And maybe feds 5 consecutive second half dominations: 5 Wimbledon Us Open doubles, many atp finals wins etc.

Alcaraz will break the points record

@@BIG_Z19905 he needs to improve his consistency at different events.

@@BIG_Z19905 no chance .

Djoko’s 16950 points can actually be broken , but will be broken by himself again if he can keep the momentum on next year 🚬

But he didn’t win the Olympics which is a big tournament

@@dewman7477 Olympics are a separate event, not part of usual tennis calendar. No ATP points are awarded for winning Olympics.

@@basileusbasileus9346 it’s still a significant tournament for any athlete to win though regardless

@@dewman7477 He only played it 3 times..and he got to one final. It's not as big a deal when it's played so infrequently.

@@joemarshall4226 he never made gold medal final only semifinal or bronze medal match. And that’s what made it impressive for Nadal to win 1 gold medal and Murray to win 2 gold medals it’s a rare once in every 4 years event so the gold medal is very hard to win

At least three times,Novak won all 4GS three times each

Yeah, even in 2022, Swiatek could not get that despite being clearly on her own league. 16950 points when there are 2 other all time greats (and Murray still there as a big challenger also) is impossible.

If it shows dominance how come he doesn't have the most slams?? how come 2 hard court slams a year & he has a total of 12 yet only 1 clay slam a year & Nadal has 14?? based on his "dominance he should have double the hard court slams 28 to Nadals' clay slams of 14...but he doesnt'...combine clay & hard court slams...Nadal has 20 & Novax 14.... We can see who really is the dominant player...

@@jmilne5751 Novak is goat..Just acept that and move on

@@madmax-nz2xh accept Nadal is GOAT & move on...

@@jmilne5751 dw lets watch next season saying goodbye to nadal

THE PANDEMIC RANKING GIVEN AWAY DOZEN OF WEEKS, its a fake record

Nole will crush this record himself before he retires

@@evolvefromnow6735 agreed. No one else can 🔥

@@evolvefromnow6735 its not a record. WEEKS AT nº1 ARE NOT A TITLE, just decoration

@@compluto4190 😄

Golden masters isn't a real term, it's a made up term by the cringe worthy Novax cult

@@bengray5013ATP say's different kzfaq.info/get/bejne/eZl0g7yd0LqqfYE.html

@@bengray5013 .... and then we are cringe

@@bengray5013 it is a real term go watch the highlights of 2018 cincy final

@@Zoran889 that means nothing. Atp call majors as grand slams even thought grand slam is the name for winning all four majors. You're clutching at straws 😂

Fed has 8 wim

This is not a top 8 records list. Just 8 records.

Of course they won't talk about ND 9 wins from 9 finals...He has suffered more losses there compared to Nadal at RG has been pushed numerous times to 5 sets, whereas Nadal has played I believe only 3 5 set matches....So it is NOT worthy of a mention at all.

@@jmilne5751 Note that Nadal 3 losses at Roland Garos are constituted from 1 Soderling and 2 (TWO!) Djokovic, whilst Nadal never defeated Djokovic at Australian. If you look H2H at Roland Garos, Nadal leads Djokovic 8-2, while at Australian Open is 2-0 in Djok favor. Which only explains how consistent Djok was on Nadal's favorite GS and surface, he managed to go deep into the tournament quite often, while Nadal failed so many times to reach semis or finals at AO. Just shows how complete and all around player Djokovic is. Nadal's records at FO are ridiculous and will never be broken, but he is unarguably less complete player than Djok in every term. He always plays his game no matter the opponent and surface, he is one dimensional. He is beast, no question about it, but one dimensional beast. While Djokovic is much more complete and can adapt and change tactics, he is like a an AI that improves every time opponent improves, sometimes seems literally impossible to win against him, like a computer. Another proof is double career golden Masters, double career slam, non calendar slam, and 5 ATP finals, while nadal played 10 ATP finals, won 0, and also lacks 2 masters. Anyone who puts Nadal in front of Djokovic just because of his clay records is plain stupid, because tennis is not only clay. You have to play all three surfaces to be the best, you cannot just ignore 2 out of 3 and completely dominate 1 surface and call yourself a GOAT.

@@heavypeki It amazes me how much detail you forget to mention....Nadal loss to soderling was due to injury. An injury that kept him from Wimbledon. Look at the records that showed injuries to Nadal during majors...there are lots of them. You also forgot to mention that Nadal has more US Open majors than Djokovic on Djokovic favourite surface & even has 2-1 H2H at US Open to him...You forgot No Olympic gold for Djokovic, Nadal youngest to win 1st major, youngest to win all 4 slams, so stop sprouting that Djokovic is the better all round player... His stats ONLY look good because 2 of 4 majors are on hard & most ATP tournaments are on hard as well. If Djokovic was such an all round player & the GOAT he would have ALL the records...but he doesn't & yeah he is BEHIND Nadal H2H in Slam matches & finals....

Are you sure that's not Johnny Mac?

@@SrbijaCG definitely. I came across that stat once 😂

It's more likely that it's Marat Safin with the most racquet smashes.

Illie Nastase made them look like Sunday school teachers.

Pretty that is the most easy to break record lol.... Unlike most other records here, smashing rackets, breaking stuffs and hurling vulgarities is something you have full control over.

5 US Open titles in a row is another one tough to achieve, considering that nobody was able to even defend his title since RF last won a US Open. Not even the djoker or Rafa were able to defend their US Open crowns in their absolute prime.

I also think that no one is touching #373 weeks at No.1

@@BG-mw5pt How about Lendl's record of 8 consecutive finals at the Open? That's almost as impressive.

What makes the Nadal record so astounding is that the French Open is really the toughest tournament to dominate, historically. Because the rallies are so much longer, and defense is so important, it tends to be won by younger guys, and it's easy for an outsider to grind his way through the mix. Michael Chang and Mats Wilander each won it at 17, for instance. Borg was barely 18.

@@sonicmoj1 RF consecutive weeks as no1 is also in no danger.

Avoids him?wtf

It's called Ped's

@@danielepriori8483 m.kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bJyIgK97rsyaqYk.html

@@danielepriori8483 omg these rafans are outright delusional 😲 these guys cant even see and accept rafa dodges nole to maintain his h2h. Ridiculous... But they agree that rafa gets injured and withdraws conveniently. 🤦‍♂️

Watch this link to know how nadal avoids federer and nole on hard courts and grass🙏

Maybe Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner can get close to that in the future.

I could see that happening, Though it's not likely.

Djokovic will brake that record in the future

Djokovic will brake that record in the future

Now it's 409

That's what makes that match actually compelling. If it was a comedy of errors on both sides it would be one thing, but it was actually a high quality match.

That's because they had so few rallies. It was just serve, serve, serve or serve-winner, serve-winner

I remember Federer going a set and a half in the US open without a single unforced error will likely never see that broken either. It was 109pts without a single unforced error.

@@mattsavage9960 He won those sets 6-4 and 6-2. It's really not such a big deal. HE was playing Isner, and between the two of them, there were service winners all over the place. Is ner tried to hit a winner any time he got a neutral ball, so he either lost the point by missing, or won it by hitting a winner, which is not an unforced error.

This is not an impressive record, i cringe everytime people praise this match,

Until wada test him... Then it's bye bye records

I think that winning every Masters at least twice is more impressive than the slam records. Slams are five sets. and if you have better fitness, you have a huge advantage...like all the Big Four had. But it's easy to lose a three setter, if you run into a player who is in the zone....an Isner or a Karlovic, for instance. But Djoker won them all...and he won them twice. Everyone is trying to win the Masters just as hard as they are trying to win slams, but no one has come close to a single Masters sweep, never mind a double.....

@@bengray5013 you're mixing up Djokovic with Nadal 🤫

@@leonkozma9148 no I'm not. Wada already said they don't agree with Novax use of hyperbaric chamber and its well known that Novax has had outbursts on court at his team when he hasn't packed his secret drink bottles... Everyone knows he's on ped's.

Nadals done that twice the fuck are you on dude

Bravo, from Novak Djokovic fan. Amazing achievement that is.

This

Federer retired. So, he has 1 retirement.

hehehe why he will retire for no reason?

Yes this is Great...

7 time will definitely be broken, can’t say for the other one

Novak’s records can all be taken in a very weak era... the only impossible record of the sport is rafas 14 FOs.

Weeks at no.1 probs not But 7year end number one can still be broken lol, that's possible for rafa to do

@@tennis-man1902 For Rafa? I mean only if Nole retires tommorow 😂

@@aleksa4924 Not even then, Rafa doesn’t care about it. He’s ended this season even though he could easily take year end . This record is unattainable for someone with so many injury concerns like Rafa . One of Novak’s best qualities is his durability . Other than 2017 he hasn’t missed many GS chances at all, that’s where he gained the edge over Rafa . Novak’s style of play will probably give him another 4-5 years easily

that record has been broken tho, by novak and nadal

@@GallantNite nope, Laver won the calendar grand slam twice, only Steffi Graff has done the calendar grand slam in the open era

@@GallantNite not broken they equalled it

But Laver won his first calendar year slam when the games were amateur, and the admitted (by Laver) best players in the world were not allowed to compete because they were pros.....Pancho Gonzales and Lew Hoad both dominated Rod when he toured with them for a year after winning his first sla. Ken Rosewall also topped him at first Rod said, "It's nice to know where you really stand in the world." So that record is not so great.

@@joemarshall4226 What about the 2nd calendar slam ? Just FYI, it's sufficient to say Grand Slam no need to say Calendar Year Slam. One AO, RG, W or USO would be called a Grand Slam Title.

Yeah, and it go well into the 900s. This will NEVER be broken.

Nadal never won in year end ATP finals that's super record

I wonder how many players even have that many weeks in their professional careers with any ranking. 10 maybe? Nadal does this while staying at top 10, consecutively.

@@santaklaus11 it will be 900 at the end of the year. Federer has 968 but not consecutive. If Nadal plays another two years he may pass 968.

What's his top 5 consecutive record?

It's amazing, considering he had long amounts of time off with injuries....

@@joemarshall4226 because he always won RG

Not possible until nadal lives

@@adityaiyer3172 Nadal was alive even before when Novak won them ,

@@draganpaunovic5596 luck lol

Novak is too old to win another French Open.

@@adityaiyer3172 luck stick to cricket indian idli boy

While I agree that Novak is remarkable champon and great human being, I will say that the most remarkable stat is Rafa's 14 RG.

@@Vaisin indeed... From the Novak's supporter. Of course, one might question how he did it: strategy, in terms of not playing (that much) at other tournaments, devotion to one surface, etc. but the number itself is really staggering. Especially given the fact that most of the players never win a single GS. To bad that Novak will not be able to do the same with AO. I mean, there is a chance 🙂 optimistically speaking, but in reality, not that much.

@@vladimirmarkovic4947 Rafa won 14 RG while also being able to win the other majors at least twice, he's really versatile player. Either way, I think the most versatile player is Novak, who won his 22nd GS. How does Rafa do it on clay? It's his heavy topspin and his brutal resilience that gives him the edge.

Ruud obviously would have won at least one GS to become No.1 so that's not entierly true. You can't just make up some hypotheticals that never happend this way and then say: look how crazy the scenarios have been.

@@radieschen79 he didn't have to win at least one slam to become number 1. He just had to make the final, which he did, and Alcaraz not make the final. So if he made the final and Tiafoe beat Alcaraz (which he was very close to doing) and then Tiafoe beat him in the final, he still would have been number 1 without a single title above 250.

@@loganflowers3133 Dude, you're just making up hypotheticals here. Tiafoe didn't beat Alcaraz, Alcaraz did make the final (obviously), so for Ruud becoming World No.1 he would have had to win a GS, which makes your claim obsolete, that he wouldn't have become World No.1 without any title above ATP 250.

Along with that he has the most match wins in any grand slam. That also will never be touched

The best players also faced off against each other much less frequently

Becker also won Wimbledon with 17

@@Smileater You're right. Chang was a few months younger though.

Isn't it 16970?,

@@NopeP It could be so. I only know that it happened in the middle of the week because of some points from the Davis Cup and that it was not included in the official counting of the ATP list because they release a new list every Monday.

I don't understand why some people think that the number of QF SF F in any tournaments is an important record. Titles are important in tennis, I guess one GS title is more important than 5 finals. I will not say that it is easy to achieve such things, but that record is not even in the top 10...

Added bonus if you're rival gets stabbed 👍

@@leonkozma9148 Actually, Steffi Graf achieved the Golden Slam in 1988 (she was 19 years old). That was 5 years before Monica Seles was stabbed.

golden slam can only be matched thou, not broken.

@@stevennorris7181 It can be broken with the Calendar Super Slam, which is a Golden Slam + the ATP Finals. Nobody has ever done that.

@@andreazonin then let me add it will only be broken by calender super slam plus all masters 1000 win in a year

i guess he meant in professional era

I was going to mention Roger's 5 back to back's - thanks. ;)

Nice!

892

It is broken by Novak Djokovic

@@jugoslavnamljidjiu9021 no it's not... novak has the total weeks on no.1 but the most consecutive weeks at no.1 is still with Roger by a long shot, in fact the second place is held by Jimmy conners which is 160...

@@jugoslavnamljidjiu9021 He is talking about consecutive weeks as world number 1

@@marshaloga3047 I could see that being broken. If an Alcaraz type player came along, started young, and had no one outstanding competitior, 4 1/2 years at the top doesn't seem out of reach, as long as he can stay pretty healthy. I could see both Alcaraz or the Polish girl pull this off....not saying it's likely, but it's possible.....If Carlos was a little taller it would help....

@@marshaloga3047 You guys talk about that record like it's more important than the total number of weeks at number one which is nonsense..

They can be broken but they won't be.

Winning 105 straight points without an UFE is impossible. If you won 48 points in a row, you won two sets. If you won 72 points in a row you won three sets. I think you must mean that he PLAYED 105 points in a row without an UFE. Which is relatively easy against Isner, since he takes the racquet out of your hand with his big serve and first-strike forehand....so it's hard to make an UFE if you can barely touch the ball. AT the same time, if you can hit some pretty good serves and forehands yourself, like Roger clearly can, John is not going to return many, since he has the lowest break of serve rate in the ATP. Where was the match?

I think these are some of the least important records. In tennis, it's important how many titles you won, not how many QF SF F you played. I guess one title is more valuable than 5 semi-finals. That story about unforced errors, come on dude. Don't you have anything else left? Some of the minor records that are brought to the fore. Fed is the guy who made in total most UFE(more than Rafa and Novak). He had less GS titles than these two, who cares how many semis or finals he play..

@@thenotorious2226 Well, as I said before, your whims aren't the only things that count. Finals and semifinals are obviously important to a thinking person who is trying to evaluate a player's career. If someone wins a title, then loses in the first round eight times, he should not be considered a better player than someone who got to the semifinals nine times in a row. Every win counts, and wins at Grand Slams, because they are worth more ranking points, and the competition is toughest, are extra special. One of the most amazing records in tennis history is Chris Evert's record of reaching at least the semifinals of every grand slam she played, except one when she had food poisoning, for 16 years!

@@joemarshall4226 Those records are nice, when you say it its impressive but nothing more that. I agree with you that some will probably never be brought down, but you can always get such records from players who play for 20 years at a high level. The records that makes you the greatest and separate you from others are titles and weeks at number one and i would say H2H with biggest rivals. Fed lost so many most important matches, believe me he will give all his semifinals togheter to win one more wimbledon or USO or Rg...

It's in the video dude!

It doesnt sound as good tho

I get your point, but it's clear that the huge amount of FO that Nadal has, makes underapreciatte his gsme on the lther surfaces, I mean, Murray is a Grass specialist and has won 2 Wimb and Nadal who has won 2 as well, arriving 5 consecutive finals, and more semifinals, cannot adapt his game to grass, and even more if we go to Hard Courts, he won 6 GS there I mean, even if you take of his all his records of FO, with 2 WB 2Ao 4 USO, He would keep as a top 7/8 best player of the history, what's more he is the only player join Nole to win all grand slams twice so... I agree that Novak is the most complete thennis player ever, but from there to say that Nadal is a one dimension player, I don't think so.

@@diegomd9727 I agree that you can't really say that Rafa is a "one-dimensional" player, but I think that Novak is a more complete player, maybe the most complete ever.

@@draganzdravkovic8019 yeah I said that too👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼

@@diegomd9727 it's actually quite weird because Nadal and Djokovic have similar wins at A0 then any other tournament yet they've only played twice. Also you have to remember Rafa has missed a lot of tournaments because of injury. Literally the reason he has barely played since Wimbledon. Also the tour is prominently hard court not clay. If you switched the tour to be Clay dominated, 2 majors 6 masters and the tour finals you'd realise that Nadal would be very far ahead in all records. The tour isn't balanced when it comes to surface so it's really hard to say who is the best.

@@NopeP if u go by that way with grass as well first fed then djokovic would lead far ahead. Thise are all ifs. And as nadal said if, if, if... Doesnt exist

This comment is gold.. you definitely got me sir

Nothing is unbreakable asshole other than your phony ass nadals fat ass

Not even close. Because of the clay courts.

You Will get 16,740, which is still very close