They run low-mid 10's stock so probably not. Good weather and track conditions? Lambo's are always slower than Ferrari, Mclaren and Porsche

Probably not, seems to be running the same as other Turbo S cars

looks like a mild tune on it....

No.

Stock I'd say.

I’d still rather have the Lambo.

Model S Plaid typing lol

Every video I've seen the Porsche is consistently running 10.2's.

reliable🤡

​@@ddoggangstar2yep, reliable. Its not a Corvette.

Plaid's launch and traction control are the best. No transmission and no shifting to slow it down ⚡️🇺🇸

And its got way more torque

@@larryc1616 A rocket car is better no traction control needed, since we comparing things with completly different engines and control systems.

So too the Lambo..BUT..that torque, that gobsmacking twin turbo torque, as the N/A V12 is revving and bulding up, the 911 Turbo is already there, i think this is the difference.That said I think Porsche well underquote power and torque, if they say 650hp, more like 700 or more, same goes for whatever torque figure is.

@@larryc1616 the two arent comparable fan boy

yep way higher, that one is stock

thanks captain obvious

Exactly 😂

Yea but what if the Lambo was tuned too?

@@thedumbconspirator4956 that’s definitely stock lol tuned this probably would’ve tied the turbo S

but the turbo s sounds awful with all these mufflers... I would take the lambo any time of the day, that v10 is better than any drag race results...

@@elcrackengaitos_bs4804yes the lambo still losses, lambo the brand itself isn’t a good car brand either, they aren’t reliable, don’t look good, to damn expensive and they are horrible on the roads

@@D1N0NUGGIE3 don't look good? Every lambo looks better than your Prius blud + lambos are not horrible on the road

@@elcrackengaitos_bs4804 my bad, they are terrible I’m the roads ask any lambo owner how they are on the roads

Why is 60-130 better tho?

Awd and the trans are so quick. I have same color and speck. Im in Midwest its cold now and car is even quicker. 🍻

@alim7502 that small difference could be the prepped track, the car wow strip looks dusty.

Really could be better fuel?

@@bugpumper 60-130 being better does not have to do with prep when both cars are not slipping

McLaren 720s doggy walks it

@@Smzxe dude the turbo s walks it in the quarter mile, can't beat awd of the line ,just not possible

maybe on CNN it does, but I have 3 cars in my garage that beat it easily....

@@chrism869 Lmfao 🤣 720s dog walked on Turbo S 10 times in a row on many different channels I can link 10 videos 720s even walked on Tuned turbo S But Carwow used worst driver in worst condition wet track Even 720s spider ran 10.1 @145 mph on Autocar channel that was on a dusty Runway So 720s is clearly Faster

@@Smzxe carwow multiple races from the dig and the turbo s beat the 720s every single time, it's just rwd vs awd traction, you can try to get a good launch, but you'll never ever ever get even close to launching as good as awd, unless you're on a prepped strip and drag radials. What you mentioned, probably the turbo s got out front in the beginning cause of the awd ,and the 720s caught it at the end, you cant beat the launch on the turbo s ,and carwow did it on the dry,not in the wet

On road 10.3-10.4

​@@jozefjozefczyk3936 10.1,10.2 Unless some bad driver is launching it without getting proper boost on launch

Even at a half mile the Porsche would win since it’s so far ahead at the quarter mile. A mile race might bring them even.

​@@briankearn6991No Lambo makes less hp

@@sjhudon386 dont matter, aero also comes into play

Porsche has better top end, it does weight less tho

For rear wheel drive, the Tecnica is very fast. Top end run, the Tecnica will be faster. My friend and I did a test, in his 992 turbo, and my Tecnica. Very competitive .

Yeah these things always punch above their weight it’s crazy

Well tell me how is a 650hp 1600kg car doing 60-130 in 7.2 secs while the 1520 kgs 640hp is doing 7.6 secs??

German hp*

​@@alim7502 That is because of the 992 Turbo S' AWD and torque advantage. But do realize that a McLaren 600LT will beat the 992 Turbo S at higher speed acceleration...100 - 200 kph, for example? And the 600LT is older and has less hp.

@@alim7502 I’ve given up trying to work out why. For instance Why is my bone stock 1,900kg Smart electric car quicker than an Audi RS3 & BMW M2 at 0-60 & quarter mile ? It makes no sense. Duel motor AWD 428hp 543Nm 0-60 3.7 quarter mile 12.1 on tarmac. Oh and at £43,450 it’s cheaper too.

Exactly ! a thing that a lot of people forget when they are comparing a turbo with 1000hp cars like the plaid or the SF90

@@CLSTRN911 yes. People should try to beat a 911 Turbo in a car with comparable power. Hint: they wont beat it. People comparing it to a Plaid are straight up idiots. We can compare a Plaid to a Rimac too

All the Teslasimps in the comments are just too funny.

@@Teslapromo103 No they're not. The plaid only has 10% more power to weight ratio and destroys the Turbo S by a whole second. (I've also seen it beat a 800- 900 hp Turbo S despite a power too weight disadvantage) Also, the Plaid is a 90,000-130,000 sedan, the 911 is a 180,000+ supercar, while the Rimac is a 2,000,000 Hypercar with about double the Plaid's power to weight ratio, so clearly it makes more sense to compare the Plaid with the Turbo S.

@@cubozoan9448 Lol i don't know where your numbers come from, but Plaid puts almost 1080whp down, so no, its not 'just' 10% better. Plaid also has instant torque and better aerodynamics. Tons of advantages to beat a 911 Turbo in a straight line. A 800hp Turbo S still has a worse power to ratio than a Plaid and is only half a carlength behind it. So, nice try, but the 911 performs better for what it is. Especially for being Ice, coming from a Teslaowner.

🤡

@@cleverusernamecl5532 🤡

It wasn’t running slow, those times you quoted were pretty much ideal conditions. Car and driver tested them at those times with a 4mph higher trap speed for both. So while it’s possible, you can’t expect ideal every time, even if the cars are extremely consistent and can manage to set those times. Just the way the world works

no bro, I meant the times on the other video, when it was runnin slow, check on the link he put@@PapiAndrey

in that one video it was runnin much lower@@PapiAndrey

exactly!

Fake numbers lol

200,000 isn’t a bargain and it isn’t faster in top speed than most porsches

The Plaid is under $100k, where are you getting $200k? And top speed is kind of a silly comparison. No one is ever topping any of these cars out.

@@ericship8383$89k=200k? Weird

What are you 12? No one gives a shit about top speed.

​@@ericship8383 sure it is. Plaid tops out at what 200? 205? 217? Porsche 911 hovers right around the 200 mph marker as well with 718, cayenne, Macan taycan all being slower... Not that it matters because that plaid is leaving the Porsche up until maybe 190 mph, and you're never going 190 unless ur on the autobahn

Porsches consistency is amazing

Put it on the dyno, if you dare.... No way it runs 10.1 seconds with only 650 horsepower (550 whp since it is AWD and has increased drivetrain losses). The Turbo S 992 is definitely making more power than claimed to output.

​@@Seventh7ArtLol so what. Most turbo cars have more hp thsn advertised

@@Seventh7Artalready done - ~670hp at the crank for a turbo s

​@@Seventh7Art Hey brother, Porsche, as with many manufacturers, underrate HP. Porsche are known to release figures based on worse case scenario (averages). Many other manufacturers often release best case scenario figures. That factory rated 640hp and/or 1/4 mile & 0-60 times was more than likely what they noted while testing in the heat of South Africa. Note, the Turbo S in this video was cutting ~1.48 '60 times...track surface was really good and thus it was not short shifting into 2nd and/or killing his '330. That same car on that day and track with a tune and exhaust would have ran 9.50's. Ask me how I know😊 😊

No it won’t. It’ll be too heavy. Won’t be any faster than a non-hybrid Turbo S.

Yeah it's not gonna eclipse the plaid

​@thedumbconspirator4956 electric cars who cares

@@MrJohndoe996 no it will be faster. Porsche said that the hybrid system will be there only for the performance

@@MrJohndoe996it will. It won’t be a plug in hybrid, just a mild hybrid to boost performance

Same here. You can't ignore the sound experience from a NA v10. But, would choose 992 gt3 rs for the same money if available at its sticker price.

In the looks department they're boring.

​@@brownro214looks are deceiving my friend

​@@brownro214said no one ever. Americans are just salty they need like 400hp more to beat a 911.

@@artansadiki3244I’ve seen a boat hellcat gap one with 2 bolt ons 🤣

@@johncena-hq1ti Yeah probably had 1000hp to keep up with a stock 650 911 as usual 🤣

That’s…debatable, I believe there’s a video on Carwow they have a video of the turbo s vs Performante and the Perf won…

Ja, der Klang des turbo s ist viel zu leise

Curious as to why people always bring up sound when the objective is about winning races ? Yes, it sounds like trash, but what ice vehicle in its class is beating it straight out of the dealership?

And a 5k exhaust can fix it 😂

Facts .. honestly me also I wouldn't care that a car beats Me by like half a second in the 1/4 me the Lamborghini with the color and sound is so breathtaking

​@willzuehlke37 The problem I have with your statement is Lambo's are suppose to be competitive fast. Are we now gonna just let that slip and accept "well, I like the looks and sound, who cares its not fast enough?" Lamborghini has fallen way behind in the speed department. They're years past due to fix that.

@@ronin7645 Dude no they aren't..... They have never ever been about pure speed and performance, which is why they have NA engines. They are about amazing sound, looks, and drama, which is what they give you

@@markoon139 Yes and no. You can't tell me Lambo's isn't about speed. Of course their brand is about looks, and sound. But that's not it. It has to be fast as well. They definitely have fallen behind the speed category compared to its competition. Porsche and Ferrari has easily passed them in speed. Even the Vette has caught up with them.

@@ronin7645 yeah, so?

Me too

Hallo. Ich bin Deutscher, und wohne in Stuttgart. Aber ich würde auch den Hurracan nehmen, ich liebe v10 Sauger Klang

Until I bring my Plaid. 😎

​@TheMadmax0609 Brooks has a Plaid. Notice how he didn't mention it? Because no one cares lol

@@MrJsevo29 Oh EVERYONE cares... They just can't keep up. 🤣🤣

His SF90 is way faster

@@TheMadmax0609 🤡🤡🤡

C8Z06 has a great launch and 0-60 but just not enough to keep it going, it's trap speed is on the lower side but its ET is pretty quick. Should be pretty close. Love the new Z06's btw.

Both cars are pretty neck n neck but the huracan being around 250lbs lighter edges out the c8 z. According to reviewers though both cars trap around the same, mid 10s, low 130s

You should post videos of both cars. I think us plebians on here would love to see some content if you own both.

Thank you!

Not really, an Evo does the same

@@blazesmooth5573 of course it would it is AWD: I expected for the Technica to be slower that the EVO.

@@timmietz If that's the case the STO does the same 10.5

@@blazesmooth5573 yes, ie believe it does.

Traction+torque+PDK is the difference I think. The Lambo is probably down a bit on torque off the line. Hard to compete with a good turbo car.

720s?

Who cares! It is not about quarter mile time look at Ferrari it killed the brand with its stupid turbos ! Put a turbo on a honda civic it will be faster only immature people care about how quick the car is

Sound too.

Did 10.45 later that day in the Tecnica

​@@DragTimesstill trash

Exactly....

Revuelto beats every turbo S. Clown

​@@MichaelYounesreally ? A 600k 1000hp car can beat a 200k 650hp car ? Wow 😂

720s is quicker. Drag times ran 9.7 with a stock mclaren 720s turbo s only did 10.09, slower than mclaren, slower than Tesla

​@@N0neofyourbusiness.720s is 100k more expensive and of ur in a normal road it will never d0 10.3

​@@N0neofyourbusiness.Should be quicker since it has more hp and less weight. Weird comparsion

Plenty can, I have 3 of em in my garage...

@@DragTimes that's why I said panting at all play some Brooks I respect your car knowledge and erasing abilities and I'm a subscriber to your channel I'm just saying that there are a few cars if you have three of them you're lucky enough to have them God bless you brother I should add that I'm talking about from a 0 to 60 and quarter mile you're driving abilities drag cars in race cars and I'm getting a little old so I'm going to do it no more but I do enjoy your channel and and I know you're a big fan of the Porsche 911 cars

@@DragTimes Model S Plaid, SF90 and 765LT right