♥️

Eastern Catholics also receive it during childhood.

@@revertrevertz5438 I didn't know that, thank you. Even though my father's side was supposed to be Eastern Catholic. They stopped practicing religion when they were young, my siblings and I weren't even baptised.

Razlike su ogrromne .To razume samo onaj koji zivi kao pravoslavni hriscanin.

Some protestant churches do a communion too, well, I know mine does, but our eucharist/body has the consistency of a saltine cracker, and the blood is actually grape juice and not wine, due to the laws in the US.

Yet no where do you find that in the Fathers writings or in scripture… Communion has always been served with both kinds.

Also Christ didn't say the same words when he presented his blood (the wine) and his body (the bread). But I guess it the popes told you something, you do not care what Christ actually said, even if the priest repeats those very words in front of you each time he presents the Eucharist.

@@srfrg9707 Although, you are right, catholics should commune on both, you are a bit harsh. This person surely cares and just doesn’t know and must be now in some sort of confusion. You can just politely inform him or her.

@@gebranhaddad6312 I was polite..

​@@srfrg9707If you bit Christ's arm, would He not bleed in your mouth? so if the flesh is truly His flesh, you still recieve the blood

actually in the Byzantine Catholic they have in the Eucharist Gregory Palamas as a saint he call Catholic as blindly following and obeying satan for the Filioque

​@@user-pj7sq7ce1f lol what

@@POTATOSOOPS i said catholic participate in the Byzantine Catholic Eucharist see that Eucharist as the one universal Eucharist of there church but in that Eucharist Gregory Palamas as a saint the issue is that Gregory Palamas says that catholic are blindly following satan and obeying him for the Filioque.so explain how the Catholic see a Eucharist as there Eucharist when it has in it a person as a saint that call catholic as i just said

@@POTATOSOOPS Roman Catholics believe in and receive Byzantine Catholic communion. Byzantine Catholics venerate St Gregory Palamas which goes against the Roman Catholic view of filioque and other western heresies. TL;DR Catholics contradict themselves when they say ByzCaths are legitimate

@@user-pj7sq7ce1f obviously your first language isn’t English (if it is then you must have a disability of some sort as trying to make sense of your comment isn’t easy). We (Byzantine Catholics) do not profess the Filioque, we do not even have it in our translation of the creed. We proclaim in the creed, “I believe in the Holy Spirit… who proceeds from the Father. With the Father and the Son He is worshipped and glorified. He has spoken through the prophets.” Which is exactly how it is written in the original Greek. Gregory of Palamas is venerated as a saint in both the western and eastern churches, and not only that the Filioque isn’t an issue for the majority of orthodox (and eastern catholic) christians. If one studies the historical context of St. Gregory’s words one can see that it was said not from a theological background, but an ecclesiastical “I’m better than the lowly Roman Church. As Greeks viewed Romans as lesser than them.

As do the Orthodox during the prayer before COMMUNION

Even in Novus Ordo Masses, we kneel during consecration, and we bow our heads when the host and chalice are elevated. We may not receive the Eucharist on our knees, but we of course kneel when we pray to thank the Lord.

@@Xerxes2005 - there is nothing preventing you from receiving on your knees.

@@joelandrew9688yep we even prostrate actually when the chalice/bread is elevated

i would say different rites However the issues between the sister churches could be fixed in a few years

☦️

From the council of Trent to Vatican II the Roman Church kept the wine for the clergy only. The reason why is that the West developed the ideology of three estates, nobility, clergy and the third estate. When Christ said all Christians are lords no matter their social status, (and that's why we say sir, monsieur or signori) the West created different ranks of Christians, with some more anointed than others, from the top (pope) down. Therefore some where not considered noble enough to receive the entire communion. That's the deep root of the Great Schism. The idea that the Church is a vertical monarchy. We orthodox remember that Christ told us not to do so (Luke 22:24) Lord have mercy on us all sinners.

Just because Catholic Churches themselves do does not mean that’s what the Catholic Church says to do, you just attend tradcatholic mass

not quite that exactly. but I think what you mean is that Jesus is wholly present in both the body and the blood. people can accept either or both and have received Jesus fully. (that is the Catholic teaching)

@@kateri17 yes thank u that is what I meant, I just worded it confusingly

I think that’s why he explicitly mentioned Roman Catholics.

hypocrisy there because they have in the Eucharist Gregory Palamas as a saint. He says latins are actually following and obeying satan for the Filioque

@@user-pj7sq7ce1f what does that have to do with receiving the Eucharist as infants?

@@revertrevertz5438 because how can catholic participate in a Holy Eucharist see it as the one universal Eucharist of the church but in that Eucharist is Gregory Palamas as a saint. But Gregory Palamas calls latins as satan acting and blindly following him for the Filioque

@@user-pj7sq7ce1f would you say that all the Catholics, for example in Syria, who have faced genocide and martyrdom for living their Christian faith, are followers of Satan?

How does communion in the hand work if you’re partaking of both elements? There was an error where only Catholic priests took the blood butI believe that was centuries ago and it has been corrected.

Thank you. Some do receive both by intinction (the dipping of the host in the blood) but from what I've been told it is common practice for some to just receive the host.

@@Theoria In my country Ethiopia both the Roman rite and the Geez Rite(which is Ethiopian Rite and part of the Eastern Catholic church) drip the host in the blood but during COVID restriction the church started giving communion in hand so in that case the gave the host alone so that if they drip it and parts of might remain on hand and fall. So to avoid that they only gave ths host on hand so they could align with government safety measures. I hope this makes it clearer

@@santok.garcia thank you for the comment!

​@@santok.garcia how satanic is that belief.isnt suppose the Catholic Eucharist Jesus Christ in reality how can COVID overcome the supposed body and blood of Jesus Christ

We just don't do it because they don't have a full understanding of the faith. We want people to be educated on the faith before they take it

@@saintpatrick-et5qfMany of us don’t have a “full” understanding of the faith, I’m not sure anyone does. People under the age of 7 can be educated on core dogmas and take part in the Holy Eucharist.

​@Saint Patrick that's not why. no one is expected to have a full understanding of a Mystery. It's done in the LATIN rite because it's said that communicants should be able to distinguish the host from regular bread/ food. Eastern rite Catholics don't require this.

That's exactly why they dont not have a understanding of what they're we can not recieve the Eucharist as if it was a cookie we have to fully understand what we are receiving the Body, Blood , Soul ,and Divinity of God made flesh. Not to mention they could accidently drop it or they could spit it up that's desecration that's why we also dont use unleaven bread because it can leave particles and crumbs behide it would be a tragedy for Christ to be stepped on a desecrated. Orthodoxy also respect and protect the Eucharist at all cost not trying to disregard it and desecrate it that's why in the Roman Catholic Church we have some steps before recieving the Eucharist.

The Babies are already protected without communion the have the sacrament of baptism. That itself is one of the greatest sacraments it itself is deemed in my belief a minor exorcism you are banishing in the name of God the sin of Adam and Eve

***Matthew 16:11 How is it you do not understand that I did not speak to you concerning bread?-but to beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees.” 12 Then they understood that He did not tell them to beware of the leaven of bread, but of the doctrine of the Pharisees and Sadducees. >>> the entire process is a symbolistic reminder >>> blood (wine) = God sacrificed Himself for His own creation so that you can be free from sin (wine is called the blood of grapes - was used to wash clothes - symbolism for washing away sins) >>> bread (word of God) = study and obey God's word >>> unleavened bread = reminder that if you're not obeying God -all the self righteous rituals in the world cant save you >>> a little reminder of the Love of God for when mankind is at its worst

which is pagan blasphemy >>> the ritual is symbolism

@@johnmark6628 and who are you to tell ?

True! Thanks for pointing this out!

@@Theoria I enjoy your Chanel. I think you should revisit this video and Instead focus on how both Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox have liturgies that commune differently or similarly based on for lack of better words, if they are practicing a Latin rite or Byzantine rite Liturgy.

nobody is erring on this issue. Non-catholics are non-catholics for a reason.

In what ways is he wrong?

If no one tells your mistakes you will never see them. "If your brother does something wrong to you, go to him. Talk alone to him and tell him what he has done. If he listens to you, you have kept your brother as a friend." Matthew 18:15

not sure anyone that thinks eating the bread is literally eating the flesh of Jesus should be commenting on anything Biblical

@@johnmark6628 54Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day. KJV John 6 (note John 6:66-and note the numbers: clue to "man's understanding"-do not fall into this trap that Catholic Christians believe, and you do not)

False but also true

The Eucharist is the body blood soul and divinity

Yes kzfaq.info/get/bejne/f6xhidqDt8nTeok.html

And even in the Latin rite it varies. Sometimes you do receive them both together on the tongue.

There is only one truth. Let your yes be a yes and no be a no. The rest is from the devil. (Matthew 5:37) That does not means we don't care and love each other. But love is not encouraging a friend to remain in his errors.

*catholic. When referring to "catholic" as the worldly Church, it is written with a lower case "c". When speaking about the specific rite as you say in Roman Catholicism, only then "c" is capitalised. To correct: "The Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholic Churches both are still catholic, however different rites, but still one God, one faith, and one belief."

Only very little.

@@GoToLiturgy Ok. More getting used to the flavour than actual alcohol...

@@hei7586 Yes

Please reach out to your local Eastern Catholic Church if you would like to join an Eastern rite. I personally dont wish Catholics to lose communion from their own Church. I'm Orthodox btw and I have best regards for my Catholic brethren.

@@lizzystar1907 Sorry to correct you sister but as an orthodox you shouldn't tell that. Orthodoxy is not about the fancy eastern rite. the Church of Rome has profoundly changed her dogma introducing important heterodox teachings and its apostasy (distancing in Greek) from the orthodox faith is growing wider since the schism. The orthodox thing to say to that person is what Christ said "Come out of her, my people,’ so that you will not share in her sins, so that you will not receive any of her plagues.""

Brother in Christ, the main thing you need to know is that Rome used to be orthodox. You will return to YOUR orthodox faith, not to the rite of the East as some say. If you want to join for the fancy rite you are missing the point. If you are joining to follow Christ on the narrow path you are guided by God. Thank the Lord for his guidance. Kyrie eleison.

Dont leave the church, read books of the Catholic saints!

@@srfrg9707 Yea and how would you like to hear radtrad catholics and sedevacantists say similar things about the Orthodox Church. Why don't you go evangelize those who don't belong to an apostolic Church or of a different faith instead

Bro. You dont practice this belief and that's fine. This is a tradition that was passed down to us from Christ that we believe in Orthodox and Catholicism.

@@oroGold-s5b you're partly right. It is a tradition, but Christ is not in the wafer nor did Christ or the word of God teach that. We are saved by the word of God, the gospel of Christ which is faith in Christ, not eating Him.

@@sammygomes7381 Remember we have different beliefs. What you believe is right for you. There's many beliefs out there. I'm not against any. In this particular belief we have its a joyful tradition for us. Theres sources that satisfy this belief for us but not for you. Im happy you have God in your life and how you worship God is great😄

@@oroGold-s5b One follows the word of Gor or traditions of a church. I know only one thing, Christ died for me, not the catholic church, but I do know the Catholic church has put more to death than they died for.

@@sammygomes7381 That's good brother. Catholics also believe in the word of God. Your right Catholics have failed God. Catholics believe there's no man greater then Jesus Christ and we seek his salvation. Since Catholics are sinners we believe Jesus Christ died for our sins.