we really are 😀

We are...;-)

yes, especially when considering Sweden only have got a population of 9 million.

@@eric_cantona2198 make that 10.18 million (2018)...;-)

No it's not, in fact it's quite an average airplane very slow when fully loaded. But sweden has good marketing. The gripen cannot beat the Su-35 or any top end air superiority airplane.

Agreed! I also like those sharp turns!!!🙏

Really so! Not gliding on their belly like US and Sov-jets....

Bara att bygga fler. Ni kommer att ha en egen fabrik i Brasilien.

​@Prabhudutt Bisoi we have many things to put down when Brazil choose the Gripen Jet. We´re going to build it here what makes the costs go down, so we will learn how to do it producing more with less. Payload capability is nothing when you see better and has more number. France has long story selling us trash and USA would not give the main weapon code. Also our pilot wil have more flight time than your what can make the difference in a battle. What is Tejas? A kind of flight test garbage?

indeed amazing Gripen pilot

The name of the pilot: Lt. Máté Majerik. Hungarian Airforce. :)

Thank you! :)

Hungarian rhapsody

Andras Antal Csok SWEDEN IS BEST

Mis,sim5GA @@knightflightvideo

Thank you for kind comment! :)

Der Pilot war echt toll!

Nagy Magyarorzág ¡¡¡¡¡

Thank you! :)

That they do my friend, that they do.

Well said !!!

but ur country is so large, u need something that can fly a longer range, f35 ....LOL

@@steevoy9966 The Gripen E range with external tanks is 4000 km, enough to cross Canada from East to West coast without refuelling. The F35A is limited to 2,200 km, and is also slower. But even more important is the cost / benefit. Canada could buy 4 Gripens for the price of 1 F35, and the operating cost is a tiny fraction of the F35A. So more could be based around the country, instead of having to fly so far to respond to threats. And they can easily operate from highways too.

8 miljon actually. 2 millions are hottentots.

@@steevoy9966 Well, a large country need more planes. A longer range is just another word for showing up to late to the party.

Here's just the machine that's Swedish. It bears the Hungarian national flag and the pilot is Majerik Máté.

@ The computure limits your movement so you can jank it as hard as you like and it's still gonna pull 9G max. He is a good pilot but this is nothing new when it comes to the Gripen.

@@zoom5024 after all, we are SO PROUD of our Pilot from Hungary ;)

This display was designed and produced in Brazil. Swedish area force has definitely adopted!

@@PROV-g2g nej alla JAS piloter utbildas på F7

@@DetStoraMisstaget :)

I hope my government (Canada) shows the same wisdom that the government of Brazil did.

Thank you for saying that, greetings from Hungary! :)

As a Swede i must agree ! It seems like the Swedish Airforce pilots have more restrictions when they are doing their displays. Maybe they don`t want the full potential of Gripen shown to future oponents. You must correct me if i am totally wrong.

@@hakanpersson6524 I tend to agree this display was more lively, but I think the Swedish pilots look more precise and coordinated. Look at their 4-point rolls for example.

Obrigada. :)

Häng på full vapenlast och externt bränsle så blir resultatet annorlunda. Gripen passar bäst olastad i fredstid på flyguppvisningar. Räknar man med att eventuellt behöva använda flygplanen skarpt i krig så beställer man F-35.

@@jonasastrand9945 En F35 som inte kan skydda sitt land om det skulle bli dåligt väder..

@@jonasastrand9945 "Häng på full vapenlast och externt bränsle så blir resultatet annorlunda." Till skillnad från andra flygplan? Ah...Andra använder magi för att flyga!

what on earth does that have to do with this?

Thank you very much for the great compliment! Vielen Dank für den sehr netten Kommentar! :)

Danke, Volker! Dir auch noch einen schönen Sonntag! :)

Thank you! :)

Many thanks my friend! :)

You're welcome! :)

Thanks for watching and commenting, Jandro! :)

Thank you! :)

Vielen Dank, Daniel! Ja, live ist nochmal was anderes. Da geht der Sound richtig in die Magengrube. 😊Ich wünsch' Dir noch einen schönen Sonntag! 😊

Kann man beim nächsten Mal vorher eine Initiative starten , um diesen nervenden Moderator endlich einmal das M... zu stopfen? Der redete ohne Pause! ...vor allem, wenn die Jets im Tiefflug dahergekommen waren: wer sollte da etwa zuhören können...?

It is not faster than any other 4+ gen regardless you check with loadout or without loadout. It is hard to compare the price because most of Gripen customers bought and operates only a very few airframes, a part of them leased and only a fraction of the capabilities of the Gripen C is exploited. In know only the values of Hungary and the USAF operates cheaper their F-16s (~20k USD/FH) than if we count all expenditures and we divide with FH or Gripen fleet. But are lots of factors why this can happen. For ex. exchange rates of different currencies... Rafale has two engines with is a very huge cost factor.

Is your keyboard broken?

Well, it isn't. The price also depends on what model of the jet is in question.

It has always been designed to be a Flankers buster. It may not be as versatile as F-16 or Tejas.

@@molnibalage83 You can find the numbers from the Swedish airforce and it is about 4,7k USD/FH for the C/D version. Well below 20k USD/FH. Might of course be more expensive to buy (with no other trade offsets) but it really is the cheapest fully modern fighter out there to operate and maintain. Normally the purchase price is less than 10% of the total costs for having an aircraft serviced during it's lifspan...Hence the 39 is a really "cheap" fighter jet.

Hungarian gripen? Gripen is Swedish...

@@rickstrom5499 He means a Gripen flown by the Hungarian Air Force (like the one we're watching here). You can't be THAT stupid!

In the hands of a well trained experienced pilot, the Gripen can be a deadly formidable opponent.

Thank you for your kind comment! :)

Since the Flanker was the thought main air-to-air target of Gripen A, what you said was one of the design minimum targets when Gripen A was designed in the 80’s. The version in the video is the improved C version.

How?

@@johnraina4828 I don't know if it actually has but at least the gun works. The F-35 has been a pathetic comedy of errors up to this point. It's as if Lockheed-Martin has never designed a plane before.

@@AvroBellow Never heard claims of head to head. But it placed second in total redflag score in 2012, just behind the F-22. You also don´t have much use for your gun beyond visual range ;)

Why it is the best choice? Many 4+(+) fighter have in their config much higher combat capability. For ex. 0 Gripen C/D has AESA radar which is crucial especially if you do not have AWACS because its very quick scan rate. None of the C/D Gripen have MAWS. The wing fuel tanks limits it even ASF weapon qty. Yes, Gripen can be a good choice for some countries but calling it best without any remarks is simply funny. Comparing to an F-15SA the Gripen C/D in most of areas can be called outdated of simply inferior. Of course an F-15SA is much more expensive but it is in a different category...

Well, not necessarily.

​@@molnibalage83 The C/D version have different radar warning systems but no IR missile warning system. Otherwise an extensive EW suite. E/F version will have that and more. Wing fuel tanks take up space. That is true. Thats why the 39 have emphasis on using improvised runways and short turnaround times. It was never supposed to fly to the target for hours and drop a paveway and fly all the way home. It's supposed to go where the action is and stay in the area or close by. That is why stealth was deemed to be impractical to maintain in field conditions and thus excluded from the design. The C/D version can use the radar in a way that makes it have some advantages like the AESA. One aircraft can fly at a safe distance and use the radar while relaying that information and target data to other aircrafts that fly radar silent to get into position for a kill. Nice trick if I must say. Is the F-15SA good? Of course it is. It's super! Better than two 39 C/D? No I don't think so... And there we have the advantage with the 39's design. Very capable at a "modest" price, very low operational costs and good mission avaibility.

The man sitting in the cockpit... ;)

Charles Davis A Hungarian.

@@BasicModelling Astounding wit. you should be on the stage.

Lieutenant Máté Majerik

First Lieutenant Máté Majerik

Sustained negative g = fueldump. It's supposed to happen. No worries the plane is safe :)

Nope, Brazil won't get this! This is the old Gripen C, but I wonder if some show artificial performance limitations has been lifted now that Gripen E/F is near... That is the planes Brazil will get!

@@RogerJL Irrelevant semantics. The JAS-39E outperforms the C in pretty much every metric.

ตกลงทอ.ไทย จะสั่งกรีพเพ่นเอ็นจีหรือไม่ครับท่านป้อง..........อยากรู้คำตอบก่อนไม่หายใจครับ......

About $50,000,000USD each but they cost less than $5,000USD per hour to fly.

Dabei war der Freitag an dem das Video entstand noch der bessere Tag. Samstag war's dann richtig eklig. ;)

@@knightflightvideo ja habe den Stream angeschaut

😁🍺🍻