Same, would be a better movie without the verbal propaganda!

@@EthanBonardel 🤡

Yes

they did, its called walking with dinosaurs

Exactly! Pure eye candy.

Walking with Dinosaurs was shite.

@@aciddrive1019 brainlet take

The people need a Netflix “Walking with Dinosaurs” narrated by Sir David

@@danielv1617 No, it should be narrated by somebody who isn’t a preaching, patronising, sanctimonious bore. Somebody who hasn’t spent the last sixty years standing on the shoulders of giants.

@@aciddrive409Yeah!! Donald Trump should do it I'm sick of all this global warming nonsense, Down with joe biden, me and you bro, forever 🤗

And is able to float and teleport

Yeah, he's been drinking nothing but formaldehyde for 65 million years. Amazing preservative, that.

@@theloneranger8725 the camera man is a God confirmed

😀

@@Meme_Hobo lol

He didn't make this :/

It was 66 million years ago the dinosaurs went extinct .. the title is wrong

@@salmonhippo9824 They didn't say this to him. To the creators.

This is not a realistic view of our world 65 million years ago, Giganotosaurus and T Rex did not exist in the same time period and T Rex did not have feathers

@@sumbitch3rdgen They didnt even exist 65 million years ago. The mass extinction that ended the mesozoic era took place 66 million years ago.

68th like

Let's just think about the fact that living beings started to use noises (in order to communicate) only after a certain period of time. Early animals weren't able to growl, scream or bark and they used scents, magnetism, touch and light instead. Earth in that period was a silent planet, water fire wind and earthquakes were the only things able to produce sound and I can only imagine how alone and lost a human would feel there.

Looks so fake man :P

@@louiefence6579 because cgi and this isn't what dinos sound like

I kinda wish they used this logic thought the films, like the first jp did, yea big music pieces are needed but you can create allot of tension with very little, also we don’t need corny characters. Ian malcom was eccentric but he was also sexist a bit of a dick, but then got serious when he saw what was going on.

I know, me too!

Ok but the problem is, this movie need human or narrator to tell us about the plot

@@monstertokusatsu6042 no it doasnt! I would just love to watch these animals without a freaking narrator.

narration by David Attenburough (or however you spell it)

And then they ruined it by having yet another weaker dinosaur kill the Rex

It has basically been established at this point that the Jurassic Park universe is not the exact same universe as ours.

The T-Rex would still win

@@lyly_lei_lei this part is clearly showen to be back in time.

@@drbomdaydayboms4890 Yes, back in time in a *different* universe, the Jurassic Park universe, not our own universe.

@@lyly_lei_lei derp xD

Jurassic park the game: ha... yeah...

A croc or a lion or any other large predator would attack, kill and eat any feasible prey like this, animals have instinct, it's not about having it in for something.

She did eat the lawyer in the first movie.

@@Dante-vf4sd A croc would probably not a lion though

To save on special effects it was decided in studio that creating a working time machine was cheaper than getting the super computers for processing the special effects. Like Stanley Kubrick did with the moon landings. All filmed on location to save money.

Ha ha ha

World or park

Or during the time when Job 40 was written, and other historic accounts "the science" and "chosen history" works so hard to deny and reject. Read a literal translation of Job from Bible Gateway with the notes at the bottom, try English Standard Version.

@@imhuntingwabbits5532 He he he ha

That was the whole thing in the original novel in fact. Doctor Wu explained that they would hatch the animals without knowing and tweak the mix of the modern animal DNA with the incomplete DNA found. The clones were made to look as an approximation to what was known then or what people expected. They weren't really Dinosaurs, they were chimeras, hybrids of different species that would look like Dinosaurs in the image of what was discovered at the time. That was the whole point of having Allan Grant and Ellie Sattler at the Park, to approve on the look and partial behavior of the creatures to Hammond. Crap got really messed up when they started behaving outside of what was expected and Wu even suggested to Hammond to scrap the batch they had and hatch a few new batch that was more controllable. Many of the characteristics such as color and even poison or snake like attributes were part of the DNA mixing in the cloning process.

Jurassic park is all wrong with the fact that every dinosaur fighting with Trex doesn’t die from the 6 ton bite. And of course, this epilogue has a flashback to the time period of the dinosaurs with trex and acrocanthosaurus or giganotosaurus or whatever dinosaur that is living together and competing. Trex really never lived with any other large predators nor was in any competition with them

@@ricardofalcon7889 it's actually 7.1 tons

@@Souljaboyo477 it’s roughly estimated to be around its own weight

@@ricardofalcon7889 But when has a dinosaur not died from the T rexes bite

No, its not. They didnt lived at the same age and if they did, T-rex would stomp giga due the fact of be much more bulkier, stronger bite, heavier and build to fight directly, while Giga was build bite and run. That movie sucks.

@@triplocore JP was never meant to be a scientifically accurate documentary..

@@FeroxX_Gosu Doesnt mean that It have to be a extremely dumb movie which leads the average person to misinformation. Unfortunately movies like that have a underrated responsibility.

@@triplocore JP's only responsibility is to make children pick up a Dino book or documentary after they watch a JP movie and they definietly live up to that! Hell, I even searched for dino stuff after the movie for days to get myself up to date with the recent scientific results and watched the Apple documentary "Prehistoric Planet".

@@FeroxX_Gosu If you really believe that more than 1% really do that, I have a bad news for you. The majority will just take it as reality, I lived it in my skin, I was the children who get to read the books about that after watch the movie, but my friends, all of them, assumed that JP3 was the truth and spino really could beat the T-rex. That new JW movie is just the same. Giganotosaurus was inferior to T-rex in absolute ALL ASPECTS, but who care? A lie repeated 1000 times becomes a truth. Kids who just see that movie will just believe that they lived together and T-rex was a prey, thats it. Just one or another will bother to search it, and half of them will just keep the same opinion even reading the truth and search by wrong source to enforce his beliefs because the average person dont like to believe that his visions was wrong.

Yeah

Yup, this scene alone could've made it decent.

Literally me right now...

@@FourKaiju this scene is better than the ENTIRE movie .

In the extended edition it has this and I prefer that over the theatre release

yeah but there would be like no plot if they were to make a movie like it

@@papaprotein9000 there is a movie about an allosaurus that gets its jaw broken that begs to differ

@@papaprotein9000 just looked it up, the movie’s called Dinotasia if you want to see it. It’s good.

they probably didn't do a whole lot of thinking in any sense that we can relate to though.

@@papaprotein9000 I think a lot of people would pay to see dinosaurs.

Very true and 100% agree.

thanks to NASA we've improved CGI that much. I hope in the next moon landing they make it right.

I still felt that way as a 9 yr old seeing the first Jurassic Park. That movie still holds up because of it's many practical effects. 2000-2020 it was this CGI limbo where you could tell it was fake. Like CGI yoda etc.

Yeah? Yet 1993's effects somehow looked better. That's when I was a kid and I practically shit my pants when I saw the T Rex in the rain.

Except the T-Rex never looked like that in real life (look of the head is all wrong, just find a picture of Sue the T Rex for a more accurate one). Also, the hands of the animal could only face inward (like if you were clapping), so the movie version of it with the hands facing downward is wrong.

I disagree greatly sir but hey that’s my opinion And your opinion is that movie sucked which I think is wrong but stew it’s my opinion and your opinion it’s

@@TheChosenOne1098 I certainly don’t disagree. 😔

Foreeal

Honestly, all I cared about when watching the movie was the more accurate dinosaurs and the Dimetrodon. Unfortunate that they still have the Dilophosaurus spit venom, though

@@TheChosenOne1098 but ronin the movie did suck and this scene was not in movie but it gives a hint that this gigantasaurus kicks the trex ass like it did in movie.

This man is said "quiet down kid, it can run forever". I don't think he understands what's happening.

I don't want to be that you but I see here the same shitty problems of the last film: The people being so stupid and the dinosaurs being treated like a slasher guy who is nearly unbeatable. Come on we eradicated mamuts and another beasts with similar size of dinosaurs with only stones, bones, wood, torch and spears. How and why in the hell why can't kill a bunch of giant animals with all the technology?

@@freddyjosereginomontalvo4667 plot convenience, the writers can't be assed to come up with any real conflicts. just easier to make the humans absolute spanners. they've seen the audience eats it up anyway, so why bother

@@neito.m.6741 Right? We've got a 12-ton Carnivore running free but no worries! We'll wait til it gets tired to catch it. Even though we have a helicopter and thermal imaging technology.

@@freddyjosereginomontalvo4667 because people just buy this shit up and they know they don't need to put effort into it to make money.

It was leak like a year ago. About the opening scene being back time, and it’s supposed to like reveal the meteor hitting the dinosaurs. The people who had the chance to see it, said it was extremely breath taking! So I can’t wait!! I can tell that most of the opening scene must’ve been cropped and edited. Obviously so they don’t give everything away! But can’t wait!

LMAO

Good luck to the camera man

Nah they removed all the buildings and replaced them with dinosaurs they didn't make for no reason

@@Zweve Lol. 😂

There should be an extended version of this movie that includes this scene.

Yeah I was so looking forward to seeing it in the theater.

they needa go ahead and just do a dinosaur documentary lol

Not to mention the sound design is on point. They really brought them to life in such an amazing way

And bold move making the first hero shot of an Oviraptor with pronated wrists eating an egg, establishing right away that the movie is not going to even try to be accurate to the science

In the end they scrapped this scene and it had the best cgi. Some of the cgi in this movie was so bad 🥲

well did you?

Its a bit Stanley Kubrick ean ish

Machine time yes sirrr

Yeah I just saw the movie and this was not even in it

Their will be extended cut that might put the prologue back.

@@legendary5733 hope it does

Yeah I just watched it yesterday and couldn't find this scene. It was ridiculous we couldn't know that why were Giga and Rexy fighting. This should be the back story for why they were.

Because the fight would be 30 million years of impossibility

I like the fact that they dont have auto aim on the darts and actually missed

"Keep it steady" shoots it on car, yeah Great details

@@Pannkakaize Made no sense but sure

Yet it somehow looks significantly less real than in 93.

man every big carnivore dinosaur is not a T-Rex😂

also how the eye goes from a "living thing" to a dead eye was great too.

Conversely, this means that the existence of the fan favorite Rexy is based on a story that she was killed by a giga that was already extinct (died out arround 30mio years befor the t-rex) at the time. is that supposed to be the story for rexy?

So much attention to details that they show two creaturs that existed in two different continents with a time lag of more than 30 million years.

Ok

Wow you were alive to hear what they actually did!?

@@ramonvasquez3202 Speculation based on the most related modern day animals and infrasound.

how the fuck would you know

@@mortenskands201 See above comment. We can make accurate speculations based on things like the shape of skull cavities and estimated biomass, along with the use of infrasound technology to get an idea of what it might've sounded like. Is it gonna be 100% accurate? Probably not, but we can get close.

@@JohnnyShagbot well semi accurate until we have more findings that prove it's complete truth

Including the asteroid impact.

And space to get that shot of the land mass of the Earth at 0:24

This is why you don't have a girlfriend. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Seriously, so overdone....

they found the video in the amber

I thought I missed this scene in theaters but it wasn't put in.

I know right, super disappointing!!

I was totally bummed when it wasn’t in it. When the film started and the first scene came on, I was like “Did I miss something or did they not put it in??”

They said it was to long so there for they did not put it.

@@NpcCat12 yeah it was much better to spend time on the story of the clone girl

Man i loved those early 2000's dinosaur documentaries. The ones where it was all about the dinosaurs and not paleontologists. Cuz at one point dino documentaries pretty much became fossil record documentaries, some of the most boring shi--

It’s probaly no where near of what it really looks like lol

Yeah man, that's what probably happened 65 million years ago, a deformed Giganotosaurus fighting against a Tyrannosaurus in a random Savannah somewhere because why not am I right? This probably happened for sure, I'm feeling it.

And in case some of you play Jurassic park III builder. I have completed the game :/

The design chosen for the beasts are bullshit tho. They would look way less intimidating

Did you just assume T-rex gender?

@@southpakrules Rexy (the T-Rex) is female, as were most, if not all of the dinosaurs in the original Jurassic Park. (Of course there was the matter of the frog dna, and some species spontaneously changing sex and therefore were able to mate. Rexy was the only t-rex at Isla Nublar, so no reason for her to sex change)

​@@transitfan954 Biology has nothing to do with it. T-rex could be traumatized literally shaking. Science is racist.

@@southpakrules Bro, do not start with all this of assuming genres and that, it is a movie, it is made to enjoy, so do that, and science is not racist, science is the most exact thing there is, so do not say nonsense and enjoy the video.

@@southpakrules mmmkay so even though I'm pretty sure you're just looking for an argument, it was stated that all dinosaurs in Jurassic Park are female but are able to reproduce asexually because if tree frog DNA that was put into their genome to help them acclimate to modern temperatures as was other modern animal DNA. (Which explains why most of the dinosaurs don't look accurate to scientific interpretation.) Reproducing asexually = a single creature, in this case a dinosaur, reproduces by cloning itself. It does not require a member of the opposite sex to breed, however in some cases if not all (I'm not too sure about this next part) things that reproduce asexually can also reproduce via opposite sex. So yes. Rexy is a female. However there are a few hints that males do exist occasionally throughout the Jurassic Park franchise. I.E. The rich dude in Fallen Kingdom specifying that the allosaurus being auctioned is a juvenile female.

It was a time warped for me to see the reminder too.

Need a full movie of just that

@@ewok7075 YESSSS

They ruled with man.

@@lancer717 what do you mean lol

@@ewok7075 exactly if the producers made a remake of walking with dinosaurs but with this level of cgi it would be crazy

Just like real life, then.

Truth

dart guns arent like real guns, also he was a kid, on a helicopter, but still, it was a fucking tyrannosaurus

He couldn't even hit a dinosaur if he tried.

Firing a very low velocity, fin stabilized, unbalanced projectile, out a of a extremely short barrel, large caliber smoothbore. Its more of a guess then aiming. The projectile will have a ton of velocity change meaning excessive drop and wind effects, and its moving too slow to really stabilize as regular bullets rely on spin while fins rely on sufficient speed and being aerodynamic. It likely doesn't stabilize in the barrel meaning it might not exit "straight" and come out at a slight and different angle every time like a nerf gun. On top of that because it wont stabilize right, it might not fly straight either. Also shooting out of a moving helicopter is extremely weird and hard to do. They move a lot even when hovering. And when they are moving steady in a direction that really complicates lead and windage. And something like that giant ass slow moving non-aerodynamic syringe being shot will be affected by the rotors swirling downwash, where as a aerodynamic bullet will not. Also the liquid sloshing around inside of it in flight will alter the center of gravity and further unstabilize it. So no that's not that unrealistic. Having that gun on hand with the proper ammo to local police is.

Rex saw the dart was coming, he ducked. So not the hilo kid’s fault.

@@johnlivingston9217 And how does a Trex 1) see a dart no bigger than a finger from that distance with a spotlight blinding him and 2) have the brain capacity to understand what the dart is and to duck away from it to avoid getting tranquilized. Buuuull shit!

Don't forget the oviraptor stealing eggs, the sauropods having elephant feet and the t rex having feathers. None of those are accurate.

Did any of those prehistoric fauna even coexist together?

@@GeraltofRivia22 Well, the oviraptor didn't steal the eggs, it just ate them. And rex having feathers is still up for interpretation.

@@ozzywalker609 "stealing" the eggs refers to eating them. Which we have zero evidence for in oviraptor and again, is based on the misidentification of its own eggs.

@@jackleo4435 1-Nope, none of the creatures in that clip lived together irl, and 2-happy new year

This and the Xfinity commercial in 2019 are the best short movies under 5 minutes.

Let’s goo and I’m a big fan of dinosaurs and my mom always like I love dinosaurs like I had so many dinosaurs when I was little I had a T. rex shirt and I was a big fan of the Jurassic park and world movie and now there a new one I’m so hyped for next year

A fellow skylander fan I see!

Oh yeah, buddy. 😎

I can't believe it! Like 5 or 6 months till the Jurassic World: Dominion! I watched all movies 3 days ago and now I need more! Can not wait. ;)

@@ZEN37_ if youre a big fan of dinosaurs why do you like jurassic park an furthermore in what deranged state of mind do you need to be to believe this looked anything more than widely unrealistic and plain shoddy writing

How else do you think they get t-rex dna

prehistoric mosquitos are something else

the mosquito listened to the rock rap and became ripped as hell.

@@redhotlavagaming2533 They took some Avinychus DNA to help them in their quest.

it must be because mosquitoes of that time were far stronger than now as survival was hard at that time Glad those mosquitoes aren't here now xD

They actually used a raven as reference^^

continent? that bad boy jumped forward 7 millions years just to hand out that ass whoopin

Not to mention the T-rex lived on an island where is now western america.

Looks more like an achro than a giga tbf

Giga had some serious fucking beef

@@mareanie5998 wdym? It looks like a giga to me

@Jon Hesson first of all he never said that, chill the fuck out, and second of all rex was thought to have some feathers when they were young but shed them as they turned into adults

​@Jon Hesson That's not exactly true unless you count dinosaurs like Archaeopteryx, which have existed since over 150 million years ago in the Jurassic, as not resembling birds. The origins of complex feathers lie even further back, in the middle to early Jurassic, based on the fact that most major groups of feathered coelurosaur theropods seem to have diverged from each other there. Barring the pretty much non-existent possibility that different groups of theropod dinosaurs evolved feathers independently of each other, then at the very least the last common ancestor of pretty much any coelurosaur (including Tyrannosaurs AND birds) would have had at least protofeathers too, given there is concrete evidence that the earliest tyrannosaurs possessed protofeathers and lost them secondarily in later genera. I do agree that the fluffy rex portrayed here is now an outdated look, and that many dinosaurs would not have possessed feathers, but it's no good to exaggerate the other side of the argument.

Every therapod in the T rex family tree has been proven to have feathers, except T rex ofcourse. It is widely believed that t rex lost it's feathers the way elephants lost their hair.

@Jon Hesson You literally contradicted yourself there buddy, congrats

@Jon Hesson The majority of *very large non-coelurosaurian* dinosaurs did not have feathers (and this isn't even getting into the possibility that theropod protofeathers may be homogenous, thus shared by a common ancestor, with the quills found in some ornithischians and even the pycnofiber hair of pterosaurs). Archaeopteryx isn't even the first feathered or bird-like dinosaur in the fossil record, and it definitely didn't sprout complex feathers overnight. Fossils of even older forms like Epidipteryx from 165 million years ago and Anchiornis from 167 million years ago also preserve complex feathers, and these indicate there was a massive radiation of feathered, gliding forms that can trace its origins to the Early Jurassic. These forms gave rise to the better known dromeosaurs, as well as the line that led to birds, and the likelihood that the ancestors of Tyrannosaurs would have split off from this lineage before it even developed complex, vaned feathers, as well as the presence of a full, fluffy integument in basal coelurosaurs such as Sinosauropteryx indicates there was a very large diversity of small to medium-sized feathered dinosaurs since at least the early Jurassic, as the earliest undisputed Tyrannosauroids are Middle Jurassic in age.

Tearjerkingly true

This looks so good! I'm wondering why they released such a long piece of the movie but I'm now definitely interested

It would be a very inaccurate documentary

I thought it was from the walking with dinosaurs movie.

@@YusuffYT it was released that it’s not even going to be in the movie which makes it even more awesome. That’s countless dollars in CGI just to make a (fantastic!) KZfaq video. In fact, it looks like Universal is doing something unique here where instead of releasing the first trailer they release a full blown “prologue”. We already had the first trailer for Jurassic World and Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom by this point. Looks like we’ll get the actual trailer during the Super Bowl. I kinda like this plan!

Triggering the memory of spinosaurus snapping the t.rex neck in JP3

Great now I have to play ark

@@diegoesplossion Ill check it out!

That's not giganotosaurus. Giganotosaurus went extinct over 80M years ago. I think it's supposed to be Acrocanthosaurus.

@@mandalf2717 lol yesterday me and my friend were playing ark and a giga killed one of the new wyverns we got

@@Jogoat286 noooo!!! Rip 🥺

Ayo thats a good touch, didnt notice that

I think they did cause the tail also bumped on top of the car

VFX guys just adding that little extra touch, for fun

Oh you just gotta listen to some VFX artists talk, what they have to do and research, behind the scenes or breakdowns . There's a tremendous amount of conscious detail put in the big expensive visual effects.

Ark player moment

what is wrong with you go watch it

The camera man needs more hype

The camera man needs a raise

The camera man is an overused and unfunny joke

@@garterbelttights6607 ok and? 64 people found it funny

@@redhotlavagaming2533 m8, im older than you. Get a life. People find the joke funny even tho you don't, so why even post a comment?

I mean... Jurassic World 2 was really terrible so I'm not gonna watch this movie for that reason.

@AUTISMO There WOULDN'T BE any overpaid actors in it to begin with - JUST DINOS - that would be the main thing!

Haha! good one!

Especially the original soundtrack from the first 2 sequels on the 90s!!!

😪yesss👁

"American Graffiti" was one of Spielbergs first movies and I actualy saw it at a drive-in.

The mosquito that bug started it all

Also, no one looked in their rear view mirror to see the T-Rex coming and then read in horror the warning on that mirror: Objects in the mirror are closer than they appear! :-)

Not the Sharpest Tool in the Shed. African Elefant Weighs up to 6 Tons. T Rex is Estimated between 7- 8 Tons. An Elefant can Surprise charge you, you do not here them Walking. A Rex Has Predator Feet to make him Quite.

@@MaxVax-dh7rh Have you seen an Xray of an elephant's foot? The bottom is all fat pad. A TREX foot is built different. And it doesn't matter anyway because in JP1 they established the thumping and shaking when it walks... I only pointed out that they seem to have forgotten that detail.

@@mr.mediocregamer9653 I agree that it seemed Scarier and Better in JP 1. Not real but better for a Movie. I actually hate all after the first 2. They should Make the Books into a Movie. Way Better. It needs to be a PG 18 Movie. Have you seen the Books?

@@MaxVax-dh7rh I read the first book. I think I read the second book but I can't remember, it was nearly 20 years ago.

I think they removed it because of non-accurate giganotosaurus model and they never lived on same time or place.

But rex capture scene was cool. That would be good if that scene didnt canceled

@@cysgod45 You give them far too much credit. I highly doubt that would be their reasoning. The series has never given a damn about historical accuracy...just look at the velociraptors.

@@HEARTS-OF-SPACE they tried to make opening accurate

@@cysgod45 Sure, and I'll give them credit, but it was ultimately cut from the film, so... I totally agree that this sequence is great and pretty accurate, though. Have you heard of Prehistoric Planet? It's basically five hours of this sequence with David Attenborough narrating. The CGI is at least as good, if not better than this sequence (seriously).

no shit

@@kingkuf7371 :D

B.S

how do you know? You would need to be in the brain of a dinosair to know what they call or not call their food :P

@@6666Imperator dinosaur enemy= ROAARRRR dinorsaur juvi trying to take some of the ded dinosaur ur pack killed= snap roar herbivore when carnivores coming= uhuhhuhuhuh raptor calling pack for attack= intense screaching

Ikr

fr

probably a lot considering the camera crew's lives were put in danger lol

Not to mention the inaccuracies of the animal designs and behaviours.