That’s pretty cool to be a part of something like this. I’m a mechanical engineering student any tips?

We made some of the piezoelectric parts for focusing the mirrors - in Massachusetts, all the way across the country from CA. It takes a lot of work by lots of people to get something like that going. Those who can, do; those who can not, sit around and complain about those who do - such as, why did we get paid for doing things :-)

Be in the right place at the right time, like Forrest Gump. :-) @@ExclusivelyC4

Your contribution is very much appreciated!

Kudos Sir

Yeah but history tells us its right around the corner, maybe not our corner, but soon, in the landscape of world history.

It's soooooo much closer to reality than it was a year ago though.

@@Studio23Media Not really, or at least not thanks to this "breakthrough". The approach the NIF took would be absolutely absurd for putting power on the grid. ITER is much more likely to contribute useful science.

Doing fusion is easy, just take a hydrogen bomb.

Viable hot fusion power stations have always been 20 years in the future - since the mid-1950s. You might want to study and learn the connections between "cold fusion" and the events of 9/11 to understand why we are forced to use either fossil fuels or not-really-renewable energy systems now. It's serious.

shooting a f ton of lasers at something with giant capacitors is a breakthrough?? this is shlt they where doing 60 years ago. this is a scam

Us

😊😅

😢

Centuries

LOL

Sure except they are completely full of sh_t and biased towards Marxism when it comes to reporting any news related to politics. Years ago I liked 60 minutes. Not anymore

It's not a question any more, I made it up this hill. He was Hindu Yea so we made it to our destination...🤔

I get most of my comfort from seeing the word "breakthrough" in millions of articles in dozens of scientific journals and realizing none of them have ever led to a commercial product

I get confort by choosing a bicycle over a car or a plane... "unfortunately", I do have to take a train occasionally.

Exactly…

Physicists are first of all engineers.

Like most people with ZERO knowledge of the subject, you falsely assume that engineers haven't been involved from the beginning. This is a tool to probe plasma physics for nuclear weapons. They just used this event as a PR kick to get more funding but it will NEVER be a practical means of power production and it was never intended to do so. The Holhraums alone cost about $100k apiece to make, and store a few pennies' worth of energy. Economics will never favor this approach, ever, even if all of the technical issues disappeared.

And yet this is the first time we've actually achieved ignition so

Greatest advancement in humankind: "bro hurry up!"

Now we are 15 years away.

Fusion power is like Mexico, it’s great to talk about, especially on “60 Minutes of BS” and each will always have a bright future.

tomorrow never comes.. its always tomorrow..

We also don't have decades left to turn this 'Titanic' around. The vast majority of the Earth's 8.0+ billion humans have become masterful at excluding the following two warnings from their consciousness. I urge readers to search for the following two article titles. IPCC report: ‘now or never’ if world is to stave off climate disaster (TheGuardian) UN chief: World has less than 2 years to avoid 'runaway climate change' (TheHill) * This statement was made 5 years ago.

Until it accidently explodes, and your whole house is gone.

​@@MuradsaharThe sun is dying in billions of years buddy. You'd be better off worrying about your own imminent death! That's what I do! It works out great for me.

@@murrmurr765 We are talking about small nuclear powered sources, which you can have in your house, for electricity! Not the sun itself.

​@@Muradsaharmight be the most head scratching comment ive ever read.

What was your monthly electric bill prior? What was the total cost to get your house off the grid? Have you made your money back in cost savings yet?

It's called propaganda.

And every 60 minutes host will be long dead and buried before we see the fruits of what they stupidly call a "breakthrough"

@@rob1248996i think propaganda would be the opposite, like bias statements on news channels… or almost any statement…

She identifies as a woman actually

@@lemmon.pngpablo1450 Designed to keep the money flowing into the already massive useless jobs program.

You likely missed the fact that NIF has always been primarily funded as a thermonuclear weapon (H-bomb) explosion simulation tool. It serves, in a reverse engineered sense as a thermonuclear explosive that shrinks the explosion center down to a microscopic bit of fusion fuel that has been extremely compressed and heated to plasma temperatures. The challenges of creating the precisely focused compressive forces in NIF are largely derived from and borrowed from the designs of the thermonuclear weapon secondary explosive component. The NIF administrators have become masterful in obscuring the primary function and funding for the NIF at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), whenever they present the lab to the press and the general public. It's been estimated that approximately $11-billion has been spent on NIF so far from federal revenues.

It’s will destroy our environment

The vast majority of Earth's 8.0+ billion humans have become masterful in excluding the following warnings from their consciousness. I urge readers to search for the following article titles. IPCC report: ‘now or never’ if world is to stave off climate disaster (TheGuardian) UN chief: World has less than 2 years to avoid 'runaway climate change' (TheHill) * This statement was made 5 years ago.

Coming from a person who's hometown in Arizona started improving after an electric car company came in, I would say yes. The lithium mining at the Salton Sea will most likely benefit the community there. People will be needed to operate this plant, so they'll probably hire specialists to relocate/work there as well as hire locals for everything a specialist wouldn't be needed to do (labor). So, there'll be more people going into the Salton Sea area and more locals with a reason to stay. The benefits of having this plant come into that town specifically won't be on some grand scale, unless more attractions are created, but it will be something. Having a large company roll into a city that's otherwise completely unknown, really boosts moral for those who live there and it will create new jobs for the locals, even if the company is profiting much more than them.

"Money". The only other dirty words I know that come before it is; "Profit" and "Greed", and the effect of these words turns into such words as "Envy" and "Hatred". A good direction for our kids?

very insightful, although fusion power is closer than we imagine and at a commercially scalable level too.. I completely agree about the uneven distribution of economic benefits from any major project etc. The masses will still benefit but not as much as some of the top tier population, especially a sector like mining where corruption is difficult to trace and curb it will be more palpable.

​@@luciesuevas9534 Yes, but the more people involved are there the more expensive the lithium ends up and cannot compete with other sources . Besides batteries without lithium, with much higher energy density are in the works now, so this whole effort may fizzle away... Typical worn out 60 minutes story, worth 60 seconds .

Nuclear (pronounced new-klee-ur) power, like all centralized power systems, requires long-distance transmission lines connected to complex regional utility grids, both of which remain vulnerable to power outage. State of the art power is rooftop solar 'matched' to small battery BEV and PHEV plug-in hybrid vehicles in the garage or carport connected to neighborhood minigrids. Tell 60 minutes about it though their corporate board of directors already know and don't care.

I am impressed with the accuracy and detail of your recollection. I work at the facility you are describing and when you would have seen it in the 80s it was still the 24 beam system which could deliver about 2kilojoules of light to a target. It was upgraded in the 90s to the current 60 beam system which does about 30kJ on target and produces maximum fusion yields of around 10^14 neutrons per shot. In the mid 2000s we added a second laser system to the first which can simultaneously deliver a 2 petawatt pulse of light to the target. If you're feeling nostalgic, you can see the state of the system when you last observed it in a documentary on my page narrated by Neil Armstrong. We're an unclassified facility and still conduct tours for the public if you want to visit. The whole place is probably about 5 times larger than when you saw it last.

I was absolutely fascinated by this story..anytime a life changing or generational changing discovery is made I am intrigued..especially when the scientists claim they can make an explosion that as hot as the center of the sun!! the little 'bullet' they make to power the whole thing is amazing in and of itself! and then glued with an eyelash?? omg!! then polished 100x smoother than a mirror..and its smaller than a BB and filled with hydrogen at some ridiculously low temperature..and then 190 lasers as long as a football field will combine their energy to fire at that 'bullet'..I was honestly surprised the thing that held the BB was still intact somewhat..you would think at temperatures never achieved before in mankind would just evaporate everything it came into contact with..that kind of confused me but I am still in awe at the overall magnitude of what these amazing scientists are trying to achieve..they tried and failed for 13 years..talk about perseverance!!! what also caught my attention was both your response and bigkahuna's..I live in the Finger Lakes area, Geneva specifically, and travel and work in Rochester regularly..it's an amazing city rich in science and research history..the affect Kodak had on Rochester and then the entire world is just mind boggling..I am not surprised they had their hands in scientific experimentation..I attended RIT in the mid 80s as a math major and have always been fascinated with science and the amazing accomplishments that have happened..especially the last 10 years or so..I would LOVE to visit this facility you speak of!! whereabouts in Rochester is it located?

This is such and amazing story .this made my day .

@@johnnyaxe2004 it's at the UofR

Take a nap at 5.

😅

Hadn't heard that one myself but we're closer than ever so don't confuse the excitement and enthusiasm of physicists with timelines. The science is also evolving faster than it ever has. In the mean time, I'm taking some solace in the fact that fission power is becoming viable again now that people are seeing some seas warming over 100 F.

AI, once it develops a little more, is going to acccelerate breakthroughs like this at a mind-numbing pace. Once they are self-learning and the singularity is reached, many of the issues that humans have been stuck on will be solved at an uncomfortable speed.

I expect that 20 years from now, fusion energy will be only 20 years away. (I'd love to be wrong.)

@@ncdave4life I'd love you to be wrong too but I doubt it. It's clear they are pretending to have massive breakthroughs but in reality, it's going nowhere

@@SurelyYewJest common joke that it's always a couple decades away.

Congrats on learning how progress is made.

But not we have AI too. Let alone quantum computing breakthroughs. Progress should definitely be accelerated.

Not only is it as far away as it was 30 years ago. But. 30 years ago they told us fusion would be so cheap it would be essentially free. No one is talking about how much it will cost anymore. So will probably be unaffordable.

Lets hope AI can do the science before the decade is over

It's interesting how many people lack an understanding of history.

the people who built the great pyramids had it..... wonder what knowledge was lost?

I always thought its 20 years away?

@@wolfgangpreier9160 30? :D

@@wolfgangpreier9160 more like 50.

it always 10 years away...next year it will still be 10 years away >

Its 199 million kilometers away.🎉🎉🎉

Thorium reactors are too dirty and have not been proven to be a worthwhile alternative.

It's gonna get real interesting

@@user-fs7df1xg9v If you could ask a question what would you ask. If you have whistleblower of interest which one?

Why do you need the government to confirm? You can find all the evidence yourself, whatever it is floating around has clearly been here for a long time and is clearly aware of us, yet they don't want to make contact. They might of help us along the way but they definitely don't want permanent contract.

"Eyewitnesses" of Extraterrestrials again ? 😂🤣🙃💀

So far they are getting 1/3 more power than they are putting into it by a mammoth facility. If they are using pure hydrogen that might be nice but is it doable. Since 60 Minutes technical knowhow is rather limited it could be a deuterium-tritium mix which could prove expensive. The use of lithium greatly reduced the size and expense of the hydrogen bomb, even then they still used fissile material to get the fusion to work. I will be more impressed with a sustainable reaction which this is not. The Manhattan Project had a sustainable fission reaction, and in this project they are fusing and object smaller than a BB for one pop. I also wonder when you are producing megawatts or gigawatts of power will the helium and iron production remain insignificant or will it become a problem like carbon dioxide is for hydrocarbons?

@@katrinaanon1038 On the helium, it should reduce the current amount of hydrocarbons used to extract the helium currently being produced. Donno about the iron, how much is being produced?

@@katrinaanon1038 they are generating about 3% of the power they are spending and even that 3% is in a form we can't use and will suffer losses being transformed. They are lying to you.

The laser consumed more energy than the fusion produced. And I think they are lying about it producing fusion, because there is no excess energy. LENR (Cold Fusion) is the only fusion that has produced real, measurable, net excess energy. It has been verified now.

The bad thing is lots of these components are made in China, and eventually will need Overhaulin’ and upgrading to get the desired results. Everything is contracted out to different countries . The city I live in manufactured the first Apollo landing on the moon. Also, they manufactured a challenger all that is gone. Now all that’s left on the huge site is a Kaiser Hospital, a huge mall and a Huge museum actually a unique museum that shows everything about all it’s achievements for space exploration there’s event, the Apollo castle, the original one there along with space suits pictures in and anything related. Nowadays, everything is contracted out to different states, including China what a shame

That's why we should stop burning oil for fuel. It's just too precious to burn it.

, at current consumption, we have by some accounts an estimated 47 years of oil left to be extracted. That equates to somewhere in the region of 1.65 trillion barrels of proven oil reserves. Other sources up this estimate a bit, but most agree we have around 50 years left, give or take. For reference, a barrel of crude oil is about 42 gallons or about 159 liters. With regards to other fossil fuels, we have an estimated 53 years of natural gas, and 114 years of coal left to rip out of the ground.

Synthetic Oil???

First lets shrink the cosmetics industry. Go to the market and look how many damn useless pastes and stuff you can count that have no use but massive marketing.

Oil is used to form plastics because it sits at a high energy state (that's why it's such a great fuel). The vast majority of chemical reactions used by industry starts with high-energy ingredients, and go down the energy gradient. That allows the reactions to proceed "for free" in terms of energy cost. (This a general rule, not a hard and fast rule. There are notable exceptions. e.g. Fertilizer manufacturing requires lots of energy to create ammonia. Bauxite requires lots of energy to convert into aluminum.) So we get plastics from oil because that's the cheapest way to create polymers (in terms of energy cost). Plants create natural polymers (wood) by going up the energy gradient, using energy from sunlight. With easy access to cheap energy, our chemists would be freed from the shackles of energy cost, and able to explore ways to create artificial polymers from base materials by going up the energy gradient. Instead of relying on starting with oil and going down the energy gradient. It's also worth mentioning that one of the primary benefits of plastic (resistance against biodegradation) is also the reason it's a problem (it's slow to break down if improperly disposed, because it only breaks down via UV light in sunlight). And this same advantage/problem would apply to other artificial polymers we develop. In fact plants evolved wood (basically very long chains of sugars) to thwart animals which were eating them for sustenance (to get at the energy stored in the sugar). To date, only specialized bacteria are able to break down cellulose into shorter chains like starch and sugar. And herbivorous animals have a symbiotic relationship with these bacteria in their gut. There have been a few instances of bacteria developing the ability to break down plastics. So in a few thousand years I expect the problem of plastic waste in the environment will take care of itself. Plastic still sits at a pretty high energy state (why it burns so readily), so any bacteria which can break it down will tap into a new energy source.

Isn’t this the first time humans ever did this? So I guess it’s a breakthrough, furthermore advancements will be milestones.

@scalemodeltutor9841 If you're referring to the nif, then they have done this before, just not extra energy out from the reaction than the laser input but not the whole system still. Others have also called it a milestone from kyle to thunderfoot and some others who went over. It is impressive, but not a breakthrough the news makes it out to be. From what I and others understand, a breakthrough would be net gain or more energy out than the whole system.

It's pretty meaningless since the energy required to fire the lasers and run all the computers and equipment in the facility was not taken into account in order to make it sound like it's more momentous than it actually is. They put in two units of laser/heat energy and got out 3 units of heat energy. They would've had to get 1000s of units out in order to come close to breaking even on the energy consumption of the experiment. Don't forget, that heat energy has to be turned into electricity and there is a huge loss in the conversion.

@The1stDukeDroklar agree enough. I believe it was 3million out put of the 2million input from lasers but around 400million into the system. So about 133x or 0.0075 percent output, not to efficient and most likely not going to be for some time. I wonder how efficient those flash lamps are that add energy to the lasers?

@@mr.ackermann807 Yes, 2 MJ in and they got 3 MJ out. Keep in mind that it's two different kinds of energy people are getting confused about. The MJ they are talking about is heat energy provided by the lasers and 3 mj of heat energy released by the reaction. Any heat energy released would have to be converted into electricity through the same old process of heating steam to turn turbines that would convert the heat into electricity. So, when everything is said and done they used 100s of MJ of actual electricity to generate 1 lousy mj of heat for a fraction of a second. It simply isn't a viable approach.

it all sounds nice in theory, but theres still so many problems with no solution in sight. im more convinced that our current civilisation wont live long enough to profit of fusion energy.

@@pukcip83 AI is a game changer. If it's aligned, it will take care of all of these hurdles in no time.

​@@Adam-nw1vyAI fanatics are a frightening sight.

@@androwaydie4081 KZfaq know-it-all's are such an embarrassment.

There are other types as well 😮

It's for TV ... and as usual, American TV producers Don't think that the average American can focus more than 39 minutes 😂😅 and that might be the truth.

Budget cuts.

It doesn’t account for commercial breaks if broadcasted on over the air TV.

they just disproved God

there are some smart people in this world which brings back hope for our species in my mind. She is definitely one. What an interesting thing to study.

It's nice to see both a pro-Science and spiritual remark in the same remark. That is a rarity these days. As a science-accepting spiritual theist we need more of this on the internet.

@@0397rb we can’t make scientific breakthrough simply because it’s a sin? I feel like not religion, but religious people are trying to hold humanity back

@@EperogiLimousine they definitely are.

When you consider the yield on the tiny spheres essential to get this thing working and yet it is not sustainable...remember the Manhattan Project was a sustainable fission reaction...and this one is one shot before they have to recharge the whole system to generate that billionth of a second pulse, you may have to wait until the 24th Century before they can get this thing to be practical..

Free energy! It's been around for a long time.

Everything is energy. Energy creates life.

Zero point energy has been around for decades- and suppressed. Check it out. There are many extremely wealthy individuals that will do anything to stop this from occurring.

@@kamakaziozzie3038 They've killed many people to keep free energy technology suppressed. It's right around the corner though, they can't stop the truth.

Just knots, not knots per hour.

Yup its running on nuclear fission which breaks atoms and creates radioactive waste. Fusion fuses atoms together,creates way more power energy and doesn't have radioactive waste. It would be nice if giant cargo ships could run on nuclear power but it'd be very dangerous due to accident risk and hijacking risk. It's possible fusion powered cargo ships could be safer since no risk of radioactive ☢ meltdown or crash poisoning the waters.

@@michaelbrinks8089 Sadly, that ain't the case. Fusion will produce prodigious amounts of energetic neutrons which will happily make other materials radioactive or toxic in one way or another. Fusion reactors will have to be very well shielded. High energy neutrons will happily convert phosphorus atoms in your DNA to silicon, the first step to becoming a borg :)

@@michaelbrinks8089 Nuclear submarines typically store their spent nuclear fuel on board until the submarine reaches a port where the fuel can be offloaded and transported to a nuclear waste storage facility. The process of handling and disposing of nuclear waste is highly regulated and requires strict safety protocols to ensure that the waste is handled in a way that minimizes the risk of harm to people and the environment. There is a common misconception that nuclear waste is just pumped out of the system as it runs, like exhaust from an engine. This is simply not the case. The nuclear waste is just the collection of radioactive isotopes (think of individual atoms of rare metals) that are trapped within the fuel. Once the core has served its useful life, currently around 30-40 years, then it is cut out of the ship and replaced with a new one.

@@nickg1895 Yeah, I dunno all the specific details but knew the dangerous radioactive ☢ waste obviously remained in the sub until it could be safely offloaded and knew it's not released like some sort of engine exhaust. I'm not sure if or how my previous comment made you think I had a misconception that the waste somehow gets expelled out of the sub.

That’s a fascinating idea.

@@S1nster The people profiting on the rest of us is not interested in the progress of others, they're interested in money and power.

@@S1nster Thats why we use billions of tons of fossile fuels in both vehicles and power generation while there are truly fossile free alternatives just waiting to be used, right? Thats why hundreds of thousands each year get lung cancer from burning coal while nuclear could have been used and recycled right? Nope, it's because there are entities that profits from human suffering and those entities comes first, always.

You don't understand how technology spreads. The powers that be never wanted Russia to get nukes. Almost as if their agency isn't what you'd think!

They ain't gonna stop nothing.

The powers didn't stop electric cars the first time. Poor vehicles and lack of market did. You won't see anyone stop fusion either because for commercial level production, the tech will always be 20 years away. Fusion is relatively easy, mass production of it isn't ..

Too bad all of Stellantis' vehicles are junk.

Stellantis Vehicles are built like crap. So I am neither impressed nor excited.

@@benluciano4980 Junk in what sense? We hardly get any of them here in America except RAM and stuff. RAM trucks aren't super popular but I've liked the newer ones work mates drove. Hardly any vehicles aren't junk tbh

​@@off6848quit driving RAMs and you'll change your opinion a bit

@@off6848 you think a ram is a nice truck. Tells us all we need to know.

39:28 Remember Michal Faraday. What is the use of a newborn baby? Thanks to relentless efforts by our scientists that has brought us comforts.. ans some discomforts

the biggest problem with fusion is containment having the gravity or magnetic field to force the atoms to stay where they are and continue fusing

@@claybair4904 The biggest challenge is to create more energy than it costs in input and confinement pressure. The Sun gets this for free from gravity.

Not in the next 20 to 30yrs

Government did not build the planes. The most successful aircraft were built to satisfy private demand.

People don't bother to inform themselves about anything, so they lap this Buck Rogers stuff up like Pavlovian dogs. Indeed, the Gen IV SMCs that are about to come online here (already online in China and Russia) can solve energy issues for millennia, but they're too simple, too "boring", and too practical and therefore they are not a part of the Bread and Circuses narrative.

shooting lasers at things.. real incredible

@@williesreserve7475 You don't know much about the complexity of this task.

@@PromethorYT they where doing this 60 years ago and they literally tell you what they are doing. it doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure this out.. they shoot 300 units of energy at the target and only get 3 units back. the 3 units they get back is not even new energy it is just the aftershock of the 300 units shot at. this is nothing more than a scam

You're not wrong, but there is also a ton of energy used to generate our current systems as well. This is why we need to begin discussing scale ability.

It's a very expensive ignition system. There could be other ways to start the fusion process as well...but lasers just kinda work for now :D

*You mean in another 100 years?*

Or longer heheheh( depends on how much they can milk the taxpayer for).

Energy and power are not the same thing.

Do post back in 20 years. Whether you will still be an optimist is the question ..

I sadly disagree. Fusion won’t be free energy for all. It will be “free energy” for those producing it. Everyone else will still pay just as much

The first computer used lead tubes and punch cards. Free power??? Is gas free, is coal free, is electric free, is solar free? Solar breaks needs repair, replacements etc. Does it ever pay itself off? They use your taxes to make this, but free? Not!

Actually the first computer was a wooden frame with beads on it. It could add, subtract, multiply, divide.

Good analogy.

Well said, the video makes it seem that they actually got more energy out then they put in, wich isn't nearly the case, as you explained very well.

🌎: "🧐 😶 🤗 🤔"

They seem to be moving backward. Other reactors can sustain fusion for multiple seconds. I think the record is a minute or two. Fusion is the easy part (that's been done for decades). Containing it without losing energy, while efficiently extracting energy is the challenge. The brake though that alludes everyone is not fusion, but efficient containment. This one is only a fraction of a second...back to where it all started. Hydrogen bombs. Basically this is a tiny hydrogen bomb that isn't putting any focus on containment whatsoever, just like a big hydrogen bomb. All they're learning from this, is how to make better hydrogen bombs (in a way that circumvents international bans for testing hydrogen bombs).

The reported experiment at the National Ignition Facility (NIF) took approximately a week to set up but the actual nuclear fusion reaction lasted for approximately 0.000,000,000,08 second. There was no significant amount of propagation of the reaction in the microscopic portion of the fuel that did react and approximately 96% of the extremely expensive fuel was blasted away before it could react. The maximum shot rate of the enormous NIF lasers is about one shot per day. It is rare to get anywhere close to that rate. Since this announcement , almost 1.5 years ago, only a few of the NIF shots have gotten close to this announced shot.

i'd wait to invest in much. check out the ufo disclosure stuff we already have 0-point energy same tech Nikola tesla had once theorized.

What about cobalt required, mined by the children slaves in Africa?

@@JDAbelRN i don't agree with the practice, and hope it can be addressed quickly, but if i let that influence my decisions, i wouldn't be able to participate in modern society.

Mining lithium they will lie and tell you it's safe and clean . Like I say lie because they want their greasy hands on the fast cash . Unless a battery for a car can average 750 plus miles of range and sustain that power for over 5 years of use in any climate . I see it as a huge waste and going to create more problems even esp in disposing of them for the planet . Our nation's power grid cannot handle every car and truck charging daily . My thoughts . Go tell these companies that wanna mine it fly in a lithium powered air plane to prove it's all good

⁠@@JDAbelRNAs you type this from a phone or computer? Way to be a revolutionary , comrade 🫡

You will make t to 2100. They will perfect growing replaceable organs/ cloning by the time you need them. In addition, many other advancements will be available to extend your life considerably.

@@georgeanddaddecker7563 Do you really think that "they" would let "you" or "I" live forever? Think about it

Fusion is still far from reality

​@@georgeanddaddecker7563 yes, say 10 or twenty years.

Tequila salad, that is reserved for the owners of this planet.

The Soviets did it right. Everyone needs radioisotope thermoelectric generators in their house.

Theyre neat but they have a couple of problems.They produce a lot of plutonium that could be used in bombs and the only molten salt reactor they tested had quite a few of problems. Watt for Watt renewable energies are juat way cheaper than any other form of energy generation.

@@cheafchecker72 (was a joke)

@@DanniDuck didn’t even saw your comment lol was supposed to be under the first one lol

@@cheafchecker72 Seems unrealistic considering one could make a hydrogen bomb without plutonium just need uranium and tritium.

What will it be powered by?

@@floyd3276 New to fusion? Magnetic confinement is the most promising of tech that isn't very promising thus extensions given on when commercial fusion is likely. The only method that does work is well beyond our abilities (now and forever) and that is gravitational confinement

Laser fusion is probably the least viable method achieve sustainable fusion, and it's beyond frustrating seeing this colossal waste of time and money technology get so much media attention.

I, Too, am a pompous at-home scientist who believes lasers are a poor and inefficient way to add energy to the fusion reaction. I actually invented the original model for a goobly-dooble magnetic fusion super reactor, which even in theory is much better than this! Seriously though, yall sound like some real fun people to be around. Nobody is impressed with your at-home science skills.

@@lostchild7774 I think you just proved that you are the most remedial of us "home scientists" for nothing was said that isn't common knowledge

No The reactor that helion is building is going to work in 2028 it is going to work before that reactor

In an alternate world, Elon Musk spent 44 billion investing into fusion energy instead of buying a social platform and losing most of his money.

@@Litkeen He probably saved the world this way. One sided pro government Twitter propaganda did a big number on the populace now tides are turning.

What operates inside a liquid lead sphere? Laser spallation usually occurs on the surface of solid materials.

@@off6848 Riiiiiigghhhht. Paying fascists and misogynists to "tweet" hate speech is going to "save the world".

Lithium will always be handy to have, to the plants building for it will find plenty of customers regardless.

What do you do with all of that Iodine-131?

@@timogul Yep, I don't deny that.