Thanks

Thanks!

Thanks!

Thank you

Thank you

Thank you!

Thanks!

Thanks!

Спасибо.

Thanks!

Muchas gracias

Thanks, usefull tip

Thanks! I enjoy watching your videos.

@@Fred_SPb thanks

Thanks!

Thanks for the kind comment. We try :)

Спасибо за оценку!

@@Fred_SPb Сколько времени у Вас занял этот проект?

@@od300380bvv не напрягаясь - около трех месяцев по вечерам. Если уделять больше времени думаю за месяц по вечерам можно сделать. Много времени отнимает полное высыхание разных шпаклевок.

Thanks. I have not had the opportunity to buy a Fujimi kit, I know that it is of good quality. The main landing gear of the Hobby Boss kit are too thin, the wheels are smaller, so I took the main landing gear from the Italeri kit, the front leg in the Hobby Boss kit is made with high detail, so I put it on. Gear doors is from Hobby Boss kit.

This is a disposable surgical scalpel from which I made a scriber. Here you can see it kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hrtxpaqC39GrZ2g.html It's a bit primitive, so I bought a dental instrument (I don't know what it is for, it was just bent as I needed) and made a new scriber out of it. Here it is kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hMqihamZktfZkXk.html

Conozco el set de Fujimi, pero desafortunadamente no pude encontrarlo.

The glue I use will strip the paint off. Before gluing the paint must be scraped off with a knife.

yes, after fujimi, but it is already very far from being a good kit.

Спасибо. Скрайбер из стоматологического инструмента.

Thank you. Sturene sheet is very thin, it is from cans of dairy products, I have now measured the thickness - 0.25 mm, so it is easy to give it the desired curvature. In addition, the curvature of the channel is determined by the lower and upper lips of the air intake.

@@Fred_SPb Excellent, i'll try it! Again, wonderfull model. Thanks for sharing!

@@santiagoburgos3911 If you want to try using styrene from cans, you should find a triangular sign and the letters PS at the bottom of a can.

Спасибо

This is a homemade scriber made from a dentist tool.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hMqihamZktfZkXk.html here you can see it

Of course, the kit was sacrificed. In addition to its advantages, it has many disadvantages. This was done in order to complete the Italerie kit in order to have a Corsair model. A Fujimi kit is a rarity here. In this case, money didn't matter. Sometimes resin parts cost as many as several kits.

For making wash I use Tamiya enamel paints (in square bottle) and odorless thinner for paints.

I don't have a ratio. I dilute the paint so that it is like milk.

@@Fred_SPb thanks

Hobby Boss kit has good details, good fitting, a lot of rivets BUT it has horrible geometry and shape. And this build is a kind of challenge for me.

@@Fred_SPb I forgot to say that this is really an outstanding result. Beautiful little bird!

From the point of view of scale, all lines must be sanded, since the seam between the panels cannot be displayed in 1:72 scale, but all manufacturers depict them. These lines are better than those that were on the parts initially. This video is not a guide how to apply panel lines. I am just trying to build something from this kit and show its quality. And I don’t like to leave the assembly because I don’t like the panel lines. Esci or Italeri - what's the difference? This is firewood.

And why is it good to highlight those lines even further? Yes, I know this kit. I have it too. MY opinion on it is the same. Purchased mainly for the windshield and the decals. My Fujimi kit's windshield has broken to million bits (so thin they made it, it exploded when I cut it from the sprue) and there is not a single aftermarket canopy/windshield to this craft. BTW I am in the brink of shove all of my Hasegawa kits (except the Sabre Dog, that is decent at least) into the trashcan. The engineering on those kits are just idiotistic. Probably engineered by people who never assembled a single of their products. Most of the parts are not positioned at all, especially not in the nose section. Their F-4 is one of the worst in 1/72, and their F-15 is crap too. Both of those kits are from the 1980s, and they just simply repacking them all the time. And of course every repack means a raise in the price. The F-15 is in the same price as the GWH F-15s, but the two are not in the same league (Hasegawa in the 2nd/3rd lowest, GWH in the 1st highest). It is popular to look down on the Italeri kits, but most of the hyped and praised Hasegawa kits as bad as those bad Italeris. And there are a lot of Italeri kits that wash the floor with its Hasegawa counterparts (for example the A-10A/C). And well, the Hasegawa A-7 kits are even worse then the ex-Esci/Italeri. Never understood why Hasegawa is so praised. They are fucking overrated.

I agree with you. If you build models for fun, that's fine. But when you assemble a model and want to get a good result - it's a little different. If quality did not play a role, we would not see the beautiful Tamiya or GWH models. Thanks for your opinion and comment.

@@Fred_SPb still you did an amazing job at making the model keep it up 👍