10 Planes You Didn't Know Airlines Owned

  Рет қаралды 96,325

Aviatrix

Aviatrix

Күн бұрын

In the past 35 years, more than 16,000 commercial aircraft have been retired worldwide. And that number will continue to increase as time goes on. So today, we will be looking at 10 planes you didn’t know airlines owned.
Let’s get into it.
✈️ Don't forget to LIKE and SUBSCRIBE for more travel-related content! ✈️
Tags: airbus a380,airbus a350,airbus a320,a380,airbus,aviation,planes,aircraft,planes you didn't know airlines had,planes you don't know airlines had,planes you didn't know airlines owned,unpopular aircraft,unknown aircraft,unknown planes,secret plane,Learjet 45,Cathay Pacific Learjet 45,Lufthansa Cessna Citation,Cessna Citation,A310,Emirates,747,boeing 747,Emirates A310,C17,Qatar Airways C-17,KLM ATR 42,Icelandair DC3,DC3,Japan Airlines II-62,Il62,Fokker F28

Пікірлер: 281
@peoplesambassadordm8279
@peoplesambassadordm8279 Ай бұрын
The a310 was NOT produced in 1883
@Turkeditor296
@Turkeditor296 Ай бұрын
But if it was, imagine retiring the a310 for the Wright flyer💀
@Paper246
@Paper246 Ай бұрын
Is this video made with ai or something 💀
@Turkeditor296
@Turkeditor296 Ай бұрын
@@Paper246 most likely
@peoplesambassadordm8279
@peoplesambassadordm8279 Ай бұрын
@@Paper246 nope. Lol but proofreading editing before publishing is good
@Mario74788
@Mario74788 Ай бұрын
Correct😂😂😂
@christophercole8114
@christophercole8114 Ай бұрын
I had no idea that the Airbus A310 was in production 20 years before the Wright brothers invented the first airplane!
@rosser95
@rosser95 Ай бұрын
Why is the information in this video so bad ? A310 from 1883 , IL62 was a wide body ? Do better !
@KnightRanger38
@KnightRanger38 Ай бұрын
IL62 engine location as well....
@matchc0635
@matchc0635 Ай бұрын
now you know it's AI generated.
@vieuxbal1253
@vieuxbal1253 Ай бұрын
@5:09 "As of 2024, there are no Caravelle aircraft in operation by United Airlines." No kidding 😲😳
@galadato7425
@galadato7425 Ай бұрын
Unbelievable
@vieuxbal1253
@vieuxbal1253 Ай бұрын
@@galadato7425 🤣🤣🤣
@donrobinson6613
@donrobinson6613 Ай бұрын
1883 until 1997 with 114 years of service the A310 has got to be the most successful airliner so far.
@ImEpic854
@ImEpic854 Ай бұрын
Lol.
@TheJakeUtube
@TheJakeUtube Ай бұрын
You should fire your script writer and whoever does the final approval for these videos. So much wrong info.
@angelitacancholamoreno4830
@angelitacancholamoreno4830 Ай бұрын
Most likely chatgpt
@Stopnaziruzzia
@Stopnaziruzzia Ай бұрын
1883 love it. That this was not spotted.
@Tyler.rexing12
@Tyler.rexing12 Ай бұрын
The guy even said it. He should’ve really checked his research before he said it.
@t-minus-qj7sd
@t-minus-qj7sd Ай бұрын
@@Tyler.rexing12 Probably an AI voice...
@BigGuy10Points
@BigGuy10Points Ай бұрын
Yeah bro don’t you know your aviation history? Where did the Wright brothers get the idea from?
@benkovacs3447
@benkovacs3447 Ай бұрын
ahh yes, the a310 was definitely made in 1883.
@fayyadguissida
@fayyadguissida Ай бұрын
Me who's from 1883 , I can confirm it's true 👌
@user-fj5os6jw4o
@user-fj5os6jw4o Ай бұрын
It's well known that many people were rescued from the 1883 Krakatoa eruption in an A310. How that plane was in service for well over a century is just absolutely amazing.
@claycassin8437
@claycassin8437 Ай бұрын
Especially since the only jet fuel back then was produced by Tibetan monks feeding kerosene to yaks. The byproduct was pure, but difficult to get down the mountain. And the yaks were not happy.
@ItsRobby5436
@ItsRobby5436 Ай бұрын
Bro what are these NPC channels lately with AI voices and missinfomation a A310 WIDEBODY with JET ENGINES in 1883???? Lmfao
@benvikarasa2815
@benvikarasa2815 Ай бұрын
AI garbage
@ImEpic854
@ImEpic854 Ай бұрын
1983, not 1883. (1983 was when the A310 was first produced)
@widget787
@widget787 Ай бұрын
Is this AI created? KLM is not an airline only focused on long haul, they fly a lot of long haul but also has an extensive short and medium haul network, which makes their Amsterdam hub work. They have more than 100 narrowbody aircraft in service, including KLM Cityhopper. Their ATRs flew both both KLM Excel and KLM UK, subsidiaries that operated out of Eindhoven/Maastricht and within plus out of the UK.
@Homoprimatesapiens
@Homoprimatesapiens Ай бұрын
The IL-62 isnt a wide body airliner, it is also a narrow body airliner such as the British V.C.-10.
@davidbeckenbaugh9598
@davidbeckenbaugh9598 Ай бұрын
And the wing mount engines sure looked like a strange mounting. Almost like they were mounted on the empennage............
@emmell4799
@emmell4799 Ай бұрын
The Caravelle is not a T tail
@Southwest_923WR
@Southwest_923WR Ай бұрын
Technichly it is. Commonmly refered to as " inverted cruciform T" aka, " Low T".
@randomxnp
@randomxnp Ай бұрын
@@Southwest_923WR I would call it a mid-tail.
@ImEpic854
@ImEpic854 Ай бұрын
I would call that a + tail.
@kenward9501
@kenward9501 Ай бұрын
The first aircraft with a true T tail was the Hawker Siddeley Trident (9th January 1962)
@cameraman655
@cameraman655 Ай бұрын
Yep, another Clickbait video that lured me in with a doctored thumbnail photo (Air France L1011), when will I ever learn…? Scrolled through the entire video, no AF L1011…Duped once again…😡
@Kenzotopia
@Kenzotopia Ай бұрын
Same here!
@KyrilPG
@KyrilPG Ай бұрын
Air France very briefly flew 2 Tristars in 1989 or 1990, I'm not sure. If I recall correctly they were some kind of wet lease (with crews).
@massimoforesti
@massimoforesti Ай бұрын
​@@KyrilPGLeased from Air Transat
@ImEpic854
@ImEpic854 Ай бұрын
Probably with the Classic Eurowhite livery.
@stephenh5944
@stephenh5944 Ай бұрын
@3:53. Those aren't spoilers.
@ImEpic854
@ImEpic854 Ай бұрын
If I’m correct, that’s the horizontal stabilizers.
@isaganipalanca8803
@isaganipalanca8803 2 ай бұрын
As a child in the Sixties in Manila, the very first jetliner I travelled in was a Thai Airways Caravelle from Hong Kong to Manila in 1966. The trip to Hong Kong was in Philippine Airlines Vickers Viscount turboprop. Later I flew in a Philippine Airlines BAC-11 from Manila to Davao and a Cathay Pacific Electra turboprop to Hong Kong from Manila - later on their Convair 660s. Interisland flights were and are still a bif thing in the Philippines. So In my childhood, I got aound in DC-3s, Hawker-Siddley turboporps, Fokker Fairchilds and YS 11 turboprops of Philippine airlines and the long defuct Air Manila. There were so many different makes of airplane in those days. Today it's basically only Boeing and Airbus. But I'll never forget my firt flight in 1966 to Hong Kong and back, first in the PAL Vickers Viscount and in the Thai Airways Caravelle. The Caravelle was the more luxurious craft. I loved the triangular windows and debarking on the rear ramp! Oh yes, and I loved watching the Qantas Constellations which plied the Manila-Australia route in the early 60s.
@robbroere1384
@robbroere1384 2 ай бұрын
The IL62 Engines are on the tail not on the wing as stated. The only reason JAL used these planes as with Russian pilots they could overfly the Soviet a union on the way to Europe avoiding the long flight via Alaska. As such they were Soviet planes operated by Soviet pilots.
@michaeldunham3385
@michaeldunham3385 Ай бұрын
That excuse makes no sense
@robbroere1384
@robbroere1384 Ай бұрын
Not sure why this is qualified as excuse. Airlines had the option to add many hours going via Anchorage Alaska or get in a deal with the Soviet Union to lease a plane with pilots from Aeroflot (and yes you can get your titles painted on) and fly with a stop in Moscow. Jal for a period choose that.
@woltzwurld6760
@woltzwurld6760 Ай бұрын
Jesus, I didn’t know Lear was owned by bombardier, I hang my head in shame 😢
@galactaplays
@galactaplays Ай бұрын
It is not a separate company
@wickster79
@wickster79 Ай бұрын
Ok il62 the engines are on the tail of the body. Not on the wings. 2 engines in 1 pod per side...hahaha ok this person needs to research a little more on these planes. Also it was not a wide body design it was a narrow body with a single aisle. The range is about accurate.
@MV5LANDmusic
@MV5LANDmusic Ай бұрын
Ah yes...1883
@charliechristmas5147
@charliechristmas5147 Ай бұрын
I agree with most of the comments on here that the information put forward is incorrect…..including the fact that the cockpit and front section was used under license from de Havilland and was first used on the Comet
@jessebricks7538
@jessebricks7538 Ай бұрын
do better robot
@marcel-rudimantaj4773
@marcel-rudimantaj4773 Ай бұрын
And the C-17 isn't of Qatar AIrways it is owned by the Qatar Military but is in a Qatar Civilian scheme to facilitate access to areas where a Mil aircraft isn't so happily seen.
@SiD_996
@SiD_996 Ай бұрын
Ah yes the A310 Queen Victorias jet of choice when visiting far away lands back in 1883
@jaylin01
@jaylin01 Ай бұрын
A310 in 1883😂😂😂
@alexclement7221
@alexclement7221 Ай бұрын
0:27: Bombardier: bom-bar-dee-AY.
@michaeldunham3385
@michaeldunham3385 Ай бұрын
Seriously is it that important?
@galactaplays
@galactaplays Ай бұрын
it is literally bomb-ar-der
@michaeldunham3385
@michaeldunham3385 Ай бұрын
Yawn....
@alexclement7221
@alexclement7221 Ай бұрын
No it's not. Call up their corporate headquarters in Montreal, and tell me how they answer the phone...It is, and always has been bom-bar-dee-AY, from all the way back when they made snowmobiles. Trust me, I speak French, and have family in Quebec. You are an ignoramus.
@mikemontgomery2654
@mikemontgomery2654 Ай бұрын
@@michaeldunham3385 Is it that hard to say correctly?
@claycassin8437
@claycassin8437 2 ай бұрын
Why no BAC 1-11's? No F-100's? Both operated by USAir(aka US Airways, now American), who was the launch customer for the Fokker. They also operated the F-28, by the way. This list is disappointing.
@jeffssaunders
@jeffssaunders Ай бұрын
Originally Piedmont.
@claycassin8437
@claycassin8437 Ай бұрын
@@jeffssaundersThe F-28's were originally Piedmont. The BAC 1-11's were originally Empire Airlines. USAir was originally named Allegheny Airlines, and it acquired those two carriers along with several others. The F-100 was USAir's own launch.
@emmell4799
@emmell4799 Ай бұрын
Singapore Airways had Learjet 45's too
@PatrickShasby
@PatrickShasby Ай бұрын
you left out the BAC 111. One thing I learned here is that jet aircraft were made in 1883!
@benzuda43
@benzuda43 Ай бұрын
I was hoping to be the first to mention 1883! That was just o er 100 years after they secured the airports in the American Revolution
@EuroScot2023
@EuroScot2023 Ай бұрын
Those are the airports where the invisible aircraft land, aren't they?🤣
@gerardosalazar161
@gerardosalazar161 Ай бұрын
Don’t watch this video because it’s full of inaccuracies and wrong information.
@borninjordan7448
@borninjordan7448 Ай бұрын
1883? I'm sure that, when Robert Louis Stevenson published Treasure Island that year, he was thrilled about the thought of his first flight on an A310.
@tobiaswieland8847
@tobiaswieland8847 Ай бұрын
The two Il-62 aircraft never belonged to Japan Airlines, but to the Soviet airline Aeroflot. The two aircraft were used by Aeroflot in co-operation with Japan Airlines on routes between Japan and Moscow. This is why the aircraft were painted in the standard Aeroflot livery and only had small Japan Airlines stickers on the front of the fuselage. The two airlines had already done something similar before with a Tupolev Tu-114. My God, this video is so poorly researched and so full of mistakes. Lufthansa never owned a Citation X either. The image shown comes from a forum for the X-Plane flight simulator and is explicitly labelled as fictional.
@galactaplays
@galactaplays Ай бұрын
It was the other way around with the livery
@claycassin8437
@claycassin8437 Ай бұрын
This guy has no idea of what a wet lease is, though I am sure he knows what the dream is like.
@Dan.d649
@Dan.d649 Ай бұрын
The United Airlines Caravelle was an elegant looking airplane. It must've been nice to fly on one of these beauties around the US.
@grondhero
@grondhero Ай бұрын
Everyone's so concerned about the A310 being made in 1883, they didn't notice that the Icelandair's DC3 was flown domestically, in Iceland. Or that Qatar Airways C17 simultaneously flew Mach 0.79 which is equivalent to Mack 0.79. 10:00 It's true! 😆
@joselembo4661
@joselembo4661 2 ай бұрын
1883?🤔
@diamesarr1500
@diamesarr1500 2 ай бұрын
😂 I was confused
@hilman94
@hilman94 Ай бұрын
proof that time travel exists... 😅
@jimpern
@jimpern Ай бұрын
This video should have included the C-130 Hercules cargo planes that had been operated by Delta and Alaska Airlines.
@mikemontgomery2654
@mikemontgomery2654 Ай бұрын
And Pacific Western Airlines.
@patolt1628
@patolt1628 Ай бұрын
Some remarks, if I may: 3:14: the SE210 Caravelle was indeed designed by SNCASE which was a part of the rebuilt aircraft manufacturing following WWII. SE means South-East. There was also SNCASO standing for South-West: the names of the companies being then related to their geographical location. SNCASE never produced any military aircrafts: just some fighter prototypes without success. In 1948 they produced a 4 engines airliner, the SE.2010 Armagnac which, to my knowledge, has never been exported. SNCASO manufactured some transport aircafts, one prototype rocket plane (the SO.9000 Trident in 1953 which reached Mach 1.92), the helicopter SO.1221 Djinn (gas ejection from the blade tips and no tail rotor) some of which entered service in the Army Aviation in Algeria and the twin jet engine bomber SO.4050 Vautour (Vulture) which has been used by the French and Israeli Air Forces. SNCASE and SNCASO merged later on to become Sud-Aviation (South-Aviation). In parallell existed Nord-Aviation (most famous aircrafts being the Nord 2501 Noratlas, Nord262 civilian twin engine transport airplane and the C160 Transall in coorperation with Germany. In 1970 Sud-Aviation and Nord-Aviation merged and became Aérospatiale (producing Concorde) with 3 divisions: airplanes, helicopters and missiles. The airplane division, located in Toulouse, became a big part of ... Airbus 3:19: this aircraft (3 engines) has nothing to do with SNCASE (created after WWII) since it's most likely a Dewoitine D332 (pre-war manufacturer), an airplane from the early 30's. 3:22: the aircraft shown is not a French military aircraft but a British Bristol Brabazon which flew in 1949 to be a transatlantic airliner but was eventually a commercial failure. 3:53: you mention wing spoiler but you show the horizontal stabilizer ... Btw, all Caravelles had wing spoilers from the begining. 4:43: this is not a "T-Tail". For T-tails refer to the DC9 for example. Anyway T-tails have nothing to do with reducing drag: they are related to the efficiency of the stabilizer with regard to the airflow. A lot of mistakes ...
@marcel-rudimantaj4773
@marcel-rudimantaj4773 Ай бұрын
The LH Citation are used exclusively on training.
@rocketmanVA703
@rocketmanVA703 Ай бұрын
There are literally too many errors in this video to list.
@felix_five
@felix_five Ай бұрын
Man those A310s can just keep flying and flying even after 100 years 😂
@geoffreyhui830
@geoffreyhui830 Ай бұрын
I remember taking a Swissair Caravelle from London to Bale/Basle in 1962.
@jermaineravenberg
@jermaineravenberg Ай бұрын
Wojow A310 produced in 1883, 20 years after slavery was finally abandoned! A pitty sales only picked up about a century later
@jeanlucdrion1152
@jeanlucdrion1152 Ай бұрын
Not bad for a jet built in 1883. Im quite impressed with its modern look , i must say myself . Talk about being ahead of the curve.
@hanseggink6455
@hanseggink6455 Ай бұрын
Some info is not correct…KLM EXEL stopped operating in 2005 so the ATR’s in the video were already retired in 2007 and the IL-62 was never owned by JAL but wetleased from Aeroflot to be able to fljy over theSovjet Union on the Tokio - Moscow route. KLM did the same since this was a faster route than flying via Anchorage.
@aaronallen943
@aaronallen943 Ай бұрын
Airbus was so ahead of the game. Developing jet powered aircraft in 1883!
@jeffssaunders
@jeffssaunders Ай бұрын
Some flying today feel that old.
@maltheartist_aviation
@maltheartist_aviation Ай бұрын
the first a310 was produced in 1883? wow, it’s super old then!
@SMGG77Aviation
@SMGG77Aviation Ай бұрын
When i think of emirates I think of A380
@vukacimovic9196
@vukacimovic9196 Ай бұрын
Otto von Bismark had a private a310
@BigGuy10Points
@BigGuy10Points Ай бұрын
Bro it’s Bom-bar-dee-A not bomb-a-dear.
@Amir19897
@Amir19897 Ай бұрын
the a 310 was made in 1983 not 1883
@1616044
@1616044 Ай бұрын
Did I miss something? Like the fact that Bill Lear is the father/inventor of the Learjet in the late 60's in Reno, NV. Yeah I just didn't hear that.
@peoplesambassadordm8279
@peoplesambassadordm8279 Ай бұрын
The a310 was 1983 introduced
@PeterNGloor
@PeterNGloor Ай бұрын
IL 62 was not a wide-body plane, nor are its engines mounted on the wings. Next time do your research.
@DavidMaharaj-rm1td
@DavidMaharaj-rm1td Ай бұрын
BWIA or British West Indies Airways owned the The L-1011 because of Caribbean airport's short runways and they used it for USA destinations.
@nashG
@nashG Ай бұрын
bruh, emirates a310. I KNOW-
@Franlol_Copilot
@Franlol_Copilot Ай бұрын
Nobody talking about Metrojet hong kong airline when meteojet was a passanger airline💀
@hikarikaguraenjoyer9918
@hikarikaguraenjoyer9918 Ай бұрын
>planes you didnt know were owned by airlines >C-17 that is owned by Qatari Air Force The IL-62 isn't a wide body airliner, JAL never bought the the IL-62, the Aeroflot operated it in conjunction with Japan Airlines to fly routes to fly JAL's Moscow services in the 60's, they were definitely not flying them as late as 1988 as by that point JAL had long been flying its own DC-8's. The vast majority of aircraft mentioned in this video were leases, airlines did not own them.
@parimalghosh9983
@parimalghosh9983 Ай бұрын
In 1883 the a310 was not manufactured. It was before the first flight of a aeroplane
@jansupronowicz1300
@jansupronowicz1300 Ай бұрын
Il-62 was not a widebody aircraft. And it did not have its engines on the wings, but at the rear part of the fuselage, much like British VC-10.
@petel4119
@petel4119 Ай бұрын
3:22 Bristol Brabazon wasn't built by SNCASE. Unfortunately.
@citrus.airways
@citrus.airways 17 күн бұрын
A310 came out before the Wright Flyer 💀💀💀💀
@LRBerry
@LRBerry Ай бұрын
North Korea's only airline Air Koryo, has 2 IL-62M aircraft It operates as VIP transport for government use. The IL-62 was similar to the British Vickers VC10 aircraft that were flown by several airlines and air forces worldwide. The BAE ATP was developed from the existing Hawker Siddeley HS 748.
@galactaplays
@galactaplays Ай бұрын
12:09 DC-3 with turbines???
@Yes-kv4gd
@Yes-kv4gd Ай бұрын
dang I missed out on 1883 seeing the a310s never knew planes could also time travel too
@pilotyeray1144
@pilotyeray1144 Ай бұрын
Bro the Lufthansa cj1 literally says flight Training on the fuselage 😂
@petergajda3732
@petergajda3732 Ай бұрын
Il-62 is not a “wide-body”. It has a long, single-isle fuselage.
@mercerconsulting9728
@mercerconsulting9728 26 күн бұрын
IL 62 engines are not mounted on the wings; they're on the tail.
@airbusa3193
@airbusa3193 Ай бұрын
IL62 with engines on the wings ? and the 1883 blunder voiced and displayed in the video a Caravelle with a T-Tail that has wing spoliers !!! . Did the creator actually look at this video after creation.
@Frank-zv1xp
@Frank-zv1xp Ай бұрын
I believe the year might be a bit EARLY
@Sierra-Golf-19
@Sierra-Golf-19 Ай бұрын
If the C-17 can only lift 46 tons how does that equal three M1-A1 tanks? The M1-A1 weighs in at 55 tons each, that is 165 tons.
@MechaNick767
@MechaNick767 Ай бұрын
1883? Wow! Airbus sure was ahead of it’s own time. 😆
@anethers7545
@anethers7545 Ай бұрын
New luggage compartment door 😂😂 rear air stairs 🤣
@ludgatecircus15
@ludgatecircus15 Ай бұрын
Aaaah the A310. The mainstay of the Boer War and Boxer Rebellion. Airbus really did a good job of getting in the air before that pesky Wright Brothers.
@gwats19577
@gwats19577 Ай бұрын
I used to fuel ATR-42s in Denver in the early 1990s....😅😅😅
@vincentcalvelli6452
@vincentcalvelli6452 Ай бұрын
The engines on the IL62 were not wing mounted.
@EuroScot2023
@EuroScot2023 Ай бұрын
A shambles! Did anyone check this video before posting to YT?
@user-km5es5dt9u
@user-km5es5dt9u Ай бұрын
Isn’t it crazy that the IL-62 has engines on its wings. smh
@AnAvgeek
@AnAvgeek Ай бұрын
6:44 1883?
@user-ju2zc8qs6o
@user-ju2zc8qs6o Ай бұрын
You mean 1953 which was the introduction of the A-310 by Swissair which production ended in 1998 because of the lack of buyers, they manufactured only 250. They haven't talk about the A-300 built from 1974 to 2007 which was a remarkable aircraft for that period, almost 600 were built, airlines preferred the A-300 instead. They also didn't talk about the DC-9 which were built from 1965 to 1982, over 960 were built, were replace by the MD-80 and 90 (because of new engines, they were built from 1979 to 1999, over 1900 were built, than the MD-90 appeared in 1993 until 2000. There is a lot more but the people who produced that video have no idea of the aircraft technologies nor its history. You had the Convair 880 in the 60's, the 717 and BAC 1-11 in the early 70's not to mention the Comet, the Vickers which had 4 engines as the Convair 880 during the 60's and 70's as well as the BAe 146 introduced in 1983. All of them were jet aircraft.
@globoliver9697
@globoliver9697 Ай бұрын
The sound volume varies a lot.
@vicetech2920
@vicetech2920 Ай бұрын
Wait, what? 1883? So the Wright brothers were just kidding. They were attempting to fly 20 feet while Airbus was crossing oceans. Emirates later bought A310 that was almost 100 years old? Hallelujah.
@treiberbass2463
@treiberbass2463 Ай бұрын
The IL-62 is a narrow body not a wide body.
@plhebel1
@plhebel1 Ай бұрын
The IL 62 does not have it's four engines "on the wings" but rather on the rear fuselage as anyone can clearly see,,, Sloppy proof reading of the narrations. Reading thru the comments this is not the only goof up,,, Better luck next time.
@codfish3258
@codfish3258 Ай бұрын
bro said the a310 was made in 1883 when the first airplane was made in 1903
@sebavidaurre
@sebavidaurre Ай бұрын
19th century aircrafts were magnificent...
@mercerconsulting9728
@mercerconsulting9728 26 күн бұрын
1883?? 😂 I had no idea they were so advanced in those days.
@caseohcrashes
@caseohcrashes Ай бұрын
the thumbnail 💀
@JoelmatthewYT
@JoelmatthewYT 2 ай бұрын
Under 1 year gang
@JoelmatthewYT
@JoelmatthewYT 2 ай бұрын
Me
@finalities
@finalities Ай бұрын
BRO SHUT UP
@Thenicesunset2
@Thenicesunset2 Ай бұрын
@@JoelmatthewYTshut up
@JoelmatthewYT
@JoelmatthewYT Ай бұрын
@@finalitiesopps I accidentally clicked the report button don’t be so rude and mean
@KQPianos_music
@KQPianos_music Ай бұрын
Wow, 1883
@lvsluggo007
@lvsluggo007 Ай бұрын
A video is pretty bad when 98% of its commenters seem to know more than the people creating the video.
@kamelenawosofrank9733
@kamelenawosofrank9733 Ай бұрын
1018U?
@andrekruger135
@andrekruger135 Ай бұрын
... "You did'nt know.."... Thanks for informing me... I thought I did know (about) (at least) the one I flew...
@AutoclaveMachine
@AutoclaveMachine Ай бұрын
1883? Before the wright brothers? I don’t think so.
@randomxnp
@randomxnp Ай бұрын
No, 46 tonnes is NOT three M1A1 Abrams tanks. One M1A1 is 57 tonnes according to Wikipedia, which is about right for a modern, western MBT. The C-17 can, however, carry one Abrams as you got its capacity wrong. It can carry about 77 tonnes, not 46 tonnes.
@jermaineravenberg
@jermaineravenberg Ай бұрын
KLM didn't buy ATR72, nor did they only focus on longhaul flights having flown all douglas and fokker models as well as 737's and Embraers on their European network. The ATR's where acquired and operated through their purchase of Air UK and a franchise agreement with Air Exel from Eindhoven and Maastricht
@flyingdentist
@flyingdentist Ай бұрын
incorrect infos!!!!!!!!!!!!
@mikemontgomery2654
@mikemontgomery2654 Ай бұрын
1883 for the first A310? Who knew....
@mikemontgomery2654
@mikemontgomery2654 Ай бұрын
You were also wrong about KLM's acquisition of the ATR 42. The only reason they had the ATR was because of the company's acquisition of Air UK. KLM also inherited the BAE 146 from Air UK. KLM wanted more access to the UK market and thought that buying Air UK was the way to do it.
@That_guy-dn5mh
@That_guy-dn5mh Ай бұрын
1883💀 it was made before the wright brothers first flight 💀💀
@alecairpaag
@alecairpaag Ай бұрын
The "aisle 62" has engines on its wings? Did i hear that correctly? Sooo many errors! I stopped counting when I ran out of fingers. Sooo much misinformation in this video.
The Worst Selling Commercial Airliners
38:49
Ruairidh MacVeigh
Рет қаралды 722 М.
World's Most Bizarre Airline - North Korea's Air Koryo
18:03
Sam Chui
Рет қаралды 942 М.
How to open a can? 🤪 lifehack
00:25
Mr.Clabik - Friends
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
Irkut MS-21 - The Aircraft That Can CHANGE The Way We Travel
26:27
Science for everyone
Рет қаралды 294 М.
Plane WON’T Climb! Then The Pilot Did Something Incredible
13:08
WingedWorld
Рет қаралды 637 М.
Boeing’s Downfall - Going for the MAX!!
24:42
Mentour Now!
Рет қаралды 195 М.
What’s WRONG with the Airbus A350?!
22:01
Mentour Now!
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
DEADLY Attitude! The Truly Shocking story of Pakistan Airlines 8303
54:24
Mentour Pilot
Рет қаралды 2,3 МЛН
Why Did Airbus Put *tiny* Engines on the A340?
10:38
Coby Explanes
Рет қаралды 1,8 МЛН
Captain's point of view, Boeing vs Airbus.. The Real differences
11:20
Unforgivable!! The Tragic tale of Air Algérie Flight 6289
25:23
Mentour Pilot
Рет қаралды 3,1 МЛН