I’ve been shooing CX-5 and CX-50, have a 2021 CX-5 currently. It feels a bit quieter and more refined to me than the CX-50 but the CX-50 is more brawny and I like the front of it.

Well yes that’s why they made this, ?

@@dnice362 they couldve just given the CX90 a bench seat in all trims and saved millions on the development of a totally “new” model

I literally didn’t buy a cx-90 because I could not get a turbo s with a bench seat. Stupid packaging

@@sethgunn8256 you can get a base turbo S with the bench, just not the premium or premium plus which add a ton of nice features. Very annoying.

@@jakes5530 exactly.

🤣🤣🤣

We all know -

​@@2004cyrus I wish Sofyan did...

They needed to shrink this, but if they did it wouldn't have competitive interior space.

@magnoliap5824 no I'm not. It's nice and roomy

@dustinm8800 problem is, other cars are just as nice and just as roomy. But they're also smaller outside and easier to park and maneuver.

@@th003g Mazda builds a great vehicle. They're fun to drive too

​@@magnoliap5824 I probably would have bought it. Was waiting for it. 🤷🏽

Actually, those aren’t cup holders in the back they are storage cubbies. I finally got a close look at them on this video and those are not the same design as the cup holders in the CX-90.

they still got the cx 90 3rd row air vents

lol not that unique

lmao

They can still come in handy

Hey,,, The dogs need cup holders too! For their Starbucks Frappuccinos. My dog acts like she wants to drive sometimes.

@@hyundaiveloster6437 That's a really good point. 😂

They aren’t cup holders on the cx 70 just open areas. Toyota does the same thing on the new gx and 4Runner

What's crazy is they do in the CX-5, not sure about the CX-50.

Like their CX-5 that I have

Just like Raiti’s Rides and Car Confections

Yea zircon sand is nice it came out last year. I have it on my new Mazda 3

Yep my Mazdas have had felt in various places since 2007.

Go look at a CX5 interior, it has objectively nicer materials than this car and is almost 10 years old

Good for storage

This guy is painful. Discussing the tires, key fob, cup holders, sound of the engine. OMG! Cut to the chase. Thank goodness for the double tap ffwd function on iPad.

Its a very quiet engine and cabin. No sound adjustment to exhaust sound.

Still crazy that $60k car don't have heated/ventilated seats and heated steering wheels standard. My 10 year old Grand Cherokee has that.

So you think that they arbitrarily decide what region is getting what or they're driven by what their market research shows? If their research showed that the CX-60 would have done well in North America or whatever region you're in, why in the hell would they be like "nah, CX-70"?🙄

Who wants a crappy Hyundai from Korea. All glitz and no reliability. I like this big ass 2 row. And Volkswagen did what you said nobody else does. It’s called the Atlas or the Atlas Cross Sport. A 2 row and 3 row. When you create a billion dollar car company and do better than Mazda, let us know so we can call out all of your screw-ups whether they are legit or just trolling you. Sounds like you can’t afford these upper middle class offering. Stick with your Chevy Cruze.

@@CRP3252he’s an idiot. Ignore his folderol

@2004cyrus - Those are two different body types, hence the different names. One is a suv body and the other is a coupe suv body. Just like Q7 and Q8. The two Mazdas are the exact same body and dimensions. Try again. Gotta love douchebags who think they know someone from what's written in a comment. Such a big man you are with your overplayed online insults.

I actually prefer the cx70 exterior (less chrome etc) and interior (red) than the cx90.

No it’s not as nice as this exterior wise

How is 6.1 seconds slow?

@@marantamil459 it is, given the rear wheel biased awd system, paired with a force induced I6. Perhaps it was the transmission, which was dumbed down, to appeal more to the masses, than a sportier feeling/quicker wagon/SUV. Comparing apples to Oranges here but, my Current Audi does the 0-60 in the low to mid 4 second range, with similar power outputs mind you. But again, this Mazda was created this way to appeal to a broader range. Either way, glad they are still building sportier vehicles, although nothing like the 90s. But I digress.

​@@Kiss__KissMazda de-tuned the engine to get better gas mileage, so this cars speed isn't even at its full potential

For now. When the CX-90 moves to 2025 model year there will be a a price difference.

​@DeadAir21 they lowered the cx90 price when this was introduced.

@@th003g you are correct but the CX-90 is still 2024, which means the price will go up when it becomes a 2025.

Inflation is going up again, so expect prices to go up.

Not even close

Bro compare the price first.... mdx 20grand over this. How can you think to compare these two...

MDX S is almost 20k more. At that price, get the X5.

​@@ryanb8736 in term of hp .. pretty close.

@@naveennain8560 in term of hp .. pretty close.

True...why not make a true squared off Hatchback instead of the rounded roof? Shorten it too.

Yes, and it was 10 inches shorter than this with similar cargo space. You hit the nail on the head. People expected a physically smaller car when Mazda hyped a 70. What they got was a clear example of bad product planning.

Exactly, right now they don't even do 3-row right with the CX-90 so they have two tweeners.

I was really considering a Mazda 3, CX-30, CX-5, and 21 Mazda 6 Turbo before I found out about that. A real shame.

@@wbwayne8887 just check the VIN range and buy a vehicle built later that year after it was fixed. or buy a '22.

​@wbwayne8887 Yeah and it's frustrating that hardly anyone seems to talk about it.

@michaelp.3485 I'd like to think that Mazda has resolved the issue, but just don't know for sure.

​@wbwayne8887 I'm sure they have it resolved, but I have been driving my 21 CX-5 with the turbo for over 3 years and almost 50,000 miles now. I have had this issue since the beginning. With all those miles burning excessive oil, what damage has been done to the engine that I don't know about? Mazda has extended the warranty, but the fact that they had to get sued first in order to do anything shows that they have no integrity and are not trustworthy. Even now, I have read reports online of some Mazda dealers not honoring the valve stem fix and making consumers jump through hoops. I guess I will see what my experience is when I take my car in on Friday. I have taken my car multiple times to get the oil topped off due to the low oil light coming on, and already the **** at reception was trying to say that they had no record of me coming in for this issue. 🤬🤬🤬

Yeah but then don't compare how they both drive☠️

No

Not allowed

The only less you get is seats.

@blackwhirlwind1245 kinda matters if you are shopping a full sized suv. But their trim structure is different for the 70 vs the 90.

@@gabrieliacoboni6951 it only makes sense to get this instead of CX90 is the top trim level of CX70 so you get all the features plus bench seats. The lower trim levels of CX70 doesn’t make sense.

@@blackwhirlwind1245 That was my understanding as well. Mazda really needs to firm this up in the next year or two. The 70 and 90 lineups are far too confusing.

Because Mazda wanted a 2 row SUV with 'class leading' space, and their only way of delivering on that was just removing the third row of the 90 because the 90 is already on the smaller side of the class space wise. Problem is, for most people when they buy a car that's over 200 inches long, they expect it to be space efficient and could care less how it feels when driving as long as it drove ok. The 90 is the size of a Grand Highlander outside and a highlander inside. Removing the third row does not increase daily usable cargo space. The cubby underfloor storage is hard to reach from the back and side doors.

Cargo room is identical.

@@th003g how so? They took the seats out, that has to make a difference?

@thomas735 they put a foam sound insulator where the seat was. The area on top of the floor is the same.

@@th003g hmm

A passport doesn't compete with this lmao and a v6 that makes less power and less torque

The mazda is an inline 6 and rear wheel drive vs the honda is a transverse engine and front wheel biased which is why there's a hump in the 2nd row of the Mazda.

You do save 18k.

@@Transit_my-wayHonda also has a rear driveshaft like Mazda. Honda just keeps it under body. Mazda tucked it up high, so they needed the hump. Mazda is more car oriented and Passport is more off-road. Hondas AWD is amazing though. It will go places where the Mazda can’t. Mazda will be more refined and that’s what you are paying extra for. If you want a real sports feel and a better built vehicle, get a BMW X5 with B58.

Apart from the fact that the CX60 and CX80 exists.

@@marantamil459 I don’t think they meet US crash standards right? Would need some reengineering vs taking out some back seats

I AGREE 100% but at least they didn't add shiny black plastic all over everything lol

@@phillipsmall7674 I AGREE 100% about the 'no shiny black plastic'. 🙂 Not a fan of that either.