More about the shifts and getting there is what’s exciting lol.

@@btowngolfr812 ….what , I mean it makes sense…

For real lol

Hahahahha

@@btowngolfr812 imagine being so sad and usless that you leave a shitty comment and think your Clever

Haha exactly

Forging these engines doesn’t really help them that much at all. Better to run big turbo and have a second engine spare.

No, there are much quicker stock motor Golf R’s/S3’s. If you look into other tunes like EQT/Sneakytuned, they make more power and will do a custom tune for you and your turbo. You don’t have to spend a bunch of money building the motor, these motors make good power with simple supporting bolt ons to for a larger turbo

Power is there in the golf, it’s just not geared for that top speed run

@@mcomarottis828 didnt leave off the line like a 500bhp golf at all. At stage 3 there still monsters up to 160mph. Shouldn’t have mattered too much here.

not with the mods that have gone into it

@@declancosford7701 you clearly don’t know how much a golf r costs to get to 500bhp then 😂😂 £3-5k max

yeah… you’d be really suprised when you find out there are £3k superbikes thatll smoke both these cars from factory lol.

@@HandHaben thats a completely different story tho? if i crash a car at 60 im more likely to survive than on a bike ay and power to weight is different so its irrelevant

@@HandHaben old bikes from the 90's too 😭

130hp shy of the lambo, at that... golf would have walked the lambo at 600, let alone 630

That’s a good way to look at it! 🥳

Yes but the golf is ugly the lambo isn’t. Put them both on a track and see who wins.

@@BigMike48 yes sir exactly golf is ugly trash 4 cylinder sounds like ass

@@Genny2Turbos don’t diss 4 bangers. Early 2000’s they ran the car scene. But golfs are ugly

@@BigMike48 man i have a 2016 mustang ecoboost 4 banger 🙄

He beat a turbo car not easy for a naturally aspirated engine

@@JUFFAIR101 still more powerful, and still tuned. Built and engineered for speed. The Golf is impressive tho

😍

I have their kit running 458awhp.. so roughtly 525-550hp at the crank depending on how you calculate the drivetrain loss. They are pretty concervative on numbers I guess

Yeah that would be 500hp crank lambo is probably 580 wheel

Huracan is stock its naturally aspirated no room for adding horsepower at most 20hp add Twin Turbo thats a totally different level Huracan

🙏

Big ego Volkswagen Golf drivers did😂

@@Itsnotyouitsme47 if they had the same hp. Then maybe awd would have beaten the aero …i drive a 2018 golf R.

Yea I thought that too. The lambo is just much more aerodynamic. Not much you could do to counter that kinda design in a tuner car. More power and mods to put the power down is your only option.

Polite of them 🤣

They are, even for the new 8th gen!

@@rambow70 glad to hear that! Manual Transmission cars are a dying breed, especially with the coming of EV and self-driving cars. It’s perhaps a dying art that I’m very nostalgic of. I just love having total control of my car while I’m shifting gears. Don’t really care if newer Automatics are faster on the strip.

They still do, my 2011 and 2017 GTIs were MT, but my 2021 DSG is just a different breed, I don’t think I could go back to a MT

I think some of the back of roads might allow it by me lol. some of them back roads are long

Thanks Jason, will do 🙏

With a turbo against no turbo

@@JUFFAIR101 The VW Golf GTI/R platform uses a small engine and a turbocharger instead of a naturally aspirated larger engine, to achieve similar power levels with less weight and better fuel economy. What is your point?

More than twice the price? More like 8 times the price

Plenty of fun 🤩

@@motorculturetv Getting Tom ready for the VW drags at Warwick

typical incel

Until it's time to go on a race track. How's that built Golf R handle on a real circuit? The Huracan has a proven track record no pun intended LOL. That's where the supecar money comes into play here. Everyone so concerned with straight line performance, 0-60, 1/4 mile and half mile exhibition and any jack off can buy a shit box slap a turbo on it get 500-600whp out of it and run 10's these days. Whoop de doo da! When you get that backyard project on a track or in the canyons with a real car you'll see why a supercar with all the engineering behind it wins on all levels.

Me too

Maybe it does... Wink Wink

Solid stuff 😅

He should really let the car drive for him poor lad can’t shift

couldn't agree more, id take a built 4 banger over a v8-10 anyday!

It takes a “built evo” that’s sad, the Golf R is stock block lol

@@Yaboybash true

Evos are fucking slow lmao.

Hint* The Golf R gets raped.

Racingline stage 3 is 460-480. Even quoted on there website.

@@IKenexPSN no it’s not it’s 490 look again

@@motographics still shite numbers

@@IKenexPSN not to insult or start a keyboard war of course ! ...i think your confused with HP VS BHP VS WHP ...Racingline kit is 490WHP take the 12% drivetrain loss off its 520-530BHP so identical or more than to your SA kits .. all the stage 3 kits on these EA888 engines are very similar. Because anything over 550BHP on a stock block is playing Russian roulette. on those figures its not a case of if the bottom end is going to blow up-its when. granted this video is poor all round, editing, the cast, the vehicles used etc, but i think your trying to slam something that in reality is very similar to what your used to.

@@motographics from what ive been told from an actual customer its 480BHP. No at the Wheels. Theres a video of Racingline’s demo car somewhere on youtube and that is also 480Bhp. And just a touch over 400WHP. The drive train loss with 4Motion is also predicted 16-18%. Sometimes even 20 depending. Anything over 520bhp is Russian roulette with these cars. And thats from douge at MRC who’s a god with them. Plenty of these blow up at stage 2. Some are invincible. Very odd as there seems to be no consistency with the 2.0TSI’s.