Yeah, I want to turn it really bad because of it!

Turned down the volume while he was shooting

@@brycehiigel235 So did I. I wouldn't have minded the music if cut by about 50-60% in volume

So did I

i agree.... that was a nightmare. i think i got ear aids now.

😂🤣😂🤣

Lmfao😂

I agree

Genious

Hated the music it made vomit come up in my mouth

😂😂😂😂👍🏿👍🏿👍🏿👍🏿

Arrow looks like it has, NO, "Helical" ! Arizona EZ Fletch, THREE AAE Stealth Max's,.. w/ 3* Helical just,.. WORKS !

100% agree

Yes maybe now adding a 4 fletch to this tune is working out to help correct it...

Adding weight to the tail makes the arrow less stable. The further forward the arrow's center of gravity is of its center of pressure, the straighter and more stable the arrow's flight will be. It's almost always more efficient to achieve a desired degree of stability by sticking to three vanes and increasing their size (especially their height and rearward sweep) than it is to use more vanes of a given size.

@@Marmocet not exactly. Adding more weight to the rear of the arrow directly correlates with the amount of weight FOC. Your statement is correct in certain circumstances. If you add weight/drag to the rear end of an arrow with low FOC, yes it will make the arrow unstable. But an arrow with more weight FOC requires more weight/drag to stabilize.

@@nolesreign2594 FOC is a muddled concept. It's better to use the terminology that rocket scientists use. An arrow is stable so long as its center of mass (or center of gravity) is in front of its center of pressure. The further the center of mass is in front of the center of pressure, the more stable the arrow. An arrow's stability can be increased either by adding more weight to the front, moving the center of pressure aft by increasing fin/vane surface area at the rear (which adds weight to the rear, so there is a tradeoff), or both. If two otherwise identical arrows differ in position of their center of mass, the one with proportionally more weight to its rear will be less stable than the other. Adding a fourth vane to an arrow moves the arrow's center of pressure aft, but because the extra vane has mass, it also moves the arrow's center of mass aft. Usually, the center of pressure will move further aft than the center of mass, so there is a net increase in arrow stability. My point, and this is demonstrable using rocket design software, is that you can achieve the same rearward shift in the center of pressure with a smaller rearward shift in the center of mass, and hence a greater increase in arrow stability, by using three slightly larger vanes (height is the key parameter) instead of using a fourth vane.

@@Marmocet all that Is true, but doesn't pertain to what my comments were about. My point is that the heavier the point or broadhead, the more weight/drag needs to be added to the rear. Otherwise, why even use vanes or fletchings at all? For example, let's take a 410 grain arrow that has a 150 grain tip. 14% FOC. When shot the arrow will cast downwards relatively quickly, say 50 meters out of a 60# 325 FPS bow. If you add fletchings and pin nocks, now the total arrow weight is 435 grains 11% FOC. The heavier arrow will fly further before casting down, say 65 meters out of the same bow.

@@nolesreign2594 No, adding weight to the rear decreases the arrow's stability. What you're thinking of is that lighterweight arrows have less momentum and are more rapidly slowed down by friction with the air than heavier arrows, provided that the only difference between the heavier and lighter arrows is mass. For a given bow and a given arrow's aerodynamic properties, there is an optimal arrow weight that will give the flattest flight profile out to a given distance. If an arrow weighs less than that optimal weight, the best way to increase its weight without affecting its stability or spine is to insert a weight tube into its shaft. Weight tubes don't move the arrow's center of gravity, whereas adding weight to the tail moves the center of gravity further from the nose and toward the arrow's center of pressure, which makes the arrow less stable. Arrows don't nose down because the tip is heavier than the tail. They nose down because they're falling towards the ground, and the slower they travel, the more they fall per unit of horizontal distance. The ideal arrow would have a massless arrow shaft, massless nocks and vanes, and have 100% of its mass concentrated at the tip.

Love the vids SoloCam keep them comming !

Be carefull 😂😂

You are right. The last shot fired was definitely a 4 fletch, and maybe one more arrow in that volley could have been 4 fletch.

dw hunter 🤫sshhh, you’ll start a new trend hype and drive up the cost of feathers lol

Not if they get wet

@@dereksteele2284 what dummy bow hunts in the rain ? No blood trail. They make duck powder and plastic bags if a fellow HAS to hunt in the rain.

@@dwhunter8904 where I'm at, it's always damp, and having your arrows rubbin' on wet brush would ruin feathers. And u don't need a blood trail if you make a good shot, dummy

@@dereksteele2284 Ha Ha….keep hunting rookie, you’ll see 😂

They don’t shoot broadheads

Some do

Luke Sanders I was this thing the opposite. It seems to me if the target distance is short the sooner the arrow is lined out (paradox and yaw) the better and at a close distance the four fletch won't affect speed enough to count against accuracy.

True that ...

Really....

It would have been nominal at that arrow weight. Talking a few grains difference between the 3 and 4 fletched arrows.

i just shot my neighbor in a fit of rage after listening to it!

That is a possibility. Maybe try paper or bare shaft tunning just to get that last step. If it is off just a little it will speed them up that much!

I always paper tune with a bare shaft. Having said that, if your arrow isnt cut and built properly, that insert can be glued in out of concentric (Learned through multiple arrow manufacture's schools). When i used to build arrows for a shop, Id always use a dial indicator on a jig to make sure those inserts were square with the rest of the arrow. Ive seen some where .030 to .050 would cause drastic garbage flight on a fixed blade broad head. My solution for me was to shoot mechanicals. No more arrow tuning and no flight issues.

I agree with bill 100%, I've never had a broadhead that I cannot get to group together. 4 fletching is useless, 3 fletch with helical is all you need!

@@79brumley what distance do you shoot?

@@hoythunter4853 Out to 100 yards, I have a 70 yard video on my channel!