Coming soon don't have an exact date other than this year for sure

@@FASTgraphsplease let us normal” subscribers have access to it too. Many of the recent features are only only available for premium subscribers which is ofc reasonable but this one should be for all subscribers.

I'll try and do better

*Valuation

It is difficult to say why the market behaves in certain ways at certain times. However, in the long run sanity prevails. Regarding Chinese stocks there is obviously political risk, some investors also have concerns about the legitimacy of the numbers. Nevertheless, I agree that the valuations look extremely attractive, assuming all the numbers are legit. I believe your last sentence in your comment poses an interesting hypothesis in question. Hope that helps, and thanks for subscribing, regards, Chuck

Thanks for the question. I used several screeners in FAST Graphs. 1st I went to the preset screens and ran every preset screen with the word growth, there are several. I also used the regular screener wearing custom look for growth about 15%. Thanks for considering a subscription, I am the cofounder and therefore obviously biased, but I concur that it is 1 of the best analytical tools available. Regards, Chuck

Thanks, we would like to develop one

Just curious, please give your definition of undervalued. Thanks

@@FASTgraphs it’s all relative, right? Would you have said NVDA was undervalued a year ago? It certainly was.

I don’t mean to be rude or imply that “value investors” as a category are wrongheaded. Quite the contrary. I simply believe that fair value cannot be determined without also understanding the business- the goods/services it offers, how it compares to competitors, who its customers are and what goods/services do they desire? Often this due diligence takes too much time and effort so investors choose one or the other valuation method. Both are incomplete pictures.

@@andrews2441 Thanks for the reply . For starters, you are correct when you say that valuation is relative. The important question is relative to what? The only rational answer to that question is relative to cash flow production or earnings production, which are simply different ways of saying the same thing. At the end of the day, a investor in the stock can only receive value from the amount of cash flows (earnings) that the business generates on their behalf. Just as you would calculate a dividend yield, you should also calculate an earnings or cash flow yield. Simply because the amount of cash flow (earnings) the company generates on the shareholder’s behalf produces a true yield or return. That is why most investors utilize the discounted cash flow valuation methodology. Secondly, I always suggest that investors conduct comprehensive research and due diligence to learn as much about the business behind the stock as possible. Regarding graphs, FAST Graphs are completely different than most price or momentum-based graphs. FAST is an acronym for fundamentals analyzer software tool. What makes them different is that they look at the business fundamentals 1st and foremost. The forecasting calculators utilize the best current consensus thinking of leading analysts following the stock that in theory at least have looked under the hood to understand the business and its cash flow generating future potential. Consequently, they represent a good starting point that investors can evaluate. Note, I did not say totally rely on, instead I said evaluate. Keep in mind that a significant portion of the analyst expectations come from guidance that the management of the company provides. Finally, NVDA did in effect look fairly valued a year ago based on analyst expectations going forward. However, you are correct in recognizing that expectations have increased rather dramatically since a year ago. The point being that NVDA’s was reasonably valued, not undervalued, based on actual numbers the company produced. Nevertheless, at the end of the day the investor’s ability to forecast future growth in earnings achievements of the company in question will prove to be the true determinant of valuation. FAST Graphs are simply an analytical tool to think with that can aid investors in drawing those conclusions more efficiently, effectively and faster. Just like any task, it is always easier when you possess the correct tools. Regards, Chuck

Good future growth expected but stock is extremely over valued currently

There is no mystery with GPN, 7 years ago it was overvalued and now it’s undervalued. The time divide is now not 7 years ago. Fi is a great company but it does not pay a dividend, furthermore, it is fully valued at today’s prices while GPN is undervalued.

yes all international exchanges are available approx 80,000 symbols

The 15 P/E ratio is a fair valuation reference for most companies, but not all companies. However, FAST Graphs already produces the historical normal P/E ratio (the blue line on the graphs). Nevertheless, these are valuation reference lines that you can measure and analyze. FAST Graphs do not attempt to dictate fair value, instead they reveal it. Here are 2 articles and video that will add more detail: fastgraphs.com/blog/investors-should-not-pay-more-than-a-15-p-e-ratio-when-buying-a-stock-ben-graham/ “ and “ fastgraphs.com/blog/why-a-15-p-e-ratio-is-fair-value-for-most-companies/. Nevertheless, the feature you are asking for is already in development. Regards, Chuck

I am working on an update

​@@FASTgraphs I am very much looking forward to it!! Thank you, Mr Chuck!❤❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉

What people should not like is unjustified P/E expansion. P/E shrinkage will often bring crazy valuations in line.

Thanks for the feedback

What paper

If you don’t know why you’re investing in a stock, then you should not be investing. In fact, you would be gambling if you did.

@FASTgraphs Don't kid yourself, there's an element of gambling to all of it. I've been watching a lot of these 'emphasis on graphs' videos (not just yours), and it's all akin to looking at the clouds and seeing lions, tigers, and bears. Yeah, you can see them shapes, but they're still just clouds.. You seem like you got it all figured out, so congratulations.

@bonanzatime You should stick to CD's if you believe that .

@@FASTgraphs CDs are a waste of time. And you know it.

@@bonanzatime then learn about true investing

I am sorry, but I do not know what you are trying to say. 1 of the major things I talk about are company's earnings. If you are referring to stock price and how it reacts you are correct that is not something I worry about. I care about the value of the business behind the stock, because I know in the long run stock price will take care of itself.