With that said, efficiently resorting recreation and large tract space to thee county program which typically already has the equipment to maintain, while leaving tiny park and monument art to the city seems of reasonableness.

You had great positioning with 1 lap to go. Bummer you lost it

When looking at pro building or growth concepts types, one must critically analyze with observation on matters of war profiteering, on concept of undermining US mechanics and on concept of assumptive identity origin. The ones similarly that are against growth, not your usual show up every now and never kinds, but thee ones we see working on thee matter ... Again, we have to consider assumptive identity concepts of trying to establish an identity in the US. My observation has been thee technical kinds oftentimes are trying to maintain control of their assets, but people have no ideas how mechanical and intensively these people work in the pursuit of these activities when, moving from place to place of places that are expanding. If you've lived in more than one place in a time of growth you will see the same concepts over and over when it comes to the dynamics. Which includes the building of projects that were never agreed upon from the original transaction by the person whom originally held the property for more than a few decades.

Something else to consider, people in other countries have property on book with perceivable deeded ownership, paperwork lost in satchel, who don't know the location of property. The zoning notice intent is to find the original owner. It's not to build anything, especially not anything mechanically incorrect and not to the owners advantage, which is what we see with some of the builds, laundering the money through their professional sports career, investing it in a hedge fund of pretty much only stolen assets that might be duplicate representation of value in the markets and built in a way that erodes at the bodily integirty of the main mechanics. You will see this on a property built at an angle and not the standard lower littorol consistent with the Marshal accord in thee US, built on convex corner concept or pivot shift concept with the advantages to the decision maker of stolen ownership that stole thee US investors position in the deal, incorrectly as they are to be technical assistance or technical communication assistance on other matters but have stolen the build decision making with intent of shifting mechanics.