched it with my friends, and I was the only one who didn't see it coming. I don't regret though, I love that feeling of impression when the plot twist is revealed.

+bUrRiEdaLiVe6 yeah, I was pissed that the main guy got caught but it was awesome

ME TOO! When it's revealed that his dad has been a dummy the entire time! I have chills just thinking about it.

The cabin in the woods was awsome

luca di salvo i didn't wanted to know that

Loosely, but yeah.

luca di salvo WhAt?!! Childhood ruined! Thanks a lot!

I would rather you not have said that now I want to die

Love the film it was fantastic who would have thought she was a lolli wannabe psychotic killer! Epic twist and film overall

yeah it was pretty obvious in the movie tat it was real.

JoelRiter Impressing considering that they hadnt introduced the simulators before the last third.

The book is always better. Just look at Maze Runner.

william timonen Didnt need to, the build up of it the way they did revealed something else was going on completely.

darkstar100x Excet Fight Club and in my opinion Willy Wonka. Im sure theres others. Even Chuck preferred the movie over the book proving its not impossible to do a good movie based on something, just requires not looking for a trend and trying to profit

I'm actually sad cuz after t3 the point was to do it a second time and successfully save the future! Terminator genyis was supposed to be that start to end the franchise for good! Stop judgement day or something

i read it. but did you really need to comb through all that? i watched the movie once and took that away from it. wasn't even paying much attention to it.

Williambarela This video touched on many ideas that led to their conclusion. I had to also touch on many examples and or points to make the actual conclusion apparent. That's all. I appreciate the fact you understood the movie from the jump. A lot of people didn't however. Thank you very much for the response. Cheers ;)

But there are a couple things that dont quite add up then : how he constantly things like : you smell that? ( like when they heading to the ocean), or "you hear that?" . Not once does he make a remark that involves seeing something. This was done very purposely. Just like in the first fighting scene where he first looks back to the tunnel prior to the fight, and then moments before retreats back into it, where all the sounds are so much clearer. And how about the town shootout, he only and ever shoots at people the moment they fire at him, because that way he knows where they are standing. For the same reason he doesnt shoot at the bald guy (reddick or something) because he doesnt shoot at eli, so eli doesnt even know he is standing there. Especially with the town shootout scene in mind, i believe eli was blind his entire journey

Meat to please you I understand where you're coming from. There are many things done in this movie to detract away from it's reality. If you read the directors interview about the movie he explains what it's actually about. The apocalypse took Eli's sight & gave him a mission. Once Eli accepted this mission he gave his eye sight back in order to complete it. You can see his eyes change from normal to milky white at the very end. Demonstrating that his eyes are functional up until the very end. Once his mission is complete he goes back the way he was; But again, don't take my word for it. Look up the directors interview and he'll go into more detail that might satisfy your curiosity. Thanks for the response. Cheers.

+The Epic Question I believe you but that doesn't explain Meat's objection. Why did they shoot the movie as if he was blind if he actually wasn't, but more so, do you have any evidence from the movie itself other than his eyes changing color or what the directors say, that he was actually blind. Of course the directors word is enough, but it lessens the movie if they shoot it for a twist that isn't actually the twist in my mind

+rekrn12345 Lol! I didn't even think of that, good one.

+Ikrani Or the internet's favorite: it's a toned down Battle Royale.

Surprised Robot No, see, Battle Royale didn't have a commentary to make about the media being exploited in a bread-and-circuses way with a modern context, thus leading to the hero, after watching several of their new friends get brutally killed during the televised event, turns the tables on the oppressive regime and uses that very same media outlet as a way to rally the people to revolution. Pop quiz time: did I just describe The Running Man or the entire Hunger Games franchise?

Ikrani True, though the reason I mentioned BR is because it's the most popular comparison. Which is hilarious considering BR kinda rips off The Running Man to an extent, or it as least very similar in premise much like The Hunger Games. Also, to answer your question: you described Death Race 2000! Ok, but seriously, you described both, but The Running Man (and Death Race 2000) did it first.

The first time I saw that scene, watching all the vehicles work together, all I could picture was all the vehicles combining together to form a giant robot, like the Stunticons into Menasor.

I hate it when stuff combines to form one terrifying titan. It's so meh.

Devastator, Transformers..

Outerspaceman21 exactly. based on how that franchise noise dived t3 is simply the lesser of a great trilogy. t1 great , t2 godlike, t3 good enough.

Outerspaceman21 Love all the first three compared to the rest.

Never realized there was a third one... huh...

Outerspaceman21 i even don't mind SOME of salvation.

Casey Tatum As did I, if for no other reason than the T-800 attack at the end.

the ending of the mist that our main protagonist was driving and the military was following him in the back all the time and he even killed his own family

James Ferraris Spoiler alert! And what do you mean "the military was following in the back all the time"? The military was heading *into* the area, and he met them when he was heading *out*, trying to *get away*.

I do believe the military came from behind him and drove past him; meaning, if he had just waited in town, he would have been saved earlier.

IKR well, what do you know, I just had to rewatch the scene, since I was absolutely sure the military "met" him (that is, came from the front side of his car, and not back, implying that they came from outside of the town). But you are absolutely correct, they seem to come from the town, even having saved a bunch of people. Wow, this makes the ending even sadder. :(

Stephen King is notoriously bad at endings. So the fact that an ending impressed him is not a good thing, really.

oof...

the only reason SAW pt. 1 is good is because of its ending lol you can't use the same kinds of twists sequel after sequel (never mind making sequel after freaking sequel lol)

Yeah I saw a lot of rated R films as a kid too, but that was then 90s. Yeah that scene in Sleepaway Camp was creepy.

Or maybe the twist is that he really has 30 books

I like to think that he had the rest of the bible memorized. It's that one book in brailie that gave him trouble, so he carried it around. Stupid, I know. But it gave me peace of mind.

+Aj Styles Beats RomanReigns Adam is one of the main reasons why I watch this channel.

Man you are gonna feel really silly when he loses. WWE invested all their time into Reigns just to let him fall now. I myself have nothing against Reigns but rather the piss poor booking they give him. And he has the title and this is going to be his "proper" run with it.

+Quavion Deering I agree w both of you, I believe reigns will lose first then turn heel beat the holy bejeeses out of styles on his heel turn, and win a series in the next two to retain.

Blasphemy

Agreed with Jack

agree with the guy who agreed with jack :p

I agree to an extent. The twist is marvelous, and yeah the movie can drag at times, but I actually do quite enjoy it from beginning to end. I like the slow pace. It doesn't saturate you with jump scares to the point where you become numb to it all.

Are you sure you're not thinking of 'The Orphanage'?

Iain Meldrum I am sure, although "The Orphanage" is great as well. The only thing I really disliked about "Orphan" was the character of the husband. He was so ridiculously dismissive of his wife that you would almost think he was the bad guy. He very poorly written and portrayed. Awful character.