Damn :O

I have a 300wm. Shot a moose through the lungs and it stated to walk away . Put another round in his head and he dropped. Shot another bull moose with it, hit him high in the neck. He was dead before he hit the ground. The lung shot went through and through. The neck shot did not. Their necks are thick solid muscle though. Both with 180 grain lead tips.

you must be shooting squirrels then 💀 or you’re only doing headshots.

Steele and paper don’t have legs. Lmao! It’s a joke!

Arizona, desert mule deer - 340 yds. Coues deer - 230 yds, 350 yds, and 445 yds. All were high shoulder hits. All dropped in their tracks.

I today learned they make those uppers

@@danc9866 They say that there are issues with the extractors. But getting a 30% increase in ft-lbf with only a small reduction in capacity .i.e. a 25 round 308 will hold 22 300wsm..On paper it looks good..But how accurate and reliable is it? Hellofa mag dump tho..If you loaded them up with .30 API rounds I don't think too many things short of a tank would still be standing after that mag dump..

Jagzilla I’m building a .308 ar for hunting but I think I’m picking up a howa 1500 chambered in 300wsm for $350 with a scope.

@@danc9866 That's a super deal.

R32R38 why I think I’ll be picking it up

Man I had that same gun in the black shadow I took many many big bucks with it sold it if I could find one again she wouldnt leave. Take care of her man.

Thank you GT!

Agree; dead is dead, wounded is wounded, misses is missed.

Really appreciate you watching delta!

@@WHOTEEWHO If possible... A smith and Wesson M&P II vs ruger AR556 would be great... If possible.. No pressure... At your leisure

I’ve had a Savage model 110 chambered in 7mm Remington Mag with 150 grain rounds and I can guarantee that they’d be good for well beyond 400 meters, fyi I could stretch bullet holes at 200 meters with it. Factory stock no work whatsoever done to it

In that rifle, with that one single unknown manufacturer's round tested... yes, it was slower than expected.

Bonded or all copper bullets, yes.

👍👍

That's a awesome idea

Yes the wsm is more accutate!

@@donaldbougie694 But is it?

🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲

The 770 have 24 inch barrel and the 300 wsm too.

I have the 3most popular WSM,s love all 3

Steven Adams there are some options in that price range . Here’s a little secret unknown to the majority of hunters in the world , most scope manufacturing companies believe it or not get their glass from a European company called ( Meopta) and brand their own name on the scope tube itself ! You can research it , it’s true ! So paying high dollar for a name brand is typically what it boils down to . For instance Redfield optics were bought out by Leupold & Stevens and are made in the Beaverton , Oregon Leupold plant on the very same assembly lines . Same glass , same tubes , with some slightly different features or reticles , and different badging . So I can assure you that Redfield scopes are highly regarded as a respectable and trustworthy brand as equally as any Leupold out there . This is typically referred to as ‘ platform sharing’ commonly known in the automotive industry. Ford ,Lincoln Mercury were all birds of the same feather. As well as Chevrolet, GMC , Buick all are General Motors products with slightly different options features and badges, but they all are made from the same components when it comes down to the engine and transmission and mechanics. So the same holds true with Leupold and Redfield . Also don’t overlook a Weaver scope , they are rugged , durable and very functional scopes . Bushnell scopes are quality made optics as well , using “Bausch & Lomb” optics who happen to make glass for the medical industry for microscopes and such . And I wouldn’t overlook Nikon either , side by side next to a Leupold, I can’t notice any difference looking down the tube , both have outstanding clarity! Again , quality scopes with great glass at a fraction of the price as much higher end optics companies. Remember what I said above about how most of these companies buy their glass from Meopta ( which also manufactures rifle scopes themselves at much cheaper prices than the big name companies) Swarovski, Leica, Nightforce, Zeiss , and some others are very high end quality optics , but from my experience, a good quality Leupold is my Go To brand . What separates the big players from the others is when low light conditions come into play , you see a more crisp and clear sight picture and have a bit more of shooting light available, but you have to ask yourself “ is an extra 5-10 minutes of shooting light worth a price tag of 3 or 4 times ? “ a lot of that quality has to do with the coating on the glass itself which can be costly and that in itself will drive up the price of the scope . But , when it comes down to it , you get what you pay for . Also, NEVER skimp on your optics. A good rule of thumb is that the cost of your scope should be as much or more than your rifle itself. Assess your needs and shop accordingly. Ammo is another topic , but don’t skimp on that either , buy the best quality premium ammo you can afford, that hunt of a lifetime may only provide you with one opportunity.. MAKE IT COUNT AND HAVE NO REGRETS . Just be sure your rifle groups it well . Good luck and happy hunting .

@@NorthwoodsNomad Who makes a highly durable scope with milliradian increments on a sight reticle in the first lens, or what is it they refer to that as??? the first focal plane??? Do you recommend any sources to go to in order to learn about scopes for someone like me who knows nothing about scopes?

Me to,the same year with you.

Charlie P I’ve had one on my bucket list forever, and I’m looking at the Henry All Weather Model or the new X Model . There’s just something about holding a .45-70 in your hands that gives you the same confidence as driving a 379 Peterbuilt semi truck , when you know there isn’t much that it wouldn’t flatten lol 😂

What does a belt have to do with velocity ? Belts are just left overs from the old days. No use whatsoever.

24 vs 26 inch barrel. That's why?

If you understood physics you would understand why the short fat cartridge won the velocity contest. Let me help. Cut both the cases in half length wise so you can see the interior if the casing. The path from the primer to anywhere inside the 300 wsm is shorter than the 300 wm. What this means is the powder burns faster and hotter, thus more velocity. All the short fat cartridges are more efficient in this way. What is remarkable is that it too the arms and ammo makes so long (how many decades?) to figure this out.

I’d go 26”

I’d say 26 two. Works for Wetherbee. Can’t believe how poorly dictated that last message was. Need to proofread better

If the barrel lengths were the same, it would have been.

Is your Tika in .300 wsm? How do you manage recoil?

Limbsaver makes a model for the tikka

Did 44 mag vs 500 mag already

Coming soon

That is pretty nerdy 😆

Have to hit the lottery first

@@WHOTEEWHO well hurry up, I want to see the video. Lol

Lol .408 Cheytac is Ridiculously expensive. You should sponsor it and let him shoot it.

Agreed. It should have been in the 2950 range I think.