Amen

Thank you.

Actually the B747 seemed a bit slow and over flared pushing the main gear into the ground.... Oops !!!

Many aircraft nerds are a miserable lot

when you average it out, the missed seconds and the added seconds come out to an average of 3 minutes.

🧈🧈🧈

Laying down the frosting 😂

How’s msfs? Only just got it for the Xbox but not set it up yet. Ta

50, 40, retard, reta *WHAM* shes a bit taller than I remember her-The pilot flying

@@kashy1116 its good. Graphics are great, loading time is really bad. and don't expect full flight sim, the ony buttons that work are the main ones you need for startup plus a couple others

Good thing it was a cargo plane or there'd be some bags to empty.

I have never done that in msfs😡 granted I never played it😂

Yeah

Yes I was there! It’s amazing!

737 was even better😮

Nice!@@Delano1226

@@Zzrdemon6633 Of course it can! They just don't like to when possible to keep the skin maintenance costs down. If needed for SURE they'll be up in the rain.

Excellent advice ! Vertical is just awful 🤢 Pan & Scan is so 1990’s.

Their TVs are vertical (made by TikTok). People don't realise they get 66% more picture with horizontal videos.....

How do they get 66% more picture?@@allanmanley6340

The 'zombie mode' 🙄

There is absolutely NO valid excuse for anyone to make any vertical videos, ever. Our basic physiology means that our field of view is significantly greater width-wise than vertical. It makes no sense to make a vertical video unless the audience is some kind of alien.

Hats off to the pilot that keeps them from crashing

you forget RUSIAN SUKHOI and Rusia Pilot... They are the best...

@@mr.e0311they are soft, prima donna’s

When it's actually heavy snow, you have to use the perpendicular runway to exit because you can't see the taxiways. I'm not exaggerating either, I've had to do that landing there in snow at night.

well it doesn’t 😅

There may be very few times that it will snow in August in MN but again very very rare for that to happen. This was most likely filmed sometime between mid fall to early spring.

@@RazgrizF14DI just assumed that Minnesota just gets 12 months of winter, so snow in August would be expected 😀

Two seasons there, July and winter.

That videos shows why the weakest thing on the F-22 is the pilot.

Chance of dying in a car crash throughout your whole life: 1 in 103 Chance of dying in a plane crash throughout your whole life: 1 in 11 million

why are you scared from flying?

well thats by design. they pick materials that will bend so that any sort of tension or load can be dampened instead of building up and breaking something apart.

Big things wiggle and flex. Skyscrappers wiggle and flex on the daily entire feet along the length. 10,000 parts flying in close formation around an oil leak.

@@slinger7529 I'm absolutely aware of that, but they just look so fragile! Engineering is a hell of a beast.

Yeah!!!

Good job no-one was swimming in the lake!

meh. Sometimes when I'm landing my A380 on a snowy driveway I won't even bother to lower the spinny-underneath-bits. If the snow is deep enough I just set her down straight into it, belly first. It saves wear-and-tear on the tyres and it's like sinking down into a feather duvet with my favourite Bangkok ladyboy. There's nothing like that feeling after a long flight.

​@@fluchterschoenreading this as I'm about to fly to Bangkok lmao

They can lineup that close! No air turbulence with these aircraft?

@@musicloverme3993 It's a telephoto lens, so the depth of field is compressed. They are not as close as they look. Plus, they are small planes so probably not much turbulence.

@@phillymathguy8142 So then the opposite of your vehicle side mirrors, "Objects in the mirror are closer than they appear."

@@musicloverme3993 I'm not an optics guy. Read about telephoto lenses & what they do to "depth of field". It's like those pictures you see of a sailboat supposedly sailing right in front of a big freighter. Looks like it's about to get rammed. It's much further from the freighter than the picture leads you to believe.

You worked for Chris Pratt AND Whitney Houston? Awesome.

@@ge2623 That's why he will always love you.

I'm curious, do these extreme maneuvers multiply the shortening of engine TBO?

@@ge2623 the rare actually funny dad joke in the YT comments, much appreciated

👍@@n_tas

henrythebasset8749, That, or a former RyanAir pilot.

Me too!

It’s actually not that bad, and it’s only for a very short time. The power and vectoring makes that maneuver possible 👍

@@jesperwall839 You say it as if it were easy to endure 4-6g xD

@@Angel-so6tg The pilots are trained to endure 9g for way longer than that maneuver takes. With g-suits off course.

@@Angel-so6tg 4-6g is easy for most fit people for, say, 10 seconds. Far worse is the negative g when you level out at the top of a speed climb.

was that not a cobra maneuver?

Who knows? could have chopped power a tiny bit early.

@@jhill4071 if you chop power, you will loose speed and land even harder. Accelerating will help on the landing itself, but that goes against the point of landing in the first place. The correct thing to do is to lift the nose a few degrees so the descent rate is reduced. When to do that varies from plane to plane, as lifting the nose also lowers the airspeed and can result in a hard landing if you do it too early.

@@spiff1003 Can you also pl explain what that flare means ?

@@spiff1003 I was watching doves and blackbirds land in my gravel driveway for bird seed i threw out there.. Noticed they flared into the wind and turned left almost every time right at landing. They spread their tail feathers and kinda pointed them downward ,and their wings flared out and extended. I noticed sometimes i would see a dust cloud when some landed. Then I noted the dust cloud landers were WITH THE WIND...LOL

@@Test-li4jo I think it refers to a floating action that is available if you skim the runway a little before touchdown. In fact i think you have to defeat the flair once initiated or you will float too far, and have to abort the landing. (i am no pilot, so one will have to probably straighten me out

True!

Talking of Die Hard... in the first one, while on the plane there is a reference to 9 11. The guy says he's been making a fist with his toes for 9 years, and then McClane says he's been a cop for 11 years. The 3 Die Hard movies are related to 9/11. Terrorists destroying a building, terrorists on a plane, and then terrorists in the financial district of New York. Nice pre-programming for the simple minded sheep.

@@StopMediaFakerylol. Do you also think a cloud that looks like a sheep actually is a sheep? 🤦‍♂️

@@StopMediaFakery Breaking news. There are 5 _Die Hard_ films.

@@StopMediaFakery Mate, if you're looking for evidence of 9/11 predictions* in Hollywood output, check out the pilot episode of _The Lone Gunmen_ and then look up the date it aired. It'll blow your mind. *and by "predictions" of course I mean some very smart writers coincidentally seeing the same vulnerabilities that terrorists were about to tragically exploit.

@@StopMediaFakery The irony when people like you call others sheep, it takes a brain as simple as that of a farm animal not to see how stupid such conspiracy nonsense really is.

Yessss

I wonder how no one of them suffered any wake turbulence effect? And how pilots are not worried about it.

Depending on the rules of engagement, yes. Visual identification, don't shoot unless fired upon, sort of thing.

True😄

Must be a bad muffler.

Imagine if all that noise were converted into something useful, like thrust.

I believe the real G's happen at high speeds, those turns look to be at lower speeds but the weird angles would do some stomach churning

Oof!

It was so hard I almost felt it! RIP main gear.

A few fillings came loose.

Boxes don't complain.

​@@iflyuwalkthe recipients sure do

aircraft was probably doing touch and goes for pilot currency so just a normal procedure.

@@RazgrizF14D "touch and goes for pilot currency" - do you have the slightest idea of what you are talking about ?

@@hb1338 Yes I do. All pilots have certain parameters they have to meet in order to be able to keep flying. Part of that is they must have a certain number of take offs and landings within a period of time. If they do not meet those parameters, they will have to do a flight with an examiner to show that they can still fly safely before they will be allowed to fly solo or with passengers. I am a pilot myself and I was an Air Traffic Controller.

Every airman?

@@HansDelbruck53 virtually 😀

@@gokceaydin3324 An airman is a member of the Air Force, not a pilot.

@@HansDelbruck53 I see, I'm no native speaker, don't know the exact terminology.

I guess lots of packages will arrive a bit destroyed after that

Smoooooth!

The "fire boss" isn't in the airtanker. They just orbit around the fire at upper altitudes, directing the airtankers to do their job. Very boring, from what they tell me. Plus you're trapped in that airplane for hours at a time.

They attack fires for sure. I've been watching them do it today.@@skydiverclassc2031

0:15. 0:36. 1:23. 1:53. 2:21. Upper right corner at the beginning of each clip after the description.

Any stable genius would understand…

Not familiar with Ramstein, but I was at that show, and he was in the box where all performances were performed. It is EAA Airventure though so some rules are waved for the week.

After Ramstein a rule was added that prohibited maneuvers when flying towards the crowd.

@@ghost307 The plane was travelling parallel with the crowd line.

@@hb1338 Correct.

In the UK, CAP403 government standard requires minimum separation of 230 metres between the crowd line and the display line, extended to 450 metres for aircraft operating in excess of 300 knots, or reduced to 150 metres for helicopters and light aircraft. It would be very hard to estimate the distance between the F-22 and the crowd.

No, that is not a good enough reason at all. You asked.

Flare is not the use of ground effect, flare is what the pilot does with pitch attitude to decrease sink rate and airspeed prior to touchdown. Ground effect may happen during flare, but it is not flare. A wing need not be flat on the bottom to create lift. Most of the wings seen on this channel have some curve on both top and bottom.

But after the pilot pulls back, that ground effect is keeping that plane flying slower than if it were in the same configuration but higher. Ground effect does reduce stall speed.@@gort8203

@@gort8203 Flare is also used to ensure that the main gear touches the ground first.

@@hb1338 That also has nothin to do with ground effect.

And while we're at it, ground effect is not due to compression of the air under the wing into some kind of cushion. It is due to the fact the flow around the wing must necessarily have less vertical component as the wing nears the ground. There is less upwash ahead of the wing and less downwash behind the wing. The reduction in trailing vortices reduces the induced drag of the wing, which behaves as though it has a higher aspect ratio. The wing produces more lift and less drag at the same the angle of attack it held before entering ground effect. That is why aircraft tend to sink and decelerate more slowly in ground effect. That's a simplification, but nowhere near as simplistic as the common 'cushion of air' story.

Except that it wasn't a takeoff. Another misleading title from 3 Minutes of Aviation. It was a low pass followed by the steep climb you see on the video.

All the fan boys rave about how their favourite aircraft can turn on a sixpence and win any dogfight, whilst forgetting that aviation combat is no longer fought that way. The F-35 is not very manoeuvrable, but its' radars and weaponry mean that it is likely to win almost any encounter in which it engages.