I wish Joe "Diabetes? What's that?" Rogan would have Barnard on his podcast

Same! Amen to that

What a load of crap. @0:15 "...a low fat vegan diet..." 1) Right from the start it's biased by studying only a LOW fat vegan diet 2) It didn't compare it to a LOW fat "conventional" diet so the conclusions are meaningless. I'm amazed people continually fall for this garbage!

don't lie to yourself

ian thompson people are stupid, I’m just glad vegans can reproduce so we’ll just have to let nature take its course

It's such an amazing transformation isn't it ?

You have inspired me to do the same. Thank you!

That’s great. What exactly did you eat?

@@myLA-ml8se I'd advise getting Dr Esselstyn's book. It's about $10. It covers the diet.

Thank you. I will do. I also read 21 Kickstart plan by Dr Bernard. Some recipes are really good but the plan contains a lot of sugary food and some ingredients are not always available or expensive. So I am looking for a simple ingredients weight loss plan. I am trying vegan diet now. It is very difficult though

You will only find veganism as a diet only the last 100 years or so. It is completely unnatural and unsustainable.

George Orwell grocery stores are unnatural lol..go back to your cave

@George Orwell I see you on every vegan video....

George Orwell You should tell that to all the peasants that lived on potatoes, grains and bread coz they couldn't afford luxury's like meat in medieval times

Sure when it's free it should be truth wow, lazy vegans

Fernando Juarez interested in this research!!

I hope they actually don't get the mental issues

José Javier Rivera Benítez post proof of plant based diet causing mental issues in people otherwise stop commenting immediately and delete your channel. if our species is to progress then there is no room for silly trolls. state your claims and prove them, or leave. plain and simple.

Good for you...you are changing the world

Mr LloydVal Yeh, How can I prove something that obviously I hope it doesn't happen, well, shame on those KZfaqrs that got very bad health habits including mentals because of this... Why I should erase my channel? I got not channel Bruh, don't come with that attitude on internet, when you no legal rights to do nothing about my oppinions, our species cause this, deal with it.

Omg yes ^ lmao

Olivia Love Worthy "science" these days seems to be awfully one sided.. so no

It's cause they got ligma

It’s biased and inconclusive

So every other study done on food by non vegans is also biased?

Lies go viral all the time until they are destroyed by facts.

thank you

Lol 🤣

@@PLANTBASEDNEWS I have a question,, Can fasting affect the ammune system in a good way, even if it has been malfunctioning, a doctor said my friend will always have to take a small dose of a medication for the rest of his life, he is only 38. He is about 80 lbs over a healthy weight.

Plant-based news promotes propaganda that fish and other meat products as unhealthy and actively prompts vegan junk food from subway and KFC and McDonald's so what is it is vegan about your health or the animals if it is about health then why do you make videos when a non-vegan restaurant make vegan junk food I but go all on aboard when talking about unprocessed food like fish I wonder Plus What the health promotes propaganda that fish and meat are unhealthy The title should be why vegan doctors like to hate anything that's non-Vegan I can make a whole video about why brown rice is unhealthy because the high level of arsenic cause cancer so therefore brown rice is unhealthy what about the DHA IN Fish is better than ALA in plants and much more bioavailable I think I would rather listen to what longest living healthy Japanese are eating whole food unprocessed diets just because most vegans are less likely to smoke and drink alcohol and eat less processed food doesn't mean that vegan diets are Heather at all the fact that pesco-vegetarians had the lowest hazard ratio for all-cause mortality in the Adventist Health Study 2 despite pollution? I can see the ecological and other ethical problems with eating seafood, but doesn't epidemiology contradict the claim that a vegan diet is healthier than a pescovegetarian diet? I don't think I know better, it's just that I see some contradiction here. This study on vegans' use of saying vegan being Heather than meat-eater has clearly shown the opposite true with the fish-eater this doesn't mean vegan diets are unhealthy but not optimal as whole food plants based with some fish since this diet provides all the nutrients from plants and B12 DHA and more biologically available vitamins A and D, therefore, non-vegan diets can be slightly Heather than WFPBD Not all vegans eat this diet vegans do eat refined carbs also added vegetable oils and mock meats is not correct to say that vegans are automatically Heather because their diet is vegan Any idea, why pesco-vegetarians had the lowest hazard ratio for all-cause mortality in the Adventist Health Study 2 despite pollution? I can see the ecological and other ethical problems with eating seafood, but doesn't epidemiology contradict the claim that a vegan diet is healthier than a pescovegetarian diet? I don't think I know better, it's just that I see some contradiction here. Thanks for your reply. The level of mercury in fresh Atlantic salmon is 220 parts per billion mercury so which means That a 3oz serving is equal to 85 grams of Salmon 220/1000000000 equal 0.00000022 grams of mercury x1000 to milligrams then it's 0.00022 milligrams x1000 to micrograms then it's 0.22 microgram x85 for 3oz serving 18.7 micrograms of mercury The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) states that 0.1 mcg per kg) of body weight per day is the maximum safe dose of mercury. So 18.7 mcg from fish I am weighing about 73kg that's about 161 lb So Roundabout 0.10mcg per lb so my exposure Is within the safe non-risk limit if I eat 85 grams every day which is a lot I eat about 85 grams of salmon 3 times a week so my total consumption a week is about 255grams that's equal to 9oz a week Now we have to x3 the exposure of mercury that's come at 18.7/161 = 0.116149068322981 x3 = 0.348447204968943 Roundabout 0.35 I have to 7x the safe expound limit of 0.1 x7 = 0.7 mcg per pound per week is safe to limit I only would get 0.35 which is well within the safe limit so at this level heavy metals like mercury are completely harmless to get a negative effect you need to be exposed serval times the upper safe limit so you are wrong about fish contains omega 3 and DHA that helps the brain development and lower heart disease anyways if you are still concerned about this explore it safe to eat fish a couple of times a week the benefits of fish completely outweigh the negative so stop spending misinformation If you still are stubborn about not eating heavy metal you do know that you're exposed to heavy materials at a far higher amount from second-hand smoke brown rice has arsenic that's doesn't mean that brown rice is unhealthy like fish the benefits outweighs the drawbacks of combining fish with prominently plant-based is optimal for health 👍 I am not saying that if you don't eat fish you will be unhealthy or anything you could live as healthy Without eating animals products as well I am just trying to inform people that spending misleading information about the health effects of eating meat and fish is toxic does not help promote veganism because veganism has All to do with animals' ethics and the environment because both of these aspects are harming animals directly or indirectly While health is a personal choice nice logic very mon biased video 😂😂 Ca the

Or ethically, not butchering various animals in various death destinations.

Are you still buying the propaganda?

Plant-based news promotes propaganda that fish and other meat products as unhealthy and actively prompts vegan junk food from subway and KFC and McDonald's so what is it is vegan about your health or the animals if it is about health then why do you make videos when a non-vegan restaurant make vegan junk food I but go all on aboard when talking about unprocessed food like fish I wonder Plus What the health promotes propaganda that fish and meat are unhealthy The title should be why vegan doctors like to hate anything that's non-Vegan I can make a whole video about why brown rice is unhealthy because the high level of arsenic cause cancer so therefore brown rice is unhealthy what about the DHA IN Fish is better than ALA in plants and much more bioavailable I think I would rather listen to what longest living healthy Japanese are eating whole food unprocessed diets just because most vegans are less likely to smoke and drink alcohol and eat less processed food doesn't mean that vegan diets are Heather at all the fact that pesco-vegetarians had the lowest hazard ratio for all-cause mortality in the Adventist Health Study 2 despite pollution? I can see the ecological and other ethical problems with eating seafood, but doesn't epidemiology contradict the claim that a vegan diet is healthier than a pescovegetarian diet? I don't think I know better, it's just that I see some contradiction here. This study on vegans' use of saying vegan being Heather than meat-eater has clearly shown the opposite true with the fish-eater this doesn't mean vegan diets are unhealthy but not optimal as whole food plants based with some fish since this diet provides all the nutrients from plants and B12 DHA and more biologically available vitamins A and D, therefore, non-vegan diets can be slightly Heather than WFPBD Not all vegans eat this diet vegans do eat refined carbs also added vegetable oils and mock meats is not correct to say that vegans are automatically Heather because their diet is vegan Any idea, why pesco-vegetarians had the lowest hazard ratio for all-cause mortality in the Adventist Health Study 2 despite pollution? I can see the ecological and other ethical problems with eating seafood, but doesn't epidemiology contradict the claim that a vegan diet is healthier than a pescovegetarian diet? I don't think I know better, it's just that I see some contradiction here. Thanks for your reply. The level of mercury in fresh Atlantic salmon is 220 parts per billion mercury so which means That a 3oz serving is equal to 85 grams of Salmon 220/1000000000 equal 0.00000022 grams of mercury x1000 to milligrams then it's 0.00022 milligrams x1000 to micrograms then it's 0.22 microgram x85 for 3oz serving 18.7 micrograms of mercury The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) states that 0.1 mcg per kg) of body weight per day is the maximum safe dose of mercury. So 18.7 mcg from fish I am weighing about 73kg that's about 161 lb So Roundabout 0.10mcg per lb so my exposure Is within the safe non-risk limit if I eat 85 grams every day which is a lot I eat about 85 grams of salmon 3 times a week so my total consumption a week is about 255grams that's equal to 9oz a week Now we have to x3 the exposure of mercury that's come at 18.7/161 = 0.116149068322981 x3 = 0.348447204968943 Roundabout 0.35 I have to 7x the safe expound limit of 0.1 x7 = 0.7 mcg per pound per week is safe to limit I only would get 0.35 which is well within the safe limit so at this level heavy metals like mercury are completely harmless to get a negative effect you need to be exposed serval times the upper safe limit so you are wrong about fish contains omega 3 and DHA that helps the brain development and lower heart disease anyways if you are still concerned about this explore it safe to eat fish a couple of times a week the benefits of fish completely outweigh the negative so stop spending misinformation If you still are stubborn about not eating heavy metal you do know that you're exposed to heavy materials at a far higher amount from second-hand smoke brown rice has arsenic that's doesn't mean that brown rice is unhealthy like fish the benefits outweighs the drawbacks of combining fish with prominently plant-based is optimal for health 👍 I am not saying that if you don't eat fish you will be unhealthy or anything you could live as healthy Without eating animals products as well I am just trying to inform people that spending misleading information about the health effects of eating meat and fish is toxic does not help promote veganism because veganism has All to do with animals' ethics and the environment because both of these aspects are harming animals directly or indirectly While health is a personal choice nice logic very mon biased video 😂😂 Ca the

And yet, people who go carnivore or ketogenic reverse heart disease as well. If you need a book to tell you what to eat, then it is not natural to do so.

George Orwell so if someone craves laundry soap then they should eat it? A book says that's pica but I guess the book is wrong.

George Orwell do you have any proof of this claim? also how do you define what is natural in terms of behavior?

Plant-based news promotes propaganda that fish and other meat products as unhealthy and actively prompts vegan junk food from subway and KFC and McDonald's so what is it is vegan about your health or the animals if it is about health then why do you make videos when a non-vegan restaurant make vegan junk food I but go all on aboard when talking about unprocessed food like fish I wonder Plus What the health promotes propaganda that fish and meat are unhealthy The title should be why vegan doctors like to hate anything that's non-Vegan I can make a whole video about why brown rice is unhealthy because the high level of arsenic cause cancer so therefore brown rice is unhealthy what about the DHA IN Fish is better than ALA in plants and much more bioavailable I think I would rather listen to what longest living healthy Japanese are eating whole food unprocessed diets just because most vegans are less likely to smoke and drink alcohol and eat less processed food doesn't mean that vegan diets are Heather at all the fact that pesco-vegetarians had the lowest hazard ratio for all-cause mortality in the Adventist Health Study 2 despite pollution? I can see the ecological and other ethical problems with eating seafood, but doesn't epidemiology contradict the claim that a vegan diet is healthier than a pescovegetarian diet? I don't think I know better, it's just that I see some contradiction here. This study on vegans' use of saying vegan being Heather than meat-eater has clearly shown the opposite true with the fish-eater this doesn't mean vegan diets are unhealthy but not optimal as whole food plants based with some fish since this diet provides all the nutrients from plants and B12 DHA and more biologically available vitamins A and D, therefore, non-vegan diets can be slightly Heather than WFPBD Not all vegans eat this diet vegans do eat refined carbs also added vegetable oils and mock meats is not correct to say that vegans are automatically Heather because their diet is vegan Any idea, why pesco-vegetarians had the lowest hazard ratio for all-cause mortality in the Adventist Health Study 2 despite pollution? I can see the ecological and other ethical problems with eating seafood, but doesn't epidemiology contradict the claim that a vegan diet is healthier than a pescovegetarian diet? I don't think I know better, it's just that I see some contradiction here. Thanks for your reply. The level of mercury in fresh Atlantic salmon is 220 parts per billion mercury so which means That a 3oz serving is equal to 85 grams of Salmon 220/1000000000 equal 0.00000022 grams of mercury x1000 to milligrams then it's 0.00022 milligrams x1000 to micrograms then it's 0.22 microgram x85 for 3oz serving 18.7 micrograms of mercury The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) states that 0.1 mcg per kg) of body weight per day is the maximum safe dose of mercury. So 18.7 mcg from fish I am weighing about 73kg that's about 161 lb So Roundabout 0.10mcg per lb so my exposure Is within the safe non-risk limit if I eat 85 grams every day which is a lot I eat about 85 grams of salmon 3 times a week so my total consumption a week is about 255grams that's equal to 9oz a week Now we have to x3 the exposure of mercury that's come at 18.7/161 = 0.116149068322981 x3 = 0.348447204968943 Roundabout 0.35 I have to 7x the safe expound limit of 0.1 x7 = 0.7 mcg per pound per week is safe to limit I only would get 0.35 which is well within the safe limit so at this level heavy metals like mercury are completely harmless to get a negative effect you need to be exposed serval times the upper safe limit so you are wrong about fish contains omega 3 and DHA that helps the brain development and lower heart disease anyways if you are still concerned about this explore it safe to eat fish a couple of times a week the benefits of fish completely outweigh the negative so stop spending misinformation If you still are stubborn about not eating heavy metal you do know that you're exposed to heavy materials at a far higher amount from second-hand smoke brown rice has arsenic that's doesn't mean that brown rice is unhealthy like fish the benefits outweighs the drawbacks of combining fish with prominently plant-based is optimal for health 👍 I am not saying that if you don't eat fish you will be unhealthy or anything you could live as healthy Without eating animals products as well I am just trying to inform people that spending misleading information about the health effects of eating meat and fish is toxic does not help promote veganism because veganism has All to do with animals' ethics and the environment because both of these aspects are harming animals directly or indirectly While health is a personal choice nice logic very mon biased video 😂😂 Ca the

HyoRiN89 One of my favorites....And also The China Study. I love that book.

Save the planet, save yourself, save other sentient beings. Yep, those three films covers all three bases for going vegan. Any one is enough by itself, but that one dietary change can achieve all three makes not going vegan indefensible.

papparocket I think Netflix is lowkey an advocate for veganism lol

Juice Dude, that is awesome!! Good luck with the channel! 👊 It seems like Dominion will be the new Earthlings btw, watched the review by Those annoying vegans! Check it out!

Damn, you get respect for the hustle.

Rachael Wood Plus, a really awesome guitar player! Who woulda guessed?? 🎸😃

It's bizarre isn't' it. My father-in-law recently passed away due to dementia. The first thing the family did when they got together for the funeral was order a bunch of pizza.

Geefiasco my dad had a quadruple by pass. I bought him how not to die, showed him forks over knives. Made him plant based foods, showed him how to make them himself, bought him a couple of cook books, took him shopping and showed him what to look for. All while his unsupportive, ignorant, worthless wife undermined everything. He's back to eating like shit. Sadly he probably will be dead in the next 5 years. Breaks my heart and I love him no matter what but I did all I could do I can be at peace with that at least.

Hazen So sad to hear - I’ve accepted that if they really wanted to change their diet and change their life for the better, they would have already. Eating what we eat is “too much effort” unfortunately.

You can't save people from themselves, unfortunately.

The only description that fits how hard it is for people to stop eating animal foods is addiction. Heroin addicts have a terrible time kicking their habits even though they know every time they shoot up that there is a pretty high chance they will die. Plus there is no need to inject drugs and so heroin addicts can stay away from people and places where they used to use. But everybody needs to eat and so are almost certainly going to be constantly around people who still eat meat and highly refined foods. So imagine how much harder it is to kick the animal food habit when A) you don't really want to and B) everybody else but you is telling him that not only is it natural for him to eat they way he does but also necessary including his doctors. That anybody changes in the face of these pressures is really nothing short of amazing. Plus diet is also tied in with family and traditions. Giving up all the foods he grew up eating can feel like you are condemning your grandmother who fed him all these foods or abandoning his heritage and its traditional foods. This is basically what my Dad said to me.

Vegan For The Animals Ⓥ He should end his videos playing some guitar licks 🎸😄

Paleo diet is called paleo because it is ancestral. It is the food humans were designed to eat.

George Orwell roflmao

Humans are herbivore And we are biologically design to eat plants

Captains vLogs lol say that to my gut. I've been eating beans and grains around 6 months and they fucking bloat me up and gave me soo many digestive issues. Maybe vegan diet is the way for some people but not for me

LOL... eating beans and rice is not eating a healthy vegan diet dip-shit. And for the record, eating those could NEVER cause one single problem. Funny no doctor can name one single disease, cancer or tumor cause from eating anything vegan, and you actually think people would believe a word you're saying... hahahahah Like I said, you as a human are HERBIVORE. Herbivores don't get sick from eating what they are desinged to eat.

Carlos Ernesto Gutierrez Vazquez No one cares if writing like that.

This is how I permanently cured my type 2 diabetes.

Initial commit! Why? He's a fraud lol.

He's on you tube in order to make money, he has no ethical concerns or firm beliefs, its all about the views.

Leif D He's another Joe Vegan lol

VP is a moron, literally. This video will not help him.

What’s the scoop on him?

raw veges give me ligma

Well if you take toxicity into your mind like Eminem and toxicity into your body with junk food you're going to have a lot worse than Ligma. You'll be a slave to others who want to exploit you. Stand up for yourself and love yourself.

Shane Sterling ligma balls

Shane Sterling That's sounds like you are a passive agresive SJW.

@@80slimshadys 😂😂😂

Whole Food Plant-Based Man House was eating flesh cuase he know the man is full of crap

I go to wfpb bit then also junk food vegan. At least I am not harming animals and environment

DARK RIDE N.O.W. If you're producing CO2 then we always harming the environment

@@JoseRivera-rl3qv Hi troll... hahaha!

DARK RIDE N.O.W. Well, that was a fact... but yeah you're projecting yourself too. harming the environment just by existing

Genesis Alvarez Thank you for providing more group lazy thinking for an Ideology full of flaws when they take legislative position

José Javier Rivera Benítez what about it is lazy thinking and why is it lazy thinking? also what are these flaws that you are referring to?

Mr LloydVal Maybe because it has been accessible for at least a decade or more (depending on the research). Stop being so naive. The difference now is that you have access nowadays. Get better at your english, and don't worry I get that all the time.

​@@JoseRivera-rl3qv Your use of the English language was not as effective as Mr. LloydVal's comment. The only problem he had was capitalization, but you failed to capitalize "English" as well. Your syntax fails to achieve the one purpose of using the English language- to communicate. What could "...when they take legislative position" possibly mean?

@@JoseRivera-rl3qv Please enlighten us about the "flaws" to which you referred.

This is not a recent video!

You like to see Dr. Berg cause you like to compare subjective aspect of people

Look at his page. He looks very similar.

Berg D.C is 53 years of age. 12 year younger! :) Makes a big diffrence in apperance especially in that range. Not a fan of Eric because of his promotion of animal foods and misunderstanding of good and bad carbs. But props to him for promoting people to eat a whole lot of veggies.

ian thompson :::: Let’s see a photo of YOU!!!! How healthy do YOU look?

Plant-based news promotes propaganda that fish and other meat products as unhealthy and actively prompts vegan junk food from subway and KFC and McDonald's so what is it is vegan about your health or the animals if it is about health then why do you make videos when a non-vegan restaurant make vegan junk food I but go all on aboard when talking about unprocessed food like fish I wonder Plus What the health promotes propaganda that fish and meat are unhealthy The title should be why vegan doctors like to hate anything that's non-Vegan I can make a whole video about why brown rice is unhealthy because the high level of arsenic cause cancer so therefore brown rice is unhealthy what about the DHA IN Fish is better than ALA in plants and much more bioavailable I think I would rather listen to what longest living healthy Japanese are eating whole food unprocessed diets just because most vegans are less likely to smoke and drink alcohol and eat less processed food doesn't mean that vegan diets are Heather at all the fact that pesco-vegetarians had the lowest hazard ratio for all-cause mortality in the Adventist Health Study 2 despite pollution? I can see the ecological and other ethical problems with eating seafood, but doesn't epidemiology contradict the claim that a vegan diet is healthier than a pescovegetarian diet? I don't think I know better, it's just that I see some contradiction here. This study on vegans' use of saying vegan being Heather than meat-eater has clearly shown the opposite true with the fish-eater this doesn't mean vegan diets are unhealthy but not optimal as whole food plants based with some fish since this diet provides all the nutrients from plants and B12 DHA and more biologically available vitamins A and D, therefore, non-vegan diets can be slightly Heather than WFPBD Not all vegans eat this diet vegans do eat refined carbs also added vegetable oils and mock meats is not correct to say that vegans are automatically Heather because their diet is vegan Any idea, why pesco-vegetarians had the lowest hazard ratio for all-cause mortality in the Adventist Health Study 2 despite pollution? I can see the ecological and other ethical problems with eating seafood, but doesn't epidemiology contradict the claim that a vegan diet is healthier than a pescovegetarian diet? I don't think I know better, it's just that I see some contradiction here. Thanks for your reply. The level of mercury in fresh Atlantic salmon is 220 parts per billion mercury so which means That a 3oz serving is equal to 85 grams of Salmon 220/1000000000 equal 0.00000022 grams of mercury x1000 to milligrams then it's 0.00022 milligrams x1000 to micrograms then it's 0.22 microgram x85 for 3oz serving 18.7 micrograms of mercury The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) states that 0.1 mcg per kg) of body weight per day is the maximum safe dose of mercury. So 18.7 mcg from fish I am weighing about 73kg that's about 161 lb So Roundabout 0.10mcg per lb so my exposure Is within the safe non-risk limit if I eat 85 grams every day which is a lot I eat about 85 grams of salmon 3 times a week so my total consumption a week is about 255grams that's equal to 9oz a week Now we have to x3 the exposure of mercury that's come at 18.7/161 = 0.116149068322981 x3 = 0.348447204968943 Roundabout 0.35 I have to 7x the safe expound limit of 0.1 x7 = 0.7 mcg per pound per week is safe to limit I only would get 0.35 which is well within the safe limit so at this level heavy metals like mercury are completely harmless to get a negative effect you need to be exposed serval times the upper safe limit so you are wrong about fish contains omega 3 and DHA that helps the brain development and lower heart disease anyways if you are still concerned about this explore it safe to eat fish a couple of times a week the benefits of fish completely outweigh the negative so stop spending misinformation If you still are stubborn about not eating heavy metal you do know that you're exposed to heavy materials at a far higher amount from second-hand smoke brown rice has arsenic that's doesn't mean that brown rice is unhealthy like fish the benefits outweighs the drawbacks of combining fish with prominently plant-based is optimal for health 👍 I am not saying that if you don't eat fish you will be unhealthy or anything you could live as healthy Without eating animals products as well I am just trying to inform people that spending misleading information about the health effects of eating meat and fish is toxic does not help promote veganism because veganism has All to do with animals' ethics and the environment because both of these aspects are harming animals directly or indirectly While health is a personal choice nice logic very mon biased video 😂😂 Ca the

If you click on "Show More", you will see 3 links to those studies 😄

Cathie Y We all listen and we not all believe in lies and fantasy world

Yeah right. Veganism requires the death of millions of animals to sustain their diet of monocrop grains and herbivore competition, as well as the destruction of their natural habitats down to the killing of bacteria that was used for the top soil. The blood and bone meal used to grow crops is where vegans get most of their food from. Not only that, but the millions of wild animals that are killed by farming combines, and pest controllers. Yes, animal corpses are the fuel for the food vegans eat. Just because you don't see it on a plate, doesn't mean you are not contributing to death.

George Orwell you don't have to use blood and bone meal...lol and how many animals are killed to feed the billions of animals that are slaughtered? Veganism isn't about perfection. Why is the rainforest being cut down? Grass fed beef and palm oil... So because some animals are killed indirectly we should just throw our hands up in defeat and cause the max amount of deliberate harm?

George Orwell go do more research on combine deaths...

80% of crops grown are to feed the Sentient Animals that sadly end up on Your plate! Please get Your facts straight. Vegan farming systems need improvement no doubt, but it is a massive improvement on the evil of Animal farming & all the associated farming that goes with it!

VerticalFreedom wth do you mean no rape lol....jaysus and you people wonder why people question your opinions on this...

ricky dedos doesn’t sound like you ate a balanced diet

sounds like u did overeating. u cant eat too much even on vegan diet. try again with lesser quantity of food. plus track ur water consumption too. too much water also causes bloating.

I have a urologist friend and when I mentioned hca and acidity from meat he did acknowledge those are problematic. Hca is a marker for colon cancer

I don't think there is a definitive answer but I've also heard the 500mg value. I believe you should also make sure you are getting enough D3 to help with absorption and make sure you are not getting too much salt to reduce excretion.

Mukul Tiwari better do a lot of research on this because too much calcium can cause heart disease. I think if you eat enough vegetables you’ll get all the calcium you need!

Yeah thanks for answering :thanks

Kent Hanna, and of course the best source of vitamin D3 is the sun. And in India Mukul doesn't have to content with long snowy winters that keep those of us in the northern tier of US states locked inside for about a third of the year, so he should be able to get plenty throughout the year.

Probably the best resource to know what the best of the peer reviewed science has to say on just about any subject in nutrition is nutritionfact.org run by Dr. Michael Greger. Here is a link to his summary page on calcium. nutritionfacts.org/topics/calcium/

Check out Brenda Davis's books

If you use less than one cup a day, you're ok. More info on Nutritionfacts.org youtube channel

Plant-based news promotes propaganda that fish and other meat products as unhealthy and actively prompts vegan junk food from subway and KFC and McDonald's so what is it is vegan about your health or the animals if it is about health then why do you make videos when a non-vegan restaurant make vegan junk food I but go all on aboard when talking about unprocessed food like fish I wonder Plus What the health promotes propaganda that fish and meat are unhealthy The title should be why vegan doctors like to hate anything that's non-Vegan I can make a whole video about why brown rice is unhealthy because the high level of arsenic cause cancer so therefore brown rice is unhealthy what about the DHA IN Fish is better than ALA in plants and much more bioavailable I think I would rather listen to what longest living healthy Japanese are eating whole food unprocessed diets just because most vegans are less likely to smoke and drink alcohol and eat less processed food doesn't mean that vegan diets are Heather at all the fact that pesco-vegetarians had the lowest hazard ratio for all-cause mortality in the Adventist Health Study 2 despite pollution? I can see the ecological and other ethical problems with eating seafood, but doesn't epidemiology contradict the claim that a vegan diet is healthier than a pescovegetarian diet? I don't think I know better, it's just that I see some contradiction here. This study on vegans' use of saying vegan being Heather than meat-eater has clearly shown the opposite true with the fish-eater this doesn't mean vegan diets are unhealthy but not optimal as whole food plants based with some fish since this diet provides all the nutrients from plants and B12 DHA and more biologically available vitamins A and D, therefore, non-vegan diets can be slightly Heather than WFPBD Not all vegans eat this diet vegans do eat refined carbs also added vegetable oils and mock meats is not correct to say that vegans are automatically Heather because their diet is vegan Any idea, why pesco-vegetarians had the lowest hazard ratio for all-cause mortality in the Adventist Health Study 2 despite pollution? I can see the ecological and other ethical problems with eating seafood, but doesn't epidemiology contradict the claim that a vegan diet is healthier than a pescovegetarian diet? I don't think I know better, it's just that I see some contradiction here. Thanks for your reply. The level of mercury in fresh Atlantic salmon is 220 parts per billion mercury so which means That a 3oz serving is equal to 85 grams of Salmon 220/1000000000 equal 0.00000022 grams of mercury x1000 to milligrams then it's 0.00022 milligrams x1000 to micrograms then it's 0.22 microgram x85 for 3oz serving 18.7 micrograms of mercury The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) states that 0.1 mcg per kg) of body weight per day is the maximum safe dose of mercury. So 18.7 mcg from fish I am weighing about 73kg that's about 161 lb So Roundabout 0.10mcg per lb so my exposure Is within the safe non-risk limit if I eat 85 grams every day which is a lot I eat about 85 grams of salmon 3 times a week so my total consumption a week is about 255grams that's equal to 9oz a week Now we have to x3 the exposure of mercury that's come at 18.7/161 = 0.116149068322981 x3 = 0.348447204968943 Roundabout 0.35 I have to 7x the safe expound limit of 0.1 x7 = 0.7 mcg per pound per week is safe to limit I only would get 0.35 which is well within the safe limit so at this level heavy metals like mercury are completely harmless to get a negative effect you need to be exposed serval times the upper safe limit so you are wrong about fish contains omega 3 and DHA that helps the brain development and lower heart disease anyways if you are still concerned about this explore it safe to eat fish a couple of times a week the benefits of fish completely outweigh the negative so stop spending misinformation If you still are stubborn about not eating heavy metal you do know that you're exposed to heavy materials at a far higher amount from second-hand smoke brown rice has arsenic that's doesn't mean that brown rice is unhealthy like fish the benefits outweighs the drawbacks of combining fish with prominently plant-based is optimal for health 👍 I am not saying that if you don't eat fish you will be unhealthy or anything you could live as healthy Without eating animals products as well I am just trying to inform people that spending misleading information about the health effects of eating meat and fish is toxic does not help promote veganism because veganism has All to do with animals' ethics and the environment because both of these aspects are harming animals directly or indirectly While health is a personal choice nice logic very mon biased video 😂😂 Ca the

All Nat. Cat Just go vegan and be A SJW and not an open minded, labeling people

All Nat. Cat I saw a diabetes drug ad prior to one of the plant-based videos. I even saw another ad involving animal products! Talk about insanity! 😫😫😫

Right on, man. My motivation is ethically based, but having an easier time shedding the extra pounds is a pretty damn cool perk.

@@zacharyshort384 I didn't check my cholesterol or A1C or fasting glucose before I started the vegan diet, but 5 weeks into it, my numbers were all within the normal range despite the fact that I had a BMI of over 40, which means my numbers probably shouldn't be any good. What I do know for sure is that my blood pressure has dropped at least 20 points probably more in the last two months, and I definitely do not feel inflamed which my whole body was routinely before changing my diet. I have lost significant weight before doing an Atkins diet and kept it off for two years, but could never lose the last 40 lbs I wanted to get off. Thanks to intermittent fasting, I have added some additional tools to take weight off that I believe will be beneficial, but the vegan diet improved dramatically today when I realized that guacamole & salsa on my lunch time salad is less calories than my vegan ranch dressing. Guacamole & salsa with beans & long brown rice was great, but guacamole & salsa with beans and riced cauliflower & broccoli tastes just about as good with 1/4 the calories of the rice too.