well, after studying for a few hours my accuracy went from 30% to like 80% and my rating from 300 to like 2k so it is possible

@@FlagerMiszcz 2k from 300 in a few hours? That's impossible. 300 is low even for a beginner that barely knows how the pieces move. And 2k is already close to fide master level. A genius wouldn't play like a 300 in the first place and someone that gets to 2k in a few hours has to be one of the smartest persons alive, if not the smartest to have ever lived.

@@iustinventaniuc8699 you must be fun at parties

@@beyfan43 im fucking your mother while your at the party bud.

@@beyfan43 you saw that written by someone else and now you think when someone makes and argument its perfect to say

What was her rating ?

she didnt deserve you

damn nikola tesla came back from the dead for this

But did you sacrifice or blunder your queen bro?

Did she also cheat on you with a fish

Respect to your mom last night

@@robertmills6482 dude chill what did i do to you?

@@bankusharma3821 what did he say

@@k_wl he said respect to my mom for sleeping with him. He deleted his comment now

@@bankusharma3821 oh damn

Nah, Scholar's Mate requires your opponent to have enough brain cells to know that you shouldn't blindly attack enemy pieces at every opportunity. If you go queen first, 200 elo will definitely attack it, if you go bishop first, there's a chance they'll attack the bishop with a pawn, and if they don't then you still have to put your queen out there and get a 50/50 chance whether they attack with the knight (giving you checkmate) or with the pawn (blocking the attack). Though I suppose you could move your queen to f3 and try again, in the latter case. I suspect this is also why it's called Scholar's Mate, by the way. It's the quickest mate that's designed to work against opponents who aren't completely braindead, but instead are simply unaware of the attack and don't have the presence of mind to see it when it happens. Other quick mates tend to have rather more negative names, such as the Fool's Mate.

@@Leyrann IDK, that's how I won a lot of games up to 400😂

@@Leyrann Exactly. And that's why traps provided by GM to noobs don't work at all, because real noobs don't play logically.

@@Dr._Bo your one of those losers huh

My biggest surprise was that 200 wasn't worse.

It's always a3/a4/h3/h4, maybe b3 or g3 if those moves look particularly useless in the position

I actually got h4 first try this time. I’m pretty proud of myself

It’s not the worst. It’s usually just the most random. I’ve guessed it

Paracetamol is good shit

same

🤣

X)

😂

Ohhhhh mmmmMmmmaaaaa guuuuudddddddd OHHHHH YyyyyyyeeeeeeeeeeeHhhhaaaaaaahahaha

@@JokerScribe 💀💀💀💀

Correction: Better than Magnus. Engines are far stronger than the best chess players in the world.

Correction: Alpha Zero is best

@@user-ri3zm2mo7k Correction: Stockfish 15.1 is best. AZ was discontinued years ago, and the network Stockfish uses is already stronger.

@@RedArremer I just watched before this his video on stock fish 15.1 and what whiplash

Ask Hans Niemann for advice?

I would've taken with the knight 😅

Same 😅

I was 100% taking that pawn and blundering M1

I totally didn't see that backrank mate either.

I was debating on Bxg3 and Ne3, ultimately decided on Ne3, but I definitely did not notice the backrank mate.

Fascinating

But then a6 would have actually trapped the knight

What do you get for doing that? A pat on the back?? A blowjob?? (if yes I would do it)

@@danielyuan9862 ðat doesn't matter in the slightest

@@tomasbeltran04050 why you use the voiced dental fricative instead of just "th"

Bro is 200: they don't even know the sicilian exists. Cheater just thought they were playng "good chess because computer said so"

There was no sicilian

@@insertnamehere6280 Yes there was, watch the whole video

It was the perfect crime, they say blissfully unaware of any concept of the forensics that are available.

Stop.

yep. their skill(or lack thereof) speaks for itself.

I don't get why you keep mentioning his low skill level. There's nothing wrong with that (as Levy says). Clearly something wrong with his character though, I can't imagine getting any kind of satisfaction from winning by cheating.

@@blitzstrahl Because its funny seeing a person so unbelievably bad that they need daddy stockfish to help them even have a chance against someone who is just as clueless as they are.

They probably are a fish 💀

dude's seeing life 5 moves ahead.

@@daley_bricks..... Gzus, the bots are sort of cheating on your quote already

@@recitationtohear 💀

Oh my god… Guys, do me a favor and mass report this scumbag. Referring to both Avi A and R 2 H since they cooperated in sharing the spam link

@@perseusgeorgiadis7821 is being sarcastic a crime Is being texted by a scammer a crime

vibrating pacifier

Chess speaks for itself

Dang I didn’t even know an elo of 67526802209645841583879061361800814224269427869589384312198268703685091643180416969132446952698303794226010370578672908593198347699886928591906501031587651846976759681112609524787093848004428636186893395272784450630354080243217646658024696659065951793757223520229235577548653833681102170973893746054649126415909143150172860721156685810655759230011450132992176454983227538696340112610447029002337004887877266387704586077293585433151612518800147764461182680822867092786694982831838641800997499819339206579415325649748486265233918911087114592440896594062675914294925816719862178374679272092637524786939036290035924271782253738059886933923447877769583003016705363339031413069155837518524761078342052635475632113169618774549275701480106933362990003732589370593557325299434734459295866728988740794174654391479926000848846686708729736713207285203712732201272410830836913052635365082888725171636081587151603468291106754640398232146673627370895934090777828827549554232436190464827998683927179246029919443251026464452337939599198528297828591122689960620361238248313158071643395848405047261412680039877733761849874447323867911712630023171745968278465780558568067035013885275080292137360491875164947724464221693533755035300065350065137490832039523382963747026185653050331832380991844842560750923543775188582096487476950254418365198999674684417286265442786651594404781622946901879166382930714196908227460133027605817864877377712193142137625430353718448269390732615776645283198828602917680224041088993892610506802195917247838900106910698057030379190571057605849323113308634452008179881165616449767648354161225066967961297609698742737923389391615207441152319392845687673311899247085327703421862972871644495409572259985563215471482083325653231777113271326579970310755604973969708949477374254974480294652427022436705380184064008853457214518515270985563195412993145274057688634448812449445800617631162768243125606424844709372022149908463572254912654907763445758543980999149122998104378965626781898655221443263601405152073199706585080288735040205417371277253096243200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 was possible

@@benjaminmajors2183 you forgot -

@@nopeyt3387 No - required, he was writing out 900 factorial.

@@iamrejected1995 What? Did you think he mentally calculated 900 factorial? Lol

I have negative elo

Damn. I guessed Kh4.

Samee when hes on GTE he says the same thing and it's always some dumb A4/h4 idea

Me too bro xd

same felt great

I guessed h3, solely because every time Levy says "you'll never guess the next move," it's always a pawn move on the side of the board.

Unfortunately as a 1200 I'm embarrassed to say I would've blundered mate in 1

@@Martmists I would've blundered it as well, for some reason putting the knight there seemed right, and opened a faster route for mate, and it was protected, so my mind was satisfied with that placement, until Gotham said it would be the optimal choice to negate a mate in 1 for my opponent!! I was dumbfounded.

@@Martmists Same here

@@Martmists Unfortunately as a 2150 im embarrassed to say I would've blundered mate in 1

I'm a bit higher than 1200, and I made the exact same mistake you did. Was legit shocked when Levy showed that back rank mate, because I just hadn't seen it at all.

Hahahaha

@@Ticalafon Ben Finegold says that c4 is explosive. He's right!

Pretty soon he'll be asking what's the use of a communications officer who can't communicate. Is that you, Maitland?

💀💀💀

I laughed at that too. It's just the name for Tylenol outside of the US. 😂

@@LoyalSol yeah because USians know things by brand names not actual names

Thanks for watching and keeping your comment ❤ You've been selected among my shortlisted winners Reach out to claim prize

You would blunder it cause your a fuckin noob 😂

placebo effect or it was in a mixed preparation with an opiate. paracetamol on its own doesn't do diddly squat, except destroy the liver in high doses

yes!

Yeah tbh I feel bad about doing that

Lmao

Why do you just watch videos somewhere else instead of trying to control everyone including Levy? While you are “chilling and eating” 👍

​@@kentonbenoit9629 2 months after the fact but this was a normal suggestuon, calm down