Fantastic explanation

best shit I've seen

One thing that occurred to me when watching this is that the resolution of the image is independent of how far away the detector is from the object, in the configuration where the object is illuminated with the patterns. Of course, you might need a telescope or other optical devices to increase the signal to noise ratio at the detector. I'm not sure where that setup with a close projector, but a distant detector would be helpful, but who knows.

Instead of using an optical delay (around 9:45 in video), could one keep the intensifier running at some frame rate and calibrate the timing of the electronic signal arrival and intensifier activation by building an image from a "reference object?" By using a known reference object and determining the best "focus" of the reference, one could know the time differential of optical and electronic signal arrivals. Put the camera frame rate (200,000 per second was mentioned as possible), to intercept the signals with the intensifier running at said frame rate. Does that work? Is it easier than calibrating an optical delay? Or, is the light source not periodic enough that one loses too many photons due to the "slow" intensifier frame rate such that this scheme is not worthwhile compared to the optical delay scheme?

Does any expert can explain, is that correlated pair of photons mean the same as those photons are entangled?