Lmbo 🤣

Burn!

Wow 😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣

Damn...

😂😂

Yup

Also a good way to punish stubborn and bad skillets.

mothman1967 😁

Placement is much more important than caliber when defending against skillets.

😂😂😂

Good point, but then he would have to spend 3x as much.

sure are you buying the skillets ?

agree

Everyone knows KZfaqrs are pulling in the big bucks. Buy 3 skillets.

The skillets can cost more than some of the guns he's using.

Now you know you can just shoot them up into pieces or at least create holes to drag them by

Been there, done that. Waaaaayy easier, Brother!

It's a pain in the dick to stress relieve a huge bathtub, a pan not so much.

I tried sledge hammers with my cast iron tub and was afraid I would break the framing, so I switched to my sawmill and cut up the old tub.

Be Thankful You weren't the Plumber that had to lug them UP the stairs.

😁😁😁👍👍 thanks for watching Ted!

Lol

@@WHOTEEWHO I think you need to redo this test with a real Skillet a LODGE SKILLET!!!

Did that already...5 other videos with EXPENSIVE LODGE SKILLETS

Omg 😂 that’s what I thought too

You're exactly correct. Corners are always stronger

The .40 is a great round, but then again so is the .357 mag revolver round which nobody talks about these days. I prefer the .45 because I am very comfortable with it. Shoot what you are comfortable with. If it is a .22 LR then so be it. I know I wouldn't want to get shot with a .22 LR, and some of those guns are super-accurate. Peace, Love!!

I just want to say that the second greatest killing implement in the history of warfare is 230 grain, .45 ball ammo!🇺🇸

Also because the 40 is flattened already so expands more on impact.

Also, the 40 was a flat nose

The 45 definitely smacked it a lot harder than the others.

Chunking Missiles lol I’d love to see 10mm!

Because it probably barely went through so most of the energy was dumped right into the pan. With good hollow point bullets, all 3 rounds will dump all energy into a human, and they all do comparable damage. Around 350-590 foot pounds for all 3 rounds. Max of 500 for 9mm and 590 for the other two. Average 430 for 9mm and 500 for the other two. Not a significant difference. They're a little more powerful but nothing significant and they are all just relatively "weak" handgun rounds, and all 3 have the capacity to easily kill a man.

Swinging (and movement in the direction of the shot in general) is the sign of momentum transfer (3rd law of Newton), not kinetic energy. Energy transfer destroys, momentum transfer moves. 40 have a bit more energy than 45 if loaded to the same % of SAAMI maximums and shot from the barrels of the same length. Simply because 40 has much, MUCH higher pressure while just a bit lower area of the cross-section of the bore. There is no magic,just basic physics. Energy = area of the cross-section of the bore multiplied by the integral of the pressure over the path of the bullet (path in the barrel being from the rearmost part of the widest part of the bullet - so not counting boat tail if present - to the muzzle if you are interested in muzzle energy).

Yeah.45 extremely energy

😂

Only at very close range. That’s the disadvantage. 😒

YES YES! And less wind drag having 3 vents now

Put a few more holes in it and you have the world's heaviest cheese grater

Yeah right, you can also still fry an egg in the lower right portion of the skillet. Lol

I think your right here, lol

No Ozark trail that’s for sure

Don't copy Clint in 'A Fist Full of Dollars', his vest survived, being the door of a wood store.

@Jeffrey Bone Very true, good quote, "sorry, make that 4 coffins". Definitely don't make good westerns like his any more.

@Jeffrey BoneMy pleasure, I really enjoyed his man with no name trilogy, based on Yojimbo from Japan. Now back in the day, those were great movies, Japanese or American.

Did you see the handle?

Only on PUBG 🤣

Glock 21 gen 4, CCW for 2 years. No regrets

5 Wars ; it is a proven performer...Spanish American War...WW 1 and WW2 ...Korea & Viet Nam...

Would never want to be on the receiving in of a .45 ACP. DESIGNED TO REPLACE U.S.CALVARY COLT REVOLER 45 LONG COLT AND JOHN BROWNING DID IT. OLD WINCHESTER 240 SILVER TIP HOLLOW POINTS .45 ACP MAKE IT ABOUT PERFECT MATCH TO THE FAMOUS .45 LONG COLT.

yup!

.45 is my choice for a side arm. I feel more confident with it and it has been very reliable.

🤪🤪🤪

There can only be one 😈

I like to grab $1 skillets at yard sales. Fun times putting big ass holes in them.

You’re torn? You should see his skillet ...

WHO_TEE_WHO why does evey 40cal holder use 180 grain.I prefer the 165 grain just think it's a better grain

Good question. Just what i happened to have

Well after seeing that....I know my very much loved cal. the 41. Mag. would most definitely punch through a cast iron skillet....Whooo Hoooo.

I am sure it would! Thanks for watching!

WHO_TEE_WH.

we shoot .45 cal. black powder muzzleloading pistols and revolvers at 25 and 50 yards. 25 yds ain't that hard. 50 yds is a different story.

Nope!

Marty Mcfly would beg to differ

Yep that’s the real moral of this story. Not surprising that is the nature of cast iron.

I know now!

Big Faaaaact's 😎.

Word!! Same here...

Hell an air rifle could shoot a hole through a cast iron skeelet!!

...or shattered.

It's stress relieved, not hardened.

Ya, no deformation, just pure shear force hole punch

I guess theres differences in cast iron as we shot one about month ago with Ruger 22cal and penetrating was really close.Fastest rounds was sold out so we couldnt get fastest 22cal rounds.

Yess sir was thinking same thing

U

Exactly

I agree

Agreed

40 and 45 are actually pretty close. Depends what brand of ammo. People just don’t like the 40cal , mostly because of these KZfaqrs

As she should

Thanks for watching Vic!

I think you meant how round the 40 hole was compared to the 45. The 45 hit closer to the crease so would have made a bigger hole. I fully agree.

I think that all three rounds should have been fired at the center of the skillet... okay you would need 3 different skillets. But yeah had the .45 been on center it would have been larger.

The 40 made a bigger hole because of the flat bullet

@@TomahawkChopa the 40 was only slightly bigger because the 45 hit the edge of the skillet...

.40 has more energy than .45.

Thanks Anthony. Good point

He said they are expensive. At Walmart they are almost 5 dollars each. LMAO This nut is confused.

LOL. I think they are $8. $24 is a whole lotta money for me 🖒🖒thanks for watching!

Well, you will just have to decide what is more important, bullets or cooking implements?

It’s a open field . Calm your tits

Thanks for watching!

@Thomas Beaty What about 32 cal?

Yep, i agree! Practice is more important than engaging in my-caliber-is -better-than-yours debates

ABSOLUTELY 💯

Thanks for watching Big Ron!

Heck man I just subscribed and rang the bell too. Stay safe

Hey thanks appreciate that! New video every day, quite a bit of awesome stuff coming out in the next couple weeks

Big Ron I carry a Springfield XD Mod. 2 subcompact 40. It's a little snappy for my taste, but I love it.

Springfield XD is a good choice

🤣🤣🤣

J D WTW IS CHEAP AND A NUT JOB TO BOOT !!!

Absolutely true

Totally agree, skillet was compromised first round!

Thank you

Standard 40 fmj is flat nose

Surprised me

😂 thanks for watching Bobby!

Thanks for watching Michael

😂😂😂

😂😂😂 thanks Ed!

Thanks for watching!

Happy early birthday Gary!!! We will shoot off some fireworks in your honor!

Gary Allen Happy birthday.

Darrell Blake Thank you very much for the Birthday wish my friend

WHO_TEE_WHO Thank you so much. I love your Videos. Yo ur vids keep getting better and better

Gary Allen happy birthmas... Yes I think that would be a gay idea shoot up some stuff.

👍👍

40 H&K here. Wouldn't swap it for any

Same here man the 40 SW SD all the way

Glock 22 .40 S&W👍

Love the Smith & wesson 40 also the Colt 1911 45

The rounds they used in that era may have been lower velocity. The cast iron may have been thicker also. We'll just have to try it. Right?

I get that comment a lot! Thanks for watching :-)

I agree

My US made Lodge skillets are thicker than this Chinese manufactured Ozark Trail junk.

I was saying that exact same thing.

Probably right there :-) Thanks Daniel

no doubt , definitely a factor to consider, my grandmothers old cast iron skillets could stop a tomahawk missile :P

Bahahaha... no skillet is 1/2 inch thick. None

You are right because the skillet my dad uses I would be amazed even if a .357 could bust it lol

Agreed.👍

Thanks for watching David

Thanks for watching!!! 45 put a whoopin on it!

You better just knock it off with that hilarious comment 🤣🤣🤣

Yee yee! Fun targets! Thanks maniac!

WOW! i love the 4570

WOW....a disc harrow? that's one sweet projectile....

🖒🖒🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Me three!

I thought they might bounce off too. Why I stood so far away 😂

Yup i like shooting the milk jugs!

I keep a C9 by me in the kitchen. And a JHP 45 beside me in the bedroom. HP's are crude, but effective. I've got $250 in the pair. HP has great customer service as well.

Nothing wrong with hi point

@@devincruse6736 my wife bought me a 9mm hi point and it shoots flawlessly!!!! A good hot round and A hi point is all I need for the house. Well, besides my shotgun. Stay safe!!

Microwave

It works good in the microwave, get ye one o' them plastic microwave cookers.

Me too! Thanks for watching!

The difference in the way the skillet bounced around is due the the difference in energy transferred AND the difference in shot placement. The 9mm bullet was only 115gr, the .45ACP bullet was 230 grams -- twice the weight, but the .45 bullet was almost certainly travelling slower. Although both mass and velocity contribute to the muzzle energy, the muzzle energy is proportional to the mass while proportional to the square of the velocity. The velocity of the bullet is a more important determinant of muzzle energy. For a constant velocity, if the mass is doubled, the energy is doubled; however, for a constant mass, if the velocity is doubled, the muzzle energy increases four times. In this case, we are not looking exactly at muzzle energy, but at the downrange energy of the round, however at 20 yards neither bullet will have slowed enough to make much difference. The TYPICAL velocity for the 115gr 9mm is around 1,246 fps. while the TYPICAL velocity for the 230gr .45ACP is around 850 fps. The actual energy of the 9mm round would have been about 10-12% GREATER than the energy of the .45 round hitting the skillet, but we don't know how much of the energy was actually transferred to the skillet. IF the faster 9mm round actually passed completely through the skillet it might not have transferred all of its energy to the skillet while the slower .45 round could have been stopped by the skillet (even while blasting a hole through it). Without a high speed camera to get ultra-slow motion video there isn't any way to see what happened as each bullet hit the skillet. As an educated GUESS, my guess is that both bullets transferred very similar amounts of energy to the skillet -- certainly NOT enough difference in energy transfer to account for the visible difference in how the skillet bounced around from the impacts. So, why did the skillet bounce around so much more dramatically when struck by the .45 round? I would expect that SHOT PLACEMENT had the most to do with it. The 9mm round struck barely off center so it had to try to move the whole skillet almost straight back. The .45 round struck way out near the edge, causing the skillet to spin around, which is what we saw happen.

I 'll stick with the 9.mm and .45 they both have been WAR TESTED and the .40 is just one of the new fancy new comers like the 10.mm as well

i have a feeling a .40 or 10mm will do just as good if you are okay with the 9mm and the .45ACP

No doubt the .45 is THE go-to round for stopping/knockdown power

Might have to get some today

Super thick ! Thanks for watching the truth! 😂🖒

Lmao

Nope probably a bad idea 😂 thanks Mark!

Real thick!

Mark...Ha, that's what I was thinking...LOL..!!

😂🖒

Not in the least

Separate pans, too. The shots may compromise the strength of the pan changing the variables for subsequent rounds.

Should have huh. I dont think it hit the rim. May have tho. Thanks for watching!

Going the cheap way one skillet rot all three guns

Yep, the test was a flub dub failure.

🖒🖒

I was thinking the same thing.. also that look like cheap cast iron pans... actually I kno they were bc of the symbol on the bottom... use a antique lodge pan, those super thick ones... good metal was used back then. 😎