Learn more about the 1970 Eldorado and some unique facts about it.
Пікірлер: 482
@myronfrobisher3 ай бұрын
In 1980 we had a senior mechanic at Bland Cadillac in Houston who had a home machine shop. He would snatch up any 500 or 472 V8 he could find from totalled 68 - 76 Cadillacs and rebuild them if necessary to max out horsepower and sold them as fast as he could crank them out. Never told me who was buying them - like me he loved the older vehicles - we had many pleasurable hours of conversation reminiscing about the good old days. In remembrance Bob J.
@timothykeith13673 ай бұрын
Before diesel pickups the 500 Cadillac was a good towing motor. They are limited in rpm, but under 3,500 rpm is adequate. The 500 is relatively light weight
@SpookyEng13 ай бұрын
They work great in a GMC Motorhome
@LongIslandMopars3 ай бұрын
@@timothykeith1367They use them on the big airboats. Ride in one in the Everglades
@fortunatecookie90553 ай бұрын
Those motors were grunt muscle with boatloads of torque. They were great for heavy hauling & towing.
@Ed_Stuckey3 ай бұрын
That black beauty shown for the first thirty seconds is a work of art.
@angelo_giachetti3 ай бұрын
It IS gorgeous!
@jamesweddle1843 ай бұрын
Cadillac definitely changed the Eldo from year to year, but they never improved it. The 67 will always be the definitive Eldo in my eyes.
@Zoey-ms5rl3 ай бұрын
The 1967 eldorado is the bomb diggity 🎉❤
@manoman03 ай бұрын
@@jamesweddle184 My father had a 1991/1992 Eldorado. Mind you, it was an amazing car and in comparison a much younger Mercedes Benz felt like a tin box to drive in (97 E-Class).
@paulkirkland153511 күн бұрын
The ''68 Eldorado is my favorite because of the clean design with the concealed headlights and wipers. Also yfirst year of the 472 V8. "What's a little gas to drive in class"! Ah the good old days when Detroit was king and aids meant assistance. Makes me wonder what happened to Detroit?
@geoffjohnston17083 ай бұрын
The 1967 Eldorado would have to be one of my favorite cars of all time - absolutely beautiful.
@jeffrobodine85793 ай бұрын
The 1967 had the old 429 but the 1968 had new venerable 472 with similar styling but a not as nice of an interior. Tradeoffs.....
@user-cr9zh2vf7sАй бұрын
66 was better
@jamesbosworth4191Ай бұрын
@@user-cr9zh2vf7s The 66 was a different car - a more DeLuxe version of the "regular" Series 62 convertible.
@MarkWG3 ай бұрын
The 1968 was the BEST year of this four-year styling era. The 1968 model gave you the all-new 472cid engine with 375hp, Dual exhaust option, longer hood with hidden wipers, square classic Cadillac mirrors, hidden headlamps, new Cadillac logo, parking lamps in the front fenders, and the best version of the razor blade taillamps. You can keep the '67, '69, and '70 models. I won't even mention the '71 through '78 models. They were just another Cadillac model with nothing sporty or unique about their styling.
@Lasuvidaboy-jp4xe3 ай бұрын
Not to mention the the dashboard designs used in the 1967 and the slightly different 1968 design. Much better looking than the cheap looking dash and no color keyed steering wheel offered in 1969-70
@bigjoe3303 ай бұрын
I agree 💯%> those taillights and hidden headlights were spectacular
@terry941313 ай бұрын
Without question, the most beautiful post-war Cadillac.
@MICHGO13 ай бұрын
THIS GEN ELDORADO IS STILL ONE OF THE MOST STUNNING CARS ON THE ROAD.
@steve201183 ай бұрын
67 Eldo and 66 Toro are absolutely gorgeous!
@jonowens4603 ай бұрын
Pretty 😍😍😍
@therealniksongs3 ай бұрын
Yes! And don't look anything at all like each other! Both beautiful. GM was at the top of their game then. They are a shadow of what they once were. Olds and Pontiac gone; Buick reduced to marketer of boring Chinese SUVs.
@sehismith3 ай бұрын
I never would have guessed that the 1971 Eldorado was the same length as the 1970 model! Ooh, and bucket seats!
@pcno28323 ай бұрын
Of course, what passed for "bucket seats" in those days were not much different from the split bench seats that were always available, so half of it was semantics.
@aloysiusbelisarius99923 ай бұрын
Indeed...! The '71 looks obviously fatter than the '70. I guess part of me still doesn't believe the author; I'd have to research the stats to confirm that.
@jimmiesmith58113 ай бұрын
I don't believe it
@jamesbosworth4191Ай бұрын
@@aloysiusbelisarius9992 The 71 is more rounded and buxom than the 70. The 70s was more in the 60s angular mold, the 71 marked a return to the buxom look of the 50s, so it looks bigger than it really is. It was actually the smallest Cad in the 70s.
@aloysiusbelisarius9992Ай бұрын
@@jamesbosworth4191 Well, if one factors in the whole decade, I'd say the Seville takes that status, but that's beside the point. One thing I'm curious about is how the Toronados from '71 thru '78 looked a lot like the Eldos of '67 thru '70. It makes me wonder whether Cadillac decided to donate the old Eldo shell design to Oldsmobile for refitting into the '70s Toros. I also have the same feeling about the first-gen Seville shell, being that the sedan variants of Cutlass from the early-'80s looked a lot like the Sevilles of the late-'70s. It's only a guess, but the similarities to those respective models look too coincidental to me.
@dannyg65923 ай бұрын
I enjoy this format and it is great fun learning more interesting facts about these awesome cars. Hard to imagine the '70 and '71 are the same size - the '70 looks so sharp and elegant, while the '71 appears enormous and bloated in comparison.
@timmcooper2943 ай бұрын
GM actually began using Monoleaf rear suspension on the ChevyII / Nova in the early 1960's. On another note, I never understood the "partial frame" concept, not befitting a Cadillac of old. Cadillac engines were really great in this era.
@johneckert13653 ай бұрын
I think they just used that layout because Olds had already designed it.
@donalddodson73653 ай бұрын
Thank you. I like the "Top 10" format and your usual formats. You are a "Rare" and perhaps "Classic" KZfaq content creator: no "click bait," no hystrionics and political intrusion. Keep up the good work.
@RareClassicCars3 ай бұрын
Thanks very much! Much appreciated!
@Lasuvidaboy-jp4xe3 ай бұрын
Beautiful Eldorado. My favorite of the 4-year run was the 1968. I think that was the pinnacle year of that body style.
@danielulz16403 ай бұрын
Me too.
@jonowens4603 ай бұрын
67-68 Pretty Machines
@mikemccown17663 ай бұрын
I worked in the parts department at one Cadillac in Phoenix in the mid 90s and the owner of our dealership was Bob Lund who was president of Cadillac motivation from 1962 until 1973. We were the world‘s largest exclusive Cadillac dealership and if you need it old Cadillac parts, you called me! Bob is a great guy.❤😊
@joenorthrop10883 ай бұрын
Nice to see two cars featured in this video that once belonged to me: The Lucerne Aqua Firemist/white top and bucket seat car (pics were taken in my driveway for the listing on Bring a Trailer, where I sold the car about three years ago). I believe it had 23K miles at the time. And, Adam’s Black/red slicktop ‘67 was also mine for a few years. I sold it about ten years ago and knew the interim owners until Adam bought it. Of course, I always have at least one of these. In my view, the most beautiful Cadillac ever made. My current ‘67 is an Atlantis Blue Firemist slick top with dark blue leather.
@jimthompson6063 ай бұрын
To me, this car has one of the most beautiful designs ever. But I bet it was thirsty with that 8.2 liter engine. I remember talking to a guy who was a parole officer about 1972. He spoke of a gang of kids who stole exclusively Eldorados. They knew how to bypass the security and they were so little they had to climb on top of each other to get in the car. Great initiative and ingenuity if only it could be properly channeled. I always appreciate your presentations.
@DonFarmer-hq5sw3 ай бұрын
I used to drive a 74’ Eldo Convertible white with Red leather interior 💗🤩
@Erik_Swiger3 ай бұрын
Dad had a 1972 Eldorado. I remember him telling the story that some kid with a hopped-up V8 tried to race him from a stoplight. Dad said he just pushed the pedal down and left the kid in his dust.
@Porschedude83 ай бұрын
I've always suspected the suspension would be designed to give a sportier ride for this model. Kind of a subtle "clapback" to the banker's hotrod.. We like this format and appreciate all that you do! Your channel is gold..
@mindeloman3 ай бұрын
Back on the 90s I saw a program where these two guys bought a 8.2L sedan Deville. They tuned it out and took it to a drag strip. Ran it down the 1/4 mile, came back, cut off the rear doors and ran it again. Shaved an entire second of their E.T.. And after every run, they would cut something else off. It ended up being a rolling chasis and drive train with a seat and a steering wheel. I think they were running in the 13s when it was over. I guess it was a fun way to show how power to weight ratio works and just how heavy those Cadillacs were.
@davidgold59613 ай бұрын
Sacrilege!
@mindeloman3 ай бұрын
@davidgold5961 yeah.....hurts to think about now, but at that time, it was just a 20 year old gas guzzling caddie that no one wanted.
@jamesbosworth4191Ай бұрын
I would think with no rear doors, the back seat area would have acted like a drag parachute and force the engine to work against it.
@jamesbosworth4191Ай бұрын
@@mindeloman There were still plenty of people who loved them, people who couldn't afford them when they were new.
@laserwizard23 ай бұрын
Oh, how I love those GMC motorhomes!
@douglasrizzo92103 ай бұрын
As always, Adam, a superior job. Always look forward to your work. 1) The retractable rear windows were also on the 1967 thru 1971 Thunderbird, when such cars were not equipped with the factory Landau roof. 2) Buckets and Console are exceedingly RARE on 67 thru 70 Eldorado, and also, there are 4 known examples with an Oldsmobile style full length operating console with floor shift. Cadillac dealers did their level best to discourage ordering stuff like this, as they felt it was "hot rod kids stuff" and not proper for a mature, wealthy clientele. Most likely, they didn't want cars coming back after being driven hard. 3) The 1969 Cadillac steering wheel was a "Rim-Blow" design, where you honked the horn by squeezing the steering wheel rim. There was a flood of complaints from (mostly) upper middle class housewives that they would be in an emergency situation and slamming their fist into the steering wheel, with no results. Hence, the hasty 1970 redesign, which looks like it was done very quickly (because it was) to alleviate this customer complaint. The 1969 wheel was initially supposed to be used thru 1970 as well. Many 1969 wheels were modified for more conventional horn actuation. 4) The 1970 was supposed to have dual exhaust all the way back, but, as you can see, it's dual to the muffler with a single outlet. Again, referring to #2 above, that was "hot rod kids stuff." 5) The 8.2 was capable of churning out 600 horsepower with a full, quiet exhaust and hydraulic lifters. GM was terrified of the bad press from the safety nerds and discouraged Cadillac from extracting this much. Even in later, Clean Air Act years, with low compression and unleaded fuels, the 8.2 could've blasted out way more than it did, as you've seen on your cars. Driveway tweaks unleash at least 50 to 75 horsepower. One Cadillac engine builder has a 472 ( the 472, 500, 425 and 368 were the same "engine family") with around 800 horsepower running unleaded pump gas, cats, and full exhaust. 6) Finally, the 500 was in advance response to rumors that Ford was working on (and did have ready but never released) a 514 cubic inch variant of the Lincoln 460 with about 400 horsepower. That engine wound up in slightly detuned form in Super Duty trucks and the 460 would soldier on in its regular form thru the 1978 model year.
@Shiftyspeedshop3 ай бұрын
I love these cars, thanks for the video.
@gmpny39453 ай бұрын
Today's Cadillacs may be faster and handle better, but they do not have the style nor presence of the first gen Eldorado.
@richardmorris70633 ай бұрын
I have a newer Cadillac XT5 as my dailey. I love it but w/ 20" wheels its fairly stiff. I wish they kept the XTS & went pure luxury w/ it.
@dustin_45013 ай бұрын
This is the eighth generation, Eldorado man.
@douglasb.12033 ай бұрын
@@dustin_4501EXACTLY. Thank you.
@dustin_45013 ай бұрын
@@douglasb.1203 You're welcome.
@UberLummox3 ай бұрын
@@dustin_4501 8th? How do you figure? 2nd or 3rd., maybe...sorta.
@jcarr03143 ай бұрын
Enjoy this format for sure. Always nice to impress your friends with random knowledge
@Cheezwizzz3 ай бұрын
I was fortunate to own a 75 Eldorado. Not the quickest car but as you said when you punched it,the hood would rise and she’d peel out! Great car
@wildcat641003 ай бұрын
Great episode. This format is fun. The ‘67 Camaro also had monoleaf rear springs. One year only, it had multileaf for ‘68.
@mrho4speed3 ай бұрын
Thank you for another well done video!! My personal favorite is the 1968 Eldorado = everything is just right on that car and that year!!!!
@justinweidenbach36993 ай бұрын
Many first-generation Nova/Chevy IIs had mono leaf rear suspension, but that was a much smaller vehicle, and certainly not luxury. Always enjoy your channel.
@joe60963 ай бұрын
Imagine if the EPA never existed and these engines were able to be improved over time. Imagine the 8.2 liter with direct injection, variable timing, variable intake, a cold-air intake tube, and made out of aluminum!!!!! Holy crap they would literally shred the tires off!!
@henrystowe62173 ай бұрын
I wish they would never have existed. I believe that we would have cleaned up fine without it.
@davidgold59613 ай бұрын
Yes, you just gave us a pretty fair description of the hot rod hobby.
@greggc80883 ай бұрын
Most everything the EPA forced to help hydrocarbon emissions was for the good and we probably never would have seen manufacturing costs drop low enough for producing and machining aluminum to gain performance, efficient fuel injection systems (even GDI), or VVT/VVL systems so they could make it to light vehicles. That said, every single thing pushed by the EPA to reduce nitrogens of oxides emissions killed power and fuel mileage so they can keep their EGR systems and low compression engines with retarded ignition timing.
@henrystowe62173 ай бұрын
@greggc8088 it has come at n enormous cost. Todays DI engines are in the tens of thousands. Turbos add to the problem. With safety regs, costs are unaffordable. Have you looked at the sticker on a new car lately? Even used clapped out pieces of trash cost 5k or more. Ill take leaded gas over this
@greggc80883 ай бұрын
@@henrystowe6217 Preaching to the choir.
@MrPoppyDuck3 ай бұрын
That Eldo is one smooth looking car. Great video!
@Galfrid3 ай бұрын
Yeah, THAT'S a REAL car! 😍
@bradh74723 ай бұрын
I love watching your video's because you are so detailed on the cars you cover. I remember seeing these big cars back in the day, thinking there is no way people are going to want to collect these cars. They will all go to the junkyard once people are done driving. LOL How wrong I was. I actually like these big yachts now, probably because I'm older (47). LOL
@jamesbosworth4191Ай бұрын
You are still young! My kids are older than you, but you are a mature adult, not a teenage boy.
@bradh7472Ай бұрын
@@jamesbosworth4191 48 now. LOL
@robertlombardi22283 ай бұрын
Adam - you are a wealth of information and knowledge on the history of these classic vehicles. Thanks for sharing this video with us. 😊
@rightlanehog31513 ай бұрын
Adam, Fact: Nobody was expecting a video at 11:18 on a Thursday morning. 😁
@edwardpate61283 ай бұрын
GM also used a Torsion Bar front suspension on the C10 to C70 trucks in the early 60's
@_PJW_3 ай бұрын
Just the better looking model.
@Tony-hx2fj3 ай бұрын
I too am amazed that the '71 was the same length as a 70. In '74 I bought a beautiful light Mediterranean blue with white top and interior '71 (like the '71 convertible shown) . The front wheel drive was amazing. I got stuck going down a steep loose gravel drive which was almost perpendicular and had to back up to get out. The car just backed up without skipping a stone.!!! I ended up selling it cause I was going to college and it didnt want to park such a beautiful car with the terrible parking. Although it handled great, the ride was not nearly as soft as my then father in laws '72 Thunderbird which too was a large coupe.
@jamesbosworth4191Ай бұрын
Those 72 - 75 "Thunderbirds" were actually Lincoln Continental Mark IV with less standard equipment and a slightly lower price. Nice cars, but they were hardly the sporty cars that 'Birds of the past had been.
@THROTTLEPOWER3 ай бұрын
Love these cars!!! 👍👍
@user-ht1xu4gv2u3 ай бұрын
Ours was a 1968. Pink one red interior😊😊
@THROTTLEPOWER3 ай бұрын
@@user-ht1xu4gv2u Very cool!
@UberLummox3 ай бұрын
@@user-ht1xu4gv2u Nice! They looked great in pink.
@user-ht1xu4gv2u3 ай бұрын
@@UberLummox yeah trying to find the color like a pinkish lavender color with matching top....More to come
@UberLummox3 ай бұрын
@@user-ht1xu4gv2u Oh I think I know that color. Back in the day there was a '67 in my town that was *pink* pink. Kind of a light pink.
@davidstranz4383 ай бұрын
Had a 60,000 mile ‘70 Eldorado in the mid 1980s, fun car to drive with the ability to annihilate the front tires at will. Pretty impressive top end speed as well although the 120 mph speedometer was a bit of a letdown.
@madmike26243 ай бұрын
Adam, your content is always spot on and as accurate as a Swiss time piece! Bravo sir!!
@SuperDirtyred13 ай бұрын
Hello, Great Video Thanks. My 1970 Eldorado Had a Tilt and Telescoping Steering Wheel And it also had the Large Moon Roof . To this day I have never seen like the one I had in 1975.😂
@randyfitz83103 ай бұрын
Thanks Adam, you made my day with this in-depth and interesting cameo of the 1970 Cadillac Fleetwood Eldorado! Very enjoyable.
@lorieandpatrickdavies74833 ай бұрын
I've always thought the 1967-70 Eldorado is a wonderful, timeless design. The successor 1971-78 model, not so much.
@keeganandersson42813 ай бұрын
The 67-70 design is by far the best, but the next two generations were decent-looking. The downsized 86 model was a complete turd tho and killed the model imo
@bigjoe3303 ай бұрын
I agree. Cadillac traded classy for garish.
@therealniksongs3 ай бұрын
Agreed. '67-'70 crisp, chiseled and elegant. From '71 forward they are bloated fat whales on wheels that got worse looking every year.
@jamesbosworth4191Ай бұрын
@@therealniksongs The 70s marked a return to the buxom look of the early to mid 50s. Some loved it, some hated it.
@rjanderson73943 ай бұрын
Of my 80+ vehicles only owned one '76 Eldorado a beautiful '76 Conv. / Canary Yellow With Camal Top & Interior! A Toronto Blue Jays pitcher bought it for his Dad, NICE KID!!
@OLDS983 ай бұрын
Thank you Adam. I loved hearing the Toronado and Oldsmobile facts mentioned in the video. I swear you can see the 1971-1978 Toronado in the 1967-1970 Eldorado. It is clear Eldorado influence Oldsmobile Toronado. The engineers and designers at Cadillac had imagination and forward thinking world class luxury with V-12's and other things.
@andyanderson33523 ай бұрын
I love your videos, they are absolutely fabulous!
@jimbartalone87733 ай бұрын
Early Novas & Camaro/Firebirds used momoleaf springs. Especially with weaker powertrains (sixes & small V8s.)
@joemazzola73873 ай бұрын
I like the format as you learn sometimes unbelievable things I would never guess the 70 71 have the same dimensions
@jamesbosworth4191Ай бұрын
The 70 was more angular and chiseled in the theme started by the 57 Ford, the 71 harked back to the buxom look of the early and mid 50s, so it looked bigger than it was, the 70 looked smaller than it was.
@Gary7even3 ай бұрын
My dad's 66 New Yorker had bucket seats similar to that with a semi-console in between them. I think that was a relatively rare option on the 66 New Yorker.
@michaelmullard42923 ай бұрын
Thanks, Adam, for the great video. I love your idea of top 10 interesting facts. For me, the 67-70 Eldorados are the pinnacle of American automotive design and I think my fave is the 1970. I prefer the exposed headlights and just love the rear taillight design of this car. It’s sad that GM became so focused on cutting costs. They cheapened what was, at that time, a world class vehicle. Awesome channel!!
@robh.52423 ай бұрын
Excellent video and information. Loved the Eldorado! Thanks, Adam.
@frankbrowning3283 ай бұрын
Absolutely Stunning!
@lilitharam443 ай бұрын
Love your videos! I'd love to see one on the 79 (I'm not sure of the year model but the 79 looks closest) Olds Delta 88. My grandma had one for pretty much my entire childhood, bench seats front and back, four door. My sister called it the "Lead Sled" because it was silver. Those were very reliable cars and their size made them safe for grandma's. Keep up the great work!
@jetsons1013 ай бұрын
A friend had a 68 or 69 Nova with Mono Leaf rear springs. It was a 6 with a powerglide.
@pcno28323 ай бұрын
I used to see Novas and Camaros crabbing down the street when they got old, nothing too serious, but the clamps that held the rear axle to the springs seemed to loosen up. I though at least some Novas had multiple layers of leaf spring, though they might have used single leafs on the base model. When that suspension was re-used for the '76 Seville, they put liners, Mylar or Teflon or something, between the leafs to keep them from squeaking.
@patrickflohe74273 ай бұрын
@@pcno2832 I remember Novas with single leafs, and with multiple leafs. I got a ‘78 Nova for my stepson, and it had multi-leaf springs. My sister had a ‘76 or possibly ‘75 dark blue Nova, bought brand new, and I liked it. She was killed in that car by a couple of dickhead drunks, and I don’t remember for sure, but think it was multi-leaf rear axle. She didn’t have that car all that long….she was killed in October of ‘76.
@jamesbosworth41912 ай бұрын
Sorry for your loss
@danmurphy2963 ай бұрын
I love how much you love cars Adam and I'm learning things that I never knew.
@eartha9113 ай бұрын
Thanks, Adam! I really appreciate these auto-education pieces. My neighbor growing up ordered a new Eldorado every year. As kids we always gathered around to see what her new color would be. I remember thinking, as she drove up in the 1971, that the design had gone retro. It almost had some 1973 design incorporated. I was only 14 at the time, but I still thinks that today.
@eartha9113 ай бұрын
I meant 1953 design....oops
@whitsundaydreaming3 ай бұрын
The ‘67-70 are the attractive models. ‘71+ just never clicked.
@bobdavis33573 ай бұрын
Very beautiful car
@bartlevenson78512 ай бұрын
Back in the mid 80s I had the occasion to drive a '76 Cadillac Coupe DeVille. Amazing fuel economy, at 5.5 mpg! It did ride smoothly, however, and had gobs of torque to launch it off the line away from traffic lights. Felt like you were stopping a train to stop at an intersection, and did indeed tip the scales at 5050 pounds.
@jamesbosworth4191Ай бұрын
If it used THAT much gas, something was amis. Maybe the carb needed rebuilding and was running too rich.
@garypaul10333 ай бұрын
A number of these aspects were also on the 66-70 Toronado as you noted. On my 68 I bought and installed the 2 small quad horizontal shocks for the rear suspension setup which was similar & had the leaf springs. The horizontal units were still available in the late 70s at the dealer. The rear power windows on my Toronado also went into the pillar but only slightly so, & then tilted forward while sliding down below. As you know the Toronado also offered its transmission set up to the Eldorado thus they both had basically flat floors front and rear. The Toronado also had the torsion bars up front. My 68 Tornado had the single horizontally mounted muffler that was on both the dual and the single exhaust versions so it was pretty easy to add dual exhaust by replacing the rear muffler with the dual unit. The ride of the Toronado was still, by even the standards of the late 70s, (I drove a 1972 Cadillac Deville as well) quite comfy, & it was relatively at least, pretty smooth & did not seem particularly rough to me. of course in 68 the ride was softened up a bit since customers were complaining about it being stiffer than a luxury machine should be. As you know in 1970 the Toronado had the W34 option available (and also for the previous years in 69 & 68) which put the hp at 400 instead of 375 with better breathing and a hotter cam.
@jamesbosworth4191Ай бұрын
Yup, it was still possible to get a performance Toronado, but Olds advertising was different - for the 67 and 68, the theme was the Youngmobiles, kind of an extension of the youth oriented advertising for the Rocket 88 and Super 88 of the 50s and 60s, but for 1969, they shifted to the luxury oriented theme of the 98 series and attracted a different clientele, who didn't care about handling.
@wallyfronzaglio3723 ай бұрын
The eldorados ride quality is probably one of the reasons the Continental mark 3 did so well
@kevinrca2 ай бұрын
Terrible ride for a Cadillac
@biglongcadillacАй бұрын
Do you have one?
@kevinrcaАй бұрын
@@biglongcadillac I had a 67 and 70, they didn’t ride well at all
@biglongcadillacАй бұрын
@@kevinrca must've been the cars. My '70 Eldorado rides great
@wallyfronzaglio372Ай бұрын
@@biglongcadillac my family had both back in the 70s that's how I know the eldorado didn't ride as good as a mark 111 or a mark v I remember the mark 111 rode the best
@tigerman33 ай бұрын
Great presentation Adam--Keep 'em coming!
@rmick663 ай бұрын
Always appreciate the informal yet professional style of your delivery. I can’t stand the other channels where the guys come on like smarmy game show hosts or out of control nuts.
@anthony2219563 ай бұрын
i believe the 67 Camaro also had single leaf rear springs
@davedavis7753 ай бұрын
The 67 Firebird had two mono leafs out back . I was big into the second gen T/A's. A coworker had an originally 67 400 convertible . Really cool first year bird .
@user-mg4uz6ix6w3 ай бұрын
great format certainly among the best presentations for my viewing interests
@DSP19683 ай бұрын
A great overview, Adam. I really think these cars are amazing, especially for the day.
@davidport46433 ай бұрын
Thanks again for your always incisive descriptions of cars so many of us fondly remember and still admire and collect. You explained a puzzlement I always had as a child. My dad’s best friend had a beautiful triple dark blue ‘70 Eldorado, and it had a remarkably rough and noisy ride on less than perfect streets. We had a beautiful ‘72 Thunderbird-Ginger Glow with white alligator grain top and hopsack ginger bucket seat interior. I knew our Ford wasn’t as expensive a car as the Cadillac, but I was always amazed at how much quieter and smoother riding the Thunderbird was.
@jamesbosworth4191Ай бұрын
The 72 - 75 Thunderbirds were actually slightly cheaper Lincoln Continental Mark IV, and that car was about total luxury, whereas the 67 - 70 El Dorado was more about sporty luxury.
@t.l.robinson21623 ай бұрын
I bought two of these ( 1 wrecked,1 rusted out) just for the engines. They are now 540ci and have 600 horsepower.
@stonetic2515Ай бұрын
5:29 I love that ivory/sky blue/brown combo, never seen any other car like it.
@laserwizard23 ай бұрын
Great video. I like the top ten listing.
@mikekaplan51703 ай бұрын
The 70 Eldorado is my favorite year, I had a 70 Eldorado and a 70 Fleetwood Brougham both in cinnamon firemist. I don't recall the heated seat option in the 70 but if I remember correctly it was available in 69, a very rare option like the sunroof.
@dansmusic57493 ай бұрын
I have always thought fender skirts make for a fatter, heavier look overall. They also tend to make the car look longer and lower. Never a big fan, they can make a car look classier or more expensive. This is a good format, Adam. I like history with specs and figures, manufacturer as well as model.
@617michel3 ай бұрын
Stella styling that caught my eye then and I still find attractive to this day.
@shrek_4283 ай бұрын
GM did have some experience with torsion bar suspension, the 1960-62 Chevrolet C-10 pickups used a torsion bar front suspension
@jamesbosworth4191Ай бұрын
As did the 88 - 90 something.
@johnwalters8783 ай бұрын
I like the hidden headlights, but like the bigger engine in the 70. My grandmother had the 70 brand new. It was a copper blown color. She called it the Cinnamon Streak.
@stephengreen35663 ай бұрын
My bedroom is smaller than the hood on this car! LOL
@giantrobot90003 ай бұрын
I like this format, Adam, and I also especially love your Best/Worst Engines videos. Would love to see more of those.
@votingcitizen3 ай бұрын
I think you meant " And one piece floor mat" in the note at 3:42, the beauty that it is. That view of the rear seat in the 7:42 does not look very deluxe, but I guess if you are rolling an Eldo, then you aren't chauffeuring extra passengers very often. I'm not sure if I would call those "bucket" seats, more like Barcelona seats maybe. While I appreciate these survey clips, I miss the detail reviews of cars from your fleet. Have you covered all of them or just waiting for the return of summer? How many jewels do you have in your inventory anyway?
@pcno28323 ай бұрын
7:29 Having the glass retract into the sail panel seems like a good idea, but it's too bad they didn't use the extra space under the sill to increase the elbow room for the rear passengers. 11:25 This is a nice view of what made the "totally flat floor" possible; it was really hiding a lot of wasted space. A floor contoured around the frame , springs, and exhaust system would have made the car less elegant but roomier; the 1979 redesign, which required 2 mats, did exactly that.
@davef.23293 ай бұрын
I recall some of those early Eldo's had a "suck-box" that would drop the power to the a/c compressor clutch after the intake manifold vacuum fell below a certain value for a period of time. It had a calibrated orifice to bleed off the vacuum slowly and the diaphragm failed occasionally causing a total loss of cooling. Though terribly vague in the steering, these were fun and powerful to drive. The first, early 500s would carbon-up fairly easily and develop a "rod-knock" if not taken out and driven hard (flogged, we used to say) once in a while. My then--boss bought a 3, or 4 yr old car that "needed an engine" for pennies on the dollar and a couple of quarts of water poured down the part-throttle Quadra-jet later, he had a great car for some years to come.
@jamesbosworth4191Ай бұрын
If I had one, I would replace that Quadrajet with a square bore carb. Maybe city gas mileage would be even worse, but part-throttle performance would be peppier - less need to dip into the secondaries.
@lubesiron-cslfarmsllc27513 ай бұрын
GM used the mono-lead rear suspension on the early Chevy Astro- GMX Safari vans . It was a thick, single fiberglass leaf spring on each side.
@fortunatecookie90553 ай бұрын
GM passenger cars and trucks circa 1966-1977 invariably shared a jewel-like faceted aesthetic on the front clip. This is very noticeable on the hood edge and corners. Sometimes it is subtle over the quad headlights, as seen on the 1970 Impala/Caprice and 1973 Caprice. If you look from above at the nose and tail of GM cars from this era, you'll notice the silhouette shape of a castle battlement as seen from the perspective of one corner at ground level and looking up. These designers were artists.
@jamesbosworth4191Ай бұрын
They were stylists, and understood that a car is not an airplane.
@tylerbounds89183 ай бұрын
1962 Chevy c10 also had torsion bars
@pcno28323 ай бұрын
7:59 The most likely reason for the odd horn buttons and the cheap look of the '70 wheel was the need to get rid of the troublesome 1969-only "Rimblow" wheel in a hurry. Rimblow, which embedded the horn switch into the inside surface of the rim itself, was an annoyance that got worse as the car aged. You eventually had to mark the areas of the rim on which the horn still worked, then find them before the person in front of you hit your bumper.
@Smith686plus3 ай бұрын
I like this format!
@alexclement72213 ай бұрын
2:00: The 1971 looks larger because of the 'bulging body lines', as opposed to the crisp, straight body lines of the 1970. Also, those fake side vents probably make the 71 look bigger...
@Sevenfeet03 ай бұрын
The first time I ever saw the 70 Eldo was in a magazine advertisement. I was early in high school around 1980 just before I learned to drive and I was researching a paper in our school library periodicals section. In one of the old magazines I had to stop and look at the ad for the 1970 Cadillac Eldo. It was a stunning car and thankfully Cadillac didn’t screw up the original 1967 design too much like Buick and Olds did for later years of this generation of car. The 1967’s front end is still the best but the 1970 ain’t bad.
@artjones24983 ай бұрын
I dont comment often,, i like trying to match what i know about the cars i grew up with,,,against what you talk about,,,,keep up the great work,,,
@andrewmladinich9156 күн бұрын
I have that car and you missed the fact that the rear suspension is an air ride auto leveling and IT RIDES GREAT and level with any load in the rear seats or massive trunk or full tank of gas. I have the triple black with bucket seats with the center console and that option is rare as hens teeth only for that year and I love it. There was another option was the electric moon roof that mine does not have and is also a very rare option but back then they leaked. True the steering wheel is a one off for that year and it works easier to find the horn positions on the three spokes over the previous 69 year and the wood grain looked better. I do have the 4 electric windows. The 501 engine for 1970 only had the high compression heads 10.75 to 1 motor and was reduced to 8 to 1 in 1971. The reason it was said to have 400hp was because of the insurance was doubled for engines over 400hp. I have seen this motor on a dyno produce 525hp. I also have the 1970 472 sedan de ville and it also has the high compression heads only for 1970. The 454 Corvette also had the high compression heads only for 1970 in the LS5 and were marked with 390 hp on the air breather but for the same insurance reason. I also own one with the Muncie 21 4 speed trans and a/c in red. My father owned a 1976 Eldo convertible Gold and it was down right slow although it was made famous as the Boss Hog car. No, the Buick regal tail lights didn't come close to the Eldo's. pff.
@craigroosa93213 ай бұрын
Another great video and nice format to use ,,, what ever you do is always awesome .
@johnde27543 ай бұрын
Very interesting that the '71 model had a nearly identical length as the 1970 Eldorado. It was most definitely the side bloat of the '71's sheet metal that made it seem like a considerably larger vehicle. That 500ci powerplant was monster displacement. At roughly 12 miles to the gallon leaded, we're fairly certain many of these Cadillacs were traded in during the soon to occur Arab oil embargo of 1973 at a significant loss. 💸💸🔍. Many Thanks Yo !
@jamesbosworth41912 ай бұрын
Not that many. If you could afford the car, you could afford the gas.
@davidgold59613 ай бұрын
1:51 The length increase of the 1971 is .00496 %, less than one-half of one percent.
@geraldbull83493 ай бұрын
Adam these videos are so cool and informative, your page has come so far. Any eye on new Land Yatchs that you want or have just bought?
@Chitwn813 ай бұрын
One of the most gorgeous Cadillacs ever produced. Id love one of these as a companion to my 72 Mark IV or a Buick Wildcat or Riviera
@jonowens4603 ай бұрын
LoudKat and Rivz' were Gorgeous 😍😍😍
@elplata72243 ай бұрын
You open my eyes up on these cars. I say mix up the format and appreciate your content. Let’s make sure we capture as much time with Bob and the like. Those guys won’t be around much longer. I would love to see more alternate brand content such as Buick and olds. You may discover more things you like For yourself!.
@jeffpurtell56763 ай бұрын
Not only the same length, but same width? A huge optical illusion lol. I had no idea.
@Garth20113 ай бұрын
There are sources/opinions that about the same era/time horsepower ratings were calculated differently beginning around 1971. I'm not sure of what they did however, a 1970 350-4V V8 had 300 HP and in 1971 it was 270 HP then in 1973 250 HP. At some point later, the 350 V8 was down to 150 HP, possible in their trucks. In any regard, today's Cadillacs don't come close to the smooth elegant ride that these old "boats" had. There was much room, comfort, plush, space etc. while today's products are more set up for sport ride, firm seats and much less room. Completely different vehicles today.
@pcno28323 ай бұрын
For 1971 GM mandated that all their cars had to be able to run on unleaded fuel, so the actual power output of many of their engines dropped. I believe Cadillac's compression ratio was about 8.5 to 1 for 1970 and 10 to 1 for 1971.
@Garth20113 ай бұрын
@@pcno2832 High compression was used in the 1960's up through 1970. In 1971/1972, compression ratios were dropped to 8.50:1. Unleaded fuel didn't start until 1975 and catalytic converters were equipped. They did change cams by 1973 and by then came the smog add-on equipment such as A.I.R. pumps, EGR etc. Even so, there are people/sources who claim the reason for the big power drops were related to the methods of measuring HP. I'm not so sure about that but that's what is being claimed. I know for sure HP suffered big in the real world so, when they went from 300 HP to 250 HP, you noticed it. That pretty much eliminates their theory.
@jamesbosworth41912 ай бұрын
I don't consider today's to be Cadillacs. More like Chevrollacs.
@jamesbosworth41912 ай бұрын
At first, 1972, it was mostly because of different measuring methods, but the 73 cars were slower, the 74s slower still, and so on.
@Garth20112 ай бұрын
@@jamesbosworth4191 Once the CAT was implemented, HP got better.