6:08 For the airframe and mission equipment only, the Lot 15-17 cost of F-35s ranges “from $70.2 million to $69.9 million for the F-35A, $80.9 million to $78.3 million for the F-35B, and $90 to $89.3 million for the F-35C,” a Lockheed spokesperson said.

2nd ❤ From this list my favourite Fighter jet is Saab Jass 39 Gripen

Development costs for Chinas were paid for by the USA though. Lol.

That's a lot of money, but air superiority is invaluable.

Realy I like this powerful fighters jets

If more F22s were allowed to be built, the unit cost most likely would have come down!

Wiki says F 22 can cost up to $380m 🫨

Unfortunately the majority of the figure you give are incorrect making me question the accuracy of any and all content from this channel.

As many others have commented, very difficult to set a fixed price. F35 is probably heavily subsidized by US taxpayers for the use as a tool for the state department. Gripen cost is between 60 and 110 milliion USD depending on C or E version as well as the included equipment and tech transfer. Rafael price probably include much of the above and take in consideration loss of tech knowledge to competitors and enemies when selling it.

The Rafale is an incredible plane ! The best omnirole fighter by far !

No, the F-35A is 71 million a shot. The BAE Typhoon II Tranche 3 is about 140 million dollars per unit. The F-22 hasn't been made since 2011. Kind of apples an oranges.

Is that Su-35 @ 1:43 with covered canopy unmanned?

Where does the information come from that the Su 57 costs 100 million?

clearly rafale is the best compromise in this list when you know what he is able to do and the very low problems this jet has had

This scale is not realistic because the real cost from a fighter jet is not only the buying cost but the full life cost (maintenance and upgrades) ,and with this parameter is the F35 EXTREMLY EXPANSIVE, much more than the Rafale or the Eurofighter Typhoon...For me is today the best fighter jet the F22, (and i'm french), but because of high upgrade costs are the F22 not up to date in some detection sensors or anti missile laser systems...

SU-35 Best aircraft

En iyisi Kaan...!

I have seen that LM took an upfront development payment of $200B rather than amortise over the production run. Assuming 3000 units that is $66M a unit. So a quoted $90M price is subsidised by the US taxpayer for $66M rather than an upfront $155M cost. LM is getting many international sales on the back of US taxpayers. I have not gotten my commission check but I am sure LM executives have.

The F-35 has been called "the most expensive weapons system of any kind ever undertaken by any military" by more than a few critics, so I'm failing to understand how they come out at #3. The F-22 is fully operational and a mature technology while the F-35 has been plagued with problems in its various essential systems, triggering comparisons to the Navy's ill-fated LCS(Little Crappy Ship) program in terms of utter, money wasting boondoggles.

the rafale is the most envied fighter

阵风价格根本没有这么贵，这是卖给印度的售价而不是造假，造假不可能超过一亿美元😂，印度买这个被坑了

Pesawat tempu yang dibeli pak Prabowo , termasuh disini nggak ya ?

Es geht doch eigentlich nicht um die virtuelle Schwanzlänge, also den "teuersten" zu haben, sondern wie man aus seinem Geld das Maximum herausholt.

F3R with the 🇬🇷 thank you buzz ps SU 34n and KF 21

The F-35 is a massive white elephant, jack of all but not the greatest of anything !

The SAAB is very cheap in running cost, can land "anywhere" and be back in action after 10 minutes. Electronics can be upgraded while in air as action is requested.

The Eurofighter famously cost the Brits more per airframe than the Raptor cost the Americans.

expensive to produce or to buy?

The F-22 was never exported because the US never wanted the world to know how bad it actually was, despite the hype !

tejas is the most expensive one😊

Только не надо забывать, что для китайцев деньги вообще не имеют никакого значения. Они могут себе позволить миллиард самолётов по триллиону долларов за штуку.

pretty sure the cheaper fighter jets Mig-21 are more worth then any of these. Some are sold at 40 thousand dollars and the fully operational ones are sold at 185 thousand dollars. That means for the price of 150 millions i could either have 1 singular F-22 Raptor or 810 fully operational Mig-21. No matter how hard you try, your F-22 is not killing 810 Mig-21. That is when you know not to buy the scam jet. I'm not saying buy Mig-21. I'm saying there are many other jets that better the Mig-21 and far cheaper then those crap overpriced things. Like the Mig-29 or F-16 and F-18. Way more worth the price.

The cost for the Gripen is overstated because of how SAAB includes a lot of expensive but very convenient extras in their contracts. The cost for the Rafale is PROBABLY somewhat overstated for similar reasons as the Gripen. The cost for the F-22 is enormously understated because it's not based on actual production. Even if the ability to restart production had not been destroyed, actual pricetag to build new ones today would likely be somewhere around 400 million $. But with the cost for actually recreating the ability to produce them added? Probably 500-700M$. The cost of the F-35 is grossly understated because of USAs subsidies. Its actual per unit cost is way above the Typhoon. And comparisons made is that you can get 2 Rafale for the price of one F-35, or 4 Gripen. The cost for the F-15EX is LAUGHABLY understated for similar reasons as the F-22.

I thought the F-22 was 360 mil usd per unit?

2:37 McDonnell Douglas F-15E Strike Eagle X Boeing F-15EX Eagle II

SU - 35 for Serbie 💪🏼🇷🇸

Ummmm, the J20 is the mighty dragon, I think south Korea has a black eagle.

As I know, B2 bomber is the most expensive.

F16v is only $63m cost, it is not because it is cheaply made, it is because the maintenance is much easier to have lot of parts around the world.

The Su-57 lacks of budget though, it cost the quality of an airplane to be that cheap being a 5th gen fighter jet

Make a cheap version fighter jet too

Excuse me miss buzz where is our beloved jets the f16 viper...?

Croatia recently bought 12 Rafale's F3R version for around 900 mil...these info's are pure bullshit

If you want to make a recording, make sure your phone is off!!

• Rafale B : 73 M€ TTC • Rafale C : 68 M€ TTC • Rafale M : 78 M€ TTC

Please without translation!!!

Euro Typhoon Fighter Top2 wtf F-35 TOP3 haha 😅😂 Fake Video

WTF Our Comper SU-57 vs J-20 wtf is this

Hi

F22 best after that j20 and su57 comes

Strike Eagle is a missile truck

It´s a little bit funny that #10 Gripen and #01 F-22 are the proven best since 2006. Everyone else price tags are "very, very" creative like the American banks or the Drug industry set prices for their owner's needs of multiple Super Yachts (de Voss owns 10), Multiple Super luxury homes, Privet Jets, and Helicopters! Eurofighter costs too much because of the incompetent owners and why Rafale cost that much, has no explanation in logic. We can't see that either Eurofighter or Rafale is as good as JAS C.

Tomcat F-14 ❤

10 cheapest pls

Le rafale ont dirait un jouet le plus moche des avions un fer à repasser 😂

Eurofighter Typhoon FTW

Fighter jets are becoming obsolete because cheap infrared cameras can detect hot exhaust gas made by their engines.

Rafale shoots down F 16

F22 lack of HMD in the helmet😅😂😂😂🤦🤦🤦😡

This is a terrible video, full of inaccuracies. The EA-18G is not a fighter, it's an electronic warfare aircraft. The F-35 price (off the rack) is $78 million per (the US has produced over 1,000 F-35's which accounts for their price to continue to drop).

Su-35 - very expensive shit... )

So the Eurofighter is more expensive than J-20, F-35 and SU-57... OK

05. Chengdu J-20 Mighty Dragon

It's very funny now to listen about Su-57 advanced technology. Which exist only in warm russian dreams and cartoons. But high price - sure it's looks like true 😂. Developers achieved their budgets...

Waiting for this information by long time

What is the cost of f16 block 70/72?

The best Rafale

Poorly researched click-bate

1

UK get back TSR 2 walk all over this lot, pick up were they left of from 70s tempest British rolls Royce engine's, drone swarms, brush this lot aside.

USA Rapport ist eine Kiste hahaha 😂

What would be the cost of yf23 😅😅😅

Su-57 is TOP2 ok wtf this Video, iam hate Russia but SU-57 is The best fighter in Top-2

Fake video

lol SU-57 - 7? )))))))))))

Cheaper by the dozen?

What's the cost of Tejas Mk1a & Ka 50 aircrafts

국민들 세금

F-16 and F/A-18E/f are too cheap for this list.

F 22 not being built anymore. so what the f???

😁Chinese J-20 Feng Du copied from U.S F-22.

TF-X MMU?

🤔

Load of nonsense .

F16 Viper...

Falta el KF 21 sur corea

1:48 Sukhoi Su-35 Egypt.

Лживый пропагандистский канал, постоянно превозносится американский металлолом. Я отписываюсь.

You say it as: Da Soh Rafal not Dasult Rafael Not being a smart ass but thats the way you say it.

There's no way a Typhoon is more expensive than an F35. It's madness to buy anything other than F35 for those nations with Typhoons and Rafale.

Eurofighter Typhoon's main origin was the UK. Yes it was multinational though by that logic, so was the F-35 (with a sizeable British contingent in the R+D and manufacture of some of the F-35's components; though yes, the large majority of the F-35 is US originated) Eurofighter Typhoon was lead by the British and the UK has the most of them for a contributor and was by far the biggest R+D and manufacture input. Although there were many components made all over Europe, BAE Systems (UK based firm) had the biggest role. Eurofighter Typhoon's successive tranches (batches) of newer models provided lots of work for many British workers. Charitably you could call the Eurofighter Typhoon a mostly Anglo-German project, as nominally, the long-lasting arguments back in the 1990's and 2000's over who would produce what and in what numbers, between which countries, eventually resulted in the UK having a 37.42% majority share of the production numbers. Germany was 2nd at 29.03% of the total production. Italy was at 19.52% and Spain was at 14.03%. This also meant that the UK had more of a share of production than the 3rd and 4th biggest partners of the program put together, whereas Germany, the 2nd biggest partner, did not (though not by much) Therefore the UK was definitely the leading partner of the project. It was born out of British Aerospace work going back to 1971, by it's own origins. The UK had been pushing for a modern jet fighter from that time onward, which could meet the demands of fulfilling the air superiority fighter role as well as some ground attack and bombing missions. It is important to contextualise this in relation to the state of play in the 1970's and 1980's, with the Cold War very much still ongoing and NATO requiring constant equipment upgrades due to the leapfrogging of technology across the late Cold War, happening constantly in a long arms race. The first demo aircraft flew in the UK, called the British Aerospace EAP (a test aircraft), on the 6th August 1986, to test concepts which would eventually go into the Eurofighter Typhoon (only, in a far more advanced form, after lots of British and multinational collaborative work over the 8 following years after 1986, by the time the Eurofighter Typhoon was introduced in the first tranche/batch in earnest) Where do you think the Eurofighter Typhoon gets it's name from? Eurofighter, yes, referring to the European project to create a formidable fighter fit for the newer geopolitical realities of the 1990's. But where does the Typhoon bit come from? Oh, that's right, the Hawker Typhoon of the RAF (British air force; the Royal Air Force) in WWII. Little remembered fact, there was some German resistance to this naming choice, with the Luftwaffe basically disliking the idea of Typhoon being picked (British Hawker Typhoons and Allied Hawker Typhoons in general had done a lot of damage to German forces in WWII and it was considered unfriendly on some level to name the new multinational fighter after a British attack aircraft from WWII, responsible for absolutely annihilating some tank formations and trains etc) Inversely, the UK was the only partner whom had a problem with the first name Eurofighter, because it sounded too alien to British aircraft naming conventions and generally rather strange as a sort of boring and lazy portmanteau of 'European Fighter'. To the RAF it sounded too generic and dull, as well as potentially politicised. The Eurofighter first name stuck, yes, as the British went along with that, but the rest of the partners agreed to Typhoon as the second name (in spite of German opposition to the use of the name Typhoon, for mid 20th century historical reasons) They were all trying their best to get along and name the aircraft something which made sense in all four languages (British English, German, Italian and Spanish) It wasn't meant to be in Latin or to be overly long, either. Partly for convenience purposes, partly for marketing purposes. The UK RAF began marketing the Eurofighter as the Eurofighter Typhoon before anyone else, with foreign exports outside Europe in mind at that time in the 1990's, which initially didn't sit well with the German Luftwaffe. This slight disagreement didn't last long however, and was quickly moved on from with Germany going along with the name Eurofighter Typhoon like everyone else involved and that little initial confusion over the naming, being largely forgotten now 25 years (more like nearly 30 years) or so later. It doesn't particularly matter now in 2023, though back then there had to be discussions, competitions and arguments made for the idea of which name was went with. Typhoon is alternatively spelt Tifon of Tiffone, in different languages, and different countries involved in producing them or their components, may have differing designations for them. Though the project and end product was definitely named the Eurofighter Typhoon by all, regardless of that. Just as the Panavia Tornado was multinational by a British and German led project, with the Tornado referring to a WWII era British RAF aircraft (the Hawker Tornado), so too would the Eurofighter Typhoon spiritually be named after the Hawker Typhoon. Tornado, Typhoon. And now BAE Systems is developing the Tempest, which, guess what, is named after the Hawker Tempest, from WWII and the early Cold War (first flight 1942, retired in 1953; never saw combat in WWII as it was over before it was ready in numbers) As far as the British were concerned, that was definitely what the Eurofighter Typhoon represented, or part of that legacy at least. A new Typhoon, basically. Ultimately the UK did lead the Eurofighter Typhoon project. In all kinds of ways the UK put more into it's development, for longer, and with more precedent in terms of their own aviation industries. When the UK was leading the push for the "Future European Fighter Aircraft" (FEFA) programme from 1983 onward, as a more serious evolution of their own work going back to 1971, in cooperation with their strongest (and richest) NATO allies in Europe, modern Germany post-1991 (Fall of the Soviet Union, Fall of the Berlin Wall) did not exist yet. When I say 'Germany' was part of the FEFA programme from 1983, what that really means, is that West Germany was. Not a reunified Germany with West Germany and East Germany together, until 1991 onward, of course. And remember, 20 years _before_ 1991, the British had been producing demo test aircraft for concepts for air superiority and multirole aircraft since at least 1971. It should be noted that West Germany was very insistent on a new era fighter of the future for the 1990's, and beyond, and they were to their credit, very actively involved and arguably 2nd only to British input and involvement. Obviously, this ran side by side with the also successful Panavia project which was about to produce the famous Panavia Tornado. In 1983, the British government ordered what was hoped to be a pair of EAP (Experimental Aircraft Programme) aircraft from the work being done in the UK, with overly optimistic intentions of input from Italy and West Germany. This was not forthcoming and so the British aviation engineers working on the project, tested a solitary demo aircraft (instead of the two the government had asked for, lacking contributions at that time from Italy and Germany) This test aircraft used the same RB-199 as used on the Tornado, with the test aircraft being considered by the RAF to be remarkably similar looking to the final product (the Eurofighter Typhoon) The iconic look of the twin-jets on the Eurofighter Typhoon absolutely comes directly from the design legacy of the Tornado and more broadly from UK jet fighter design going back to the 1950's and 1960's. Compare both the Tornado and the Typhoon to the English Electric Lightning, and you'll see what I mean (only with the iconic old English Electric Lightning, a bomber interceptor by type, primarily of the mid Cold War era, the twin-engines are vertically, not horizontally arrayed) The entire 'look' of the Eurofighter is largely based on British designs, both in terms of the aerodynamic models and in terms of the engine layout and design configuration. This entirely British test aircraft was a complete success, following in the footsteps of the earlier design, research and development efforts being made in the UK since 1971. The British House of Commons Accounts Committee, credited this test aircraft with reducing the development of the Eurofighter by a year for a saving of £850 million in 1986 money (so well over £2.3 Billion in today's money) It should also be remembered that a different multinational, European military aviation project, called ACA (Agile Combat Aircraft), had failed by the time the British Aerospace EAP came about. With the failure of the three-nation ACA program, West Germany became convinced that the way ahead was for a _five nation_ multinational project, to come up with the funding and R+D support necessary to sustain and complete it. We should not forget that there were not originally just four members of the Eurofighter Typhoon Project/Programme, but five. France was the other country. Unfortunately, France decided to withdraw from the development of the Eurofighter Typhoon, which was rather controversial and near outrageous at the time, because by then France - privy to a lot of classified information on the EF project - had taken and ran with a lot of it to put into the Dassault Rafale project instead, which was seen as a very sly move by the French and rightly always has been seen that way. It was a pretty unpleasant and deceptive thing to do to allied countries, and it followed in step with the French _also_ withdrawing from the UK led (and ultimately solo UK) project of the Future Carrier Project (which resulted in the two massive British aircraft carriers of the _Queen Elizabeth_-class)

The SU-57b is as stealthy as a BRICK!! I have seen it, and it is NOT a stealthy aircraft's airframe as it is based on the SU-27 family. The engines' compressors fins and parts show up quite visible to radar { and to the human eye as well! Totally fails in all stealth requirements} and infrared systems that would be protected in any stealth design. It might be agile (it is that) and fast (yes it is), however it fails as a stealth fighter. Sad to say, the best press it has gotten was from "Top Gun : Maverick where it was shot down 3 times. Was that the kind of press you would want for your newest "stealth fighter"? I doubt it.

AHAH Typhoon the bad copy paste of The Rafale that will never come close to it

Russian GARBAGE, makes me laugh!

Слышали - штуковина такая, Я никак понять всё не могу, Со всех утюгов, не умолкая, Ей грозят заморскому врагу. К черту мнения Тупых из интернета И пускай В Европу ни ногой, Нет у них Анала и говнета, А у нас есть тот, И есть другой. У нас есть Аналоговнет, Аналоговнета нигде больше нет. У нас есть Аналоговнет, Аналоговнета нигде больше нет. Всё сложней жить в каждодневном бреде И тону среди пиар-атак, Но с помощью его мы в рай поедем, А они - подохнут просто так. К черту мнения Тупых из интернета И пускай В Европу ни ногой, Нет у них Анала и говнета, А у нас есть тот, И есть другой. У нас есть Аналоговнет, Аналоговнета нигде больше нет. У нас есть Аналоговнет, Аналоговнета нигде больше нет. Делаем мы то, что в мире больше В голову другую не полезет, Ни в Германии, ни в США, ни в Польше Не придумали бы ничего полезней. Нам всё объяснили вкратце - Вникнем в суть, чтоб разобраться, С помощью его мы, братцы, Всем дадим еще просраться! У нас есть Аналоговнет, Аналоговнета нигде больше нет. У нас есть Аналоговнет, Аналоговнета нигде больше нет.

U.S.should of produce more F-22s and less F-35s!