No video
Multiband Compression Is Better Than EQ, Here's Why
Рет қаралды 4,116
Күн бұрынToronto music producer and engineer 5PiECE overviews the benefits of using a multiband compressor over an EQ.
NEW VIDEOS EVERY THURSDAY 12PM EST
SUBSCRIBE If You’re New - / 5piece
___________________________________________
🔊 PLUGINS USED IN THIS VIDEO 🔊
FabFilter Pro Q3 - bit.ly/3q5B6k2
FabFilter Pro MB - bit.ly/3gE7QN7
___________________________________________
🎥 TUTORIALS MENTIONED IN THIS VIDEO 🎥
How To Use Dynamic EQ on Vocals (with FabFilter Pro Q3) - • How To Use Dynamic EQ ...
How To Compress Vocals - • How To Compress Vocals
How To Use Upward Compression - • How To Use Upward Comp...
___________________________________________
🎸SONG USED IN THIS VIDEO 🎹
“What To Say” by 5PiECE (Supported by FACTOR) - Coming Soon
___________________________________________
🎧 DISTRIBUTE YOUR MUSIC ONTO STREAMING 🎧
🤑 Use my VIP link for 7% off your first year’s membership at with DistroKid - www.distrokid.com/vip/5piece
___________________________________________
💸 WHERE TO FIND FUNDING FOR YOUR MUSIC 💸
📚 FREE EBOOK - bit.ly/3q0KU0z
___________________________________________
📲 SOCIAL MEDIA 📲
WEBSITE - www.5piecemusic.com
SPOTIFY - spoti.fi/3xq3C2q
INSTAGRAM - / 5piece
FACEBOOK - / 5piece
TWITTER - / 5piecemusic
KZfaq - / 5piece
___________________________________________
⏰ TIMESTAMPS ⏰
0:00 Introduction
1:42 Using MB Comp Like EQ
2:53 Difference Between MB Comp & EQ
3:31 MB Comp Vs. Static EQ Comparison
4:04 Dynamic EQ
4:51 Parameter Comparison
5:34 Why MB Comp Is Better Than EQ
6:22 MB Comp Vs. Dynamic EQ Comparison
7:11 Boosting Frequencies
7:41 Upward Compression
9:52 High Shelf Boost vs. Upward Compression Comparison
11:22 Conclusion
___________________________________________
🎞️ STOCK FOOTAGE & SOUND EFFECTS 🔈
Sound Effects from Gfx Sounds - gfxsounds.com
___________________________________________
DISCLOSURE: Some of the links on this page are affiliate links, meaning, at no additional cost to you, I may earn a commission if you click through and make a purchase and/or subscribe. Affiliate commissions help fund videos like this one.
Copyright 5PiECE Music 2022
@WIIMTheMusician 2 жыл бұрын
Most underrated audio engineer in the game
@5piece 2 жыл бұрын
Appreciate you ! 🙏🏼
@enzoeaj Жыл бұрын
He deserves his flowers..very underrated dude🙃
@DrMuhammadIbrahim Жыл бұрын
Great video and explanation!
@ADHIKARIMUSIC 2 жыл бұрын
Bro ur doing too good ❤️🔥🙏💿 lov uh bruh 💕
@5piece 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you ADHIKARI! Appreciate you 🙏🏼
@dodgingrain3695 11 ай бұрын
Generally, there is no effective advantage between a transparent multiband compressor vs a decent dynamic eq. Usually, compressors are used as much for their color as for their ability to control dynamics. It comes down to what change to an audio track is needed and how a specific tool behaves when determining what is best. Even some stock DAW dynamic eq's have ratio, attack, and release controls these days. To me the general rule of thumb is if I want color I go the compressor route, if I want transparency I go with a dynamic eq.
@MissionFireMix 2 жыл бұрын
I thought that dynamic eq is transparent because it doesn't cause phases issues like mb compressors. Thanks for the video 👍 I will use ReaXComp more often now🥳
@5piece 2 жыл бұрын
That’s a good note but most compressors and EQs don’t have built in phase functionality. Thankfully the Pro Q and Pro MB both do so I think the two of them are a fair comparison with a winner. However, if we are comparing other branded EQs and Comps that don’t have built in phase functionality like the FabFilter plugins, then yes, that would absolutely be a much bigger consideration
@MissionFireMix 2 жыл бұрын
@@5piece thanks for the reply 👍
@MissionFireMix 2 жыл бұрын
Waiting
@bavingeter423 2 жыл бұрын
What are your thoughts on multiband saturation/clipping? I use KClip pro3 and waves L3 multimaximizer in conjunction a lot in the mix and master
@5piece 2 жыл бұрын
I haven’t played with that on a multiband level a whole lot but it sounds interesting as I do love my saturation (and occassionally clipping too). I’ll look into it and get back to you with a more thorough review, thanks for mentioning it 🤙🏼
@bassbuzzmusic6681 2 жыл бұрын
Please make video on reverb when I use reverb it always sound muddy
@5piece 2 жыл бұрын
I think this video I did awhile ago should cover it and help, especially tip #4: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/kMWdm7Kox9jPdpc.html
@billesposito2112 Жыл бұрын
I hear the movement. I like the MB better for sure.
@billesposito2112 Жыл бұрын
How do find the frequencies with the MB ? Do u sweep with it like an EQ?
@5piece Жыл бұрын
Generally, yes. I like to create a new band and then SOLO the frequencies within it to identify the area I want to treat. You can sweep the band around just like an EQ, and even adjust the boundaries until you find what you want to address. Hope this helps.
@allcapsbeats Жыл бұрын
major hair envy watching this...but I managed to persevere until the end.
@nikolaudio Жыл бұрын
this is why i dislike static EQ. Theyre great for static problems, such as notching resonant frequencies that dont move etc, but not for dynamic content. USUALLY if youre boosting/cutting etc, you only want it at certain times, not all the time.
@GothClik 8 ай бұрын
So should u just use mb compression instead of anything else? Why do ppl even use eq
@LossLeadas Ай бұрын
because EQ can CUT basically roll off frequencies..so basically EQ vocals then add a MB
@MarcoPolux 6 ай бұрын
Pro Q3 is multi band. IMHO You could use it in all this examples as the MB. The only difference I think it’s the envelope for the MB. That small big thing makes it worthy to have both fab filters (mostly for transient shaping) not?
@5piece 6 ай бұрын
For sure. To be fair, I'm going to the extreme in this video (writing this comment longer after I posted it) and absolutely agree the two tools can be used inter-changeably. However, I do find MB Comp's pretty much always have the envelope related features guaranteed, whereas not every Dynamic EQ does. That alone is enough to push MB comp into the "winning" slot for me, since I love having maximum control. Does that mean I don't use dynamic EQ ever? No. But if given an choice between the two, I am more likely to reach for the MB personally for the reasons outlined in this video. If you have access to the same options on both (being a MB comp and dynamic EQ that both have envelope-controlling features), then the difference becomes much less noticeable or important as you can imagine. Overall, I'm just hoping this video makes people THINK before just using something at random since most tips are "use [insert mixing tool] for no specific reason whatsoever, just because" - I hope I've outlined good reasons why in this video, but perhaps I will revisit this idea in a future video. Thanks for watching!!
@MarcoPolux 5 ай бұрын
@@5piece Hey this comment may revive this old post and push the "algorithm" I agree with your comments. For me, in general, I believe the PRO Q3 is way more useful because, using good ingredients, most often I don't need the envelope in the ProMB, just with the "automatic" envelope on the ProQ3. This last one, I use when some bad ingredients I can't change (like try and mix the best something badly recorded live).... or to try and get to a special sound design. Subscribed 👍
SALEM EPISODES
Рет қаралды 579 М.
Jason Derulo
Рет қаралды 30 МЛН