Uss boise light cruiser duck butt 40 -46 sank many but cape esperance sank six in 27 minutes.
@mohdtumiran92653 сағат бұрын
At last the stupid US left Afghanistan after spent trillions of dollars.
@MS-gc7rb3 сағат бұрын
Who calls a Tiger” Tigger”?
@ynad69224 сағат бұрын
Planu ne tata VIDEN yan
@alexproctor5245 сағат бұрын
Did you just disrespect star WARS by saying the Death Star was from star TREK? Cmon
@philipreiffel50776 сағат бұрын
All the american left behing was old rubbish or damaged aircraft including damaged helicopters!
@CAFEVENUS9 сағат бұрын
AFGHANISTAN another money laundering project.
@mehdiboukhari17910 сағат бұрын
Let’s end this now the t14 can’t even move because it use a motor from the second world war and guess what motor are they using ? The tiger porsche one ! Yes the one who didn’t work :)
@GarioTheRock10 сағат бұрын
Who is the giga-chad doing cobra maneuvers in a MiG-21, that's INSANE ;-; HOOOOOWWWW, I love the MiG-21 but WHAT, I would imagine the pilot would fly through the floor as the momentum of his tungsten balls carries him on a forward trajectory ;-; A MIG-21. It might as well be a god damn single engine Cessna xD That's the most astounding thing I've heard all year, and I learned there's 3 new types of stars that we discovered and a whole bunch of stuff about anti-energy and virtual particles, but a MiG-21 doing a COBRA?! WHAT! I'm a physics nerds and that sentence is just la-la-la land in my approximation, yet here we are x)
@gaborpali38411 сағат бұрын
Has anyone worked out the ratio for the Jagdtiger? I heard of them wiping out columns of Sherman tanks only to breakdown on way back to base due to known engine issues (which meant they were then destroyed by the crew). I’d guess (I don’t recall exact numbers) like 30:1, or if breakdown doesn’t count 30:0
@robinchanguion540011 сағат бұрын
Very sceptical about Russian figures.........
@thebeef127813 сағат бұрын
I think a CSO class supercarrier should have made the list
@chicken056215 сағат бұрын
The lesser Ark and Halo array laughing in over 30,000km diameter
@idreamofire15 сағат бұрын
Flight Medic here: The fact that the bell 407, 407GX and GXI on here is a big omission. They are smaller but they have a great useable load/ speed and distance. Another good one for the larger aircraft is the Sikorsky S76
@badgermike123117 сағат бұрын
Ya have to appreciate the Polish propaganda effort here.
@PokemonMaster6978617 сағат бұрын
747❤
@MukadisAymen-ui8fy17 сағат бұрын
The western country's have always been concerned for any type of military development from countries they don't like an Iran it's one of those countries 😂😂😂😂😂😂
@anakabu737417 сағат бұрын
I always thought the american has “Batman’s” technology? Guess i watched too much movies that are full of hollywood craps.
@hilwaamanamankiyar-pp5bf19 сағат бұрын
TV
@hilwaamanamankiyar-pp5bf20 сағат бұрын
KBS
@hilwaamanamankiyar-pp5bf20 сағат бұрын
RS
@hilwaamanamankiyar-pp5bf20 сағат бұрын
RS
@hilwaamanamankiyar-pp5bf20 сағат бұрын
SV
@hilwaamanamankiyar-pp5bf20 сағат бұрын
UN
@musafawundu671823 сағат бұрын
No ships from Warhammer 40,000, huh? No Eldar Craftworlds?
@CaptAxolotl23 сағат бұрын
The uss reid was attacked and sunk in under a minute, not a few minutes like the video claims. My grandfather was on the ship and the story goes that he took one of his friends gun posts that night. The only survivors were on the top deck, because how fast it was hit and sunk. Never met my grandfather but im willing to bet he had tremendous survivors guilt for taking his friends post.
@International_CornКүн бұрын
Scharnhorst and Gneisanau, perhaps one of the only ship's of Kriegsmarine that served its intent purpose very well, a usefull capital ships in other words.
@henm3000Күн бұрын
Those yasin yasin metal cr4p's are disabled as Sheikh Ahmed Yassin
@dougcorder4601Күн бұрын
The weaponry all belonged to the Afghan military. The assumption was that the Afghan military would continue the fight against the Taliban. Bad guess...
@Vince005aranКүн бұрын
I love that you spelled Samus wrong and had her gunship flying backwards and still outpacing an X-wing
@sushmasinghkisibhibdestark9170Күн бұрын
Court lawyer
@sushmasinghkisibhibdestark9170Күн бұрын
Postoffice train.
@sushmasinghkisibhibdestark9170Күн бұрын
Pramod vinod daanesh twinkle neetu
@sushmasinghkisibhibdestark9170Күн бұрын
Sunel
@XkMengКүн бұрын
Why is Arleigh Burke included in the rankings? Look at its clothes-rack-like mast. It is far inferior to European warships and China's 052D in terms of stealth appearance.
@nnqi3475Күн бұрын
LOL, this ranking is a joke. A simple logic can reveal the problem. Since BrahMos is the best, why doesn't Russia, as the developer, use it? This video is just to please Indians.
@brucelesourd3074Күн бұрын
This video should clarify its definition of "naval vessels" does not include submarines. If it did, then at least one destroyer would be on this list: USS England, which sank 6 Japanese submarines in 12 days. Given that submarines are, in fact, naval vessels, and they were second only to aircraft carriers in strategic importance in WW2, their arch-nemeses the destroyers deserve acknowledgement. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_England_(DE-635) This channel does have similar videos covering the most offensively successful carriers and subs. I hope they do a destroyer video. This Top 6 list is especially notable in the context of these other videos because it highlights how relatively ineffective traditional gun-oriented surface combatants were during WW2 overall, compared to carriers, submarines, and, because of the threat posed by submarines, destroyers. That said, there were a few pivotal WW2 naval battles (as opposed to shore bombardments) dominated by gun ships, notably the "barroom brawl", a truly brutal night battle off Guadalcanal that happened with both US and Japan carriers out of action. The strategic and tactical importance of surface warships in these battles isn't really reflected in "Top Kills" lists, partly because assigning credit for kills is hard when the battle is so chaotic ships are often firing on their own side, partly because forcing retreat and repair is just as effective in many situations as sinking something. warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/night-battle-the-barroom-brawl-off-guadalcanal/
@seanogrady2629Күн бұрын
How about the A-12?
@_ace786Күн бұрын
nothing was stolen
@TxChristopherКүн бұрын
I call pure BS on the SU57
@proteusnz99Күн бұрын
Cordwainer Smith: Golden the ship was, oh, oh, oh. A ship 90 million miles long. Crew of one
@nogoodnameleftКүн бұрын
Where are Shokaku and Hiryu? Should switch out Zuikaku and one of the other Japanese carriers for Shokaku and Hiryu. Hiryu single-handedly sank the British carrier HMS Hermes and American carrier USS Yorktown
@user-yz1xq5kw4kКүн бұрын
Stealth planes including the j20 broadcast a radar signature when not in combat configuration. Know your shit
@darrencorrigan8505Күн бұрын
Thanks, Buzz.
@user-vs4hg4og5pКүн бұрын
Atmospheric magnetic pulse, oh...you gyes, that is from the planet I came from. Nice planet you have here.😮
@mingkwong9277Күн бұрын
All cxld...budget restrains
@garycroteau-kx9jmКүн бұрын
The bidens product revealed
@user-lk1wh9tx3yКүн бұрын
I would swap the colorado class battleships for tennessee class or iowa class there better than colorado class
@navinstrument8353Күн бұрын
Wow qatar isn't in the top 10
@tirsofelipeduranmendoza5432Күн бұрын
That was not a Su57 that was a Mig31. The R37 is to big to fit the internal bay of the felon. And strange u dindt mention the Su35 that reportlly have several kills over 120km over ukraine. UAF cant fly above 500m becose theire being track all the times by the migs and flankers-e. But i guess we have to wait when the war is over and RAF start giving the details of its aa kills. Not to long ago they show an Mig31 whith 7kills that operate on harkhor area