Your torque output for the standard engine is wrong. The standard engine torque output is around 332 ft lb.

My hubby and I just test drove the CX70. Loved the power, torque, and ride. Looks big on the outside at first, but it's perfect for us. Handled great.

They should bring the cx60 to the US!

I'm a single guy with no kids, and I can't believe how much I like the CX-70/CX-90. So well designed! And the sun visors look top shelf too.

They just announced the cx80 in Europe, 4" shorter, could have brought that here maybe in a wide version with 2 rows. But that would make too much sense.

They coulda bring the CX-60 from other markets. The CX-70 shoulda been a trim option. People want a slightly larger and more upscaled CX-50 not a 3rd row delete CX-90

Great review! Really Insightful!

great review that is straight, unbiased and yet informative about of this new Mazda CX-70.

Excellent review…it really appears that Mazda has fixed those minor issues that afflicted my CX-90 PHEV.

That inline six sound humming in the background...SONOROUS!!!

Great video Lyn!

Informative and fun--nicely done!

I have a CX50 and really want this as my next car

I'm not old & I like it. I'm In my 30s & I find it attractive. Nice job Mazda

Great review!!

How is it over city potholes.

I actually love the shifter set up. It makes a ton of sense in multi-point turns and is not so different that you won’t be used to it after the first ride

I had 4 Mazdas and I loved them, and was excited for this one but they lack so many small little details...mood lights would have been an amazing addition to the higher trims, its usually a very dark cabin and that touch enhances the luxury of the product. Great video :)

Not everyone thinks 3 rows are desirable. I much prefer the 2 row design and would not consider 3 row alternatives. Mazda understands that there are two completely different buyers. 2 rows mean more cargo room, less weight and, in this case, a sportier character with subtle design cues that differ from the CX-90.

I'm 25 & I love this CX-70. I'm a single guy with no kids so I was originally considering the CX-5 Signature, but this new CX-70 Interior is stunning in that red or tan with the Polymetal Gray blue-gray exterior

The CX70 was on the top of my list to replace our GLE... but I was hoping we got a CX60 sized vehicle.

Thye shouldve brought the cx60 to the US!!! That is what people wanted.

You have a shift logic option to take full manual via paddles. Set it up via favourites button for easy access.

I cannot wait for this to come to Australia. This looks perfect for my family of 4.

What about road noise? How do the 70 and 90 compare? I am looking at both later today and want some opinions on that.

As a 27 year old with no kids this makes me crave the hybrid CX-5/50

The CX-70 is sharp. Very nice vehicle. Top choice from the segment.

Exact same price as the CX-90 so what's the point?

The reason I'd buy the cx70 is for the long wheelbase and the heavy weight for a reasonable low price,as long as you wont not pay over the cx70 Prefered Trim level.

This is a great option for those of us who will never use a third row and would like the space instead.

The 391 lb-ft torque figure for the lower power six is incorrect; the correct figure is 332 lb-ft.

Glad they brought back the CX7 .

I think if we get the Mazda CX-60, I think it should be a wagon for the US, and if Mazda was to make a pickup, they should name it the DX-80 just a thought

The CX 60! Come on Mazda 😁

CX-70 is the Goldilocks IMHO.

Everyone I see reviewing the CX90 and the CX70 appears to be on the short side.Im 6 feet 2 inches.I was so disappointed in the legroom in the rear seat for the CX90 that I waited for the CX70.Same thing. I would guess your 5’2”

Look so good but a little bit more fog light better

Which one is better Cayenne or Xc70

I can see this as a Genesis competitor, too.

☕☕☕ Happy Tuesday

Nice review. I hope Mazda puts the I6 in a sports sedan.

I would bet that if Mazda brought the CX-60 that many people are asking for, they would complain that it’s too small, or they would question Mazda’s rationale for doing so since the CX-5 and CX-50 are quite similar in terms of second row space. However, there is no question that Mazda should have done more to differentiate the CX-70 from the CX-90.

Mazda is crazy

Makes sense having a different nomenclature for the CX-70. I cross shopped the Genesis GV80, and it was confusing trying to identify one that had the 3d row. This way, there are no issues with that. Also, the CX-70 is definitely more sporty looking.

One can wish and dream ☺

I really like this overall package, but I'm not a fan of the fake air intakes/dams in the front.

The Cx-80 thats coming in Europe should be the 70 just with 5 seat The Cx-80 will have 7 seat in Europe but.will be way smaller than the cx90

2:04 Didn't know the base one made so much more torque!

Atlas crossport is a similar competitor

2:07 That torque number doesn't seem right. It's less than 391 since the higher output version has 369 lb-ft of torque

Skip the PHEV for now. The CX-90 has seen TONS of TSB's and issues with it to this day.

why are Americans obsessed with cargo space I don't understand. What are you going to do with all that cargo space? transportate two fridges back of your car? transportate 6 washing machines? When I watch car reviews from Americans, the only thing I hear is cargo space, cargo space, cargo space, cargo space.

Yeah that torque number is way off on the base model engine.

You can set paddle shifters to stay engaged… So you misspoke

Still don’t understand why this vehicle exists

You made a mistake with the torque, how is the turbo producing less torque than naturally aspirated

cx70 = cx90 - 3rd row.

7:25 from then on i was confused

CX110 should have 4 row seats then

The ligher steering is an improvement over the CX90 Should have a torque converter transmission for smoother low speed operation.

God bless Mazda for not having a touch screen!

Not a fair comparison, instead of Honda passport this completes with Acura RDX.

In other words it’s a 3rd row option. This car as its own model makes no sense. Should have made it a little larger than the cx50 but smaller than cx90.

Should have done a interior review and left it at that.

This model cx-70 doesn't make sense at all when you have cx-90

Not sure a cx-90 with one less row counts as a “new” vehicle

looks good. but with all cars today they are pricey!!!!! OEMs interest rates are over 6%!!!! we cant afford these nice things.

It's a new era for KBB...no Muzio-music vibe.

I am! ✨️✨️✨️

Looks like a VW atlas cross sport with better sheet metal

It’s a nice vehicle, but like most of its competitors it’s a glorified minivan. At least 80% of the time it will be put to the same use as the Mazda MPV. in that case, why do you need a six cylinder engine? Why do you need to pay more than $50,000? I agree the cars are way too expensive, but some of the problem is that we convince ourselves to overlook the absurdity of the market

I love my CX-50, but this car just doesn't make any sense...

Base engine gets 332 lb ft of torque not 391

You not only made the mistake about torque figures on the base model, but your cargo capacity figures on the Honda Passport are completely wrong. With its rear seats down, the Passport has 77 cubic feet of cargo. How does a car review channel get those things wrong?

Mazda is out of touch with the market. Tested a CX-50 and it was so disappointing. Uncomfortable seats, hard on premium gas and very tight on interior space. Ended up buying a new CRV Hybrid. Another big miss here.

Mazda trying to continue pushing their cars as luxury is so sad. Mazda, you either have to start a luxury brand or keep your vehicles aligned with the rest of the market. I am not going to cross shop a Mazda if I'm planning to buy a BMW.

It looks like a bigger SUV of Jaguar

Makes zero sense. If I am one of those people that wants to haul things, I will fold the CX-90's 3rd row seat down. At the same time, if I want to bring extra people, I have that capability. Why would I want to buy the same size suv without the 3rd row? Mazda seriously failed with this one. Maybe if the CX-70 was substantially less costly, I could be convinced. Oh, it's not. 😂

This vid could be just 30 sec long lol.

Probably one of the laziest, insulting to customer intelligence car launches of all time. Should've just brought over the CX-60, though my ideal Mazda would be a Spirit Racing or Hybrid CX-30

Mazda needs more fuel-efficient vehicles

regarding the gear shifter. so why the hell the engineers executed that idea if they have to crate especial safety feature. they just wasted the company money by inventing a pain in the **** ss idea. I noticed something and I hope all CEO and Engineers read that. i think the more money you make. the more stupid idea's becomes alive!! we are the engineers who create annoying ingenuity by choice. to make our consumers life miserable. job well done!! OH !! and we love to slap Piano black for interior design everywhere on a vehicle. 🤣🤣

Well😂 you absolutly has never drive Mazda. .the power...smooth and high speedy dont drive like other cars in the market. I WILL NEVER GO BACK TO AMERICAN CARS! JAPANESE ARE RELIABLE AND DRIVE BETTER TO AVOID ACCIDENTS.

Whinging, whining and moaning about not to get the smaller eurosize CX 60 is getting old. Can't take it anymore.

Cx70 does sound like a well priced 2 row wagon. The engine I would say lacks power for how much it weighs and that’s probably why the shifting gets annoying at times. The turbo version has more acceleration to make it less laggy more not fun. The hybrid is a joke, no one will spend that amount of time trying to charge such a tiny battery. Japanese automakers are trying hard to stay afloat with new wagons that will fit a family lifestyle, while also trying to please the more eco conscious buyers by having hybrid cars available. Ultimately people will decide either go full electric or ICE because hybrids have a very high maintenance cost over their lifetime. Mazda will try and capitalize on the undecided people who want to help the planet while also having range anxiety when it comes to electric vehicles. Why not stick to a four cylinder engine?

It’s not intents and purposes it’s intensive purposes. That means was something has a purpose that intensive. Learn English.