Thanks for the feedback, will do

You're awesome! :D

I’ve settled on red ones, but I’m still thinking about blue ones, my limit is $50, which ones do you use now for games (and not only music, for example) or which ones can you recommend for choosing?

The original ones (blue) are better for first-person shooters. Red is better for music and more immersive gaming. I still use my blue ones occasionally.

ty!@@ImAWSMDanny

which ones r better for that price for gaming?

Completely agreed, the headset still has very convenient features, but when it comes to sound, it is not close.

good to know, thanks

Lol

Thank you, appreciate it

Not sure about the effects of the sound card, but I would get the Crincle Zero (Blue version) if you mainly focus on gaming, and zero red if you listen to music as well

They are more than fine without it, pretty sure that’s just an improvement.

The Apple AirPod Pro 2 is very comfortable for me, but it is not really a suitable product if you use windows.

@@TechTicals I was talking more about wired iems, I tried airpods and other iems with same form factor but never really loved the sound, and delay is always there even if it's low

@@suncake_xd TANGZU Wan’er fits me best and provides me with most comfort, but I don't think the seal is the best but its nice. I came from truthear holas and I had the original Crinacle Zero and found them uncomfortable. All are ears are different though so do keep that in mind.

Yes, I was only using it with the adapter.

is it good for fps gaming such as valorant or cs ?@@TechTicals

Many IEM have high resistance due to the built-in driver they use and most phone does not have enough power to drive it. You will typically need to increase your phone volume up to 90% inorder to get a decent volume from the IEM. Try getting amplifier like moondrop Dawn Pro, it will make your iem sound even better.

I used them around 60% on my laptop, and 80% on my phone, with the included adapter, definitely loud enough for me

I hear the OG is better, I haven’t tried it so not sure. Try it on Amazon, you can swap it if you don’t like it.

For competitive gaming, yeah the og is better. i have both. But not like the red is bad in that aspect, blue is just better. For casual gaming, both are equal. But the red could be better for some games.

I have my reds on the way, But I can talk about the OGs are awesome for gaming, I will try using the bass adaptor from the reds with the OGs maybe even better :D

@@sincariucarturalbert1275any updates?

​@@zerotactix5739 hi there. I am confused between red vs blue. Which one to pick? I have only budget for one. I would use it for pubg, valorant , Apple music on my Android, normal media consumption like KZfaq and web series.

In terms of sound quality, yes

Just today I tried my new Simgot em6l (110€) vs my 150€ Sennheiser HD560S and theyre absolute fucking trash, like its not even close. Sending them back directly, didnt even wear them more than an hour

@@PrimusInvictus interesting

@@TechTicals I have the Super Mix 4 on order as well, hoping that they’re better. I skipped the Truthear x Crinacle in order to „be set“ for a while (skipping the 50€ iems to go straight to 110€ ones) so underwhelming. Going back to my HD560S, who granted, are boring af, but extremely clear and precise, was like removing mud from my ears after wearing the em6ls. When I put the em6ls in first and just joined a deathmatch to try them out i literally exclaimed loud „holy shit they’re so bad“

@@PrimusInvictus would be interesting to know what you settle with

Thank you, for now im happy with the audeze maxwell, but im interested in trying the IE200

Ok, I got the Crinable Zero, after EQ, this match, and surpass in some ways, my HD58X.

The video is about the sound quality in game, the headset still has many good features, when it comes to sound, the earphones are better.

You can buy a replacement cable with an inline mic or even one with a boom mic. Searching for one with a boom mic showed me the "Kinera Celest Ruyi".

I dunno, maybe get a decent 50$ mic along with the Zeros and you will get something that sounds better than what the headphone offers. (Even Crinacle says this btw)

iem cables are replaceable brother. Kinera Gramr wire is an example and the mic is much much better than most gaming headsets out there.

Without a brain, how can you function? 😂

I personally prefer wireless headsets all day, I like the convenience , I’m using Audeze Maxwell, but compared to most gaming headsets I’ve used, these $50 earphones sounded better.

@@TechTicals From Rtings, Audeze Maxwell Wireless is pretty good and the Steelseries has better Neutral Sound (Overall) and Gaming. Sound in terms of imaging, sound stages and distortions etc. I got the Steelseries Pro Wireless mainly due to the fact that it has a charging dock and I can swap the batteries for continuous gaming experience. As a Esports player who races 24 hour Online Racing races, the charging function is very helpful for me. But again, comparing a USD 299.99 Steelseries Arctis Pro Wireless to a Mid/Entry tier IEM, plus maybe a HyperX Solocast USD 59.99, you can get a 240USD IEM and still won't break the budget. You can also invest in software or amps and make it even better. So gaming ones are more like feature oriented and tries to multi-tast, while IEMs just do the simplest thing as a headphone/earphone right.

You haven't tried IEMs then, because gaming headsets like yours are actually just a pay to the brand and are not anything special when it comes to sound quality, the wireless factor and comfort is good as I also have wireless headsets, but the IEMs sound quality is unbeatable within the price range of your headset I can assure you even these 50$ IEMs even tho they sound like IEMs that cost 300-400$ beat any gaming headset in sound quality, and footsteps audio in games, i personally have logitech g pro x wireless headset, hyperx wireless headset and sony wireless, and I can assure you none of these beat these 50$ IEMs that I got 2 weeks ago, I use them for gym aswell as gaming, and they are my mains, I have my red version on the way that I will use only for gym and music

@@sincariucarturalbert1275 I have a pair of Audio Technica ATH-LS50iS IEM $85USD and they do not beat the Arctis Pro Wireless in terms of bass, neutral, and treble accuracy. Using Rtings, a trusted comparison website with tonnes of tests. The best open back monitor headset from Audio Technica is ATH-R70X that cost $350USD. If you put the Arctis Pro Wireless so called "Gaming headset" next to it, it has better Bass and Treble accuracy than the ATH. Your G Pro X does not even come near to the Arctis Pro Wireless, just change the search results and see for yourself. Bass Accuracy is a score of 9.1 vs 7.9. Mid accuracy 9.2 vs 9.0. Treble accuracy 8.0 vs 7.7; Peaks and dips, Imaging are all losing to the Arctis Pro Wireless by a HUGE margin. It mainly lost to the Steelseries from Standard Deviation due to the inconsistency of results. All the graphs, tables, are on Rtings website. Just type "Arctis Pro Wireless VS G Pro X" on Google and click on Rtings.com to have a look. I don't know what HyperX and Sony you are using, let's say you are using a HyperX Cloud III Wireless, the latest and best one from HyperX. it is still worse than the Arctis Pro Wireless by a huge margin. Bass accuracy: 9.1 vs 6.9; Mid accuracy 9.2 vs 9.3; Treble accuracy: 8.0 vs 7.4. Again, all the details and graphs are on Rtings. I am not saying the IEMs are bad. But the statement of "Even $50 IEMs are better than the best of Gaming Headsets" are wrong. The Arctis Pro Wireless is not even the strongest headset from SteelSeries now, they updated it and released it as Nova Pro Wireless. Here is the Rtings website as a proof: This is comparing the best of the Monitor headset of Audio Technica VS the Arctis Pro Wireless "Gaming" Headset. www.rtings.com/headphones/tools/compare/steelseries-arctis-pro-wireless-vs-audio-technica-ath-r70x/751/1955?usage=19&threshold=0.10

​@@sincariucarturalbert1275 I do have a pair of Audio Technica ATH-LS50iS IEM which costs around $85USD. The Steelseries Arctis Pro Wireless headset is better in all frequency response. It is even better than Audio Technica's best Open Back Monitor Headset "Audio-Technica ATH-R70x" in Bass and Treble Frequency according to RTings. And the G Pro X does not even come close to the audio quality of the Arctis Pro Wireless. Just look up RTings and play with the comparison tables. Idk why my previous long comment with details and proof got removed. Just google "Arctis Pro Wireless VS G Pro X" and choose the RTings page.

It is the wireless options and the attached mic that takes my interest, I spent a long time looking for IEMs that have both, but no proper options yet