Like & Subscribe😁 Thank you for watching!! Contact: AzAirgunner357@gmail.com for any questions or ammo donations for testing. Thanks again!! Glock 27 .40 s&w Rock Island GI CS 3.50" .45 acp Winchester Silvertip Ammo Test
Пікірлер: 83
@frankbrowning3286 ай бұрын
Either one is going to be a good stopper
@EvilynKingАй бұрын
In every video I've watched - the .40 has taken the cake. The .45 expands larger, but the .40 utilizes its energy better, therefore, creating a greater wound track. You're also getting higher capacity in a more compact gun. Everyone who despises the caliber needs to take another look!
@Lee-rq1ekАй бұрын
BUT, you forgot that the 40 is so "snappy" I can't shoot it crowd !!! I have carried the 40 cal for almost 29 years and have faith in the cartridge.
@tarteen091311Ай бұрын
@@Lee-rq1ek I moved up from 9mm to a .40S&W now, got the Beretta PX4 Storm full size and added a compensator from vantage point armory barely any recoil with that combination
@Lee-rq1ekАй бұрын
@@tarteen091311 I live in SE Texas and can carry a Glock 22 comfortably even in summer. The 40-caliber cartridge is a good pistol cartridge especially in a full-size pistol. Many people repeat what they've heard others repeat.
@EvilynKingАй бұрын
I wonder if your losing velocity@@tarteen091311
@EvilynKingАй бұрын
@@Lee-rq1ekI carry a 23 and I'm an average size woman. It took some work but I can hit pretty tight groups at ten yards
@josephpepper30872 ай бұрын
Thanks for testing the Silvertips and in a good test medium! I generally agree that .40 s&w > .45 acp > 9x19.
@theoriginalOSOKАй бұрын
I carry a Glock 22 stoked with 180 grain HST's - they have tested really well from what I've seen. Both those did good too. I do like a bit more penetration though...
@BillHimmel6 ай бұрын
Solid test, real useful! I can see the usefulness of this .45 acp in scenarios where you have to avoid overpenetration at all cost!
@meekman4842Ай бұрын
Just now running across your video. Thanks for that test. I've seen a number of 9mm Silvertip videos that are mostly failures. I'm glad to see it do its job in .40 and .45.
@synystur215 ай бұрын
I like that you cut through the wound track, I dupont think I've seen any other channel do that before. Very good video!
@AzAirgunner.5 ай бұрын
Thank you very much, I appreciate that!!
@scottythebody08116 ай бұрын
Great comparison.
@cdmorrissy36922 ай бұрын
I carry Remington .45 acp UMC 230 gr. JHP's in my 5" 1911, which do 830 fps, penetrate 16" in gel and expand to approx. .675". I like these rounds because they're consistent, feed well, aren't as loud as other ammo and cost less than half of other SD JHP's. The performance of these is just fine for SD carry.
@moobutt53813 ай бұрын
Nice test. I feel comfortable sticking with my .40’s and 357’s.
@ManOfChaiTea2 ай бұрын
How many people have you heard that have lived from a .45 as opposed from a 9mm? Your heart and aorta are located within 3.5 inches from your chest.
@richki.246 ай бұрын
both did awesome ....
@adammitchell06 ай бұрын
Good video, I like that your testing light for caliber against light for caliber. You should do a hornady critical defense 45 185 against .40 165 grain
@fanman81026 ай бұрын
Excellent; thank hanks!
@AzAirgunner.6 ай бұрын
Thank you!!
@guardianminifarm80056 ай бұрын
The 40 checked all the boxes pretty well. The 45 did really well all things considered. It would be better if it could penetrate a bit more but the stills tell a story also and the big bore didn't disappoint. The permanent cavity may not have been as large as one might desire but it wasn't insignificant for sure. If these are available and reasonable they wouldn't fail to be effective for purpose IMO. Thank you. Good comparison.
@AzAirgunner.6 ай бұрын
Thank you😁
@drewday61096 ай бұрын
Love the content
@AzAirgunner.6 ай бұрын
Thank you!! Glad ur enjoying. Appreciate ya!!
@KMondy6 ай бұрын
All right all right.
@goranmalnar51726 ай бұрын
Good video like always si. Ceep going .👌
@AzAirgunner.6 ай бұрын
Thank you sir!!
@silenceismycanvas6 ай бұрын
Just a suggestion. I'd like to see a Nosler 40 S&W ASP 150 gr JHP test if possible. Compact and full sized pistols.
@unkorads10096 ай бұрын
thanks for the video, i'm for team 40sw. 🙂
@AzAirgunner.6 ай бұрын
Thank you, I appreciate u checkin it out!!
@jmichaelcarbonniere95496 ай бұрын
Good test, AZ, but a sub 1000 fps 185 in 45 ACP is downright pitiful! A 185 should be doing close to 1100 fps or more, which would probably put it close to 1000 or so out of a short barreled 1911. Not that the frangible Silvertip bullet would have done any better, it would have maybe made a slightly larger stretch cavity but penetration would have been just as poor! The 40 is a much better choice than the .45 in this case! My Speer 185 Gold Dots are doing very close to 1200 fps out of my 1911 Govt Model, which is the velocity a good 185 should be getting! None of this watered down junk for me! Cheers, jc
@nokoolaid6 ай бұрын
Underwood has 185g @ 1200. That should be close to 1100 in the shorter barrel. Most 45 stuff out there doesn't meet advertised specs let alone capability.
@gswguy45546 ай бұрын
AzAirgunner…… Out of all the Hollow points you’ve test…… Do you have any personal favorites in a given caliber?
@user-pg5st9ql2u6 ай бұрын
Dont forgot 45 is low pressure round can be loaded up plenty more stopping power slower is better and safer on urban areas both very close like twins 45 acp has history on it,s side Taylor,d one shot stopping power chart 45 ball has (69) one shot stops not bad flat point mich better
@bobjones-bt9bh6 ай бұрын
Win Silvertip in .40 is a very good round in nearly every test I've seen, including in its LE Ranger variant- ranger advertises like 1205fps the .45 mimics what Harrell's results show in terms of penetration. Short barrel .45 is disappointing usually in velocity. 332fpe what is the point? A micro 9 can develop that.
@nokoolaid6 ай бұрын
There are probably some 230g loads that will do as well velocity wise in that barrel length. 45 is kind of underloaded in a lot of ammo.
@acid6urns4 ай бұрын
short barrel .45 does absolutely awful most of the time. .45 is already moving slow, and it suffers MUCH more from velocity loss in a short barrel
@nokoolaid4 ай бұрын
@@acid6urns A short barrel will have an effect, but Federal HST works pretty well in a short barrel. Some ammo makers really drop the ball here. for instance, Hornady Critical Defense in 45 is supposed to get 1000fps out of a 3" barrel with a 185g bullet. I've seen videos where it doesn't make that with a 5" barrel. That's a problem and it's not because it's a 45, it's because the manufacturer is screwing over the customer in not delivering the performance as advertised. Buffalo Bore and Underwood generally perform very well by comparison.
@acid6urns4 ай бұрын
@@nokoolaid i don’t think you understand what i’m saying. even good ammo from a .45 in most 230gr loads that’s just shy of 1000fps out of say a 4 or 5 in barrel will see MASSIVE velocity drop going from a 5”-4” or 4”-3” in comparison to basically any other handgun round. .45 acp as a round is just simply more susceptible to bleeding velocity when shortening barrel length than other calibers are.
@nokoolaid4 ай бұрын
@@acid6urns I do, and to make matters even worse it's underloaded and by that I mean a lot of ammo doesn't meet published specs let alone what is possible.
@rodolforivero72823 ай бұрын
Las .45 son ideales de 4 pulgadas para arriba. La pequeña mamba negra (Glock 27) es formidable con cualquier munición... ...amo a la mamba y al toro negro (Glock 30s). Ambas excelentes para portar...✌️
@angrysheepdog97446 ай бұрын
The extra velocity in these light-for-caliber makes a difference. 45ACP's historical effectiveness is based on the subsonic round's huge expanded dimensions plowing a wide path. Shock-wave tissue disruption is velocity-based and exemplified in 357S/MAG crossing into hydrostatic shock territory. Ballistic studies have established the 125gr/1450ftps=583ft/lbs as the Gold Standard of defensive rounds dumping this energy in 12-14 inches and causing central nervous system (CNS) damage from the ballistic pressure wave. Water is not compressible which makes it an ideal medium to transfer energy to the brain.
@acid6urns4 ай бұрын
no pistol bullets produce hydrostatic shock except for maybe super hot .44 mag and up. pistols are extremely weak in comparison to rifles
@angrysheepdog97444 ай бұрын
@@acid6urns Your theories are old. Hydrostatic shock begins at 9PBLE and goes up from there.
@emerald640Ай бұрын
Are the silver tips on the bullets aluminum or nickeled gliding metal? The original 1980's 9mm was aluminum and later WW moved to nickel plated gliding metal.
@rangetime67796 ай бұрын
40 S&W wins this test. Good expansion and penetration. 45 ACP looked great but under penetrated and velocity was a little slow.
@mpac84465 ай бұрын
How would you rate it on a home defense vs personal defense scaleq
@landofparadise22956 ай бұрын
40 has more damage than 45 ,40 damage 2inches 3/4 size hole while 45 only 2 inches size hole according for measurement
@AvRail576 ай бұрын
Interesting comparison! I wonder how the 40 would do in a S&W shield 40?
@frankbrowning3286 ай бұрын
Should be very similar as the barrel lengths are nearly the same. Glock 27 3.43'' barrel & the S&W Shield 40 cal has a 3.1'' barrel
@acid6urns4 ай бұрын
@@frankbrowning328i would like to say you’re probably right as .40 doesn’t really suffer from velocity loss in short barrels as much as some other rounds, but sometimes.3” of barrel can make a large difference.
@frankbrowning3284 ай бұрын
@@acid6urnsI agree that the performance in the 40 is less hampered by barrel length. I shoot most everything so I like to know when possible how they perform in short barrels as I have short barrels in both 9mm, 40 S&W.
@willmorris89666 ай бұрын
I’d love to see a 200 grain 40 vs 200 grain or 230 grain 45
@al011005 ай бұрын
200 is too heavy for the 40
@kennethferguson42836 ай бұрын
The .45 is just not a good short barrel round no matter the bullet weight. In this test the .40 got better much better penetration and produced more jell disruption.
@WilliamSirman4 ай бұрын
Check the bore diameter of that Rock Island! That round was too slow!
@1badEK6 ай бұрын
I know someone that would hit the table instead of the gel at that distance.
@AzAirgunner.6 ай бұрын
😄😂
@Texan-19114 ай бұрын
Bro 5 inch barrel vs compact
@ManOfChaiTea2 ай бұрын
People are obsessed with over penetration, you dont need 18 inches, the idea is for the round to dump the energy inside the body, not blow out the back. Your heart and aorta are about 3.5 inches deep from the chest. yes 3.5. Human bodies are frail, take a ruler, measure on the body just how thick it is. 10 inches is more than enough. The .45 was designed to leave a big hole and dump all its energy.
@josephpepper30872 ай бұрын
Gelatin isn't tissue and has no bones. It's merely a consistent test medium that is a similar density to relaxed muscle. Not all defensive gun shots are over the heart, at a 90 deg angle, and unobstructed. That's why more than 3.5 inches of penetration in test media is desired.
@SDGlock235 ай бұрын
I've always felt the .40 did really well from shorter barrels whereas .45 typically doesn't. I like both, prefer the .40 just because it's on a smaller frame and gets good ballistics. I've chronographed 230gr ball .45 in the mid 700's from a G30...ouch! Overall I think the .40 works well from pretty much any barrel length and the .45 really likes the longer barrels, no so much the short ones.
@travisstankowski7495Ай бұрын
Why do 45 people have to prove a 100 year old round is relevant. It's on the wayside. If you want a heavy gun with a low capacity good for you. The fact is 10mm is the best auto. Deal with it.
@helluvademon39364 ай бұрын
1:40 paused for anyone who wants to see the 40. In the gel still spinnin
@helluvademon39364 ай бұрын
Tbh somewhere between a min 39 sec's an 40 you get the whole picture Even the bullet hole in the shirt (cloth)
@justusbryant73666 ай бұрын
The 40 won.
@EvMc3056 ай бұрын
Usually does. Remember why the 40 came into play, fbi wants better then 9. 10mm developed, g men Pillow hands couldn't handle. Hence the 40. Years of 9mm development, 'good enough' much higher capacity. Single shot wound and terminal ballistics are extremely favorable. Round count is the only debate w 40 vs 9, not ballistics
@justusbryant73666 ай бұрын
@mikelev2574 40 is a good round and it's not hard to shoot accurate. Everyone just love 9mm. In today's market it's all about no recoil and flat shooting.
@EvMc3056 ай бұрын
totally agree@@justusbryant7366 But the weirdos think 40 SW is somehow not effective or performs poorly evenly substandard compared to 9mm, when in reality the majority of terminal ballistic testing shows just the opposite. I carry mainly 9, then 380, the 40...shot placement always being the most important (:
@user-lu6mi6po9d3 ай бұрын
@@EvMc305they can't hold their gun right
@EvMc3053 ай бұрын
That@@user-lu6mi6po9d and lack of practice. Put 500 rounds of 40 sw per month for a few months and it will be just another pistol (:
@svcag17805 ай бұрын
Ok
@kenf66625 ай бұрын
You have got better ballistics testing form different brands in both 45acp and 40sw . I see just crappy ammo
@priestof1s3 ай бұрын
40 should have been 180 grain be closer
@danielrendon85554 ай бұрын
45 has always been overrated.
@ManOfChaiTea2 ай бұрын
Actually it really hasnt. If you understand the human body and location of vitals, you will learn it does the job very well. Your heart and aorta are only 3.5 inches deep in the chest..
@user-os6dx1cz6s4 ай бұрын
I hate to tell you this brother but hardly anybody uses standard pressure 45 anymore man maybe some Old-Timers but the new generation are using at least plus pee and 45 Soopers and 450 smcs and 460 Rowlands man Old 45 standard pressures basically becoming useless man
@toddd74442 ай бұрын
@toddd7444 0 seconds ago try the new?gold dot 45 acp 200 grain +p dead sure or deadwheelchair larry