xe xe Độ để '1 nữ ko up😅😅. t CTY vụ nổ big oll a sẽ🎉🎉t

Back then, not only were these stories meant to be a heroic retelling of events, but a romanticized version of battle to recruit soldiers. It was all ultimately propaganda. It was meant to dilute the actual horror of war. I'm thankful for these stories though, they really make you root for the "good guy" in a sense, but I am also thankful for modern war stories to undo the programming of my younger years of "yearning" for what this movie portrayed.

If you want to watch an older violent war film, I recommend Platoon 1986 and Hamburger Hill 1987.

@@windostar2622 yes I’ve seen hamburger hill. I think I’ve seen platoon also. Tnx

@@BluntMonster personally, I really like hacksaw ridge. Ok- Desmond Doss was exceptional, but at least it’s a real portrayal of events, and it shows the genuine heroism when it occurred. Also, I think saving private Ryan is probably a tad biased towards the worst atrocities of the landings. I think the landing scene is probably representative of the worst that happened there, with a moderate amount of dramatisation. For example, the bunkers from where the Germans were firing machine guns were at or slightly above the level of the beach- not in such a raised position and not as fortified. Also, the beach was in reality about twice the depth as seen in SPR. Thus the machine gunners did not have the level of advantage portrayed. Soldiers were probably hit straight out of the landing craft, but the fire was likely a lot more random and less soldiers were hit at that point. The vast majority of the landings were much easier.

Me imagino que después de eso su tío se volvió católico porque el mayor que comandaba eso oraba y todos oraban a la Virgen María para que los protegieran fue una batalla muy tremenda si su tío Todavía vive pues debe recordar todo eso y si ya descanso en La Paz del señor que Dios lo tenga en su seno a esos valientes que fueron allá

Ehhh?

ឆាផលមក

So brave they were. The great generation for ever.

God bless him mate! Famous line What did expect destroyers? Rgds Colin Runciman.

Qual o nome do filme?

@@leonardopaiva5351 UMA PONTE LONGE DEMAIS 1977 tem aqui no youtube

Call Of Duty WW2 be like

@@MarkussGonzaga214 m.

Qal nome desse filme

Absolutely brilliant film. The scenes of war for a 1977 film were extremely graphic.

@@chrisholland7367 pls I need the title of the movie

ឱ

@@YaYa-kr1yv ďdf49

@@YaYa-kr1yv o

11

Zz

And I

they make fake story the germans where the true heroes,.! like the us general patton say they fight the wrong enemie. And we see now why germans fight to get humanity free we are now under attack again by pedophiles and coruted media bank system its the same shit again!

@@a3iaanautlaw161 You've completely misunderstood my point and have gone off on a tangent I don't agree with.

Well in this case Major Julian Cook did lead his men across the River and assaulted the bridge with his men.

Frontal attack has this large "kamikaze-feel to it anyways, not much soldiers or officers tell this tale themselves, out of horror or death of course. Regards

if they use the anti-tank than rushing the position they will not overwhelm

Not double or triple as in normal land operations, a lot more drowning you might want to imagine

creeping barrrage

The Tanks in the movie are Leopard 1 Tanks that were made after the war, they are dressed up to look more like Panther tanks. The allies are using m47 Paton tanks that are also made to look like Shermans, I believe they did use a couple of real Shermans but most of the tanks in this movie are dressed to look like the original armor that was used in the war E.G Shermans Panthers ect. They also made some fiberglass models to represent tanks. The tank you are referring to is a Tiger 1 and none are in this movie, it is also true that the only one working tiger 1 and is named Tiger 131, it's currently owned by Bovington tank museum. however chasis of tiger 1 tanks do exist in Russia and other places but do not run. As for working Shermans, there is quite a few that work today and are dotted all around the world. If you are intrested in learning more about these tanks, you can check out either the Bovington museum website and youtube or a great youtube channel called Johnny Johnson kzfaq.info Johnny goes into great detail about military firearms and vehicle uses in many fronts and eras in movies! he also talks about their real-life counterpart and compares accuracy of how the are represented in movies too real-life uses and details.

The german tanks in the movie were the then current in service leopards of the dutch army which were loaned for filming,the ww2 tanks and vehicles were mainly loaned for the film by british film supplier charlie mann.....his vehicles would be auctioned off years later and some to this day are privately owned,some Sherman's were ex range wrecks and dutch training vehicles fitted with fake plastic turrets,some were all fake tanks mounted on dutch army land rovers,most of the German vehicles destroyed in the bridge attack were replicas save for the hotchkiss Brandt halftrack and the sdkfz7 halftrack which were charlie mann's,the sdkfz7 halftrack was a movie star having in 1968 been the getaway vehicle at the end of the dirty dozen war movie.the same halftrack appears in the early part of a bridge too far tucked under the tree during the spitfire recce flight......the 25 pounder field guns were at the time of filming still being used by the dutch military and are filmed with ww2 dressed dutch crews live firing on a range,which was then used as the rolling barrage sequence in the film.

These tanks came from our garage 😂

นัฐวุฒิ2527,,,

@@slickdrake2478 some garage ;-)

00000000000000000

Waaw very interesting

Probably the Germans did give ww1 and foreign capture equipment to troops considered “second line.”

boring, just boring ...

@@kal.50bmg32 . . . .

หล่อ❤❤❤❤🎉