Mine adjust as well, , and all the seats in my 2014 are power seats including the rear

How is it running now

Was just about to comment on this. Same one here and my seats slide back :D

Yes! My mother owns a 2014 Chrysler Town & Country Touring and we can slide back our 2nd row seats.

I Have A 2010 Chrysler T&C Touring & The Middle Stow & Go Seats DO Have Forward & Backwards Adjustment.

They're nice to travel in, even alone. Put down the back seat and you can sleep laying flat. They also get much better mileage than SUV's.

They did on my '08. My understanding is that they did some rework on the Sto-N-Go mechanisms, so maybe they don't slide anymore.

Bob Keilitz Ajeeth Uthayakumar yes I rented a 2014 T&C Touring and the seats did indeed slide back and forth. Perhaps they don't on the S version.

The swiveling seats are on the older pre face-lifted models (2008-2010)

+Maxi Dale the Toyotas last a lot longer I know from experience.but I agree looks are better :-)

Yeah I was saying the same thing. I have a 2014 and mine adjust to front and back as well as recline.

They don't even come close to being tough. Watch the crash test of the 2014 Town and Country by the IIHS

I want one for travel, the Chrysler vans are my #1 choice because there's so many of them and plenty of used parts available

April 2014 assembly loaner van's second row adjusts maybe some vans don't.

plmn93 I purchased a less than one year old Chrysler Touring with 34000 miles on it for only $19,400! It had been a lease or rental car. Since it still had factory warranty on it, I took it to the Chrysler dealer and had them go all through it. They said the vehicle was perfect. This is impressive because the original sticker price on the van was $34K + ! Check with Avis, Budget, Hertz, etc. car sales sites for these bargains!

and KBB and Edmunds and everyone else gives the Mazda5 as the best minivan... being the only REAL minivan. They are built on the last generation Mazda3's and are a hoot to drive. Can't wait for a skyactiv version to come out soon. Really wish for an extended version for cargo. you can barely put three grocery paper bags in the back with the third row seats up.

The Real Channel I assumed anyone with a 9th grade level of reading would understand that today's 'mini'vans are not really mini anymore and that the mazda5 was perhaps the only real minivan when it came out. But thank you captain obvious!

There was no 2004 windstar

They are www.allpar.com/model/m/2016.html

To the transmission that is. Chrysler will continue to produce the Town and Country minivan, but Dodge will be losing it's minivan to keep Dodge more in line with their "performance based" lineup. Dodge will, however, be getting a crossover based on the new Town and Country

@@cevans2021 yep, the Grand Caravan hung in there up until 2020 when it’s been discontinued since. Pacifica, the T&C’s replacement since 2017 has been carrying the torch and is far more modern than these vans. I wouldn’t mind getting a T&C used if the deal was right on one, but you’d bet I’d get an extended warranty for sure. There was a short-lived Voyager that was based on the Pacifica and it’s lower level trims but that didn’t last long

Bottom glove box

this is a very bad mini van if you were in a collision you would most likely never walk again. and would suffer major brain trauma from hitting the dash.

dyllman98 well then why do all the rental companies use them

***** are you stupid? If your on a two way road you would hit another car head on. Wow I just couldent belive to see that you wrote that makes me feel like 1,000 times smarter and makes u look like an idiot.

***** ok go.to iihs and look at the crash on KZfaq and you tell me if you would be able to walk away after the carsh.

Omg u are.so dumb that's the test they do for head on collisions dumb

We have stow and go in our 2011 and the second row seats do adjust.

in the limited they do

Not really, mine go way back

They absolutely do slide and they do recline. I believe it applies to all trims

I don't like the crisler town and country because it is unsafe

So after extensive research I'm going with the Touring L..I like the key start and extras it has

still safety is more important

The 2014 town and country got 4 stars in all crash test except side impact where it actually got 5 stars...looks pretty safe to me

***** yea, take that RICKY HO!! I'M HAPPY WITH THIS VAN TOO

No

It does have power lift gate. I looked at one today

they had power lift gate and navi since 2002 my 2005 town and country comes with everything except a fridge and heated steering wheel,which the fully loaded one comes wit nowa days mine has 6 disc dvd changer and heated seats sunroof and power lift gate and stow and go that slide..

True

I should also say that in 2009 We rented the Volkswagen routon for a week. I never thought it was possible for a company to license a product (Chrysler minivan), spend something like $10,000,000 and make a bad product worse. Volkswagen learned that they do not have a competitive product and are no longer attempting to be in that business, that is the best decision they have made in a long time.

***** my mistake that it was not a 5 speed. 6 speed was not standard, 2009 had a four-speed automatic, 2010 a 6 speed was optional, depending on what trim level. All of the vans that we had the displeasure of driving were SXTs which had 4 speeds. That still does not account for the tthen shuddering in Park. There is also something to be said for a very unimpressive interior. In the stereo head. There was a Bluetooth button, unfortunately it does not come with that option. So they just make you wish you had bought something different. Could you imagine buying a pickup truck with a switch for four-wheel-drive and then when you press it, you get a message stating that this vehicle is not equipped with that? The plastics are cheap, even the gearshift feels like it's ready to fall apart.

***** please backup what you say about Toyota being a huge issue waiting to happen, what data do you have? before I purchased my van, I did a lot of research and read reviews from Consumer Reports but also from owners and Dodge owners consistently have the most problems. The interior is cheap plastics and nothing felt solid. When I open the upper glovebox, I expect the door to open not just pop open a little bit so you have to open it manually. This is a minor thing, but it's indicative of attention to detail. We had the Dodge SXT trim level and there was a Bluetooth button on the stereo head, when you push this button it would tell you that the option is not available. Could you imagine buying a truck that has a four-wheel-drive indicator and when you push the button you receive a message stating that four-wheel-drive is not available? The transmission lever felt flimsy and ready to fall apart, there was a lot of slop going side to side and it was not a gated shifter. I agree with you, my vans were messed up. But that is because they were Dodge. I have a long history with Dodge, my first car was a Dodge and it was a horrible vehicle, it was the predecessor to the Dodge shadow so I do not hold it against Dodge, it was a cheap vehicle and a first car. My 2nd car was a Dodge dynasty, an old man's car but I really loved that car, the dynasty was the predecessor to what my mother had which was a 94 Dodge Intrepid. That car was fast, fun, handled great and was a joy to drive. It had its issues, but overall, it was fun. My father had a Dodge ram 3500 van, what can you say? It was huge and handled like a van, I enjoyed driving it. My wife had a 2000 Intrepid and as much as we say that we would've loved to have kept that car, the ghost in the electrical system would make the interior lights flicker when driving down the road. We put several sets of window regulators and door locks in that car. When the car stopped on the train tracks in Boston and would not restart immediately, we gave serious thought to trading, that was when the vehicle was one year old. It finally did restart but she had to drive it 50 miles back in "limp home" mode. She had the top-of-the-line Intrepid ES with a 3.2 liter V-6 (the R/T was not out). We tried to maintain our love of Dodge, but with the amount of trouble we ran into with that car, it was very difficult. The final nail in the coffin was when we had to replace the battery a 3rd time. They put the battery in front of the passenger side front tire and it was absolutely miserable to get to. We tried to have the local Sam's Club install the new battery, they refused. It looks like I have higher expectations of a vehicle then you do. As I said, I looked at reviews and consistently for the past 10 years or more, Honda and Toyota have been exchanging first and 2nd place. Dodge/Chrysler has been in 3rd, 4th, 5th, or 6th , depending on what Kia/Hyundai/Mazda have on the market. The reviews for liability with Honda and Toyota have been at the very top, Dodge never had great ratings for reliability. If you are the type of person that is turning in the vehicle at 60 or 80,000 miles to get a new one, I would understand why you would say Dodge has a good product. When I buy a vehicle, it is for the long-term and now purchasing disabled driver minivans, you are looking at an $80,000 investment. I would rather put my money into an American made van like Honda or Toyota instead of a Canadian budget friendly wagon.

***** so something got into the engine on 5 different vans between New Hampshire, Florida, and Texas? I have a hard time believing that the same quaking was caused by environment or "something getting into the engine.". It is an unrefined powertrain. It is a van that is built on a budget and I could not recommend anybody spend money on one of these.

+ForgottenReasons Yea and the Honda has a terrible auto trans. The Honda center seats can't be folded into the floor. Honda is ugly and grossly overpriced.

ForgottenReasons but do they stow and go?

1991 167k going 1992 over 200k running like new I do hate the clickityclickityclick the ultra drive makes though. Even the 2014 version

***** And they are being recalled too, not many recalls for FiaChryGroup compared to GM but Ford still leads with no recalls.

are the other people's replies deleted or something? The reason people buy this is because its a bargain used. 40% cheaper than the Hondas or Toyotas for about the same thing.

sure... and all that you added to your odyssey will be about 7-10K MORE than the Touring T&C that has comparable things. BTW... KIDS DON"T CARE HOW BIG THEIR DVD LCD SCREEN IS. food for thought. But for real, Im on the fence... Odyssey or T&C. I know that Odysseey's get only about 21mpg combined... on my limited text drive, I got 23mpg. T&C got me 26.7mpg mostly hwy (about 100miles city driving) driving after 600+ miles. Odyssey has grey leather seats or, for 40k+ you can get black leather seats. T&C has them at 30K. Grey leather seats are so... 1990's! There are so many features that the T&C provides, except for being built in america as they are assembled in Canada while the Odyssey is assembled in USA. It is a hard one to chew on... but I do know I couldnt afford a 40k+ van and moving to an "affordable" Odyssey with cloth seats and no RES just to stay at around 30K is a downgrade from my CX-9 Touring with bose/moonroof AND RES.

deekay2 it has auto and manual.

If you expect no problems with a vehicle until 16 years old that please let me know which one this is?

Give the new Chrysler a chance.

Impala Daily You know what, you are right. I can't be so biased. This isn't the 90's.

Jinu J I love the sto-n-go feature. I travel in my business with two adults and a ton of gear. This is the only van made that allows us to fold all of the seats into the floor so that we can transport valuable equipment in a very comfortable luxury environment on long trips. You can't beat the design and features with a Honda or Toyota!

Jinu J The best part about Stow and Go is the extra storage space it gives you for stuff that you don't need or want out in the open. Like emergency kits and such. Yeah, the seats are a compromise, but all vans compromise in one way or another.

You are so right; they have 10 year old technologies that have not kept up with any modern advances and their designs have not made any aerodynamic improvements. DOLT!!!

gotta agree some what. for their bread/butter vehicle, they should be doing much better with the design and interior material.

This version of the T&C (all trims) have been around since 2011... which received a totally revamped style than the previous generation which ran from like 2004-2010 or so. That said, I personal place value in cars that stay true to their design much like my 2011 CX-9 which has been around since the early to mid 2000's. The reason why manufactures decide to revamp and remake/re brand their cars is because they are not selling all that well. Insert the Chevy cavalier/cobalt/cruze/ When a manufacture builds a good thing, and leaves it alone sans minor cosmetic and tech. changes, than I have faith that that vehicle will survive. To each their own I suppose, but I'd rather not buy a car that gets a major overhaul/revamping/re-badging every 3-4 years.

Yeah you can get a Crossfire, PT Cruiser, Pacifica, Aspen, Magnum, Caliber, Liberty, Avenger, Sebring, or even a SRT4 Neon if you just ask the salesman. AND bring a time machine! The only engine left from then is the massively revised Hemi 5.7 and I don't think any tranny is left from then either. And U-connect is widely thought of as the best system available at any price.

+TheSickfloW I would too, if I had your money.

oh and it has a manual in every trim

Yup, typical. For the best of quality and resale value you gotta get the honda. The American ones fall apart and start sounding like a dying elephant in a couple years.

Alec Smith-Cooper I wouldn't be so sure on that! I work at IIHS and all the tests we do with hondas don't always pass my friend.

dyllman98 They may not pass every test, but they sure do better than Chrysler And change your profile picture. That is immature.

+Alec Smith-Cooper then mr. alec, tell me how come I have had mine going on 18 years, with minimal expense, and no rust, if you look after them they will last.

Alec Smith-Cooper anyone ever tell u to mind your own business that's inmature