nope this was in my recommendations

FunFact: I didn’t

I searched this

Yeah 🤣

Yeah I searched for it.

Can 🍺🍻 bark and everything you've not coming back from et

Because you clicked on it.

Flapjack the American penguin I just said that to my self

Flapjack the American penguin I was thinking the exact same thing lol.

cause I am

Because this video makes you an interesting video to watch how they play like a gambling

What was the Point Dark Blue Set Wiped Everyone out

It's a gamble

This was not the full game in the video.

@Nic777 The stupid Free Parking rule

@thejugador collecting everyone tax money when land on free parking and get 400 when land on go lol

took me 4 years to see what you did their

waffielz yolo what???

Thats what I play alone and think hard like in the casino

Took me two years to see what YOU did their, (it didn’t actually take you 4 years to figure it out thats just how long it took for you to discover his comment)

For real

only this isn't the world championship

Benginator still

You so alone?

I would say the person who was worst off was actually the person who got the reds. The board position was a little worse for the reds than for the yellows at the time and he couldn't build that much either. The person who wound up ahead of the game at the end of the trade was probably the person who got the dark blues, just because of the board position and his cash stack making bankruptcy to him so likely given the board position, but the person who got the best deal was absolutely the person who got greens and railroads. 5-way trades are complex and require you to pay close attention. If the other players did that, they could have taken the yellows off the table, thus excluding him from the trade, and instead included the light blues. They didn't realize it at the time, though, due to how much was going on at once. The game wouldn't have changed any, though, because the player with dark blues got insane luck. He definitely made the right decision to go with dark blues over pinks in my opinion though. Most people are afraid to take the risk of the dark blues due to how inconsistent they are, and he definitely would have been winning by far after the trade if he took the pinks, but the dark blues were far superior given board position. Every single player was coming up to his dark blues at the time of the trade, and one hit almost guarantees bankruptcy which almost guarantees him a win. I doubt the other players at the table realized he had so much money, otherwise they likely would've made him give money away. What they should have done, though, is completely cut the player who wound up with the dark blues and the player who wound up with the greens and railroads out of the trade. They had the light blues, the dark blues, and the oranges between them.

The guy who got the REDs also gave up A LOT of properties. I agree with cutting the Green + RR out of the trade entirely. He basically demanded that from the get go at which point he could have been dropped like that.

Dude

Chris DeMint is is called OCD dumass

Chris DeMint to

Trevor last that isn't OCD, that's someone trying to control everything that's going on.

Tyrizzle Productions dumbass European salty cause we kick ass

I hate the guy who puts his houses upside down, I think Monopoly is just a game of hate. Hey, I guess it really is like the real estate market.

This is literally me right now playing with all my friends and I’m a junior and the games get competitive

When I play family monopoly I make sure to scam the young-lings and then get one with the adults. I’m very competitive.

they play fast because there's a timer

So true!

everyone is moving so fast. throwing shit around in each turn. yeah I could not follow.

Once you play the game multiple times you can follow really quickly what’s going on. I’m so addicted to this game i even bought the app. Thankfully my wife loves playing monopoly too lol it’s just practice.

I could keep some track of the game at some point, where I felt lost the most was on the trade. They kept moving cards around, placing them randomly on the table couldn't keep tabs on who was trading what to who and for how much. And after that in came the bunch of houses out of no where like... I just don't know lmao

@@attmosf3ar which app? let me know too.

On board or using App?

even without that luck he was in a good position! three houses in blue is a killer!

And then a third gaha

He was gonna win anyways

It's fine.

o.c.d

A guy trying to control everything that's going on in the game.

He's white and the nearest guy is black so he takes control

LOL I'm watching this at 5 AM was really bored and randomly wanted to watch monopoly shit. I don't even play or have ever played it lol

You're on the next level of messed up

Did those dice damage your game boards? I tried using casino dice and they punched a bunch of holes into my Monopoly board from rolling them.

@@Ohrami damn did they have thumbtacks in them?

​@@jeffreyd700 Nah. The dice being used in this tournament game are standard casino precision dice. They are extremely sharp because they are perfect cubes. They are incredibly uncomfortable to hold and use and will literally puncture holes into your game board. Precision dice are great because they are the same density on all sides. This means that every face is equally likely to turn up. In my Monopoly games, I now use backgammon precision dice, which are required for tournament backgammon play. These dice are like casino dice, but they're much smaller and have rounded corners. This means they'll roll more, which means it's harder to "game" the dice by kinda dropping them, and it also means they won't puncture the game board or feel uncomfortable to hold, but they still retain all the benefits of casino precision dice.

@Nic777 Hi Nic777: I'm the judge from that tournament. No such rule was used. Players could trade at any point. As I recall, a few properties were still unsold at the point of this big trade.

@@Ohrami Hi Ohrami, Those were rounded-corner red dice (not Casino dice) that came in the Monopoly Tournament Edition box set from around 2010.

Yeah I agree with you there. At that point you actually take as much money out of them to make sure they don't get 3 houses up.

It's possible he's a designated Moderator and it his job, to an extent, to keep track of certain things. It's also possible he is the most experienced and is capable of speeding up the game. Could be any number of reasons. I don't think he was trying to be malicious.

Just what I thought, and even when they were doing the trade he pressed the yellow guy with the chose cards and the green guy too. When he was out he was making moves for ppl too. I don’t want anybody touching my avatar hshaha

but luck also applies

I think the board takes the energy from the dice making them bounce less. They could also be playing on a wooden table which makes the dice bounce less.

Yeah, silly trade. Guy with greens and railroads probably did even better for himself though. I'd say the guy with greens and railroads actually had the best position to win the game, but the dice didn't fall in his favor.

+Lycergic Bliss I believe so. During the year that was the centenary of Agatha Christie's birth, they staged a celebration in Torquay in which David Suchet and Joan Hickson met in character, with Poirot arriving by train and greeting Miss Marple with a bouquet of flowers. They showed a bit of the WC featuring a dispute over a contested roll; the prize (or part of it) for winning was to be a trip on the Orient Express.

Calm down Gen z anxiety boy.

@@RedakaiCity gen z? lol

Yes all you need is enough money

Herioz There is always luck involved! Just so happens boardwalk a low hit space got hit twice I believe which made a lucky win. (his only option to be fair.) However, debates and trading you can manipulate for better pieces! I like it! (Poker is proffesional, exact same idea.)

Adam Witcher Nah, poker involves WAY more tactic than monopoly... come on man

AFCA 1900 How so? In one case you calculate the odds of someone landing on your tiles and you adjust to it by selling and building houses and buying the accoding property. In the other, you pick when to go through with the odds you were given at the begining of the round. Monopoly has much more interaction between players and potential actions that can be made to benefit the player playing well than Poker does, but the game of Poker has its skill in hiding facial expressions and knowing your cards and odds. Both games are tactical and both have a big reliance on luck, but none have it big enough that it overwhelmes skill everytime. Both also use skill in their own way, in Monopoly's case its acting and reacting to the playing board that everyonr can see, while Poker has it set to act and react to cards that are hidden.

AFCA 1900 How so? In one case you calculate the odds of someone landing on your tiles and you adjust to it by selling and building houses and buying the accoding property. In the other, you pick when to go through with the odds you were given at the begining of the round. Monopoly has much more interaction between players and potential actions that can be made to benefit the player playing well than Poker does, but the game of Poker has its skill in hiding facial expressions and knowing your cards and odds. Both games are tactical and both have a big reliance on luck, but none have it big enough that it overwhelmes skill everytime. Both also use skill in their own way, in Monopoly's case its acting and reacting to the playing board that everyone can see, while Poker has it set to act and react to cards that are hidden.

Exo Particle how is monopoly tactic, everyone simply buys all the proporties they land on. In poker it's mainly about skill and also a bit of luck

I think he moved the wrong piece and when he moved his piece he landed on income tax and paid $200 so he just didnt take anything from the bank

Hopeless.

+Snoopy Schulz I do not think it has ever been defined, but probably for logistical reasons: 1. convenience:1 person for each side of the board. Anything more than 4 would cramp the board and table 2. speed: if you have games of 5+ players it slows the game down considerably as it is difficult to acquire monopolies and it becomes tedious and boring

A person with low cash who was able to invest $1,800 at least into his properties to get a hotel? I'm not sure if you know the meaning of low cash.

@@Ohrami i meant when im the one with low cash..i read my statement, even i didnt understand..then i recalled the incident..

@@Apezz19 Nah, rereading your statement I think that I was misinterpreting what you said 5 months ago. You were stating that you only trade it to players with low cash because in the past, you traded it away to someone with large amounts of cash and lost because of it. I will, however, tell you that this method of thinking is the wrong one. In the long term, Boardwalk and Park Place are some of the worst properties to own, due to the relatively low probability that they are landed on. Since getting people to land on you early is one of the most important parts of the game of Monopoly, having a property that is landed on more often is incredibly important.

oof