10 Fastest Passenger Planes In The World

Рет қаралды 1,096,731

Күн бұрын

10 Fastest Passenger Planes In The World (2019): Most of the passenger planes in the world are not renowned for their speeds. When comparing them to jet fighters, these aircraft are like snails. However, this does not mean that these aircraft should be completely ignored in their power and speed. A majority of passenger planes range in between speeds of 500 to 700 miles per hour, some airlines have unique airliners that can go well beyond this speed range.
The Buzz does not own the rights to these pictures or video clips. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images/clips to be credited or removed, please contact us by email at-thebuzz938@gmail.com.
#FastestAirplane #BiggestAirplane #Boeing

Пікірлер: 1 000

@mrscreamer379 4 жыл бұрын

Boom doesn't even exist. Don't be giving them credit. I can draw an aircraft and tell you it goes 2000 mph if that's the bar to entry.

@acerate 4 жыл бұрын

kph

@banana_man_101 4 жыл бұрын

Boom does exist, but it HASN'T EVEN FLEW YET

@pierreabrie9445 4 жыл бұрын

hahahaha good one : )

@TheWerner182 3 жыл бұрын

Don't you mean 2000 miles per arr

@fuckheinschitt239 3 жыл бұрын

It's under construction stupid

@vincentgoudreault9662 4 жыл бұрын

Shouldn't have put Boom as #3, that plane has not only never flown, a prototype is not even under construction yet.

@lucrolland7489 4 жыл бұрын

Indeed, Boom should not appear in that list. Not clear that the Tupolev should as ir never really entered service.

@kurosumomo 4 жыл бұрын

@@lucrolland7489 Tupolev was flying on a regular route for some time, but people didn't really like it, as it was loud and in general uncomfortable.

@TravelwithPavel 4 жыл бұрын

@@lucrolland7489 Tupolev had short life, but it was used on regular lines.

@676mz 4 жыл бұрын

yet

@Klaus80804 4 жыл бұрын

If they put Boom into this list - they could also have Boeing 2707 in it - at least a mock up was made before it got cancelled. But more realistic would be to take Boom out and only count in planes that really flew.

@11SEXMACHINE 4 жыл бұрын

Uhhh, when did planes start going miles per arr?

@BestIkeaTable 4 жыл бұрын

Hour*

@jabobthegod 4 жыл бұрын

r/wooosh

@hazridge 4 жыл бұрын

That's not really an unusual way to pronounce it

@11SEXMACHINE 4 жыл бұрын

@@user-jj9dc5is1p Lmfao

@11SEXMACHINE 4 жыл бұрын

@@jabobthegod Or like peanut would say" yyyeeeeeeeeeaaaaarrrrrrrr "

@macky4074 4 жыл бұрын

Includes a plane that never entered commercial use, a plane that hasn't even been built and used maximum recorded ground speeds which is completely irrelevant. It's like saying a road sign is fast because it can fly over 100 mph in a hurricane

@taslimajahan9392 4 жыл бұрын

1:18 miles per R lmao

@ythinder 4 жыл бұрын

I presume the "plane that never entered commercial use" you are referring to is the TU-144......however it operated about 50 passenger flights between Moscow and Alma-Ata between 1977 and 1978.

@yapod9061 4 жыл бұрын

@@ythinder I think he's talking of the Boom jet that has never been built yet.

@itsnaveenn 3 жыл бұрын

simpleflying.com/worlds-fastest-aircraft/ Correct info read this

@kendallevans4079 3 жыл бұрын

I caught that ground speed irrelevancy thing also...."ground speed"? When you're 7+ miles above ground?

@kelisep_1547 4 жыл бұрын

You can tell she doesn’t know what she’s talking about

@KamilMB 4 жыл бұрын

Why?

@kelisep_1547 4 жыл бұрын

KamilMB if you knew a lot about aviation then you’d know why

@KamilMB 4 жыл бұрын

@@kelisep_1547 well the reason why I watch this kind of films is becouse I don't know a lot about aviation, and I want to know more, so please explain.

@kelisep_1547 4 жыл бұрын

KamilMB just bc. She sounds like she’s just reading out of a book but doesn’t really know what she’s talking about. She’s all “seven seven seven” instead of “triple seven”

@kelisep_1547 4 жыл бұрын

KamilMB the aircraft “boom” doesn’t exist. It never had a commercial flight

@chuntohk 4 жыл бұрын

This list should have been arranged by cruise speed in Mach number

@cheungjackjackt02006 4 жыл бұрын

Cruise speed for commercial planes are currently limited by our wing technology.. cFor most modern planes that are still currently in use, cruise speed is usually at Mach 0.86. Anything faster than this will cause the air flow on the upper surface of the wing to speed up above Mach 1, causing shock waves to occur. This will put heavy stress on the wing, the frame, and will cause huge inefficiencies leading to bad fuel economy.

@mickeyg7219 4 жыл бұрын

@@cheungjackjackt02006 I think it has something more to do with finding an economically viable material to mass-produce a passenger plane that can cruise at a supersonic speed. Boeing experienced this problem when designing the 2707, people know how to design a plane that can cruise at Mach 3 or more efficiently since the 60s. Only 2 aircraft that I knew of that can cruise above Mach 3 for hours without blowing its engines out, the SR-71 and XB-70, but there are few of them due to how expensive the material is. It seems that Mach 2.25 is the line where you can't use a "cheap" material if you want to build something that can sustain a speed above that limit.

@jumpercable20 3 жыл бұрын

To someone that knows aircraft, of course. The problem we have here is getting Americans that don't know how many months in a year or what the 8th month of the year is would be oblivious to this information. Most don't even know how many months have 28 days---clue? All of them.

@georgem3197 3 жыл бұрын

You always say that

@smeshsmesh9695 3 жыл бұрын

Bruh I saw this comment and I am not even going to watch the video anymore

@warbird3608 4 жыл бұрын

“miles per R” 😂😂

@eric852 4 жыл бұрын

A three eight zero Boeing seven seven seven

@mariusdevik2418 4 жыл бұрын

Per AR Hahahaha

@Wobblybob2004 4 жыл бұрын

@Michael G. She could be from Belfast.

@latviantrainy968 4 жыл бұрын

The A-three eight zero, seven seven seven, mile per ahrrr, and WTH is "Boom supersonic"?

@itsnaveenn 3 жыл бұрын

@Michael G. haha Lol 😂 😂 😂

@benwm 4 жыл бұрын

Top speeds used in this video are ground speeds. Airspeed or Mach is what ought to be used. This video is poorly researched and a waste of everyone’s time.

@RoadCone411 4 жыл бұрын

I don't think the author of this video even knows the difference. The difference in mach speed for cruising is quite small among jetliners, except for the supersonics. I always thought the B747s had the highest max econo cruise speed, but perhaps the new Dreamliners and A350s are faster(?)...as it is, I notice the old B747s are typically blocked 15-30 minutes faster across the Atlantic than similar B777s, etc.

@homesweetshanghai8127 4 жыл бұрын

And the English is absolutely atrocious.

@Treadstone7 4 жыл бұрын

@@RoadCone411 that's correct. Normal cruise speed for a 747 is up to Mach .86, while test flights with 747's have even proved that the aircraft is capable of doing 0.92. compared to A350 or B787 types, the max speed in normal operation might be equal. (They are listed with max Mach numbers of 0.89) So in my calculations, the 747 is still the fastest passenger aircraft, as long as there are passenger versions in service :(

@rudolfabelin383 4 жыл бұрын

Thanks! Please see my comment in the thread.

@SketchRC 4 жыл бұрын

Makes sense. I saw the 787’s speed and thought “yeah right, that thing never went supersonic.” So that explains why

@BigJuicyBurger 4 жыл бұрын

This was horribly researched... even a first grader can find more accurate information

@yapod9061 4 жыл бұрын

Even my an unfinished Google translated Wikipedia page is more accurate than this video.

@oliverpreston7573 3 жыл бұрын

I know I’ve been much faster on 747-400

@itsnaveenn 3 жыл бұрын

@Gordon the big engine meaning

@itsnaveenn 3 жыл бұрын

simpleflying.com/worlds-fastest-aircraft/ Correct info read this

@itsnaveenn 3 жыл бұрын

@Gordon the big engine yes

@RedwoodRider 4 жыл бұрын

This video is what happens when you only use Wikipedia for research, not to mention, forgetting to have anyone grammar check the script.

@zeluokuotsu1172 4 жыл бұрын

Andy Dobis no grammar please. My foot.

@arshindersingh410 4 жыл бұрын

No think the narrator had several strokes thought the video eg lenthend fusalaag

@petercsigo9935 4 жыл бұрын

@Yin Let me guess you're sheep!

@markydee48 4 жыл бұрын

wow, that was a ton of wrong information . The Convair 990 was the fastest subsonic airliner, while the 747 has a higher cruising speed than the 777, 787, and A380, with the 747SP being the fastest of the 747 family. The DC-8 and 707 had high cruising speeds than most commercial jets today. new generation commercial jets were not built for speed. Economics rules these days or you would have had a replacement for Concorde long ago. Now a good tail wind can turn any jet into a record breaker. I flew a JetBlue A320 west bound once from California to NY and the screen gave a hefty 630mph reading. So all you just saw was highly incorrect

@mattacks1655 2 жыл бұрын

Going westbound that must have been one hell of a flight. Did you refuel in the air?

@quazar912 2 жыл бұрын

who cares...

@michaelcampbell6820 4 жыл бұрын

Groundling click bait. He might as well have included the Millennium Falcon and a Borg Cube

@seadeer923 3 жыл бұрын

Lol. Annoys me as an aviation enthusiast. Even if you’re not into it, if you gonna do a video at least research it properly

@letsgamingyt1 4 жыл бұрын

When the 787 learned to go at the speed of sound lmao

@vondahe Жыл бұрын

My personal record was a 738 Norwegian flight DUBCPH which reached 1,224 km/h a couple of years ago. I noticed when it reached 1,100 km/h and after that it just kept accelerating.

@diegobrando6737 4 жыл бұрын

Bruh a 787, and 777 go slower than 600, and a 747-8 goes higher than 600mph Also a 747-8’s top speed is Mach 0.9, and A380 top speed is Mach 0.89 So the 747-8 is the fastest subsonic passenger plane

@23dunmc 4 жыл бұрын

you understand that mach is a variable right? you could be doing 1220kph at sea level and not break one mach, while when you are flying at 50,000ft, where there is less drag and you are doing 1100kph you are do8ing over 1 mach.

@777jones 4 жыл бұрын

23dunmc hey genius. Mach .9 is faster than Mach 0.89. Always.

@yann5427 4 жыл бұрын

Shrek moto moto you are wrong, the fastest subsonic plane was the CV-880 and the CV-990.

@rp2172 4 жыл бұрын

Conavair 990 is faster it achived 690mph

@rp2172 4 жыл бұрын

@@yann5427 that s right it reached mach 1.12

@busterobe 4 жыл бұрын

A 3 8 Zero lmao she doesn’t know what she’s talking about

@jumpercable20 3 жыл бұрын

Please define the difference between a 3 8 Zero and a A380?

@busterobe 3 жыл бұрын

@@jumpercable20 there the same thing 0 is commonly known as Zero

@jumpercable20 3 жыл бұрын

@@busterobe right, so what's the point of arguing over the same word pronounced differently? Not wrong, just different.

@busterobe 3 жыл бұрын

@@jumpercable20 that was just one part of it anyone who nows airplanes knows you dont say Zero and also very little reasearch was put in to this

@jumpercable20 3 жыл бұрын

@@busterobe Nope, you say zulu, Kind of like Whisky Tango Foxtrot

@Ryan_0708 4 жыл бұрын

The fact she uses groundspeed instead of airspeed triggers me so damn hard😂😂

@bigwalla 3 жыл бұрын

because not everyone understands what the fuck knots are

@asmo_1929 2 жыл бұрын

@@bigwalla you can use any unit of speed for airspeed, that's not the issue

@ChrisZoomER Жыл бұрын

I saw a United 777-300ER on flight tracker moving at a whopping ground speed of 844 mph!

@yippies3726 4 жыл бұрын

So you are using ground speed for aircraft... Good one.

@meesveldhuijzen988 4 жыл бұрын

And mph or km/h instead of knots

@hodb3906 4 жыл бұрын

Mees Veldhuijzen that’s okay. It’s to represent the (in this case) groundspeed. If you are referencing to the unit of distance which in the aviation world is the nautical mile than yes, you need to use knots.

@andrewcuber8968 4 жыл бұрын

"bOeInG SeVeN SeVeN SeVeN"

@jacobdurand4347 4 жыл бұрын

The 747-8 goes faster than the a380. The highest speed recorded was 759 miles per hour during its flight tests for boeing

@jbpilot5523 4 жыл бұрын

The Airbus A-Three-Eight-Zero..

@uroveliki2861 4 жыл бұрын

Lol

@tigroza 4 жыл бұрын

The 7 7 7 And not triple 7

@iguanaamphibioustruck7352 4 жыл бұрын

In the 70's I was invited to participate in the Boeing SST program concerning titanium bearings. I advised my company to turn it down. Looking at the numbers and the opportunities for profit I concluded that planning a day for flying was pretty much the same whether you were flying a little faster or a little slower. Getting to the airport and getting ready to fly as well as the arrival time and necessities were still the same so taking a little off the flight time was insignificant and I found the additional expense not justified. Iguana

@csabababjak8963 4 жыл бұрын

Tu-154 - Max cruising speed 975km/h (527kt), economical cruising speed 900km/h (486kt), long range cruising speed 850km/h (460kt). Range with max payload and reserves 3460km (1870nm), range with max fuel and 13,650kg (31,100lb) payload 5280km (2850nm). Tu-154M - Max cruising speed 950km/h (513kt). Range with max payload 3900km (2100nm), range with max fuel and 5450kg (12,015lb) payload 6600km (3563nm).

@martinfox3478 Жыл бұрын

They were very fast in headlong dive manouevre when they crashed

@lawrencemarocco8197 Жыл бұрын

The TU-154's biggest failing is that its engines were not capable of super-cruise like the Concorde's. They had to run afterburners to maintain supersonic speed with the consequential increase in noise and fuel consumption.

@csabababjak8963 Жыл бұрын

@@lawrencemarocco8197 Yes. That was the Tu-144 not the Tu-154.

@aronbokodi7487 11 ай бұрын

Tudtommal a tu154 alulról súrolta a hangsebesség határát, több embertől is hallottam, hogy már érződtek a lökéshullámból eredő vibrációk. Az pedig 1200 km/h felett van.

@AA-tz2bm 4 жыл бұрын

First of all if we’re talking about the fastest commercial plane in service of right now it is the 747 so....

@rpach1613 4 жыл бұрын

X2. The 747-400 is the fastest commercial plane in the sky right now. The 777 is next, the the 787. Notice the freight versions of the first 2. The 3rd is a specialty aircraft for long haul flights with low passenger payload.

@seadeer923 3 жыл бұрын

@R Pach it’s the 747-8i

@sheereenaali8448 3 жыл бұрын

@@seadeer923 yup, the B748 is the fastest currently in service

@paullawtable 4 жыл бұрын

So the third fastest plane is one that doesn't exist. The plane that I am going to build in my shed, can carry. 5,487 passengers at mach 17.5.

@jasbradbur 4 жыл бұрын

It’s a company based in Denver. It’s in preproduction and is being tested rn

@paullawtable 4 жыл бұрын

@@jasbradbur so when it's been tested and given its air worthiness certification, it can be included.

@ronnytanuhanjaya8910 3 жыл бұрын

im bulding a fighter jet plane that can carry 10^googolplexian^^^(1234556112027990!) passengers and first before doing the speed, here is a list: mach = speed of sound supermach = speed of light hypermach = unparalel speeds aka 123456789012^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^(g graham's number) speed= hypermach^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^(57236832683267327638793217823178913731265312132231513253126531263216321783212317893219782167231652313154231563216723131263268326831263232683216231782378321^googolplexian)

@px1_ 3 жыл бұрын

@@ronnytanuhanjaya8910 superior german engineering am i right(make it scream retard at the pilots. *CONSTANTLY* .)

@itsnaveenn 3 жыл бұрын

Yeah

@kanseii7689 4 жыл бұрын

The b747-8i/f is faster than an a380 going mach 0.90 i think

@78Dipar 4 жыл бұрын

Apart for the supersonic Concorde, the fastest subsonic planes ever built were the Convair 880 and 990, but they were not commercial success, as they carried less passengers and needed more fuel than competitors such as the Boeing 707 and Douglas DC8. In 2001 Boeing proposed the "Sonic Cruiser", about 10% faster than other planes, but no one was interested, and the project was dropped. Airline compagnies don't care about a 15 minutes shorter travel time, what matters most is fuel efficiency...

@kentfrederick8929 4 жыл бұрын

Actually, American expressed interest in the Sonic Cruiser. It might have only saved 10 to 15 minutes for O'Hare to LAX, but it would have saved more than an hour on O'Hare to Tokyo.

@RMSAquitaniafan55 4 жыл бұрын

@@kentfrederick8929 kord to japan is less than twice the time of kord to klax

@kentfrederick8929 4 жыл бұрын

@@RMSAquitaniafan55 I just looked at the American Airlines website. ORD-LAX shows an average travel time of 4 hours and 40 minutes. A JAL 773 is showing a travel time of 13 hours and 20 minutes.

@RMSAquitaniafan55 4 жыл бұрын

@@kentfrederick8929 interesting, i was just guessing

@tempusfugit9796 4 жыл бұрын

What a load of bollocks! And where's the Vickers VC10. It was one of the fastest subsonic airliners ever built. It used to cruise at 600+.

@dankasper5104 3 жыл бұрын

bottucks u mean

@tempusfugit9796 3 жыл бұрын

@@dankasper5104 no! I mean bollocks! Slang for bullshit. Also slang for testicles.

@captainalfiemutuma1250 4 жыл бұрын

Everyone pause at 5:14 since when did the top three fly this year and wth is a boom supersonic it’s a concept Edit Get ur facts right Also which 777 and 787 there are different kinds

@thebottle391 4 жыл бұрын

CaptainAlfie Mutuma. Ikr

@billsim3389 4 жыл бұрын

If we are adding in aircraft no longer in service, you might want to look at the VC-10. Lol

@ihaveatalkingpenisanditsay6699 4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for uploading. Very informative. I subscribed!

@frutdafruit 3 жыл бұрын

These speeds are incorrect, the 747-8 can fly faster than an A380, an A380 can fly at Mach 0.85 when a 747-8 can fly at Mach 0.86. I know that this is a minor difference but it matters

@WoW_y2626 3 жыл бұрын

@@frutdafruit very true

@Lance.planes.and.more1 4 жыл бұрын

We did 1200+ km/h on a KLM 747-400 with tailwind SXMAMS. Couldn't believed my eyes back then. But you should only mention planes that are flying now.

@arashkh7 4 жыл бұрын

you can not even pronounce the name of this aircraft. it is airbus A 3 eighty, not A 3 8 0 loool

@MishutkAviation 4 жыл бұрын

And did you notice that the Tupolev Tu-144 was written as *Tupulev-144* ?

@MironBleek 4 жыл бұрын

Airbus A three hundred and eighty =_=

@itsnaveenn 3 жыл бұрын

simpleflying.com/worlds-fastest-aircraft/ Correct info read this

@urbanninja018 3 жыл бұрын

@@itsnaveenn simple flying is much better ngl

@GhastUnity 3 жыл бұрын

I die a little inside when someone say 777 (seven seven seven) instead of triple 7 😂

@ChrisZoomER Жыл бұрын

Well if you thought that was bad, I always used to say it "seven *seventy* seven" and a people I know sometimes say it "seven *_hundred_** seventy* seven" which is quite a mouthful.

@asandaxulu584 4 жыл бұрын

The fastest passenger commercial jet rn is the 747. TF YOU SMOKING ?

@hectorreymundo4215 4 жыл бұрын

Wow new speed measure, 745 miles per arr

@navneetkukreti 4 жыл бұрын

I’m a commercial jet pilot. This is all wrong info.

@itsnaveenn 3 жыл бұрын

Yeah 747-8 is the fastest with 988kmh

@itsnaveenn 3 жыл бұрын

I subscribed u

@YortOK 4 жыл бұрын

I can remember flying from Johannesburg to Sydney on a Qantas 747 when the IFE information screen read 1200km/hr at about 42,000 feet.

@Desmodromic916 4 жыл бұрын

Maybe ground speed due to tail winds

@tobyk.4911 3 жыл бұрын

Yes, I also think that this has to be the ground speed. I think this makes sense - probably most passengers are more interested in "how fast are we travelling" (relative to the ground) than in the decomposition of this value into True Airspeed and wind speed.

@ChrisZoomER Жыл бұрын

Lucky, that beats the 777-300ER I flew in at 1,183 k/h at 41,000 feet.

@Digi20 4 жыл бұрын

Well max airspeeds for (subsonic) commercial airliners is very close together. the 1248kph listed here for the boeing 787 was archieved with a record fast jetstream as a tailwind, so meassured relative to the ground (groundspeed) the aircraft indeed traveled with over 1200kph (which is faster than the speed of sound), but the true airspeed (the speed relative to the air around the aircraft) never exceeded the max cruise of around 930kph. so this video is a bit absurd. would be the same if you title your granny the fastest bicycle racer ever because the got hurricane scale tailwinds.

@PanglossDr Жыл бұрын

I was flying London - Venice back in the 70s when the pilot came on air to tell us that we were being overtaken by Concorde. However, as we had a jetstream tail wind of over 400mph, we were travelling at almost the same speed relative to the ground. Our flight time was just over 90 minutes.

@jdie2730 4 жыл бұрын

I like how 2019 is in the title yet the top two don’t even fly anymore and the boom doesn’t even exist yet

@KebsW16 4 жыл бұрын

Are these ground speed with tailwinds ? ^^

@aliks_777 4 жыл бұрын

So fuselage is pronounced fyuselayge now?

@nakamichi682zx 3 жыл бұрын

Yes!! Loved that, friggin imbecile. Apart from the absurd speeds. This is silly oriental youtube guff and somehow i suppose theyre monetising like mad!!

@cxaviation3313 4 жыл бұрын

First of all if 787 went that fast it would be super sonic second the 787 and 777 speeds are WITH wind

@jg_mg2364 3 жыл бұрын

Everyone gangsta till’ we be havin” jet powered Cessna 172s

@Bbendfender 4 жыл бұрын

These speeds just seem too high to me. Air speed should be measured in knots, not mph.

@commandro 4 жыл бұрын

Seems those numbers are highest ground speeds ever recorded of those particular aircraft. The video is also aimed at general public so the speed is indicated in mph and kph.

@theextremercdude8998 4 жыл бұрын

Bruv that Tuplov plane couldn’t even get to Mach 2

@sinistregoth 4 жыл бұрын

Tbh it could, just not all of it at the same time! 🤣

@marcussv661 4 жыл бұрын

Thank you - !!!

@mikelliteras397 4 жыл бұрын

Doesn’t really matter these days, airlines don’t fly fast anymore

@frutdafruit 3 жыл бұрын

@Ramification for aircraft like the 747, that is not fast.

@mhassange 4 жыл бұрын

Numbers 1,2,3 don’t count anymore like the title suggests it’s 2019

@thelegoman1176 4 жыл бұрын

2019 or not Concorde is the fastest and one of the best

@Japan-in-N 4 жыл бұрын

Even the VC10 was faster than the 787 yet itsnot listed

@nathanhawes4207 4 жыл бұрын

It’s not seven seven seven, it’s triple seven

@Thewhitechocolate69 Жыл бұрын

The way the Boeing 787 climbs and never stalled

@aurktman1106 4 жыл бұрын

The speeds listed for 777 and 787 were with the jet stream assisting are referenced ground speed. The Convair 990 is still (and probably always be) the fastest subsonic commercial airliner referencing airspeed.

@mijnordna Жыл бұрын

Yes, this video is misleading. Those one-off flights are not indicative of the various aircraft's cruising and top speeds unassisted by tail winds.

@user-ev8oq7zz7n 4 жыл бұрын

cruise speed is more important than top speed

@davidcrandall3975 4 жыл бұрын

Great video

@user-sp3mu4bx6t 4 жыл бұрын

Tell me please, how turbofan can be faster than speed of sound?

@thebottle391 4 жыл бұрын

😂

@jlvandat69 4 жыл бұрын

Sure looks like that A380 had contact with runway near the tail, even with the anti-drag skid deployed.

@cf6282 4 жыл бұрын

Jeff V Old footage taken during testing.

@oiiihbeta 4 жыл бұрын

Minimum Unstick Test

@b747guy9 4 жыл бұрын

These speeds are totally bogus. I can say that from experience. The Airbus 380 and B747-8i are the fastest at MACH 0.855 normal cruise.. The Concord and other supersonic airplanes shouldn't even be on this list.

@bangrul74 3 жыл бұрын

that is very cool..!! Your video is very entertaining, well done my Friend...

@millymutimba8889 4 жыл бұрын

Wow 😎cool 🙀❗️

@5implesimon 4 жыл бұрын

by far the fastest commercial airliner...only 29 miles per arrr faster than Concord!

@jamesnichols5163 4 жыл бұрын

Didn’t the dc8 reach Mach 1.01 in a dive during testing, and yet it’s not included in the video?

@ericbraun4652 4 жыл бұрын

They probably mean sustained straight and level flight.

@nepalidude 4 жыл бұрын

I like the way you pronounce hour as /a:r/.

@screaminseagull 4 жыл бұрын

Five plus minute video or a picture? I’m glad I have unlimited data.

@Shark941-20 4 жыл бұрын

Where Tupolev("Careless")-154? Avg. Speed 950 km/h

@seanbuller7578 4 жыл бұрын

apprently #6 thru #1 are all super sonic. id like to see this video again, albeit produced by people who can actually pass a drug test

@astrocrut 3 жыл бұрын

This is the case of British Airways Boeing 747-400, which on the New York-London route entered the area of ferocious Storm Ciara but thanks to the powerful transatlantic jetstream set a new subsonic speed record. Accelerated by Storm Ciara on 9 February, 2020, the jumbo jet reached speeds of 825 mph (1,327 km/h).

@danielsalem7624 Жыл бұрын

Nice fact, i can visit concorde and tupolew nearly every week :)

@tudortugui4120 4 жыл бұрын

You should have considered the cruise speed over the top speed, use IAS(knots) or Mach and list aircraft thhat are still used today.

@mryesahem 4 жыл бұрын

anybody else notice that the liveries are backwards?

@lambertomainardi7933 4 жыл бұрын

yes, i've fixed it turning my monitor

@nonameguy2092 4 жыл бұрын

Passenger aircraft do not travel supersonic, their wings are not designed for it. Wings for supersonic aircraft are short, stubby and thin for a reason, supersonic aircraft are shaped more like darts than planes. At supersonic speeds, normal wings lose lift as the shockwaves seperate the air from the wing surface, effectively stalling the plane, the nose dives, it goes even faster and it gets worse from there. If you’re going supersonic in a passenger aircraft, you are having one really bad day.

@anthonytobias620 4 жыл бұрын

Soviet tech always ahead of its time

@mcatuara1 4 жыл бұрын

Too bad the Boeing 2707 wasn't produced...would have reach close to Mach 3.

@ReflectionTool637 4 жыл бұрын

Comments below are all helpful, but I got stopped cold stone dead in my tracks when she said, “passengers in comfort”. She has obviously never flown before .....

@RealistInIdealists817 3 жыл бұрын

Cool intro

@juangallego7197 4 жыл бұрын

When I was a kid, my family and I went to Chile. We were flying in a British Airways 747-400. And I remember very well that the few screens on tourist showed 582 MPH as cruise speed and 660 as top speed. 660 MILES PER HOUR. This was 1996. I didn't really get how fast it was until I learned to convert miles to kilometers years later. I'm guessing we had tail wind to achieve such top speed... Since then I haven't been in a place that reached that speed.

@frutdafruit 3 жыл бұрын

660 MPH is not fast for a plane. especially in the 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s

@frutdafruit 3 жыл бұрын

660 MPH is not fast for a plane. especially in the 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s

@ChrisZoomER Жыл бұрын

@@frutdafruit But Mach 1 at 35,000 is about 660 mph and 650 mph at 40,000 feet.

@ChrisZoomER Жыл бұрын

Well, the 747-8 is faster than that. Boeing once listed the 747's default speed (at least when over the ocean) is 720 mph. Similarly, Airbus stated that the A380's "official" speed is 1,185 km/h.

@rcoplien 4 жыл бұрын

Per arrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!!!! lol

@henrik183614 4 жыл бұрын

👽

@ravsinghrajput2105 4 жыл бұрын

Miles per arrrr 😃

@eggimal 4 жыл бұрын

Cool.

@MJ-YT-USR 4 жыл бұрын

All you need to know is, Concorde is by far the fastest commercial passenger aircraft that has carried commercial passengers - nothing else comes close and/or has never operated commercially.

@rickydoolous4669 4 жыл бұрын

What about the DC8 which actually went supersonic once during a shallow dive?

@gordjy 4 жыл бұрын

so wrong in so many ways...

@wobblybobengland 4 жыл бұрын

Inside 13 seconds "we already know that bigger is best ..... speed matters"

@dermetzger 4 жыл бұрын

Mach 1 is 767 mph, for those wondering. So, apparently, the Boeing 787 is supersonic capable...

@WoW_y2626 3 жыл бұрын

its knots not mph...

@dermetzger 3 жыл бұрын

No, THAT is mph. While I'm aware that aircraft actually measure speed in knots, Mach 1 in knots is 666 kt. However, just like the video, I'm not speaking in terms of knots, I'm speaking in terms of mph.

@fra93ilgrande Жыл бұрын

Concorde the king 😎👊🏻🔝

@myplace848 4 жыл бұрын

I always get a laugh from non- native speakers of English when they make a video like this and don’t pronounce the words correctly. Funny.

@lilwassabi8158 4 жыл бұрын

A350 didn't make it lol

@stevevids1608 4 жыл бұрын

I thought the TU 144 never managed to get into commercial service.

@seadeer923 4 жыл бұрын

Did. But only for a few months. Wasn’t safe at all

@nathandachallenger9200 4 жыл бұрын

what about the a330 when i flew with Air Transat on their a330 from london gatwick to vancouver we cruised at 620 mph

@陳力維 4 жыл бұрын

Boeing 777, Boeing 787's speed is mostly slower than Boeing 747-400, Boeing 747-8? Boeing 777, Boeing 787's selling point is fuel-efficient, Boeing 747-8's selling point is mass and faster.

@marcoparodi1982 4 жыл бұрын

Wrong. 747 is slower than 787 since 747 is heavier and fly lower than 787.

@oranges866 4 жыл бұрын

@@marcoparodi1982 They fly at the same altitude like all commercial airliners, and the 747-8 clocked in at a faster speed than the 787.

@marcoparodi1982 4 жыл бұрын

@@oranges866 all commercial Airlines dont fly at same altitud. 767 cant fly at 43.000 ft.

@oranges866 4 жыл бұрын

@@marcoparodi1982 The typical cruising altitude of any *current* commercial airliner is between 30,000 and 40,000 ft. No more, no less. Business jets cruise higher only to avoid air traffic from airline flights.

@marcoparodi1982 4 жыл бұрын

@@oranges866 do you fly?. I guess not. I came to México City Las night ina 787-8 cruising at 43.000ft and 500 miles per hour. I guess I was doing my job wrong smart ass. When you get your licence let me know.

@dodietheprodie 4 жыл бұрын

Pish the Vickers VC10 is fastest sub sonic airliner ever built only the convair aircraft got near the speed of the VC10

@packingten 4 жыл бұрын

Flying east in JETSTREAM

@dodoubleg2356 3 жыл бұрын

FYI, your top speed for the Concorde is about 54mph off...it was actually 1,534mph but hey, who's counting??

@ChrisZoomER Жыл бұрын

The exact limits of these planes are all classified, they're only allowed to give the approximate speed.

@BeCoShooter 3 жыл бұрын

When a five minute video is used, instead of a single still image.

@AMERICANPATRIOT1945 4 жыл бұрын

Both the Boom Supersonic and the Tu 144 don't count- the Boom Supersonic is vaporware and the Tu 144 crashed so often it was pulled from service before it could be called a commercial airliner. Top safe cruising speed, or Vmo, for a Boeing 747 in level flight is about 614 mph or 0.90 to 0.92 Mach at 35,000 feet. Top speed for an Airbus A 380 in level flight is Mach 0.89 at 35,000 feet, which is the Vmo, or maximum safe operating level speed for the A380. The claim of Mach 0.96 for the A380 is for a shallow dive. This is a structural speed limit, not a level flight speed limit.

@corolla9545 4 жыл бұрын

It says here that the A380 is faster than the 747 but in real situation, a lot of A380s are being overtaken by 747s in flight!

@chagrin2 4 жыл бұрын

Its not faster.The A380 is rated at Mach.84 while the 747 is Mach .85

@corolla9545 4 жыл бұрын

@@chagrin2 That's what I've said man! The 747 is much faster at Mach .85 while the A380 is at Mach .84 maybe lesser.

@davemiller6055 4 жыл бұрын

@@chagrin2 747-400 rated at mach .92, 747-8 at mach .9, A380 at mach .89

@rpach1613 4 жыл бұрын

The 747-400 is the fastest commercial plane in the sky right now. The 777 is next, the the 787. Notice the freight versions of the first 2. The 3rd is a specialty aircraft for long haul flights with low passenger payload.

@codydolphin Жыл бұрын

The Concorde could hit 1480 mph, but this would cause massive damage to the engines and the body due to high temperatures. The max speed it could “safely” hit was 1354 mph.