Electric Currents, Resistivity, Conductivity, Ohm's Law, Nice Demos Assignments Lecture 9, 10 and 11: freepdfhosting.com/8dff79c416.pdf Solutions Lecture 9, 10 and 11: freepdfhosting.com/61a4a0f36b.pdf
Пікірлер: 624
@sayanisarkar80004 жыл бұрын
I wait eagerly for him to say ,'So first I want to demonstrate to you....'
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92594 жыл бұрын
"So first I want to demonstrate to you.."
@amisharawal39673 жыл бұрын
@@lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 I now egarly wait for you to start the demonstration 😂😂😜😜😜
@mrkassimabdalla94543 жыл бұрын
@@lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259I trust physics Haha thank you from east Africa Somalia
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92599 жыл бұрын
This website contains all my 94 course lectures (8.01, 8.02 and 8.03) with improved resolution. They also include all my homework problem sets, my exams and the solutions. Also included are lecture notes and 143 short videos in which I discuss basic problems. ENJOY!
@aryamsthapak70957 жыл бұрын
Lectures by Walter Lewin. They will make you ♥ Physics. what about the slightly higher version of these courses ,sir ?
@rajeshrisadulwad20016 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir
@mustafakemalpasha9836 жыл бұрын
ma man
@sarveshtiwari23226 жыл бұрын
Lectures by Walter Lewin. They will make you ♥ Physics. thanks sir
@conceptready9295 жыл бұрын
Thank u sir
@GHTorell4 жыл бұрын
This really belongs to the positive sides of internet, I can attend classes from MIT from my home in Sweden for free. Let's forget about all the downsides of internet, at least for now.
@aniketeuler64433 жыл бұрын
Of course sometimes it becomes a blessing too 👍
@SirRolandSK5 жыл бұрын
I start getting why the MIT is so prestigeous. Professors like you are capable of perfectly explaining something to the students without confusing them. I am currently studying electrical engineering at the Technical University in Vienna and here are the students the ones, that have to understand stuff out of books instead of listening of such great lectures. i guess everyone has it a bit different and their way of learning may vary, but the finishing pount is the same for everyone. thank you for sharing your knowledge in your unique way.
@ramatulasikamireddy22852 жыл бұрын
That's great
@ramatulasikamireddy22852 жыл бұрын
Are u a professor now?
@marcossidoruk80332 жыл бұрын
Not necessarily the case. First, books will always teach you extra stuff, you can definitely graduate from pretty much any University if you understand the lectures, but those students who read always end up knowing much more, this is a truth that is often omitted, the main factor that determines the level of education is the student. The reason MIT students are so good is because it is damn hard to get in, thats pretty much the only thing prestige does to a university. Keep in mind that prestige comes in great part from research and there are great researchers that are bad teachers, in pretty much every university you will always find some good, some bad, and if you are lucky some excellent teachers. As long as you have capabilities and will to always go beyond what is taught in class, you can always get an MIT level education, its just that if you actually went to MIT the world will recognise you more.
@mendelkeller83207 жыл бұрын
I was practicing for my Sat physics subject test, which in taking because it's an MIT entrance requirement. I didn't know an answer about emf and current, but started thinking and heard Walter's voice talking me through it, and figured it out. These lectures did make me
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92597 жыл бұрын
You are very welcome!
@powertube56714 жыл бұрын
I am a retired EE and CS engineer, having gotten my EE degree in the 60s. That being said, I am learning more from your videos, some of which I forgot, some I wasn't taught and some I never really fully understood. You obviously love your job and do a great job teaching. Right now, I am watching your videos selectively to get a better grasp of EM wave propagation, transmission lines and antennas. Thank you for posting these classes Professor Lewin! By the way, you probably should use less salt on your eggs. I know I have to. :-) I wonder what would happen if you poured some Gatorade into the distilled water. I think the answer is easy. I have to avoid the stuff because of the salt content.
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92594 жыл бұрын
thanks for your kind words
@dipamdas76352 жыл бұрын
Sir, at first I was very afraid about #Physics but now a days after watching your lectures , I can feel that physics is a theoretical and interesting subject. Thank you Sir. Love from # India... 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92592 жыл бұрын
All the best
@kameelamareen7 жыл бұрын
Woooow mind blowing , man I love the way you teach in, where you connect everything together to help us understand feel the physics not memorize it !!! Thank you 👏👏👏
@anantdesai27516 жыл бұрын
Dear Dr. Lewin: I have greatly enjoyed your lectures. My father was a professor of electrical engineering at VJTI in Mumbai. I have a Ph.D. in Mechanical engineering. Today at the age of 70, I still enjoy clarifying my fundamentals. Your down to earth and experiment based teaching is lucid and profound. My recent calibrations: Light travels 30 cm or 1 ft in 1 nanosecond. So a 1 GHz computer cannot have its primary memory more than 6 inches away!! 1 coulomb charges 1 m apart have a Force of 1 million metric tons!! That is 100m sided cube of water or 1 cubic football field of water!!
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92596 жыл бұрын
:)
@109_ritikahasija54 жыл бұрын
I started studying physics to clear IITJEE but ended up falling in love with it
@anirudhs16183 жыл бұрын
I started studying physics for my love for it but ended up in the IITJEE rat race...
@godson2003 жыл бұрын
Remember guys you are not gonna use this physics in your real life, and they are just of no use when you will be 40 or 50 years old, unless you choose to become a professor. I personally used to hate physics but now I love it. Thanks to teachers like walter lewin sir and alakh pandey sir. But when you love somebody too much, it becomes a distraction. Be it a girl, or a subject.
@gandalfthegrey27773 жыл бұрын
@@godson200 it depends on what you wanna do, if you want to be a doctor than physics is distraction but if you really love something you must persue it, if someone loves physics then they must complete a p.h.d and go to research field, here even at the age of 90 you will be using physics 14 hours/day in your life, from teaching to research and writting papers, a subject is not a distraction, everything is a distraction if you don't want it.
@ironman80807 жыл бұрын
I LOVE HIS TEACHING
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92597 жыл бұрын
:)
@kuldeepprajapat5 жыл бұрын
😍
@charulbhati86693 жыл бұрын
i discovered his videos now and they are helping me a lot in preparing for my medical entrance exam called neet in India. Thanks a lot lewin sir.
@channelnaimalum7025 ай бұрын
are you in college brother ?
@kingarth0r3 жыл бұрын
I'm legit crying at how much better this is than my *current* professor. lol
The potential difference between your professor and Walter Lewin is so enormous you have no choice but to surge here
@positivegradient5 жыл бұрын
Sir, your lectures are a gift to humanity.
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92595 жыл бұрын
:)
@ahmedfarooqkhan85413 жыл бұрын
Walter Lewin saves! This is a core course in my bachelor's in electrical engineering degree and I started to hate it for the way it was taught. I started following Walter Lewin's lectures more than the ones in my class and well he achieved the impossible. He made me love the course itself and I've been solving problems and deriving equations with so much and enthusiasm! THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THIS! THANK YOU SIR WALTER LEWIN! LOTS OF LOVE AND BLESSINGS FROM PAKISTAN!
@armandoarevalo40106 жыл бұрын
Thank you Professor Lewin for all the great lectures and resources you provide! You are a true inspiration!!
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92596 жыл бұрын
:)
@surojpaul144 жыл бұрын
Enjoying lockdown by your mind blowing electricity lectures💓
@papugamer76864 жыл бұрын
Would it be possible theoretically to give an electric shock to a person on the other side of the earth, if we had high enough voltage?
@firozalam75614 жыл бұрын
I find your lectures useful and inspiring. Thank you.
@varshasingh47345 жыл бұрын
The beauty of ur teaching is how easily u convert complex things easy
@shivrajranjan17873 жыл бұрын
Sir you are the hero of all students who wants to learn and love physics may be in life gives me the fortune to touch your feet (it is the way to show respect to our elders) you are my well wisher and a loving teacher of all time
@rafaelochsendorf10655 жыл бұрын
Hi Professor Walter, thanks for the fantastic lectures. I have a question: What would happen if you would touch de van de graaf while wearing your shoes? The charge of the VDG (the one you commonly used during your lectures) is only 10uC, so I can't figure out what would happen. I could come up with the follow (probably wrong) hypothesis: I assumed that you would experience a current from the VDG to ground, which would be limited by the VDG charge. The "tricky" part is that since the current flow is I = dQ/dt and Ohm's law gives us 100mA, it means the VDG can't provide enough current to keep that up unless it would get charged almost instantly. My (probably incorrect) conclusion is that therefore you would just end up feeling a initial shock, and if you could hold on the sphere after the shock, you would end up acting as a path for the current between the VDG and ground. Since the moving belt inside the VDG would start inducing more charge on the sphere, you would experience a (very low) current flow by the induced charge. All of this is assuming that the initial current could cause some muscle contraction but wouldn't harm you any further. Where did I go wrong? Once again thanks for the fantastic lectures, they are really unmatched. They make me love physics again and have been an excellent entertainment source every single day since I found out about them. Thank you!
@srichakraraj23386 жыл бұрын
Love you and your lectures a lot sir they are making me love physics 💓 💓 💓💓 💓
@ayeshakazi91493 жыл бұрын
Sir really your teaching skills are amazing , love from Bangladesh :)
@carl61676 жыл бұрын
Hello, I cannot understand why I would be constant throughout the circuit when considering the series of resistors. I mean, after going through the resistor, the current should increase or decrease, not stay the same. Right ? Is it because of charge density of the material, and that therefore if localy a change in speed takes place, it will spread to junctions ?
@TriThom503 жыл бұрын
Hey Dr.Lewin, So is current in the sense of circuit analysis just a simplification of a vector for convenience sake?
@AmitSharma-dh2gn2 жыл бұрын
Sir you are the legend of physics. These lectures are useful. I watched every lecture.
@martinmartinmartin29963 жыл бұрын
excellent explanation of Ohm's Law extended to encompass the world around us. Thank you Prof. Lewin
@anubhaagarwal42242 жыл бұрын
Hey almamater u r just phenomenal Loved ur experiments evry time u watch u learn even more with the dimension of thinkng being enhanced
@venkatakishore72767 жыл бұрын
Hi Sir when you are doing scuffing experiment , at that time you are wearing shoes , then your shoes are rubbed against woolen cloth so your shoes gets charged right , not your feet ? ( i.e because your feet is not exerting any friction with the cloth )
@avishkumar62813 жыл бұрын
Huge respect, sir i am really in love with physics because of you. Thanku so much sir ❤ love from india 🇮🇳
@studylearningchannelvedant65323 жыл бұрын
Congratulations sir ,for your biggest achievement. That you know.
@caiarcosbotias17105 жыл бұрын
An excellent lecture. Thanks for uploading it.
@theodorebrown423510 ай бұрын
Thank you professor lewin for all your efforts!
@hindusthaniboy3 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir to help poor Indian students in this situation by giving your lecturers on KZfaq.
@fernandoencinas52315 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for your lectures dear Prof. Walter Lewin. They are very inspiring. Please let me show some doubts about the last demonstration of the lecture: 1) The charge detected by the electroscope is due to a bulk conduction process through the soles or a surface conduction process over the soles, the shoes,... (or both processes)? 2) The charge detected by the electroscope could be an induced one by the charge created is the low surface of the soles during the scuffing? I know that a opposite charge is generated in the pad by the scuffing, but perhaps it can easily go to earth and have a net charge in the soles that could cause an induced charge in your body. 3) The electroscope null response when you stop the scuffing is due to the fact that the charge goes to earth through your body with the shoes. Do you think that can play a role the charge recombination in the interface between the sole and the pad? 4) It could be interesting and informative to repeat the experiment but placing bellow the pad a thick plate of teflon or fused silica to prevent the charge leakage to earth. Perhaps the electroscope do not discharge even when you stop the scuffing. Or may be the electroscope is discharged due to the recombination mentioned in 3) even when the leakage to earth is not posible. Thank you so much.
@miguelcovarrubias-conde39423 жыл бұрын
This was really helpful for preparing for my test. Thanks!!!
@achyutsingh52983 жыл бұрын
Awesome experiments, absolutely loved it!
@dustinjohnson64662 жыл бұрын
This man is a legend. Please keep teaching. Thank you Sir!
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92592 жыл бұрын
You are very welcome
@shiwanimishra29927 жыл бұрын
I'm so glad that my teacher suggested me about ur lectures on youtube sir😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊
@yash292107 жыл бұрын
Finally you changed your channel's profile picture!!!! GLAD TO SEE!!!!☆★☆★☆★☆★
@loucascubeddu3 жыл бұрын
Hello, thanks for the free lecture! I have a question: Why doesen't 𝛕 (tau the time between collisions) go down when the Electric field goes up? Why does it stay constant even though we applied a force to the electrons and they now are accelerated? Thanks!
@chappie36422 жыл бұрын
I suppose it's because as was shown previously the effect of the electric field is almost entirely negligible when compared to that of temperature, and either way the time an electron takes to crash against a particle is probably the average one, so if the electric field pushes some of the electrons towards crashing maybe (and I mean maybe) it will then prevent other electrons from crashing somewhere else, meaning that its effect on 𝛕 ends up being cancelled
@blthetube14 жыл бұрын
This is the answer to our lack of education problems. Get our most brilliant minds and make their knowledge free and universal.
@harshameti10666 жыл бұрын
Sir charge density(j) =di/ds and not i/s,why?
@yashaswinin17083 жыл бұрын
Love from INDIA 🇮🇳🥰🤗 Thanks for the professor Walter Lewin🙏for making us to love physics ❤
@Shivu1234abc2 жыл бұрын
i cant express enough how much i loved this
@kartikvashist25225 жыл бұрын
Hello sir! At 6:17 you derived the speed of electrons in that conductor. Then how come current flows within just the flick of a switch? Thank you, sir.
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92595 жыл бұрын
because the E-field propagates into the conductor with the speed of light of the conductor.
@kartikvashist25225 жыл бұрын
@@lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259 thank you sir!
@sonal43653 жыл бұрын
hello sir, I've been attending your classes since last week and I've realized that there was so much in physics which i was not aware of , your classes made me realize that physics is very interesting and thought provoking.
@BrandonF6016 жыл бұрын
Wow......you sir are AMAZING. I mostly had no idea what you were talking and writing about but as a 17 yr employed automotive technician that uses an oscilloscope literally daily, u were directly describing ptc and ntc style thermistors. A negative temperature coefficient thermistor or variable resistor is the most commonly style engine temperature sensor used in automobiles. Temperature up, resistance down. The lab scope is also used for issues pertaining to variable relector, hall effect...whatever sensors controlled by a transistor driver ( fuel injectors, ignitions coils, output solenoids, etc.....) Again....have no clue what you are saying but it is addicting and badass. I could listen to you all day.
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92596 жыл бұрын
:)
@wntu46 жыл бұрын
Hi Dr. Lewin. In terms of the drift velocity is it understood that this is concurrent with the electron motion ? They are still bouncing all over and hitting atoms while also meandering in the direction the voltage field is pushing them?
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92596 жыл бұрын
yes
@mavors69712 жыл бұрын
the drift velocity being a*tau, is a approximation right because between collisions the drift velocity is variable, not constant, right ?
@haupham50866 жыл бұрын
Can you please tell me know what lecture in 8.01 covers drift velocity? I do not understand what tor (T) means. Thank you
@pallaviKUMARI-vk7bs5 жыл бұрын
HereT stands for temperature ie if we increase the temperature then Vd ie driff velocity will also increases
@ahmadeldesokey98444 жыл бұрын
Sir , if we connect a dc battery across a wire , why the current density is uniform over the cross section of the wire ?
@imapublicagent3 жыл бұрын
I have Giancoli 4th edition which seems to be wrong for this. Anyone know the correct edition?
@rajpala88763 жыл бұрын
Why doesn't the water electrolyze in the demonstration experiment on decrease in water/electrolyte resistance with the addition of salt?
@hemabharathi23094 жыл бұрын
Sir I Love your lectures and it helped me to learn more abou physics
@byteZorvin6 жыл бұрын
Could I find course 6 (of that complex resistor network) in MIT OCW
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92596 жыл бұрын
make an effort and search
@vaibhavchopra87395 жыл бұрын
Professor I have a question...what would those SPECIAL shoes( worn by thief in the end) look like in order to make a working static gun from his finger?
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92595 жыл бұрын
question unclear
@vaibhavchopra87395 жыл бұрын
@@lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259 you said the thief would have to wear a special kind of boots to be able to make a static gun by just rubbing his feet on the ground... because normal boots will lose charge as soon as you stop rubbing your feet on the ground...i was asking what would the special boots(the ones that won't lose charge) look like? Would they just be thicker souled than usual or something else would be changed too in them?
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92595 жыл бұрын
thicker & higher resistivity soles
@vaibhavchopra87395 жыл бұрын
@@lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259 okay...my doubt is cleared professor...thank you
@suryak.pathak87415 жыл бұрын
Hello Professor,please provide the exact definition of series and parallel combination of resistors.
@fitwithpratham_sk3 жыл бұрын
6:34 turtle and rabbit story still valid here wow
@dve8454 жыл бұрын
showing the (non-linear) time regime impuls of resistivity is one thing, stating "not to trust Ohm's law" is a bit reductive (not to say blunt) ... we realized quite a lot trusting it (as we did with Newton's imperfect laws for instance) ... oh and though it's fortunate that resistance goes up with temperature, it's also necessary from a physical standpoint no?
@ankisbegummina89416 жыл бұрын
So professor, at 4:45 we are assuming that the E field is same throughout the copper wire, right? Otherwise we couldn't be saying V=EL (where L is the total length of the wire and V is the voltage difference between the two ends of the wire), right?
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92596 жыл бұрын
yes, since the copper wires we use are uniform and have the same diameter E is constant in the wire.
@iskrabiscevic3003 жыл бұрын
Thank you for helping me go through my physics mock.
@funfact7714 жыл бұрын
The graph 📈 is so good
@user-kf3lz8md8t Жыл бұрын
hi,thanks your lesson.May I ask that the voltage of the resistor is larger than that of the wire macroscopically, because the number of electrons remains unchanged, and the electrons need to pass through the thin tube at a faster speed to make the current equal, so a larger electric field is needed?
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259 Жыл бұрын
question unclear - ill defined
@mustahsonkhan42165 жыл бұрын
sir! y do u always pin some tools on the right side of ur shirt!
@theblackhole16 жыл бұрын
what is the substitute for ohm's law ?
@engAcasabhus2 жыл бұрын
Professor I have one question. Superconductors have zero resistance. Applying ohms law we get I=V/R Since R is zero Current should be infinite But what is infinite current? And if there is no infinite current how much current flows in a superconductor?
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92592 жыл бұрын
V=IR L is length of the Superconductor, E is the field in the superconductor E*L=V E=0 thus V=0. 0=I*0 Thus I can have any value.
@engAcasabhus2 жыл бұрын
@@lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259 Thank you very much for this kind favour.
@yogeshrathore85084 жыл бұрын
Really appreciable nice method love it
@tanaykumar34936 жыл бұрын
Sir, I have two questions, First, you said that resistivity increases with increase in temperature but when you heated up the air the electroscope showed more deviation which means resistivity of air decreased and both these statements contradict. Second, can you please explain the part that why the 2 billion resistance of the shoe is very low for the experiments you carry.
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92596 жыл бұрын
resistivity of solids increases with temperature. When you heat air you create ions and that lowers the resistivity
@akhilanr12333 жыл бұрын
I have been taking many mit courses during the lockdown and there are very few teachers like prof. lewin
@AkshayRaj_34 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU SO MUCH SIR PROVIDING VIDEO, ITS REALLY VERY HELPFUL FOR US. I LOVE THE WAY YOU TEACH. LOVE YOU SIR W.L
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92594 жыл бұрын
You are most welcome
@JohnDoe-tr1cx6 жыл бұрын
What does scuffing your feet do exactly? Does it increase the resistivity of your feet, slowing the current, and allowing the charge to stay on the thing? If so, why does the resistivity increase? Is the temperature of your soles changing?
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92596 жыл бұрын
they charge me up - use google
@dannchan003 жыл бұрын
40:19 will the light lit on if the water is heated up and without adding salt?
@sittingcat86502 жыл бұрын
For the light to lit on, you have to have free charges to move from one plate to another. There are ridiculously few of them in the clean water, so the light don't lit. When we add salt, it creates Cl-ions which can transfer the charge, so, the light lit up. If you heat up the water, say, with electricity, it may produce some ions. But it will produce ions which are lighter then the water molecule, so they will fly up in the air, and there will not be any charge transfer. But if the potential difference between the plates is so enormously large, then maybe you could see some light. Correct me, if I'm wrong. I'm not a physicist.
@harshameti10666 жыл бұрын
Sir, since current is defined as the rate of transfer of charge from one side of the area to the other side ,so 'i' must depend on area also but the equation is just i=dq/dt ,how?
@patryk_495 жыл бұрын
dq depends of area
@06_Gamer_ Жыл бұрын
Sir, ur way of teaching is fabulous 🤓
@venkatakishore72764 жыл бұрын
Hi Sir, Does increase in voltage will increase the speed of the electrons or numbers of electrons in a conductor ?
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92594 жыл бұрын
double the potential diff, the average drift velocity of electrons in conductors will double. watch en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drift_velocity
@pablojvazquez6 жыл бұрын
If the drift velocity is almost negligible compared to the velocity due to thermal motion, why does temperature increase with current? Thanks!
3:40 What the drift velocity somehow follows from the acceleration from the electric field?? I dont follow
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92592 жыл бұрын
watch this lecture - I derive it
@hardik94103 жыл бұрын
3:25 professor I have a question that why you have used F=ma for acceleration of e As I heard that mass of e changes by the relation m=m°/√1-(v²/c²) I have this confusion about it. Please elaborate 🙏
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92593 жыл бұрын
rest mass, m, never changes. E= gamma*m^2. gamma changes not m. Some books call m*gamma the relativistic mass. That's confusing.
@hardik94103 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much professor 😊❤️🙏🙏
@ahmadeldesokey98445 жыл бұрын
Sir , if I connect an n-type semiconductor to a Dc voltage source , will it conduct current easily ?
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92595 жыл бұрын
use google
@andrewdiggs91667 жыл бұрын
So maybe I am missing something, but I thought the E inside a conductor is always 0? In the case of the Cu wire is it only the surface e- that feel a force?
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92597 жыл бұрын
E is zero in a conductor for static electricity, not in case a current goes through the conductor.
@khandkertiashazad68586 жыл бұрын
Professor, I am having a tough time visualising the E field inside the wire. At 4:49 Why is the E field inside the whole conductor a constant (1 V/m). Since the length of the conductor is 10m, shouldn't the magnitude of the E field inside the wire at different distances (from the origin of the E field) be different? Where is the origin of this E field actually?
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92596 жыл бұрын
>>>Where is the origin of this E field actually?>>> battery
@khandkertiashazad68586 жыл бұрын
Lectures by Walter Lewin. They will make you ♥ Physics. So the battery is producing an E field that that is constant everywhere in space, and no matter how far away I extend the wire from the battery the E field in it will always remain same?
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92596 жыл бұрын
>>>So the battery is producing an E field that that is constant everywhere in space, >>> NO that is incorrect - Watch my lectures and use google.
@khandkertiashazad68586 жыл бұрын
Lectures by Walter Lewin. They will make you ♥ Physics. I've googled about it, but no success. Does this field have any special name or something? Can I find a field line sketch for it or somewhere? Could you give me a hint sir, about the nature of this E field. This thing is bothering me a lot.
@Amy-sx7hw6 жыл бұрын
Is it really a uniform electric field? So does that mean the electrones are accelerating under a uniform electric field?
@michalkolarik9014 Жыл бұрын
45:53 isn’t it that even without the shoes, when one touches the Van de Graaf, he won’t be electrocuted, because even though it has high voltage, it still has a litttle net charge on the surface, so the high current (lets say 300000V/1000 ohms = 300 Amps) will take only a split of second and shoud be harmles? And after the charge is drained out, if you keep touching the VDG, it won’t have the 300000 voltage anymore since the VDG is actually a constant current source generator, and the amount of charge delivered is so small that is, again, harmless, am I right or not?
@michalkolarik9014 Жыл бұрын
And hypothetically, when the resistivity of the shoes is about 2M ohms as mentioned in the video, it “should” be harmless to touch the outlet with 230V, right? (110 V in US)
@lauroflorin8 жыл бұрын
Say we have a 600 000 Km long conductor connected at some potential V. If we place 2 ammeters next to the terminals, which ammeter is going to move first and how long until the second one moves? Why?
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92598 жыл бұрын
+lauroflorin Your problem is not well defined. A current will flow through a closed circuit - it is unclear what you mean by "the terminals". In any case I am sure you will be able to do this problem on your own. Keep in mind that the propagation of E-fields in metals goes with the speed of light. Good luck!
@lauroflorin8 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I meant the long wire would be connected to some power source and thus the ammeters would be next to its positive/negative terminals. Ok, so as soon as I complete the circuit, the E-field will propagate in the direction + -> - If its speed is ~C, that means the ammeter next to the positive terminal will start moving and after ~2 seconds the one next to the negative terminal will as well. Is this correct? If so, how do we reach that the E-field in metals goes with the speed of light? Thanks !
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92598 жыл бұрын
+lauroflorin make a circuit with the power source (battery?) in it and a switch The problem is somewhat similar to waveguides (see my lectures in 8.03)
@cooper10564 жыл бұрын
Hey can someone help me out with a physics question. So Im studying the Current section, and that tells us how many charges are passing through the cross sectional area of a conductor right ? but how can that be if the electric field within the conductor is zero (since E= 0 (guess's law), inside there should be no moving charges because there is no potential difference)? shouldn't all the charges be on the surface of the conductor and not inside?
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92594 жыл бұрын
any current can go through a superconducting wire which has no resistance. V=IR V=0 R=0 I can be anything.
@cooper10564 жыл бұрын
@@lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259 Hey Dr. Lewin, I see that the current's magnitude can be anything, but does the current travel inside the conductor or on the surface of the conductor? Or both maybe ?
@TriThom504 жыл бұрын
Dr. Lewin, could we not also say that a negative current (i
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92594 жыл бұрын
current, I, is defined as charge per sec. The direction is defined the way positive charges would move in an E-field. End of strory
@TriThom504 жыл бұрын
@@lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259 okay but I am confused about how this is universally true without knowing the sign of the value. I=dq/dt so if you point your arrow to the right and electrons move right then the rate of change of charge to the right would be a negative value, which is equivalent to a positive value of the same magnitude going to the left. So isn't it specifically currents that are positve that are opposite electrons
@nna231019894 жыл бұрын
Where I can find explanation for the system at the end of the lecture? Please show me. Thank a lottttt.
@stargazer76443 жыл бұрын
It is explained in a later lecture
@harshankit93186 жыл бұрын
Sir, why current is taken alway equal along resistor? Is electric field or drifting of electron is responsible for current? If current is energy isn't it used by resistors?
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92596 жыл бұрын
current is not energy. current is Amperes, energy is Joules. In a water hose, the same amount of water (per second) flows through every cross section of the hose for obvious reasons THINK!. The same is true for current (charge per second) through every cross section of resistors THINK. use google.
@thienthanhtranoan67234 жыл бұрын
Teacher, can you tell me the reason why (25:25) at the beginning the current surged towards to a very high value? Thanks you a lot!!!
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92594 жыл бұрын
The E-field propagates through the wire with the speed of light. Thus switching on will "instantaneoulsy" make the current 5 A.
@thienthanhtranoan67234 жыл бұрын
@UCiEHVhv0SBMpP75JbzJShqw Thank you teacher but why is there a little increase of current and after that, in the next term, R remains constant and I is not changing? Can you tell me what happen with the resistor?
@mehulpandita88525 жыл бұрын
I have a question Prof. At the end, when you take your shoes off, you have very low resistance, so the current should be higher. But the electroscope shows no deflection. This implies that no charge flows through it. Where am I getting it wrong?
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92595 жыл бұрын
the electroscope shows no deflection as my body NEVER charges up.
@mehulpandita88525 жыл бұрын
@@lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259This means that if we let current pass through us without wearing shoes, the charge would have no other way out so it would damage our body. However, if we wore shoes, it would allow to current to flow into the ground without causing much harm.
@mehulpandita88525 жыл бұрын
In other words, without shoes, we have "infinite" resistance between our feet and the ground.
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92595 жыл бұрын
no damage if the current is very low and/or does not last very long
@legendary-n8n Жыл бұрын
"Teachers who make physics meaningless are criminals" I can't remember it exactly , my level in physics is improving rapidly thanks alot Dr/walter
@hindustaniviolin728911 ай бұрын
as a 9th grader i understood everything. u make learning so easy. thank u so much sir
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they925911 ай бұрын
Glad to hear that
@poojyadav74423 жыл бұрын
how does it feel to hold a CAT fur in your hand?
@AbhayKumar-um8vl2 жыл бұрын
Sir , why is Drift velocity = EeT/m not EeT/2m since it is the average velocity of electrons? Another question: Why T(tao) remains same when temperature and material remains same? The T is the average time of Collison of electrons and since the drift velocity is higher in higher E(electric field) the collison time would get shorter. But this is not shown in you derivation at starting calculating the speed of electrons and I Current
@FluffieWolf4 ай бұрын
I came to make same comment. Appears like we should use average drift velocity. FFor uniform acceleration
@aryan_13 жыл бұрын
Sir, this is Aryan. A huge fan of yours. If I would live near you, I would enjoy the whole day with you sir. Don't feel lone. I am with you sir, you will always be there in my heart. By the way sir, I am a high school student. I do love watching your lectures. I have just started with 8.02 and finding it very interesting but I have to skip some of them sir as I have not been a past learner of Calculus. So, according to you, what else could I do to rock my school with my physics knowledge ?
@godson2003 жыл бұрын
Dude just wait till class 11. In first month, you will learn all the calculus you need. Otherwise you can obviously go on watching these just for the love of it
@kshitishbahuguna14205 жыл бұрын
he made me fall in love with physics once again.....
@anirudhs16183 жыл бұрын
So why did you break up?
@michaellewis78614 жыл бұрын
Can't Ohm's Law be effectively saved if we were able to define temperature for a substance as a function of current? Would that relation be reducible to some constant coefficient multiplied by a function? What would a temperature function of the current look like? What else would it be a function of?
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92594 жыл бұрын
yes that can be done. Every resistor that you then buy will have to come with a written equation which is a function of I. Two resistors both 100 Ohm would have a different equation if they are not made of the same material or if their dimensions differ.
@HarshYadav-ot9xu2 жыл бұрын
Q - 1:00 as the electric field moves the electron from lower potential to higher potential it's should have a huge significant value of electric field ?
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92592 жыл бұрын
If the EMF of the battery does not change then the E-field in the conductor does not change
@HarshYadav-ot9xu2 жыл бұрын
@@lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259 As we have applied potential approach the conductor the electron flows and tries to cancel out the effect of the electric field within the conductor and it always flow because we maintain the potential difference across the conductor that's why the motion of electron takes place and if we see the second scenario in which there is no potential across the conductor then also the electrons move in randomly why? Should be some factor which is responsible for their randomness GG
@anerypatel20038 жыл бұрын
Now where can anyone find a physics professor who measures the resistance of his footwear and scuff and produce charge! It just made my day. One Question:- Can we say that if the V-I graph does not pass through the origin then is a non-ohmic resistor?
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92598 жыл бұрын
+Anery Patel ha ha ha, I am sure I am not the only physics Professor who is a bit crazy. If the V-I curve is NOT a straight line then Ohm's law is not very useful. If it is a straight line but if it does not go through zero, Ohm's law is also useless. Ohm's law requires that when V = 0, I is also 0. However, a very interesting case is a resistor made of superconductive material. Thus R=0. There cannot be any potential difference over the R as that would give an infinite current. Thus 0=I*0 (consistent with Ohm's law). I can be anything. I can be hundreds of A. That's being used with maglev trains.
@anerypatel20038 жыл бұрын
+Lectures by Walter Lewin. They will make you ♥ Physics. Okay. I see it now. Basically, for Ohm's law to hold good, V=IR must hold true, whatever the case may be(temperature being constant). And talking about the superconductors, how much ever voltage we apply the potential drop will be zero because resistance of the material is zero and so current will be infinite. I hope I understood it correctly. And I am sure that you are the craziest of all, boring into our skulls and fitting in the subject tight.
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92598 жыл бұрын
+Anery Patel We cannot apply to a superconductor any voltage as it would lead to an infinite current. In any circuit that we build to "push" current through a superconductor, the potential difference over it will be zero. >>>And I am sure that you are the craziest of all, boring into our skulls and fitting in the subject tight. It's my way of making all of you ♥ Physics. ! ! !
@anerypatel20038 жыл бұрын
Lectures by Walter Lewin. They will make you ♥ Physics. But as far as I know to "push" the current through any material, a voltage or potential difference across its end is required. And if I don't apply any voltage or potential difference across the ends of superconductor, how can the current pass through it? And it is only then when we realize that the potential drop across the material is zero and we come to a conclusion that it has infinite conductance.
@lecturesbywalterlewin.they92598 жыл бұрын
+Anery Patel There are various ways to create a current in a superconductor. One way that comes immediately to mind is that you start the current when the material is not yet a superconductor. The temperate is too high. You apply a voltage and you create a current. Now you lower the temperature and the material becomes superconductive. The current will keep going and the voltage over the super conductor becomes zero. I suggest you search the web to find other ways how very high currents can be created through superconductors in the LHC (at Cern) and in maglev trains.