Where tf do you live? Canada 😂

Thanks!

Yup. Total plan is to make everything unreliable and too expensive for common folk that keep things going.

Nothing is about lasting forever these days its all about throwing out the old and getting the newest so corporations make money and same thing with EVs just one big driving tracking device that will drain your bank account from repairs they don't care about saving the planet

Idk man my 2012 has almost 300k on the new motor, 515k on the body still doing okay

515K isn't alot of miles for a diesel engine!! V8 or not as the Europeans use mostly V8 or there best most powerful and most expensive over the road diesel Scania usually last a few million built very similar to the 6.7 Powerstroke except there emissions are nowhere near as horrible for there diesel engines than the racquet system we have in the states! I mean. Look at the carbon footprint it leaves to mine all the metals for the tailpipe,the DEF is very toxic not to mention when emissions systems start going out we're looking at around $30,000 for everything I mean its insane and only for American Diesels that I know of. Every million mile 6.7 Powerstroke (that I know of) atleast has the EGR system deleted as thats got to be absolutely horrid for an engine especially on a $75,000-$105,000 truck I mean they could atleast invest the science into the emissions as Europe has a fuel pump that almost eliminates emissions they're about to put into production I believe.. Anyway point being and I'm not being rude I just think we're getting ripped off just because we want/need a powerful,very nice interior work truck that we need dependable service out of it for the life of the vehicle which diesels are built so strong they're automatically in that category but being corked off at both ends not to mention at the top end recirculating the exhaust when without all that crap on there not only less metal we have to manufacture for less engines built because they would last,better MPG that makes up for the missions, not to mention not having to rape the earth even further by the DEF and tail pipe end of the equation getting those precious metals! Don't get me wrong I absolutely hate those "rolling coal" videos and people doing it!! Thats what keeps middle aged hard working men/women from having a hard working,reliable multi million mile engine as I have no dought they'd last a couple million without all that crap and the new S&S 6.7 fuel pump ill have a real diesel engine soon enough! At 500,000 miles you should still have a still very reliable diesel engine as strong as these powerstrokes especially 17-19 are built with the 6R140! No offense to anyone just my opinion on this platform especially 17-19 I wouldn't even buy a newer one with what im seeing and hearing everyone go through with them!

Trump 2024

Sounds like we agree. Yeah I saw that!!! Thanks for watching

@@JacobOverman your welcome bro, keep up the great work! Always look forward to truck videos 🇺🇸

Sweet. Not at all. The emission systems on the 6.7 are pretty. Good. You probably won’t have any issues until 150k+. Then again depends on what your doing with it. I deleted mine at 140k.

Awesome! Yeah I can’t wait either

What were your mods man

Good stuff.

@Jacob Overman I just couldn't gamble with that cp4 pump the one on my dad's started acting weird at 150k miles wouldn't hold rail pressure I ended up putting my old cp4 pump in it and it worked fine those cp4s really are a ticking time bomb

I talk about it in the video. I no longer run a fuel additive

ss diesel came out with a drop in cp4 alternative that's supposed to be bulletproof. but honestly with the lift pump on these u don't see very failures under 200k unless they put def in the tank or didn't change fuel filters or something self inflicted

@@jordangiesbrecht05 ya I've seen their tests where they purposely destroyed the pump pretty impressive

I don’t know. Excited to see who’s it does.

Had no issues with inspections and now I live in Montana. No inspections

2012 about 300k on the new motor 515k on the body. Work horse always pulling shit loaded down with tools

Had a 2003 duramax go 450k before I sold it with orignal motor and tranny, my work truck now is a 2006 duramax that has 310k on the clock and same thing. Hoping my 22 f250 holds up the same. Its all about maintenance, dont change your oil every 10k miles like they want you too cut it in half. Same with tranny, Ford says 150k service life on the tranny which is bs and they know it

my 2013 3500 is going on 450k with a 2k flatbed and a 1300lb welder the entire time and abt another 70k miles with a 5th wheel

I think the 2023 XLT Super Duty looks amazing and has a different body style. Not the higher trim level.

Nvm, ranch head lol

realtruck.com/p/ranch-hand-legend-series-grille-guard-front-bumper/v/ford/f250/2017/

Yeah. These saw some excessive abuse though

My mom on her chevy got 120k out of her tires and still had tread left 😅

Mud Terrains don't last as long. I had the Cooper AT3 XLT on my 2017 F250 FX4 6.7, and got 50k and still had 9/32" on it before I tossed them for Micky Thompsons Baja Boss ATs. Burnouts and towing both wear tires out. You should measure your tires to gauge your average mileage per each /32" of rubber. Then measure then after you do some burn outs and see how many mile's of usage you are wasting doing burnouts.

Yeah. I just don’t like the trend of grill over headlights.

​@@JacobOverman The snake pattern through the headlights on the 2023 serve no purpose and just tells the world Ford designers have no clue what they're doing!!! It just looks stupid beyone belief!!!!

Should!!

Not that I’m aware of

Yeah I’m not a fan

​@@JacobOverman I'm glad I'm not the only one with that opinion!!!

Good god y'all whine like women. Guaranteed in 2 years y'all are going to be singing the 23+ SD praises, because y'all are Ford guys, which means it's the best, and you've grown use to it's looks, etc. It happens every F'in time. I don't care if it's an 18 Mustang GT, 19 Silverado 1500, 19 Ram 1500, 2020 Silverado 2500, 07 GT500, C6 Corvette, etc, the fans of that series of vehicle always hate on that series newness at first, then accept it, and eventually learn to prefer it. I was like this with the 21 F150. I never thought that the 21 F150 was ugly, but I found it borning, and "meh" looking. Now, a few years later I've learned to appreciate it's simple, and clean design. When spec'd correctly a 23 SD is not ugly, but let's act like men here and deal with reality in an honest way, bed steps aren't intended to add in style, but are made to help in functionality, and easing the use of a tall, modern truck as a work vehicle. As a 2018 F150 FX4 owner I can saying in all honesty that GM's bumper/bed step setup is way better then Fords tailgate step setup. In fact the tailgate step sucks balls compared to the bumper steps when it comes to practically, easy of use, convenience, confidence inspiring, and solid feel when in use to move heavy items in, and out the bed, etc. The clean and hidden looks of the tailgate step do look better visually though. The real gist of it is that in reality GM's beds are the best in the business. They're big, not aluminum, and the multifunction tailgate is actually very useful, and better than anything Ford, FCA, Yota, or Nissan make. I understand the importance of looks on a new, expensive truck, but the OP isn't the one to be complaining about it. First you're rocking an 8' bed on a non-DRW truck. You're obviously prioritizing functionality over looks here, as long beds are ugly, especially on crewcab trucks. (6.5' beds are ugly on crewcab half-tons) Unless you're a total redneck, the OP's front bumper does not add in improving upon the looks of a 2017 F250 Lariats frontend, but it's definitely looks pretty beefy, but heavy in both a good and bad way. Toolboxes mounted in the bed, do not help make trucks look better, but they can ade it function depending on what you use your truck for. Obviously the OP's F250 is far from the cream of the crop in terms of good looking 2017 SD truck, but it seems that he set it up to add value to it for him in his line of work, which 500 HP and 1,200 lb-ft OEM, a 10R140, and bedside/bumper steps do to the 2023 SD's, so why is the internet whining about it's style so much? A mid-2000's 6L PSD SRW SD with the 5 spoke 20's is a better looking truck than any style SD released since then. Does that make it a better truck than a modern 6.7L PSD truck? No. Should people say, "my 06 F250 FX4 looks better than a 23 F250, so I'm not going to upgrade, even though my 6L is costing me out my ass in repairs, and at 340K miles of hard use the whole truck's just tired. I depend on my truck for my business, and can easily afford to step into a newer one, but gee golly they sure don't look as good as my 06, so I'll just keep compromising my back health, and safety basic on my old, worn out truck, that see a lot of work looking better with its 5 spoke OEM wheels and no bed/bumper steps."

@@JROC734 And here is one that affects safety: Of the 3 manufacturers mentioned, Ford is the only one with a major safety flaw in the design of their auto transmission!!! • In an emergency, you can't push the shift lever from D into N with an open palm!!! This is not shifting in the normal sense by pulling up on the shift lever and changing gears! • On Ram, Chevy, GMC as well as most other auto manufacturers you can do the emergency disconnect move - Honda, Toyota, BMW, Lexus, Audi, Mercedes, Nissan just to name a few!!! • The same is true on Ford's console mounted auto transmissions - you can't do the above move but have to push the lockout button!! • The whole idea behind this safety design is to allow the driver to disconnect the engine from the drivetrain without having to worry about putting the trans into Reverse! There is a safety detent and the transmission cannot go into Reverse with this emergency procedure! • No dealer know about this because for some reason, the manufacturers do not publish this info!!! Try it - you just may be pleasantly surprised unless you own a Ford product!!!!

@@JROC734 Of all the HD truck manufacturers, Ford has the best styling even though, they messed up big time for the 23s. Remember, styling is a no cost design element and it is only the way it is executed that affects costs. Search KZfaq for the Huracan Tecnica and what Lamborghini did! You won't find Italian designers do amateur moves like Ford did!!! Take a look at that video, it is as amazing as the car is stunning in person!!!

Lmao