Thanks for your honesty. I'd be happy to hear from you privately if you wish. bruce@brucegore.com

Ever think about trying Jesus Christ?? It's worth a try before choosing suicide. How bad could it be?

Hang on brother...we need you healthy, around and alive...God loves you and requests for you to hold on and strengthen for His purpose...we got this my friend

My brother in Christ, keep going. You’re meant to be here. Like Bruce says, we can’t see the ends, but God always has the means. Love you G.

Hey checkout History with Cy, and if you want a pile of books I don't need, you only need ask.

your "Lord" Baal?

@@toobalkain Baal is a dead god.

@@PeteJab a dead god, OK. So who's your lord now then?

Joseph was 17 when he was sold into Egypt. Baal means god but god is an object of worship, an idol at that. The God of the Israelites has a name, Yahweh. 😮

J.Vernon McGee does a wonderful introspective journey about Jacob in through Joseph...much more actually...the series is called "through the bible"

Yes indeed, I did misspeak at 29:10 in the video, although I did make it clear (I believe) that Jacob enjoyed several years with his family and especially Joseph, while living in the region of Goshen. Thanks for the correction.

Jacob’s favored wife was Rachael. Rebekah was Isaac’s wife and Jacob’s mother.

Thank you!

My pleasure...and thank you!

i guess im asking randomly but does any of you know a way to get back into an instagram account? I stupidly forgot the account password. I appreciate any assistance you can offer me.

@Kelvin Caden Instablaster =)

@Jaden Ace i really appreciate your reply. I got to the site on google and I'm trying it out now. Looks like it's gonna take quite some time so I will get back to you later when my account password hopefully is recovered.

@Jaden Ace It did the trick and I now got access to my account again. I'm so happy! Thank you so much, you really help me out!

Me too!

canadiankewldude i

its a myth btw, you need to wake up.

Can you believe it, I'm still asleep, believing it is actual history. Sorry Isaac lad.

canadiankewldude Touché :)

There was a lot of that doing harm and calling it good in the Goatherders Guide to the Galaxy.

@@AJNpa80 right, but the point was taking an imperfect people and guiding them back to "the way" after the original understanding was shattered. They did bad thing and suffered the reasonably expected consequences, learning the cause along the way- usually self interest. As the bible progresses, the morality progresses. The Old Testament is the beginning and shows the struggle of people to stop doing bad things and not relapse. The New Testament condenses the big lesson from the Old Testament into the Golden Rule, then expounds on this "new" idea. Could it be that goathearders understood the other religions of that time better than we do and rejected them for good reason?

Thank you! That means a lot to me!

that's old for a cat.😃

@@rossd6809 young for an elephant

im 38. and i first learned about hyksos around your age. Today... im a korean...and i think ive made a remarkable discovery about the Hyksos and can prove that they are in fact Hebrew Israeilites....but even going further it appears the Hyksos went to Korea and establishing the Nation of Korea or known as Joshen. (Goshen)m the first korean king from this line being the founder of Silla or Saro...or Shiloh. and his name was Park Hyuk guh se ,,,Bahk Hysos.

I love how this lecture ties in the Bible with history... I have always been a great lover of history & I'm a Christian... Thanks so much... I'm not exactly young nor am I old (I'm 42)...

Clayton's book is an excellent resource. Thanks for reminding us of that.

Well if the hyksos were edomites, Jacob's brother there names would be similar

That sounds reasonable but the Exodus is definitely describing the expulsion of Hyksos. The Bible states that the Pharoah was scared of the great numbers of Israelites (foreigners) and feared an invasion. This perfectly describes the great number of Hyksos people who were invading Egypt. But the Hyksos were never slaves in Egypt, which questions the slavery mentioned in the Bible.

@@peacelove6455 there was an exodus. When ahmose finally expelled hyksos from egypt after 500 years

Idk, the bible states small details like joseph clean shaving to go meet pharoah… thats not really a thing youd worry about with the hyskos.. Also, pharoah killed all the young hebrew boys when their number was great, he didnt expel them. Pharoah in the bible wasnt trying to part with the slaves Egypts timeline is freaking confusing

Hi. You have to look at the whole time line. Ultimately they will be saved. A 1000 years is like a day to the Lord, and a day like a 1000 years. In that perspective ,it's only been 6 days. Not long, and the story is not over yet. And look at Israel today.

Related data to this excellent lecture - Securing timelines in the ancient Mediterranean using multiproxy annual tree-ring data www.pnas.org/content/117/15/8410 The Thera eruption is rated between a 6 and 7 on the volcanic explosivity index scale and thought to be the cause of a major Chandler Wobble (tilting of the Earth's axis via the sloshing of the liquid core). All of the Biblical plagues save the slaying of the firstborn can be attributed to this one event and I was rather surprised that it was not mentioned in this lecture, particularly since it's probable that the entire Mediterranean coast was inundated by water from a tsunami. The PNAS citation pins down the date of the eruption to 1650 B.C.E., but there's some wiggle room with this date simply because tree ring data is subject to localized weather conditions and human interpretation. A word about the Hyksos capital city, Avaris (possibly the root of the English word avarice?) - There is a place in the Russian Caucasus where an ethnic group calling themselves the Avars still reside. A look at their folk artwork prominently features both Hindu and offset swastikas. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avars_(Caucasus) Another word - Isra - (Sanskrit) Night journey. El - (Sanskrit) G-d. One of the many Ashkenazi hereditary ailments is a condition called Bloom Syndrome. A symptom of that disease is photosensitivity; another is dwarfism. And the last word - There's a sura in the Qu'ran titled, "The Children of Israel" that's a rather interesting read.

@Robinson Pittman take this with a grain of salt because it's from Wikipedia, but read this: "The Council of Jamnia, presumably held in Yavneh in the Holy Land, was a hypothetical late 1st-century council at which the canon of the Hebrew Bible was formerly believed to have been finalized and which may also have been the occasion when the Jewish authorities decided to exclude believers in Jesus as the Messiah from synagogue attendance, as referenced by interpretations of John 9:22 in the New Testament. The writing of the Birkat ha-Minim benediction is attributed to Shmuel ha-Katan at the supposed Council of Jamnia. The theory that Jamnia finalised the canon, first proposed by Heinrich Graetz in 1871, was popular for much of the 20th century. However, it was increasingly questioned from the 1960s onward, and the theory has been largely discredited."

jews are labeled as liar in islam

The chronology is wrong. The Exodus was 1445 BC, Solomon’s Temple was built 965 BC. Kathleen Kenyon noted the walls of Jericho fell in & the dating was much earlier than 1230.

@@masada2828kenyon is such a dishonest joke. Besides, they also found scarabs in graveyards at jericho after her time. One of the scarabs was of Hatshepsut, female pharoah until amenhotep II was of age to take the throne. Hes the exodus pharoah. Anyway the scarabs are there showing the destruction wasnt in the 16th century. The destruction of jericho was in 1406bc. The other two archaeologists who dug there before and after her confirm this. She based her results on “lack of a certain pottery from cypris “ or some stupid nonsense. except then they found canaanite clone versions of that pottery style. Kenyon sucks.

+swell guy Thanks!

I'm trying to understand where the 400 years of enslavement went. If these dates are right, and we believe in a 1450 BC Exodus, then this would only amount to 120 years tops. I guess that's how others get the 1200BC Exodus, but from my studies the 1450 BC Exodus makes more sense. But here--and I mean no offense to Dr. Gore--he's having his cake and eating it too. He says the Exodus happens in 1450, but the dates are off.

@@Drakemiser this is a mis-conception. The Hebrew account states that they resided in Egypt for around 400 years. Is does not mean that they were slaves all that time. The Exodus story has it that, “ Then came Pharaoh that did not know of Joseph”. Within the Egyptian chronology, the Hyksos incursion occurred Circa1750 BCE. Since the Canaanite migration to Egypt had occurred Circa 1900’s BCD, that would indicate tat for a period of roughly 200 years, there were good relations between the Hebrews and the ruling pharaohs. Since both the Hebrews and the Hyksos are residing in the Delta, the Hyksos ruler( pharaoh), would have taken over all control of the region and did not have any knowledge of relations or agreements between thx Hebrews and the Dynastic Egyptian Pharaohs.. such is implied in the phrase, a change in rulership. During the period of the Hyksos, there were two Pharaohs. The Dynastic one at Abydos, and the Hyksos one at one of the two cities they built in the Delta. Ramses, the military garrison, and Avaris, the administrative location a few kilometers away. Excavations at both sites indicate that they were built on river stone foundations with Mud Brick above. This is in accordance with the Hebrew account that the Hebrews were forced to build two cities of mud brick. And from the standpoint of structural engineering, the moisture laden sediments of the Delta could not support great weights, plus the stone quarries were in upper Egypt, under the control of the Dynastic Pharaoh. Therefore a period of forced servitude( slavery) would have lasted 150-200 years. Until the Hyksos were expelled fromEgypt by Ahmose, the first Pharaoh of the 18th Dynasty. Circa 1550-1500 BCE.

@@Drakemiser KZfaq NathanH83 How long were the Israelites in Egypt . Interesting concept!

Since the Bible says nothing about 6,000 years ... If believing in timeline lies from fake carbon dating and fake chemical analysis, fake pottery analysis and fake handwriting analysis ... bought and paid for by the evil overlords that control the banks and the money, the politicians and military forces, the universities and schools and multi-billion dollar publishing houses that print the lies in schoolbooks and in university textbooks, you're free to choose that evil ... Since your evil overlords also control the rigged stock markets - worldwide - while controlling the corporate board members, CEO's, federal agencies, etc., you're free to bow down to the hybrid spawn of satan that control your mind - but no one with a functioning conscience would be on their knees to those creatures ... Since the New Testament mentions Augustus Caesar and Tiberius and since they lived c1400 - c1500 ... 500 to 600 years ago... and since the true timeline for our human history is clearly documented in thousands of sources, written in dozens of languages from all across our Earth, you're free to be a liar ... or you can break free of the demonic deception and stop this psychosis.

The first humans are Adam and his wife who are our father and mother. There is no ethnic group superior over another. There is no mistake in The Quran but there is many mistakes in the Bible that the Quran mentions correctly such as the position of the leader in Egypt in the society of Prophet Yusuf (Joseph). The Quran mentions he was a king and the Bible mentions he was a pharaoh. The Quran is correct and more recently the Rosetta Stone was decoded and what was found is that leader was a king and not a pharaoh. Islam is The true religion with undeniable proof and evidence. We Muslims believe in Jesus but not as God and we don’t believe God has a son. Jesus peace be upon him is a prophet and Messenger Of Allah (God) and he is the messiah. He wasn’t killed as Allah saved him before they could get to him. There is also scientific and historical miracles mentioned in the Quran such as the formation of the human embryo as well as the creation of honey in bees. There are Islamic prophecies that came true and will come true and I recommend everyone to try and learn about them. I myself know of people who were ill and suffering with issues (including black magic) and got cured miraculously when the Quran was recited over them. I invite everyone to learn about Islam.

@@hihello-yv2ttthe Quran is a lie

You better thank the jews, flavian family and josephus for writing their fairytale old & new testament you love so much! It's all man made you can research for yourself unless your hellbent on pretending!

@@snowrider4495 actually no do research yourself and you'll see the bible is pretty accurate to history. No one I've talked to did research (probably like yourself) to refute bible teaching, fundamental, principles, and science as false. And technically everything is made man, including ww2, ww1, America and the 2016 presidential election. So making a statement like yours behooves me to make you feel insecure about ideas cuz you sound like a crazy liberal (conservative if u are one as well which is worse) who just yells things out before speaking it

@@Linkz03 lol your funny! have you ever heard of Bart Ehrman? its obvious you only look to the buybull for your answers! its a shame you dont want to research the validity of the buybull to find out where it actually came from and why the romans wrote it? what does a political view have to do with anything? smh! I'm sorry I hurt your feelings!

@@snowrider4495 if you looked at what the Roman's do they literally find any religion and turn it to their comic. Some of the of the greek mythology goes to the bible moses being neptune the god of the sea because moses splits the red sea to escape the Egyptians. In the bible itself when Paul was being transported to Rome to testify to ceasar himself their boat crash, ended up on a island with snakes and a tribe they met there, and got bitten by a snake and survived and they called Paul and the Roman's sons of Zeus's because it was carved in the boat they tribe made for them to get back to Rome. And I never asked for burt viewpoints, asked for yours. You cant come here talking shit (which I made the analogy of Democrats and conservatives talking about shit they don't know making the whole scene laughable because of the stupidity) if you want to criticize then do it but back your bull back. Roman's saw where Christianity was going when the saducucees where persecuting jesus. They choose a criminal who killed alot over jesus because he didnt fit in their political agenda while jesus remain neutral politically because his government ( heavenly If you read the bible) would not be on this earth at this time because people do not have the ability to keep control. Even if they did people die and its amnesia all over again, therefore God will take over after judging all humankind and allow people to repent and gain perfection after 1000 years. Comment when you can bring some info, then the discussion can continue.

@@Linkz03 the buybull is a comic book and so is all religions! I'm sorry I hurt your feelings but all the assertions do not make it true! Dont you think it's time to put up your religious toys and quit pretending in imaginary friends, your an adult act like one! It's sad with all the research people can do today on where the buybull actually came from and you want to pretend in fairytales without any proof! I feel sorry for endoctrinated people like you that do not wish to stop pretending! Look into Bart Erhman for starters!

Interesting observation. Thanks!

Bruce Gore yeah interesting observation!!!! I was wondering, if semites were black or white?

Wow. Great point. Can you make a video or discussion on this? I think the Hyksos were Dannites like the Spartans from the Tribe of Dan.

Pharaoh is not an egyptian term used until after the hyksos expulsion. Egyptians referred to their leaders as king. Pharaoh is what hyksos conquers called themselves.

@@zevyzevness3800 Strangely enough, that concept didn't exist back then. It's only modern people like you who are bigots. "Black" and "white" are social constructs from about the time of the African slave trade to the Americas, and have nothing to do with ethnicity. North Africans were called Moors in Shakespeare's time. Israel/Canaan is in ASIA.

Stevyn W I know I wanted to go to the comment section to say “most interesting topic available “.....

I disagree

I'm happy to hear it. Thank you!

Thanks for the feedback. The chronology for the Egyptian dynasties is taken from commonly accepted estimates offered by recognized experts. I relied especially on Peter Clayton's, Chronology of the Pharaohs (Thames and Hudson). Biblical chronology is similarly based on commonly accepted chronological benchmarks in Old Testament scholarship.

As I understand the matter, the precise meaning of the term 'hyksos' is disputed. I suspect both your proposed meanings may be correct, as the term may be a pejorative, so that both the word 'shepherd' and the word 'foreign' were intended to insult the rule of a non-indigenous population.

@@GoreBruce I see. Thank you. It is really interesting how the Hyskos were there at the right time to allow the Joseph story and its sequel to take place. It seems immigrant populations taking over was unusual in ancient times and must have indicated some anomalous socio-political atmosphere that allowed it to happen in Egypt.

Quran written centuries after.

spidaman0112 Bibull was written centuries after.

@@vengefulavenger6411 yeah, the new testament, not necessarily the old testament

Even the old testament isn't a contemporary document. It was mostly written during the Jewish slavery in Babylon.

The theory you suggest is thinly plausible, but extends considerably beyond actual biblical data.

If you liked this you will be amazed by David Rohls "patterns of evidence" on u Tube

@@decay-154 yeah indeed, i watched and also watched "the exodus: fairytle of historical fact" and it was abslutly amazing . thank you for the comment

Not to my knowledge. That came later.

Well, the dates are 'best estimates' based on other biblical data. For example, we are told in 1 Kings 6:1 that the construction of the temple under Solomon started 480 years after the Exodus, which would put the date of the Exodus at about 1447 b.c. We are also told that the time from the Covenant with Abraham to the Covenant with Moses was 430 years (by Paul in Galatians). If you do a little arithmetic, and note the age of Abraham at various points in his life, you'll find that his birth was sometime close to 1951 b.c.

The dates aren't as exact as they seem. When it comes to the 430 years there is a difference between the Masoretic texts and the Septuagint and the Samaritan Penteteuch which suggests that the Masoretic text is inaccurate. In the Masoretic text it says in Exodus 12:40 "Now the time that the sons of Israel lived in Egypt was four hundred and thirty years." The Septuagint and the Samaritan Pentateuch say, "Now the time that the sons of Israel lived in EGYPT and CANAAN was four hundred and thirty years." Genesis 46 tells us that 70 Sons of Jacob went to Egypt which included the sons of Levi, Girshom, Kohath, and Marari. Exodus 6:18-20 says that Kohath lived 133 years and Omran father of Moses lived 137 years. If we add these ages together and assign an age to Moses of 80 years at the time of the Exodus then we know that the longest they could have been in Egypt must have been less than 350 years. Galatians actually cofirms this reading because Paul's parameters were between the giving of the Abrahamic Covenant and the law was 430 years. Not the time in Egypt. Then we can look at history. Joseph is said to have ridden a chariot. The chariot didn't come to Egypt until 1666 BC and so Joseph must have come around 1600 BC and after the introduction of the chariot.

I think Joseph did go in early but the Hyksos weren't a monolithic culture. Canaanites were city states. I think Hor Awibre was Joseph.

@@silencemeviolateme6076 what informs your theory that Joseph is Hor?

@@bencopeland3560 can we agree everything in the bible isn't perfect? It's not that they lied. For example there was no world flood at the time of Noah but there was a great regional flood. And to begin our tale Abraham of ur probably wasn't Abraham of ur. It was probably Abraham of uruk during the third dynasty of ur era, or right after its collapse.

@@silencemeviolateme6076 well yeah. I agree with that as a general principle (though I think it’s Abraham of Urkesh myself). But what about Hor?

@@bencopeland3560 Hyksos were Canaanites. Canaan was city states. The Hyksos were a confederacy of sorts. The Hebrews were centered at Tanis where later an architrave with cartouches of Hor and his son was moved from Memphis. Hor was buried in a shaft next to a pyramid of Amenhemet III.

The Amorites appear to be related to the descendents of Ham/Canaan (Gen. 10:16).

@@GoreBruce thanks

The Hyksos were driven out around the beginning of the 18th Dynasty (c. 1580 b.c.). The Exodus took place later.

I see.. well that's if it even happened.

@@shaolindreams Some theories do link the Hyksos to the people of the exodus. This theory is based on the dating of the Santorini volcanic eruption. A good source of info on this hypothesis is Dan Pellegrino's 'Return to Sodom & Gomorrah'. It's a good theory, but obviously not everyone agrees. Some date the exodus period to centuries after the Santorini event.

It was never a exodus, but rather they were killed and expelled by the KEMETIC king, AHMOSE I. The king killed these people and expelled them in the year around 1547 because they took over KEMET for two hundred years and enslaved the KEMETIC people in there own nation. One must remember that the word Egyptians, pharaoh and Egypt are Greek caucasian people words for KEMETIC black people in the ancient world. Read the story of the Hyksos in the encyclopedia Britannica and then you will know the truth that the semitic people weren't slaves in KEMET, but they did enslave the KEMETIC people for two hundred years.

The chronology that I assume puts the arrival of Joseph in Egypt during the 13th or 14th dynasty. The Hyksos period began c. 1663 and the years of plenty appear to have started about 1662. There are multiple Hyksos pharaohs, and the records are not great, but assuming the first of the Hyksos (as best we can tell), it would be Sheshi. As to the second question, famines took place from time to time. Aside from supernatural providence, these are known phenomena, and an attempt to provide a 'cause' would not likely be very productive.

Hey brother, and this goes for Bruce also, after much study and consideration, I believe the eruption of Mt Thera would at least explain the 7 years of famine around the World. God in HIS power would have made sure the nile produced enough water to have bumper crops for 7 years before the famine produced by the supervocanic eruption of Mt Thera. Which many archeologists date around 1600 give or take 50 years. Which would land Bruce's projection of the plenty right on cue.

@@GoreBruce Check my response to Rolando's question since I also addressed it to you my brother.

That hypothesis has been attractive to some, and I am not opposed to it in principle, except for the significant chronological problems involved.

Yes, there have been several who have claimed to confirm something of Joseph's career from Egyptian records. It is a very interesting area of research into ancient Egyptian history!

Certainly plausible!

You tube David Rohl "patterns of evidence" .After Exodus Egypt had no army and Hyksos took over and destroyed egypt

Lower Egypt is the North and upper Egypt is the south. It refers to up river and down river. Higher altitude lower altitude.

@@currentcommentor8745 Thanks. I forgot that fact.

That is a very helpful corrective. Thank you!

@John Smith could you please clarify or cite sources?

code link . Please watch David Rohls "Patterns of evidence" on you tube

@John Smith Thank you for link to Armenia . All turks are descended from Togarmahs 10 sons . I remember haik was togarmahs grandson? The Kurds also Japhetic Known as Medes in Book of Daniel and Madai in Genesis 10

@John Smith well it only suggests that ancient Egyptians wear closer to the near-easterners genetically. I don't really care anyway about the origin of Ancient Egyptians.

Also I think The "Pharoah" of Joseph's time would be known as King as Pharoah was a title used after The New Kingdom

Thank you for your interest!

The written word was the law. John 17:17 says the word was the TRUTH. Psalm 119:142 says the LAW was the TRUTH. The law was the written word. John 1:14 "the word became flesh". This is the PHYSICAL, the physical manifestation of the written word, the law, into Jesus, Yahushua in Hebrew. Paul said the LAW is spiritual. So the written word, which was the law, which God called his "truth", was the spiritual form of his son Yahushua. The word "blasphemy" means "to peirce", as in to strike a hole into. Scripture says the only unforgivable sin (sin is defined as the transgression of the law), is to blasphemy the holy spirit, or to peirce it, making it void. The Jews blasphemed, peirced, the PHYSICAL word made flesh, Jesus. Self proclaiming Christians blaspheme the holy spirit, they peirce the spiritual form of Jesus, the written word, the law, in its spiritual form. Let that sink in for a second. Christian's point the finger at Jews, for their wicked and evil deed of piercing and doing away with Jesus physical body. All while being blind to the fact that they peirced and did away with Jesus in the spiritual form, an unforgivable sin. So the only unforgivable transgression of the LAW is to peirce, or to do away with the LAW, by making it vain, void, and of no effect.

That way of thinking as just stopped any criticism you might have in your belief when reality makes your beliefs hard to square with reality. All you have done in the last 10yrs is stop your sub conscience for letting you know your beliefs arenot reality.. you've put yourself on a path and refuse to admit it leads nowhere.

Thanks for your kind feedback. As much as I love Jonathan Edwards, I think he was overly influenced by the widespread historicist view of Revelation, and that led him to the speculations that you mention. For my own view of biblical prophecy, I'd suggest taking a look at my KZfaq Playlist series, The Apocalypse in Space and Time. Thanks again!

@@GoreBruce Dear brother Bruce, first I really appreciate that although having millions of views on your channel you swiftly answer comments. May the Lord bless you for your diligence and kindness towards commentators like me. Wisdom teaches that we children of God are also growing by sharpening each other. I do not claim to know it all but as someone who has been given the will and lots of time by the grace of God to dig into this matter, I see issues in your position. Probably you have heard this argument. Why do I repeat it? Because I did listen to your interpretation of Revelation 17 and I sensed a consciousness of weakness on your side in one of your explanations. Talking about verse Rev 17:18 "And the woman that you saw is the great city that has dominion over the kings of the earth.” you give a poor and unconvincing explanation and you appear to sense it. In fact I believe you have a thorough knowledge also of the books of Moses and you know very well about the blessing and curses of God concerning the obedience of Israel. If they obey, they are the head and if they disobey they are the tail and are ruled over. When Jerusalem became a harlot, she forsook the blessing of ruling over others and entered the curse of being ruled over. Jerusalem has not ruled over all the kings of the earth when being a harlot and you seem to know it. I think you have many valid points showing that Jerusalem meets many points of the harlot. But the decisive question is whether she - in an apostate state - is the mother Babylon or one of her daughters. Eze 23:2 “Son of man, there were two women, the daughters of ONE MOTHER. ...and Oholibah (a daughter) is Jerusalem. By the way I see the same issue with Papism. Papism has had more authority over nations but right now they simply do not rule over all nations if any at all. Who cares what the pope says when it comes to ruling your country nowadays? To me papism seems to be a daughter as well. So who is the mother? And by the way Babel was around before Abraham was called, before Jerusalem was given to Israel, and before the pope has emerged being an anti-Christ. And last but not least it is said: Rev 18:24 And in her was found the blood of prophets and of saints, and of ALL WHO have been slain on earth.” What about the thousands or millions slain by communist or islamic countries? We know their father but who is their mother? Can we just gloss over? The Bible says that the mother of Jerusalem is a Hittite. Eze 16:3 (Strong H2851; From H2865; fear: - terror.) Do not the communist and islamic countries give proof having the same mother: spreading fear? I have my thoughts but I am still digging into it .

There is plenty of historical evidence for general narrative of the Old Testament. I wrote a book on the topic, and there are many other resources available that provide additional information. www.amazon.com/Historical-Chronological-Context-Bible-Bruce/dp/1426943598/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=bruce+gore&qid=1621255594&sr=8-1

If you are referring to the presenter, it is Bruce Gore, at your service!

Thanks for joining several others who caught that misstatement.

@Bruce Gore was awesome video

Abraham Bedevian : Be reminded too, that the Hyksos had enslaved the people of northern Egypt. It seems that the description of the Hyksos fit certain people of the 20th century USA, and 13th century Spain and Portugal.

Joseph exploited the hell out of Egyptians. Maybe THAT'S why Egyptians got upset.

Yes exactly. That part kind of bothered me...Joseph did act like any modern day crony capitalist would do..but who knows, perhaps the egyptians had gotten really decadent and deserved it.. but the story makes sense, save the uncertain timeline.

Thanks for the clarification. Would you mind providing me the source for this hypothesis?

Bruce Gore its my source for having a brain and having a little common sense. The time frame and family is the same conclusion as yours is it not? However look at the name of Nefrubity compared to Hatshepsut. Also the name Wadmoses. You still see recorded history of Hatshepsut but Wadmoses and Nefrubity are no longer recorded. Hmm interesting. Lastly Thutmoses the second's mummy is covered with boils. I agree with your hypothesis I just believe it's the other sister.

Fair enough. Thanks.

Bruce Gore I love your videos btw :)

@@GoreBruce 🤣🤣🤣

Hatshepsut.

Piankhi

The common understanding in Jewish tradition, as reflected in the LXX and elsewhere, is that Exodus 12:40 should be read to include Canaan, which at the time was under Egyptian jurisdiction. Thus the 430 years represents the span of time from the covenant with Abraham (Gen. 15) to the Exodus. This is the view assumed by the Apostle Paul in Galatians 3:17, where he mentions the four hundred thirty years as spanning the time from Abraham to Moses.

Ok, thanks bruce

You're going backwards. Bc means you need to subtract how many years they spent in Egypt to move forward, not back

john frankmore - Your basically correct. Exodus was 1407 BC. Solomon’s Temple was 927 BC 480 years later; but the 430 years in Egypt was counted from the time Abraham entered Canaan. The 430 years incorporated Isaac, Jacob and Joseph as well as the years of slavery, your dates are correct.

@@GoreBruce I never knew this. Awesome! Most Christians think that the Hebrew's were in slavery for 430 years

Griffith Taka dude stop the nonsense

@John Smith it's plausible. I know they weren't close neighbors of the Egyptian people. They could possibly be Armenians, Iranians or Anatolians. The problem is the possible link with Kish and the Hyksos. So maybe the Hyksos were a bit closer to the Egyptians than the Armenians and the Iranians. I don't know..

@Griffith Taka why do celts wore skirts like Mediterranean people do? I doubt they got this idea while living in the British islands. The celts originated from the Mediterranean region, I believe them. Greece or Egypt, who knows?